As the title says. You can get it there: http://support.ati.com/ics/support/d...asp?deptID=894
Click on the "737-30533: Crysis: Radeon™ HD38xx/HD2xxx seriesGraphic corruption occurs during gameplay" linky.
Printable View
As the title says. You can get it there: http://support.ati.com/ics/support/d...asp?deptID=894
Click on the "737-30533: Crysis: Radeon™ HD38xx/HD2xxx seriesGraphic corruption occurs during gameplay" linky.
sweet:
DirectX 10: Fixes texture flickering in bushes, clouds, trees
DirectX 10: Performance improvements
DirectX 9: Fixes Anti-Aliasing corruption seen on the ATI Radeon 2900 Series
DirectX 9: Anti-Aliasing performance enhancements
DirectX 9: Crossfire performance improvements
DirectX 9: Fixes random graphics corruption during game play
Thank God. I only get texture corruption in XP tho...
could you post back with results?Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
yess! results please! bench or no bench - fps increase is needed! hail 38*0! amdati must do something!
Sure. Gotta take my kids to school, then I'll install and see what happens.
Just tested the patch on HD 2900/WinXP/Cats 7.10/Crysis Demo.
Texture issue fixed :)
But the whole patch is huge and the installation is absolutely like Cats package instal :confused:
kids or no kids ....benches or screenshots for showing fps!Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
fps increase?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper
says xp32 in the install. is this just for 32-bit? sorry im not at home to test or i wouldn't have asked. :rolleyes: :cool:
edit:
# Windows Vista 32-bit Edition
# Windows Vista 64-bit Edition
# Windows XP Professional
# Windows XP Home Edition
# Windows XP Media Center Edition
# Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
never mind im a noob.
I'm curious on performance improvement, anybody benched?
It's kinda funny that both ATi and nVIDIA have released their new "Crysis" drivers at the same time, both of them giving performance boost and proper dual-card support.
I am eager to see some benches about the ATi cards as well. Is this so called "improved performance" a true fact?
nice find!
default settings
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...PU1024x768.jpg
Cat 7.10 GPU benchmark
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...768_hotfix.jpg
Hotfix GPU benchmark
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...710_hotfix.jpg
1st set of looped CPU benchmarks are Cat 7.10
2nd set of looped CPU benchmarks are hotfix
Observation:
I am not sure if this benchmark is reliable or not. The speed of the benchmark doesn't match frame rate at times. I will provide a pic as an example.
Edit:
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...FPS_error1.png
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...FPS_error2.png
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a1...FPS_error3.png
As you can see, by using the r_DisplayInfo = 1 command you can see to the right what appears to be the actual FPS. However the information to the left is what is recorded in the benchmark score. As I've stated before, the benchmark would fly through the loop but IMO wasn't matching the actual frame rate being recorded. So by enabling r_DisplayInfo = 1 you can clearly see what I am talking about. What does this mean for the actual performance score? It may mean nothing knowing this...
graphics settings used???
I ran into the same issue investigating this this morning. I wondered why it showed low fps, but the actual rendering was not choppy or anything like you'd expect whne framrate dips below refreshrate(I'm using a Dell FP3007-HC).
I tried FRAPS, saw a minimal improvement in performance...1FPS only, actually, with the hotfix.
Anyway, I started playing to see if some of the rendering issues I had seen with 7.10 were gone...got kinda lost in the game...then had to step out...so I apologize for the late response.
If you guys would like more screens, LMK, and I'll toss some up. I just got home again, so I'll try to capture some comparos...
looks like this may work for more than 3800 & 2000?
curently forcing crossfire to enable creates artifacts and docent do much for performance
downloading now anyway so we shall see if it helps
737-30533: Crysis: Radeon™ series: Graphic corruption occurs during gameplay
The information in this article applies to the following configuration(s):
* Crysis
* Radeon™ HD3870 series
* Radeon™ HD3850 series
* Radeon™ HD2900 series
* Radeon™ HD2600 series
* Radeon™ HD2400 series
* Radeon™ X1950 series
* Radeon™ X1900 series
* Radeon™ X1800 series
* Radeon™ X1650 series
* Radeon™ X1600 series
* Radeon™ X1550 series
* Radeon™ X1300 series
* Radeon™ X1050 series
* Radeon™ X850 series
* Radeon™ X800 series
* Windows Vista 32-bit Edition
* Windows Vista 64-bit Edition
* Windows XP Professional
* Windows XP Home Edition
* Windows XP Media Center Edition
* Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
Symptoms:
Graphic corruption occurs during gameplay
Solution:
Please download and install the following hotfix file to address this issue.
I will try it later tonight.
Ya i'll make a couple runs too with 2900XT 1GB crossfire and if i have some extra time I'll swap out and run in 3870 crossfire...
big boost in cpu score in 3dmarks also. over double for me. with my e6600 @ 4.275ghz.
:up:Quote:
I installed the "hotfix" without uninstall Cat 7.10 I got massive improvements!
Crysis benchamark 1680x1050 all game settings at Medium.
Cat 7.10
CPU Min 7.34 Av 14.90 Max 18.82
GPU Min 12.80 Av 18.65 Max 20.85
Hotfix
CPU Min 21.88 Av 37.7 Max 44.41
GPU Min 27.15 Av 38.09 Max 46.39
When using Fraps in game I get around 30 when walking around, around 25 in light fighting and around 20 with lots of enemies fighting. The lowest FPS I could see in game was 19
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33907988
At least I am not the only one enjoying this :DQuote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Allmost 2x more FPS?
No way Oo
Dammit bring me those 3870s ATI! In Spain it´s impossible to get one :(
More people need to try this with X2900XTs/3870's.
My 3870 comes tuesday, for now, Im on a 6200 LE.... /wrists.
can't believe this. 3870 actually beating the :banana::banana::banana::banana: out of the gt?
Q6600 @ 3ghz, 4GB Patriot valueram @ 400mhz 5-5-5-15, 2900XT, Maximus Formula SE, Vista Home Premium, Crysis hotfix.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
11/17/2007 9:11:56 AM - Vista
Run #1- 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 24.855
11/17/2007 10:22:55 PM - Vista
Run #1- 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 14.89
11/17/2007 10:32:46 PM - Vista
Run #1- 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 11.59
11/17/2007 10:49:09 PM - Vista
Run #1- 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.715
11/17/2007 10:56:35 PM - Vista
Run #1- 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 33.385
11/17/2007 11:01:45 PM - Vista
Run #1- 2560x1600 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.39
More to follow, but note that the results do not reflect acutal performance...where these numbers come from, I dunno. But I also smell a farce..medium settings? PLS...
So is this hotfix a whole new set of drivers alltogether (i.e. Cats 7.11 Beta)?
No performance improvements in crysis with these drivers.
Looks to be based off of the next driver release.... could just be betas or unsigned finals.
Edit: I have a 2900xt.
Same here. No performance improvements, but screen corruption is gone now! Using 2900Pro.
I bloody well hope this is included in 7.11...game just isn't right in 7.10...and there are still some issues in-game with this hotfix...Quote:
Originally Posted by nicepun
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
This hotfix is the driver update. Just check the driver version - it's build 8.43. the one used with HD 3800 series reviews.
Screen corruptions are gone indeed in crysis .
But no fps improvements , it even seems that i lost 5fps on average with these in crysis ? :eek:
I ran around 35 at first, now its around 30 . I got in the later levels tho , so it might be that too . :p:
mine is a 2900pro
The reason why I ask because if it's a whole new set of drivers alltogeter I want to use driver cleaner cuz we all know it's a no no to install drivers on top of drivers.
well, still says 7.10 in CCC here, I did standard remove before install.