http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/2061/chuckcpu0sm.jpg
:owned: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printable View
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/2061/chuckcpu0sm.jpg
:owned: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
a monster cpu :) cpu developpment has found its end ^^
Very good! Ya got me and I needed a good laugh!
Lol ok good :) that made my day thx :)
:lol good one :P
I'll wait for the Van Damme CPU... It's gonna whoop Chucks ass... :D
take it away take it away fast!!
Chuck Norris controls the internet , so you can expect a roundhouse kick in the face trough your computer screen pretty fast!!:fight:
Where is the Jack Bauer version?
in the over hyped Prescott uber edition of course :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
You forgot to add the following....
*Requires thermo-nuclear reactor PSU*
StyM, LOL, man! :shocked: Thanks a lot for that funny picture! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Jack Bauer specs:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
- First 24 Monolithic Core processor.
- Die size 24nm.
- Special instruction protocol set.
Others:
- It won't need any other component support (RAM, PSU,...)
- It will do anytihng by itself but it may not do what you ask it to do. It will do whatever he (or it) likes.
(My english is limited. I'm spanish)
I know, read the sig people. :cool: :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
haha classicQuote:
Originally Posted by Bourch
lol - again? I feel like I have a dejà-vu :D
Meh, that's a horrible prank, lol.
Here's a link to, SUPPOSEDLY, an overclocked Agena running at 3GHz from its 1.9GHz stock:
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...d=631&Itemid=1
I asked about Fudzilla's K10 CPU-Z screenshot to Franck(=CPU-Z author, of course) today, and he replied as below:
"Yes it is a fake. cpuz does not even try to read a L3 on AMD CPUs, so there
is not way it can detect any L3."
So, we need more time to know the real K10 information...
...but still I love Fudzilla:D
That screenshot is too old and is dated to April 2005. Please, check a thread here.Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
And here is a screenshot from the first message of that thread. There is no any doubt that screen is a poor fake I have ever seen and I left my comments concerning it at pcstats.com forum.
PHz= Punch a Hertz?
wa77ss, Petahertz (1*10E15 hertz) :D
Oh good help me :rofl:
K10 - Texas Justice Edition
lol
The fudzilla screenshot is considerably different than the one you linked, for one, it's a quad-core part. Also, I doubt an April 2005 date is accurate since in 2005 we had no inkling about K8L/K10.Quote:
Originally Posted by VVJ
Not saying that you're wrong or anything of the sort, just that this is not the same screenshot as the one you linked. If kyosen says it's fake then I'll take him at his word and believe him. :)
Furen, what is Fudzilla? I have never heard about any Fudzilla. But thanks to kyosen I know that Fudzilla is just a poor fake-maker. They don’t know about K10 anything. So, here we need official comments from the author of CPU-Z in order to stop this meaningless discussion.
fudzilla is ran by an ATI fanboy that used to work for theinq.Quote:
Originally Posted by VVJ
So to be short Fudzilla is like theinq but with a diffrent site layout.
and that CPU-z ID on fudzilla is a fake.
someone here on XS said he made it and mailed it to fudzilla for fun.
Bruce Lee whooped Chucks A$$....heheh
However, Franck was assuming that the screenshot was from a non-patched version of CPUZ...Quote:
Originally Posted by kyosen
CPUZ is easily patched and this is done quite often by those who write and test the bios. Now you have to ask yourself, who is most likely to actually have an ES chip right now? Could it be an engineer that writes and tests bioses? Wouldn't they need to modify the way CPUZ reads the bios for info if they were working on a new model of CPU?
@Viditor
You have no idea what you are talking about!
1. You can't patch CPUz, unless you have the source code, which will have some modifications, then being compiled and linked and finally to generate a patch.
2. The BIOS has no common point with CPUz. CPUz is only a util which displays your system specs, based on known data and does nothing more.
3. There are no ES and if someone has one and wants to share some info about K10 with the public, he would probably do more than just a camera shoot of a monitor with CPUz displayed. At least he could try to validate, which is easier then to make a photo with camera, transfer it to PC, resize it and upload the image to an image sharing server.
In other words, ALL ARE FAKE!
:rofl:
There are ES of Barca/Phenom/AMDs new gear now.
Does CPU-Z read BIOS to gather info? Or does it read PLLs?
I cant really see AMD ES holders/testers bothering to patch CPU-Z to get windows info somehow
It does niether. It detects the installed hardware and shows information based on known specs given out by the manufacturers.
So how does CPU-Z display our OC info, BIOS-set RAM timings etc?
By using CPUID instrucion, reading MSR (machine specific registers) and PCI devices (such as memory controller). CPUID will tell you familly , model, stepping, chache size and other various informations regarding CPU. Reading some MSRs you can obtain current multiplier. By using timing functions or RDTSC instruction one can obtain CPU speed thus calculate HTT(FSB) and other speed. Using IN and OUT intrsuctions and knoving how PCI address space is organized, one can access for example memory controller (or hypertransport controller) and read timings (also set new timings). This is how I wrote A64Info.
Haha clasic dude , I think this is old dude ,
Whats the chuck multi
:rofl:
CHUCK NORRIS 4EVER!
:clap:
I pity da foo that don't wait for Intel's next Conr....I mean "Jack" batch of CPUs.
Welcome Viditor - I see the AT forums are really really dead. A word of caution . Don't try your AMD fanboy stuff here these guys are way to sharp . Trust me I know. From experience.Quote:
Originally Posted by Viditor
Anyone know what date the new cpus got pushed back to I read some article yesterday that they were being delayed
Jacky chan is going to whoop that assssssss :D