http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/8619/newcardoi3.png
Printable View
That looks....mangled and confusing.
Since when the GT200 ( or any G9x ) core features a external nVIO chip ? :D
Looks like g80 8800gtx to me.... the nvio is a dead giveaway....
Holy Die-size batman!
There should be more memory for it to be a 8800GTX & the GTS had 4 chips left & up with 2 on the right, along with a different power setup.Quote:
Originally Posted by LexDiamonds
Perhaps the NVIO is seperate for the same reasons as in G80 (Die Size/Yields).
Still seems a bit off though...
Is not G80, look at the power Conectors one in the front and on in the end also you have 2 diferent cards there probably GTX and GTS
can be authentic ... GT200 will be shorter then Ultra ... and maybe will be there NV/IO again ... because many SP and ROPs in core ...
PS. picture is maybe from Cooler maker design centre...
Why would we even think that something that simplistic posted by an inactive member without a source deserves any thought of authenticity? I am brushing this off as someone trying to get us all riled up.
Failtroll fails at trolling.
The door's that way.
--->
You have achieved fail. Do not collect £200 and do not pass go. :rolleyes::down::down:
That "application" makes MS Paint look like 3DSMax.
No way this is authentic. For starters, those different cards would'nt be displayed like one card.
The "application" is just a viewer. This is authentic, as you will sooner or later find out. Below is another angle.
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6094/newcard2ya6.png
Enough! I want one in my rig already :D . That looks familiar...
hope it isn't real, just means more "new" coolers. :down:
Attachment 78251
Got this from my uber-NDA source earlier. Hope it doesnt get him into trouble
:down:
You forgot the PCI slot bracket :D. Also, is that some sort of new bus connector? It looks like nothing I've seen before! JK lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by K404
Aha! The PCI connector is whats delayed the card. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
Lawl @ K404
The irony if these 'mechanical drawings' turn out to be legit...we'd all get real quiet...real fast!!! :ROTF:
JOHNNY STORM!!! Look out, it's The Mole Man! Quick, torch his underlings!Quote:
Originally Posted by MaK2000
:):):)
I can see it in 3D mode now looks great.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eleeter
I believe that application is the viewer for SolidWorks.
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by eleeter
:ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by K404
don't see a reason that this info is less reliable to all others... so yes this is GT200 board... or... it isn't... anyhow quite unusual, and in a way lame way of leaking information... I still remember G80 leaks and GFX photos... that was the leak... just imagine auto magazines (online and paper) with "spy photos" of the new car models from CATIA or ProIng :D
This is pathetic. Even more so than the usual lame threads.
Since this is so pathetic, perhaps you would like to take a look at the 35MB STEP file for yourself so you can see exactly how lame it is......Quote:
Originally Posted by Swatrecon_
http://www.mediafire.com/?gem3dcyjd9y
hey Guest, dont take it personal but there has been alot of rumors and bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: on the web about this card. we will see in the comming months what the card really looks like and performs but for now, we are just taking your info with a pich of salt; and some of us more then a pinch.
Thing is... true or fake, we don't know about which card it is ( G92b aka 55nm G92 ? GT200 ? ) and also...gives us nothing regarding what we like to know ( performance :D )Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeywoman
why does the card have two PCIE connectors and is about 50cm long? :)
9000.1 hours in MS paint
BS. The pci-e power connectors make no sense where they are at. And also so few capacitors without digital pwm isnt sane.
Also, werent we told this core will be 256bit? if so why is there such a odd mem arrangement?
Anyone else notice the 3rd PCI-E power connector on the left card? Look at the PCI bracket.
Ok, the file is legit. But the OP is a moron and doesn't know how to view the files.
Here is the actual card rendered properly.
so thats how the cards look like.. how well do they perform? Can't wait. :D
offsite link pl0x, I don't see any image in your postQuote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
Well, perhaps it gives us (false)hope Nvidia will stop trying to pull 256bit dual gpu BS for topend? What disqualifies it is that its a pretty sure bet that Nvidia is done needing separate NVIO.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
i told it on first page, this seem authentic ... this is real GT200 ...
16 chips, 1024mb of 512bit?
Yup, sure looks like 512bit.
Sure, 512-bit mem bus 1GB GDDR3 ...
might just be what I've been waiting for!
if this is leit, wow...
It still looks like G80 to me, but ugraded with 8pin PCI-e power connector and other things..
How come it looks like G80? :confused:
It's clearly a different board.Actually, those buck voltage regulators (integrated phase controller/mosfet) don't work well with electrolytic/solid capacitors, they require SMD caps.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
Btw, These chips allow easy software voltage control - if just nV allows it... ;)
why would they upgrade G80 with 8-pin PWM connector?Quote:
Originally Posted by BulldogPO
So what's with the NVIO?
It's like an 8800gtx with a spdif connector, chips on the back on the card and making use of the space it has for the 8 pin power connector.
External I/O chip = better quality output (thanks to less noise) and die area savings for the core.
jup, legit (or somebody had fun spending 2+ hours faking it)
Today G92 GPU can realize only 1920x1200 via Single-Link, for 30" LCD you need a Dual-Link ... maybe with this new NV/IO chip is possible 2560x1600 via Single-Link ...
OBR,
1920x1200 cap exists because of link bandwidth limitation of DVI specification, it's not a silicon issue.
There's no way a RAMDAC be it external or integrated could output a res higher than WUXGA via single link.
maybe it is not a NVIO chip but IGP and Hybrid Power ... With this card you will be able to use hybrid Power on every board ...
:o
Errr...
Sure, anything's possible...
:)
edit:
Better pics now with AA.
http://largon.wippiespace.com/P651_frontside.png
http://largon.wippiespace.com/P651_frontside.png
Damn you 200kB attachment size limit...
Attachment 78316
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=78316&stc=1&d=12104302 85
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6094/newcard2ya6.png
http://largon.wippiespace.com/P651_frontside.png
What is that "thing" at the front of the card?
Weird looking thing, it might be optical audio somethig?
If you're talking about the little thing on top left that looks like a pipe, it's the cable that emits the light on the bracket ( check the 9800GTXs )Quote:
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
this thing is LED diode like on 9800 GTX or GX2! HD audio has again connector near PSU supplyQuote:
Originally Posted by BulldogPO
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
I see, thank you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BulldogPO
Optical audio is on this card?
I was hoping nV would finally put some effort to their PCB designs - but yet again they fail to impress. Compared to the oh-so-lovely OEM R600 (board rev. 109-B00131-00) it's one ugly colossus... This thing is the same size as G80GTX so it's whole 2½" longer than OEM R600, but still it has lesser features.
:[
If it's audio I would be seriously disappointed. It's hard to believe that NVIDIA isn't capable to create solution for HD AV output like ATI did with HDMI dongle capable of transferring video and audio!Quote:
Originally Posted by BulldogPO
what's purpose of that light?Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
It's a frickin' laser
I guess there's no special purpose, it's just a power led?
Nedjo,
Stop that double posting - let alone triple and especially quad posting which you've been committing lately.
:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by eleeter
The brand new 9900GTX, now with a laser to destroy the competition!
Wow!!! 16 memory chips (8 on front positioned differently than the 8 on the back, so that the locations are unique in order to scale with the bus bandwidth up to 512-bit).... just what I thought!
I'm wondering if I should get an adapter for 6-pin PCI-E to 8-pin PCI-E power connector
(found at http://www.frozencpu.com/products/60...27&id=X2LdWYmv
and http://www.performance-pcs.com/catal...ducts_id=21721 ---- this one can be sleeved in your color of choice, for free! )
or if I should just get that awesome new 450W Visiontek PSU booster from Best Buy for like $115 ( http://www.visiontek.com/products/po...wersupply.html )
Hmmm...
There's something weird going with the 3d model as the proportions of even the PCB itself don't match with realworld video cards. I'm not too sure anymore it's legit...
:confused:
Well, whether its fake or not, someone definitley put a lot of time and thought into making it since there really isn't anything about it that immediately stands out as being false except the NVIO thing, but then again if the die size really is that huge, then to save space and so on, it might make sense
I don't get it how the existence of NVIO (?) would "stand out as being false"? Is there a reason it shouldn't have such chip?
i dont think it's real.
you know Nv has people waching here. they would be all over it
There would be nothing they could do if the source isn't under NDA...
Can you be more specific?Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
in the original sort of mspaint type pic, why has the card on the right got a power plug that would be right over the i/o sheild?
metro.cl,
For example, the ratio of the lenght of the PCIe x16 connector and the height of the card don't match to the ratio measured from a real PCIe x16 card.
3D model overlaid on a G80GTX:
Attachment 78344
No displayport :(
SMD is Surface Mounted Device.Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
SMD is not a specific type of capacitor.
Unless you meant Tantalum capacitors, which this design has several of.
BUT Tantalum capacitors are solid state capacitors, which you said don't work.
Either way what you said doesn't make sense.
I think what you were trying to say is that those fast switching regulators need very low esr caps, which is where tantalum and ceramic caps come into play. But even so you still need several thousand uF's of capacitance between the rails and the first phase, and between phases. And these can only be done with electrolytic or polymer caps (SMD or through-hole)
LOL. wtf?Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
So? Not every card has the same length or height.
CONFORM!Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
Do you see 2 cards or 1 card in the file? because i used 2 diferent viewers and in one see 2 cards and in the other i see only 1 card.
I just see one card. I think some programs might have compatibility issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by metro.cl
I used quickstep.
I apologize, was thinking cercaps.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
The model has one single tantalum cap under the "NVIO" next to the choke so I have no idea where you're seeing several of them.Quote:
Unless you meant Tantalum capacitors, which this design has several of.
Manufacturer quote:Quote:
BUT Tantalum capacitors are solid state capacitors, which you said don't work.
Either way what you said doesn't make sense.
"Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors Only". Had a brainfart and thought of SMCs when I posted.Ummm... You don't seem to know how PWM circuits are built and where the caps are needed.Quote:
I think what you were trying to say is that those fast switching regulators need very low esr caps, which is where tantalum and ceramic caps come into play. But even so you still need several thousand uF's of capacitance between the rails and the first phase, and between phases.
Incorrect. Cercaps are perfectly enough.Quote:
And these can only be done with electrolytic or polymer caps (SMD or through-hole)
Never did I say anything about card lenght did I? About the height - full size PCIe cards are 99mm high. Except for example some non-PCIe spec compliant abominations such as some non-reference HD38_0X2s.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
Brighten up will you...
judging form the fist post nv designs there boards with paint xD
who has original files for rendering?
nVidia
can someone pm me the 3d file?
Post #27 has a working link.
:shrug:
People should read the entire thread before post :rolleyes:
srry ma bad, didnt see it, thx anywaysQuote:
Originally Posted by largon
nvidia employes are under a strict nda anyway, they are most likely not even allowed to confirm or deny information floating around on the web, some nda's even forbid to mention that an nda or something to protect it with exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChinStrap
The original mediafire link seems to have been taken down - at least, that's what their error message suggests.Quote:
Originally Posted by guest
Thanks!
Got it - thanks a bunch!Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
rendered by friend ...
http://ehm.own.cz/GT200.jpg
And today NVIDIA sent official launch date info, but you will wait for leak from another source ... not from me! :p:
That's clearly not the same model as in the link in my earlier post. Where did that come from?
edit:
PCB height: 91.7mm...
:stick:
its the same STEP file, but rendered in right size ... in profi software
:rofl::ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by K404
What is the name of the software?Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Launch date is July 19th no???? hehe
If it's the same file then how come the file I linked has different type caps below 6&8 pin connectors?
:shrug:
I suppose some kind of TOSLINK.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nedjo