OpenGL Fur Rendering Benchmark

Printable View

08-24-2007, 12:10 PM
Major_A

OpenGL Fur Rendering Benchmark

http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

Here's what I got.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...FurResults.jpg
08-24-2007, 06:47 PM
dengyong

1 Attachment(s)

card at sig spec.
Attachment 63433
08-24-2007, 10:31 PM
Major_A

Got a new card earlier. I couldn't handle playing Bioshock on my 7600GT. Oh well it's just money right?
8800GTS 320MB @ 660/1000

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...OGL8800GTS.png
08-25-2007, 04:03 AM
dengyong

Much better.
08-25-2007, 04:52 AM
purecain

1 Attachment(s)

heres mine.......... the hd2900 leaves nvidia cards behind in this benchmark.....
08-25-2007, 11:02 AM
dengyong

Did you mean two of them leave one nvidia card behind?
08-25-2007, 03:32 PM
Bl4ck^!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

Did you mean two of them leave one nvidia card behind?

not to mention the CF bugs in Bioshock ;F , you can't play a benchmark you know ( well except 3dm2001SE ;F )
08-25-2007, 04:31 PM
TSXmike

1 Attachment(s)

this is me... sli 7900gto
08-25-2007, 05:01 PM
Toysoldier

1 Attachment(s)

Luckily BioShock runs with much higher FPS than this :)
08-25-2007, 06:04 PM
dicecca112

8400 in my lappy
08-26-2007, 04:51 PM
xPliziT

1 Attachment(s)

This is my result after second run with steam download in background.

AMD Athlon X2 64 5600+ @ 3300MHz
2 Gig Mushkin 8500
HD2900XT 1GIG oc 828/1000 MHz
WinXP
08-27-2007, 02:26 PM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by xPliziT

This is my result after second run with steam download in background.

AMD Athlon X2 64 5600+ @ 3300MHz
2 Gig Mushkin 8500
HD2900XT 1GIG oc 828/1000 MHz
WinXP

Is that a single card or crossfire ?
08-27-2007, 03:41 PM
dengyong

1 Attachment(s)

another try.
Attachment 63551
08-28-2007, 02:54 AM
.devastatioN

I can't see any pictures after post #2. Here's mine though. x1950pro@stock. e6400 @3ghz, ram1:1 cas44412

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7021/furrc6.jpg
08-29-2007, 02:33 PM
Dublin_Gunner

http://www.gigafiles.co.uk/files/122/fur.jpg

Ouch, thats pretty crappy.. barely faster than a 7600GT in OGL :-(

Using Cat 7.8 on Vista 32
08-29-2007, 02:55 PM
Major_A

Have ATi's drivers caught up with nVidia's in OpenGL performance?
08-29-2007, 03:25 PM
Dublin_Gunner

Quote:

Originally Posted by Major_A

Have ATi's drivers caught up with nVidia's in OpenGL performance?

Obviously not!

In gaming they're fine though.....
08-29-2007, 03:27 PM
dengyong

I was hoping one of the guys with high ati scores would say if its from one card or crossfire.
08-29-2007, 09:03 PM
Crisao23

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7...board30pg1.jpg

2644 with the 8800GTX running at 660/2040
Vista x64 Ultimate with 163.44 Forceware
08-30-2007, 03:08 AM
fellix_bg

R600 is generally faster in this benchmark than G80.
The fur renderer here is quite simple - no dynamic branching and only a single texture fetch per 100 shader passes to form the actual fur, eg. the ALU:TEX ratio here is heavily biased toward the math power.
In a nut shell, the more [pixel] shader power you have in absolute terms, the more FPS... and more heat will be generated. ;)
That's why X1800XT is on par with, say a 7600GT.
08-30-2007, 03:50 AM
SLi_dog

Here's mine. A BFG 8800GTX OC at stock with a low clocked Quad.

http://slidog.bigblog.com.au/data/2/...0830214701.png

Also a tip guys, if you hit Alt+Print Screen it only captures the active window ;) :)
08-30-2007, 11:09 AM
Crisao23

Best run until now:

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8...board33ds0.jpg
08-30-2007, 01:08 PM
Lightman

1 Attachment(s)

My 7900GS iChill @625/1600

Attachment 63737

PS. I recently switched from my X1950Pro(GT) to this GF7900GS and in Cinebench4D H/W OpenGL is significantly lower (ATI 4515/nV 2666)!!
08-30-2007, 03:08 PM
mup0

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7...1273923eg8.jpg

Test PWN3D :) SOrry but i cant stay laughting ;)
08-30-2007, 03:58 PM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by mup0

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7...1273923eg8.jpg

Test PWN3D :) SOrry but i cant stay laughting ;)

Why :shrug::shakes: :down:
08-30-2007, 09:02 PM
death

Quote:

Originally Posted by mup0

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7...1273923eg8.jpg

Test PWN3D :) SOrry but i cant stay laughting ;)

nice pix but that not that hard to do :down:

cpu on this only makes up about 10 % of score and yes ati rule in this benchie
09-02-2007, 01:54 PM
xPliziT

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

Is that a single card or crossfire ?

this is single card.
09-02-2007, 05:11 PM
Severance

1 Attachment(s)

Program reads wrong cpu speed for me. Single sapphire 2900xt...LOL its slower in crossfire along with many other apps and games. Well worth the extra $500 hey fellas?
Asus p5k deluxe
Sapphire 2900xt
corsair dominator 2x1024
q6600 go at 3.8 gig
09-02-2007, 06:04 PM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by Severance

Program reads wrong cpu speed for me. Single sapphire 2900xt...LOL its slower in crossfire along with many other apps and games. Well worth the extra $500 hey fellas?
Asus p5k deluxe
Sapphire 2900xt
corsair dominator 2x1024
q6600 go at 3.8 gig

Whats your cards clock?
Great score.
09-02-2007, 08:38 PM
Severance

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

Whats your cards clock?
Great score.

thanx...2900xt clocks=853\900 max that overdrive allows
09-05-2007, 08:36 AM
death

it only uses one cpu core and it only uses on card
09-05-2007, 11:39 AM
Severance

1 Attachment(s)

Overclocked my sapphire a bit more and got this.
09-11-2007, 05:37 PM
purecain

to all nvidia owners, the benchmark can run differantly on some systems where part of the ring of fur is off screen. this is what gives you the high scores. this has been proved so please if your ring of fur looks very close and is partly obscured then you need to revise your settings so that they are the same as other users. when i first saw a score as high as that i new something was up and we asked the guy to show us a video to prove he wasnt faking his score. thats when we noticed the full ring was only partly rendered with part being off screen. :down:
09-11-2007, 07:45 PM
punisher69

http://img472.imageshack.us/img472/6...nchmarknm1.jpg

Single EVGA 7900 GT
09-17-2007, 07:32 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Can we get Death in here to manage this thread EOCF style?
09-17-2007, 07:33 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by purecain

to all nvidia owners, the benchmark can run differantly on some systems where part of the ring of fur is off screen. this is what gives you the high scores. this has been proved so please if your ring of fur looks very close and is partly obscured then you need to revise your settings so that they are the same as other users. when i first saw a score as high as that i new something was up and we asked the guy to show us a video to prove he wasnt faking his score. thats when we noticed the full ring was only partly rendered with part being off screen. :down:

ROFL... the youtube video asking for my apology? i forgot about that. :rofl:
09-18-2007, 05:55 AM
purecain

lol i know just had to add it cos i saw loads of scores which had to of done the same thing, by accident though of course lol...
09-18-2007, 07:31 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by purecain

lol i know just had to add it cos i saw loads of scores which had to of done the same thing, by accident though of course lol...

I know right? It is great... :)

Too bad death wasn't running this one... :p:
09-20-2007, 05:08 PM
death

Raptor22 post your score right m8 and ill add you m8

+ i am runing this one l0l
09-20-2007, 05:10 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Raptor22 8800GTS 320MB = 2108
09-21-2007, 03:48 AM
biohead

1 Attachment(s)

3271 marks

2900xt 512mb 850/1080
opty180@3.4

ati seems pretty strong in this benchmark
09-21-2007, 05:51 AM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by biohead

3271 marks

2900xt 512mb 850/1080
opty180@3.4

ati seems pretty strong in this benchmark

Wow... that is a pretty crazy score. Good job m8! :up:
09-21-2007, 07:54 PM
death

l0l raptor l0000000000l i dont run this thread im going crazy
09-21-2007, 08:25 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by death

l0l raptor l0000000000l i dont run this thread im going crazy

Yeah... rofl... the eocf version was way better... :rofl:

At least my score was in correct format... :ROTF:
09-28-2007, 04:16 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Woo hoo! Independent shader overclocking is awesome! Go RivaTuner! Woot!

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/6...2227tk4.th.jpg

Edit: Raptor22 8800GTS 320MB = 2227...
09-29-2007, 02:00 PM
Lightman

1 Attachment(s)

Here is my HD2900PRO @850/1980 and X2 5600+ 3250

Attachment 65032

I'm amazed by this card .... :)
09-29-2007, 02:08 PM
CyberDruid

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/7683/furvk1.jpg
09-29-2007, 02:28 PM
Major_A

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptor22

Too bad death wasn't running this one... :p:

I just posted the link. I'm not going to create a spreadsheet with the scores. If you want to go for it.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...LFB9-29-07.jpg

There is also a new version of the benchmark. You can download it here. If you want to download it but don't want to create an account use Username: LeaveMeAlone Password: 12345 to download the benchmark. Be sure to logout after you download the benchmark so others can use the Bugmenot account I created.
09-29-2007, 03:53 PM
RAW-Raptor22

KK...I'll make a new thread so that everyone can post in correct format... and have my stuff at the beginning... :up:
09-29-2007, 07:55 PM
Seraphiel

1 Attachment(s)

Nice benchmark. 2 * XFX 8800 Ultra XXX @ stock.
09-29-2007, 07:59 PM
RAW-Raptor22

BS score.... is the ring fully on the screen at all times?
09-29-2007, 08:22 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seraphiel

No, it isn't fully in the picture at all times. See the the screenshot from a fullscreen benchmark. If I have made an error, then I apologize.

Yeah... I dont know what is going on... The ring isnt fully on the screen so the GPU doesnt have to work as hard, hence higher scores. :rolleyes:
09-29-2007, 09:26 PM
RAW-Raptor22

I never had an issue... maybe you need to adjust the "V-size" on your monitor, and change your resolution to 1280x1024... :shrug:
09-29-2007, 09:49 PM
RAW-Raptor22

ok I will....
09-30-2007, 06:33 AM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seraphiel

Thanks.

Since you regard your own score as valid, and we are rendering the same (and missing the same), I assume my score is not BS and also valid.

Or am I missing something?

Seraphiel your score looks fine to me.

I think the partialy off the screen thing is crazy. :nuts:
09-30-2007, 09:02 AM
largon

1 Attachment(s)

2471 with 8800GTS 320MB...

edit:
... at 1.285v vGPU / 1.990v vMEM
:D
09-30-2007, 04:38 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by largon

2471 with 8800GTS 320MB...

edit:
... at 1.285v vGPU / 1.990v vMEM
:D

Nice score!!!! :up:

What cooling do you use?
09-30-2007, 08:09 PM
RAW-Raptor22

You see, SLI doesnt usually affect the benchmark... :shrug:

PM death with that pic and see what he can do.
09-30-2007, 08:43 PM
largon

Raptor22,
It's on water.
Swiftech MCW60 with an Apogee GT(X) baseplate.
09-30-2007, 08:47 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by largon

Raptor22,
It's on water.
Swiftech MCW60 with an Apogee GT(X) baseplate.

Thats awesome, Im poor so all mu stuff is on air, the GTS is on stock cooler, with stock voltages... :D
09-30-2007, 08:50 PM
ExodusC

1 Attachment(s)

Whew those 2900's are scoring high.
10-01-2007, 05:55 AM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by ExodusC

Whew those 2900's are scoring high.

ATI has always Pwned at OpenGL.... :rolleyes:
10-01-2007, 12:17 PM
strange|ife

its a furry donut:confused:
10-01-2007, 01:18 PM
Major_A

From what I can tell it looks like the same fur as DX10 fur in Lost Planet. Obviously this demo is DX9 but maybe that's the reason it runs like poo poo because it's having to make extra passes.

Example:
DX9 Fur
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/art...ge.asp/2246/01
DX10 Fur
http://www.firingsquad.com/media/art...ge.asp/2246/02
10-04-2007, 04:27 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seraphiel

You're kinda right about that.

I have tested the benchmark several times, and have also seen SLI to been non-working. But it is somewhat random. One time SLI worked, and I ran the benchmark again without doing anything but that, and in the next run SLI wasn't working at all, and didn't in this benchmark until I restarted the system (it worked in games though).

At one time I had SLI failing in the middle of the benchmark (I think): About 25% into it the fps was cut in half. The fps at first was what I expected with SLI, and the fps after a few seconds had fallen to what it should without SLI.

Dunno why this is so, but I know SLI does work with this benchmark, on and off at least which is weird.

I know right? It is kind of wierd, maybe the new 1.0.5 version of the benchie would fix it?
10-08-2007, 02:47 AM
EfterlysT

http://ww2.beffo.se/upload/pic~/0kohi530qutk.JPG
http://ww2.beffo.se/upload/pic~/7brbomqwghrb.JPG
10-14-2007, 03:10 PM
situman

1 Attachment(s)

just for fun
10-14-2007, 03:55 PM
joshd

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6503/fureo6.jpg

FEAR ME!!

(can't wait untill the 29Pro arrives... this thing SUCKS!)
10-23-2007, 02:51 PM
joshd

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshd

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6503/fureo6.jpg

FEAR ME!!

(can't wait untill the 29Pro arrives... this thing SUCKS!)

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/665/fur847le0.jpg

There we are, that is much more like it. That's done at 847/800.
10-23-2007, 08:19 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by EfterlysT

http://ww2.beffo.se/upload/pic~/0kohi530qutk.JPG
http://ww2.beffo.se/upload/pic~/7brbomqwghrb.JPG

Those are almost my EXACT clocks, holy crap dude, thanks for the definition of the difference between GTS and GTX. :D
10-24-2007, 12:03 PM
pxhx

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6752/imagemhi3.jpg

:stick: :slapass: :D :wiggle: :wiggle: :poke: :kissbutt: :kissbutt: :kissbutt: :owned:
10-24-2007, 12:45 PM
dengyong

3 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by pxhx

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6752/imagemhi3.jpg

:stick: :slapass: :D :wiggle: :wiggle: :poke: :kissbutt: :kissbutt: :kissbutt: :owned:

Attachment 66109:bs::down:Attachment 66110 Attachment 66111:gay:
10-24-2007, 12:54 PM
WoutZoR

http://xs220.xs.to/xs220/07433/Fur_Rendering.png

I'm using Catalyst 7.10 & Vista Ultimate X64
CPU speed is incorrect (to bad :rolleyes:) it's 3600MHz
All the rest is same as in sig
10-24-2007, 01:45 PM
pxhx

Quote:

Originally Posted by dengyong

Attachment 66109:bs::down:Attachment 66110 Attachment 66111:gay:

i think this beanchmark have a bug... :rofl:
(sorry my bad english)
10-24-2007, 02:30 PM
dengyong

Correto.
11-10-2007, 01:18 PM
cdawall

http://img.techpowerup.org/071002/fur.png

BFG 7800GS OC 565/1510(effective)
cpu @stock...POS mobo has no bus locks=gpu crash when oc'd

cards running stock volts...core is G71 A2 :D

pushed it higher with atitool
http://img.techpowerup.org/071110/fur.png
08-03-2009, 05:16 AM
mudkip

Does enabling post processing generate more heat (more stress?) ?
08-03-2009, 06:37 PM
dengyong

1 Attachment(s)

FurMark reports my cpu clock wrong.
Attachment 97503

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.

XtremeSystems