Play Crysis DX10 Very High with AntiAliasing 16xQ !!!

System :

Mainboard Asus Strike II Chipset nVIDIA 780i SLI.
Core 2 Extreme QX9650 @ 4GHz (400MHz*10).
Ram 2x1GB Corsair.
3x Zotac 8800GTX 3-Way SLI.
PSU Cooler Master 1250W.
Windows Vista Ultimate 32 bit
Dell 19" Wide

Quote:

---

Benchmark timedmo Assault_Harbor. Instead of a good GPU or CPU test, this focus's on real gameplay from a level of the game with active AI, active physics and stressing particle graphics as well. Each run will be somewhat unique since AI and physics are active during test but is a good representation of real gameplay to test your settings against.

---

Benchmark at resolution 1280*1024 4AA

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/3408/169284xbt5.jpg

Play at resolution 1440*900 4AA + Pinto - Ultra High Quality Costum Config V1.3 Final

http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/184...8023641sl8.jpg

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/5...8034148up5.jpg

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/7...8042717wr2.jpg

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9...7582044fs9.jpg

Benchmark at resolution 1280*1024 AA 16xQ

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8...92816xqov6.jpg

looks awesome!

The game is awesome, but it's so damn heavy to run lol. I can play on high settings, but when setting stuff to very high i get like 10fps :P

3*8800GTX and even not full hd.

not that i don't appreciate your run.

but crysis potential i guess will be shown only on next gpu gen.

Quote:

---

Benchmark at resolution 1280*1024 4AA

---

That resolution doesn't even exist anymore.

i'd like to see 1680x1050 w/ no AA

also 1920x1200 w/ no AA

What drivers were used? I have 3 8800GTX overclocked to 650/2000 and I can only maintain 30-45fps at 1680x1050 at very high settings (Vista 64bit) and no AA in DX10.

CraptacularOne that antec 850watt is enough for tri sli and a Q6600? didnt know antec made such good psu.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nosboost300

i'd like to see 1680x1050 w/ no AA

also 1920x1200 w/ no AA

---

agree %100,its all about the res.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by malik22

CraptacularOne that antec 850watt is enough for tri sli and a Q6600? didnt know antec made such good psu.

---

It sure is. No issues what so ever. This is probably one of the finest PSUs I've ever owned :) It's only blemish is that some of these Enhance built units are having incompatibility issues with the G92 based video cards. But with my system it's stable as a rock.

http://xs123.xs.to/xs123/08053/trisli922.jpg

Omg...

28 fps isn't exactly "playable" (I'd hate to see what it is in firefights...) and 1440*900 was a high res back in 2002. Really shows what a horrible game Crysis is... or that nvidia needs to get off their asses and release the next gen hardware that was due out a good 4+ months ago.

Mod Crysis of G80. Resolution 1440*900 mod Ultra High + 16xQ

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/6...s216xq2vw7.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/6...s216xq3ji1.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8...s216xq4rw1.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/1...s216xq5dr0.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8...s216xq1xw3.jpg

Try to use 1920X1200/1680x1050 with no AA because AA slaughters the performance in Crysis because of the foliage and the number of objects etc...
Too bad that TRI-SLi needs Vista to work,Crysis it's ~8-10FPS faster on XP with very High mod than it is on Vista and the quality is ~the same....
And please use some AF because distant textures don't look good + the performance hit shouldn't be big.

Quote:

---

mod Ultra High

---

how?

ba ku la... those look ugly...

just incredible..:shocked: .. im really jealous ....

awesome... nice nice... in 2 years I can play the game like you now xD:D

Try with this setup on the second to last boss. I was playing crysis on 1600x1200 with everything on very high but no AA and it was very playable, but when I got to that boss I got some serious lag.

Your screenshots look great.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nosboost300

ba ku la... those look ugly...

---

LMAO the water looks like somone spilled gasoline in it, it has the rainbow affect lol

this is a great setup, crysis never looked so good

I´m amazed, didnt now crysis could look that nice

given the EXTREMELY poor rendering of the rock in the foreground and the extremely poor foreground water rendering i would say you are not using proper AF setup and possibly even a bilinear filtering to increase your frame rates.

on the flip side..

SINGLE frame screen shots of a game NEVER look as good as the game in motion.

for me personally the screen shoots are highly suspect,,,, anything 20ft away from your character looks great but anything close looks like frack...
upclose stuff never looks that poor if setup and using proper settings.

i call shinanigans and say you have modified the INF file to produce non standard rendering...

this?

http://crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=13790

why such a nice rig and no 24" widescreen?

I did give it a try 4 months ago with my 3 x 8800gtx and stopped trying after 10 minutes.
It is simply impossible at this moment to play it fluid @ 2560x1600 on high, definatly forget anything with AA and don't you even think of the word ultra !
It's time for the g200 to show up and put these in tri-sli, than it might be possible to see some nice results @ 2560x1600 8xaa 16xaf

There is something with crysis and my system, which results in really poor performance when compared to other people with similar systems.

I cannot play on high or very high without it running at ~5 fps constantly, and even on medium it lags a little. (This is at 1440x900, no AA)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oohms

There is something with crysis and my system, which results in really poor performance when compared to other people with similar systems.

I cannot play on high or very high without it running at ~5 fps constantly, and even on medium it lags a little. (This is at 1440x900, no AA)

---

quad core needed for sure,not for crysis but for your sli setup.and what powersupply is pushing your rig?

Q6600 @ 3.6GHz, 3-Way SLI 9800 GTX @ 750/1140

Crysis 1280*1024 Very High 4AA
http://forum.amtech.vn/attachment.ph...1&d=1209192355

Crysis 1400*1050 Very High 4AA
http://forum.amtech.vn/attachment.ph...1&d=1209192441

Setting Crysis 1280*1024 Very High 16xQ, my 3-way SLI 9800 GTX @ 750/1140 crash.

Conclusion : 3-way SLI 8800 GTX is stronger than 3-way SLI 9800 GTX.

nice :)

Is this the best veryhigh quality mod for crysis it looks very nice.

The very fact that you need at least $1000 dollars worth of graphics cards to get to borderline playable levels at 1280x1024 with 4xAA says it all imo. All hail Crysis the worst coded AAA game ever seen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Linchpin

The very fact that you need at least $1000 dollars worth of graphics cards to get to borderline playable levels at 1280x1024 with 4xAA says it all imo. All hail Crysis the worst coded AAA game ever seen.

---

I'll second that opionion.

nothing special i can play smoothly on two Ultras at 1920x1200 8AA!

Lol i tried crysis demo on my pc and it ran horribly, the graphics and physics are amazing though. Seriously though, in order to play this game maxed out i need to invest in 3 way SLi?

nice thread where can i download the tools... because io had some
CVAR files to tweak in DX9 XP into VERY HIGH or Costum profile... are these the same or what? do think so...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XS2K

Try to use 1920X1200/1680x1050 with no AA because AA slaughters the performance in Crysis because of the foliage and the number of objects etc...
Too bad that TRI-SLi needs Vista to work,Crysis it's ~8-10FPS faster on XP with very High mod than it is on Vista and the quality is ~the same....
And please use some AF because distant textures don't look good + the performance hit shouldn't be big.

---

My patch to 1.2 took that away. :(

once I finish the game I will load & play 1.1 patch