http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling...oc.aspx?i=3202
Printable View
As good as a tie in my books (Since on Anandtech, you're not allowed to outperform the TRUE:rolleyes: ). Makes you wonder if 2 more heatpipes would have put it over the top?
Seriously, just looking at the loaded temperature graphs, where the two differ, the difference seriously qualifies for statistical irrelevance. I'm sure we've all seen more temperature variation between remounts of the same heatsink.
I think 2 more heatpipes only would have helped with the capacity, the temps would have been roughly the same. Only downside I can see with it how noisy the fan gets on the high setting, as I prefer silence over performance (though I try to get the max performance for my silence if that makes any sense)
Ouch it's on par with the Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme! Now if the base of that heatsink is properly flat before we get it then I think this would be a better seller! But The Ultra-120 has a nice thing where you can easily replace the fans!
A lot of the differences on Anand seem like they are due to statistical anomalies, in truth. They probably average the temp over a few runs .. at least, I hope they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by MpG
45 bucks? dam....thats an awesome price to performance ratio. i'd hit it
its not realy competion over all the true didnt ave enough heat load
It only matches true at high speed. Noise/performance wise, true is still the best.
You're right, but the price on it makes it a better choice for most people.
Ok...... I really don't want to nit pick BUT..... Let's see how it performs with a quad. All high end air coolers should be tested with quads as they put out the most heat. Surely Anandtech can afford to purchase a quad for testing.:rolleyes:
I don't understand reviews of high end air coolers on dual core chips. Show me the max of what this thing can handle!! For example. If you try and lookup reviews on the Ninja Anniversary edition all copper version you will find a review from DragonSteelMods almost every sight you pull up regarding a review for this cooler all point to the same place. In this review it is tested with...... Intel P4 Extreme Edition 955 CPU @ 3.46GHZ. WTF??
dont most of those places get chips donated to test for the cpu marks or grafix tests so they could have just reused on of those
I wonder about taking it to the extreme though the fans on it are probuably only 45-50cfm. The cooler you keep the top of the TEC the cooler the base will run so I'd like to see the results from a higher cfm fan. Might have to buy this and test with a 92mm Delta 175cfm fan :D just for benching though. I wonder how many watts the TEC is.
why do they test them with a dual core? doesnt make sense to me, i mean they are one of the bigger review sites, so they should have plenty of them.
also they prolly used some low speed fan on the TRUE seeing how they have put it as the least noisy cooler (tie with 2 or 3 others).
My friends, if you look at page 6, you can see that the TRUE extreme is still the best. Incrising the speed of the cpu the TRue performs better.
Do you not remember the heat output those things had? I could be wrong, but it may still have the crown of the largest heat dump, especially when overclocked.Quote:
Originally Posted by GripS
You're right. Those things are extremely hot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serra
Your logic is flawed.Quote:
Originally Posted by wyemarn
They used a noisy stock cooler that comes with the Nirvana unit.
The TRUE doesn't come with fans, so you are free to choose the
best noise/performance fan you can afford. Swap out the cheap
stock fan on the Nirvana for the same Scythe S-Flex fans Anand
uses to bench the TRUE, and then see how they compare.
Which reminds me, you still need to add the cost of fans to the
price of the TRUE. This makes the Nirvana a hands-down price/performance
winner if using the stock fan. (and the Cooler Master Hyper 212, a mid-range
cooler, seems to be just a degree or two behind the TRUE as well...)
I guess the Thermalright :kissbutt: may soon finally come to an end :ROTF:
EBL
EBL
So let's see:Quote:
Originally Posted by brunormt
* Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme: $56.95 on sale @ Sidewinders
* + Scythe S-Flex SFF21F: $13.95 on sale at Jab-Tech
= $70.90
- VS -
ZEROtherm Nirvana: $47.99 @ NewEgg
Price difference: $22.91
So as configured, the units Anand tested reflected roughly a $23
price difference. the TRUE (as tested) was 48% more expensive.
Follow me?
So now I'll take a look at page 6, as you requested:
Highest Stable Overclock
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme: 3940
ZEROtherm Nirvana: 3900
Again, this is with the Nirvana using an inefficient stock fan,
and the TRUE using one of the best fans you can buy.
Yet, the TRUE manages a whopping 1% better overclock.
FACTS:
If you use the crappy stock fan on the Nirvana (and whom among us would)
the Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme manages a 1% higher overclock for a
48% higher price.
My Conclusion:
Replace the Nirvana's stock fan with a Scythe S-Flex, and it will beat the
TRUE by a couple degrees, match it in noise/performance, and still cost you
10-bucks less (and that's when the TRUE is on sale :cool: )
EBL
but, you cannot change the fans on the nirvana.Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilBellyLint
And you can't de-solder the cheap capacitors and opamps on a sound cardQuote:
Originally Posted by revogamer
and replace them with high quality variants to double your sound quality;
or volt mod a board to increase max voltage under load, or hack a BIOS
for increased performance, or mod a Radeon GPU to turn it into a FireGL
card costing five times the price, or...
;)
EBL
(it can be done) But regardless. Let's forget replacing the stock fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by revogamer
Does a 1% higher over-clock justify a 48% price premium?
Call me insane (many have; it's been certified) but I say, not worth it.
EBL
No such thing as a fan that Cannot be replaced.
Only 2 degrees behind the Thermalright, and 4.5 decibels quieter.Quote:
Originally Posted by HKPolice
I'd say that corroborates my earlier conclusion.
Now, had they swapped out the stock fan for a quality, higher CFM
variant, and matched the noise output on the TRUE in this particular
test, guess what might happen? ;)
EBL
Bottom Line My Friends
Commercial website reviews are often quite flawed with respect
to testing procedures; usually not entirely unbiased with respect
to their desire to maintain good terms with certain manufacturers;
and always spin test results to color the reader's opinion.
Don't believe me? If I have time, I will show you a classic example of
this from Anandtech, comparing two entirely separate reviews of two
CPU coolers that obtained virtually identical results, yet Anand
concluded one product was an abject failure, while the other showed
great promise and just barely fell short of the top coolers they have
ever tested. Repeating: SAME TEST RESULTS.
Sift through the bull:banana::banana::banana::banana:. Ignore the hype.
And when something seems a bit biased, go back and look at earlier reviews...
you may be surprised what the facts can tell you.
EBL
I say screw review sites--that's what you guinea pigs are for!!! I'm too cheap to be one myself, so I need you guys.
So, somebody please hurry up and buy this nirvana & the collermaster V12, and compare them to the TRUE that you already own! I have a blower that needs a heatsink!
If you want to do a % comparison...you can't do HSF cost, you need to compare total system cost.Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilBellyLint
So on a $1500 system, the TRUE costs 1.5% more for 1% higher OC with less noise.
The Nirvana at 1600RPM will not perform as well as the TRUE--it's louder because the fan is faster.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GripS
You have any idea of the heat load and TDP of that CPU?
Pressy/Smithfield are the best CPUs for these procedures imo.
Heat output may be very high, but heat density is not equal.Quote:
Originally Posted by GMX
Always best to test with the CPU you plan to use.
bit-tech had one aswell..
Thermalright vs Zerotherm: Cooler Faceoff
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...otherm_nv120/1
NV120 wins with high fan, lose with low fan.
Ultra 120 eXtreme with Noctua low fan.
:up: thats why i always do my own reviewsQuote:
Originally Posted by EvilBellyLint
I need some opinions. I've been thinking about buying the ZEROtherm since i don't want to spend $70 on a cpu cooler but i'm wondering if the Ultima -90 would be a better choice. I already have a 92mm Tornado to use on it so the cost would be around the same as the ZEROtherm but i'm not sure which will perform better. Plus i like the idea of a Blue fan(My case needs light. :p ) and i don't care about the noise since i crank up my nado now when i'm gaming. I haven't decided on the cpu i want to get though. It's gonna be either a Q6600 or an E8400. What heatsink do you think i should get?
Thats somthing your gona have to decide on, i havent done any direct testing on both of those. But id have faith in the Ultima 90 before the zerotherm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokin_Joe
Vapor... you know I respect your opinion. But if someone is merely lookingQuote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
to upgrade a lesser cooler to something more robust, I fail to see how
factoring in the cost of the entire rig is required, when after all, the
question is which "upgrade" cools at the level you need it to, and at
what cost. Could you elaborate as to why you feel total system cost
must be used in this calculation, particularly in cases where the rig is
already up and running?
As to the noise, I already pointed out that Anand tested the Nirvana
with its stock (garbage) fan, while using a Scythe S-Flex on the TRUE.
If a reviewer intends to compare operating noise, this methodology is
flawed, and I'd go so far as to say misleading. Not all 1600 rpm fans
are created equal -- but I don't need to tell you that :D
EBL
EBL-
There is an edit button and a delete button...
You talk about the TRUE butt kissing but then do the exact same to the Nirvana....
TRUE isn't about price/performance, it is meant to be the top aircooler on the market which it is.
Ya know, I wish I had the luxury of doing so, because I'd like to dispelQuote:
Originally Posted by joikd
some of the myths perpetrated by many of these commercial site reviews.
I'm not singling out Anandtech for any personal reasons, just that their
review is the topic of this thread, and I've already witnessed (via a bit of
digging around through some of their past reviews) how they spin the
results to satisfy their source of ad revenue.
Let's face it, most simply look at the pretty graphs, click to the
"Conclusion" page, and allow Anand to make up their minds for them.
If I had access to samples, I've no doubt I could show you some
serious flaws in their "Conclusions" about certain HSF.
In fact, I've been toying with the idea, for over a year now, of creating
a sort of consumer watchdog site that "Reviews the Reviewers."
Time & Funding are what stands in the way...
EBL
I'm aware of the edit and delete buttons. What I'm entirely unclear onQuote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
is your reason for pointing them out to me.
Secondly, I couldn't give a rats ass about this "Nirvana" cooler. My issue
is with flawed testing methods that mislead an already misled consumer.
Thirdly, I and others apparently believe your last statement is perhaps
no longer true. On a truly level playing field, and basing my opinion solely
on the data presented by Anand, it's quite apparent the Nirvana either
equals or possibly exceeds the TRUE in overall performance.
EBL
Well, if you trust Anandtech's comparisons, then it's clear the NirvanaQuote:
Originally Posted by Smokin_Joe
outperforms the Ultima-90 (and again, this is with the Nirvana's stock
fan... which isn't great.) Both units can be had for nearly the same price.
Add a few bucks or so for a good fan for the Ultima-90.
They seem to perform close enough that the differences might be attributed
to secondary factors such as mounting, case airflow, etc... so I'd say either
would probably perform above average.
EBL
Hmm guess i'll just go with the Ultima-90 then. I have always bought Thermalright's heatsinks and the Ultima seems to be smaller anyway. Thanks guys!
Cheapest cooler will ALWAYS win in your scenario (unless it is complete garbage).Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilBellyLint
A $20 Arctic Cooling Something that gets the CPU to 3800MHz vs. $45 Zerotherm NV120:
125% increase in price for 2.7% increase in clocks. That doesn't seem worth it either ;)
That's why total system cost should be factored. You get ~1% more system performance out of your system for 1.5% increase in system price. (NV120 compared to the TRUE) For some people, that's absolutely worth it, especially considering you have a no-fuss way of mounting whatever fan you feel like using.
For the example I just gave...you get
$1520 at 3800 or $1545 at 3900 or $1565 at 3940.
Mostly, it doesn't matter if your system is already running....the same money is being spent on it during its life. However, most don't think of a computer as an investment...
For instance, those who own the hypothetical aforementioned $20 "Arctic Cooling Something" deciding between a $45 NV120 or a $65 TRUE should look at it like this: $1585 for 3940 or $1565 for 3900. Virtually no difference...go with the higher one if you can afford it.
Heck, even going with your train of thought of an upgrade pricing strategy, let's take the aforementioned "$20 Arctic Cooling Something" at 3800MHz....you'd be upgrading from 3800MHz, not 0. So for $45 you can get a 2.6% upgrade in speed, or for $65 you can get a 3.7% upgrade in speed. The NV120 gets you 2.22MHz per dollar where the TRUE gets you 2.15MHz per dollar. Again, a dead-even draw.
And the TRUE does it quieter.
Which brings me to my next point...the Nirvana fan may not be garbage. It's just 3300RPM. That's loud at that size no matter what you do. You can put on a 1600RPM fan to match the noise of a TRUE, but you're only giving it half the airflow--absolutely not the same cooling performance as what we're seeing in the reviews. Low speed on that fan is 1500RPM and was tested by Bit-Tech--it didn't do very well.
Oh, and putting on a different fan onto the NV120, while possible, is not nearly as easy as just clipping it in like it is with most HSFs.
EDIT: and for the record (well, I'm on the record, I've said this a bunch of times, just not in this thread)...I haven't trusted AT's results since their Scythe Infinity completely bombed.
Okay...previous post is too long to add to, and I have more to say.
Here's what I think of the Nirvana:
It's not competition to the Ultima-90, the TRUE, the Infinity/Mugen, the Tuniq, or the IFX-14, or any of them. It's competition to other HSFs with built-in fans. Zalmans and other Zerotherms mostly. Thermaltake has one here and there, as to a few other manus, but the market is small. The fans are built-in for 2-3 reasons:
1) Aesthetics....some people like it and some companies think people like it and it will sell. It does.
2) Simplicity....nothing to install onto the heatsink, 'just' install the heatsink and go.
3) End user control....to minimize users complaining about performance from poor fannage, they slap on a fan they know does well.
Yes, you can install a different fan onto it, but that's just not what it was built for...it's not an elegant solution either...
Well said. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
I'm going to order one from Newegg :) 37AR is a damn good price. I have a quad so I'll hopefully get some results next week. Sadly I'll only have my water cooling setup for comparison though.
Wow anandtech.... dont overwhelm us with photos....
TRUE is getting old people...
When those monster coolermaster V8, V10, V12 are out, the TRUE era will be over for sure.
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/2008/01/09/c08_1.jpg
http://www.expreview.com/img/news/2008/01/09/c07_1.jpg
[]'s
Simps
That's just too much heatsink. I'll go to watercooling before i stick that on my board. :p
QFT, I said the same about the new Typhoon... there's a cut off here somewhere....Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokin_Joe
I see that the Thermalright IFX-14 Inferno is not on the chart ?
@Vapor
Sorry if i missed the point but i still do no get the logic why the entire system cost has to be compared, i dont see the difference between that than comparing to the heatsinks alone, If indeed the nirvana is 1~3c lower higher than the TRUE then we have a clear winner in price/performance, but there are some willing to spend a few more $$ for just 1~3c improvent and 0% OC gain.
A computer is the sum of the components. This goes for price and performance.
If performance is the same, lower price obviously wins. If price is the same, higher performance obviously wins. In this case, it's both higher performance and higher cost. So you need a metric for analysis.
If you want to compare system performance, you have to compare system cost. This is most noticeably true for those that consider a PC an active/evolving investment or are building a new PC. (I prefer this train of thought since the product you replace doesn't disappear--you can sell it or repurpose it any way you want)
If you're insistent on the upgrade mentality (and there is some reason to do it...especially if the computer no longer has original worth [i.e., last gen]), then you have to take it as upgrade performance to upgrade cost.
You can't compare system performance to upgrade cost to find worth. Two different metrics. Lowest priced item will always win. In the other direction, you can't do upgrade performance compared to system cost either....better performing product will always win.
Also, the value-scale of a dollar and budget is different for everyone--for these descriptions I'm using linear and non-factor, respectively.
I'm still curious to see how the V series coolers perform though. They look pretty crazy.
More here:Quote:
Originally Posted by Simps
http://www.octeamdenmark.com/forums/...ead.php?t=1089
/Thomas
So if a $20 heatsink performs 2c lower than the TRUE in ANY form of testing, it the true's price/performance still cannot be compared to the $20 HS ?
Temps don't have much to do with it with the numbers I'm using...just MHz. If a $20 HSF performed like the NV120, it would beat the TRUE in price/performance unless total system cost is very high or you already have a similar performing HSF.Quote:
Originally Posted by Demo
I just want to see this HSF try to cool a Q6600 or Quad Extreme. And even better.... cool it while the CPUs are overclocked into the 3.6ghz range.
My Q6600 @ 3.6ghz with TRUE is idling @ 40/38/36/39 in a pretty warm room. Oh... i'm also only running a Scythe NMB-MAT 64cfm 1650-1700rpm 120mm fan. Neither the cooler or CPU are lapped.
Under full load in Prime95, all 4 cores have temps between 51'c and 54'c.
Personally... i'd like to see this ZEROtherm cooler compete using quad core CPU's both stock and overclocked. Ramping up the MHZ on a quad core CPU is how you truly show the cooling power of a heatsink.
Lots of reviews for this thing out there but almost all on dual cores. Here's what I found on a Quad:
QX6700 (Beats TRUE120 and IFX-14??)
http://www.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=en&ie=UTF8
Q6600 (Same as Tuniq)
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...a_review/5.htm
And
http://xtrempc.ro/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&p=774699:
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7498/nv2jy8.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/1542/nvgf0.jpg
Is there somebody who has bought the Nirvana and also has the TRUE? It would be nice if he would use a high performance fan (S-Flex F, ZM-F3) on the TRUE and mod it on the Nirvana, so we would have a fair showdown!
Thing is, the 3000 rpm fan on the Nirvana probably pushes more CFM than the TRUE. That, and the way the cooler is designed it'll take advantage of every bit of CFM the fan can pump out, much like the Zalman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenom
I have one sitting in front of me, but no other air cooler to test it with other than a stock cooler..
Honestly though this HSF looks like a very good price/performance heatsink. Although Newegg has them regularly priced @ 60.00 you can pick one up for 40 bucks now after MIR.
$34.99 now after $15 instant discount and $10 MIR. That's a winner for my secondary Q6600 rig. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by GripS
I just orderd one for my main rig, I plan on making a jig to hold 2 120mm fans in a push pull to see if I can get the temps to stay in line with the True and keep the noise down, I'll put up some results at the end of the week if there is any intrest.
The nirvana is a beautiful cooler. Really shinny too.