congrats to kev...........:toast:
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k1...mrec-9m-13.gif
congrats to kev...........:toast:
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k1...mrec-9m-13.gif
625mhz ram @ 4/3/3/4/1 2t, not bad not bad. Thats definitly earning him some time.
Wich setup please?
:woot: congrats:toast:
Very nice work Kevin. :toast: :clap:
I'm a 680i user with Striker. 624mhz 4-3-3-4 is impressive!!
With 2:3 ratio i never was able to load Win..congrats OPB ;) :toast:
That ram used for test? Cell Shock?
its in the ss...team group 6400 CL3/EPP
X6800 S6/B2 - ln2 - Copper mousepot rev.3
680i chipset board
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
:coffee: :p: I'm lamer...It's in the screen...
Congrats OPB for the wonderfull mem settings , they are huge .
Congrats for the WR
Congratulations for that time
New WR :toast: 32 Mb :D
Wow, 680i can be fast!
19/2/6/1, that is CRAZY low...
Yep, sub-timings with 680i when tweaked right make all the difference....;)Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
the memory is freekin, honestly sick timings on such clocks
OPB, wonder how you treat that ram ...
yeah, makes me want to play with one SO bad, kinda reminds me of K8's memory controller :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
Nice one OPB :clap: :toast:
So are we going to see 8minute 32M on Conroe or do we have to wait for Penryn?
Volts on the RAM? I'm guessing at least 2.8. :p:
here was voltages
Quote:
my setting for this time 32m run:
Vdimm: 2.575v (Vmod on EVGA A1 board)
CPU under LN2 for 1.875v, normally I use 1.75v for pi 1m)
SPP use 1.40v
MCP 1.575v
VFSB CPU: 1.4v
HTT: 1.35v
Only 2.6v, eh? Not bad at all.
Congrats!!
Congrats!! :woot:
nice sub timings...:D no
OPB shutting mouths at it's finest...:clap:
congrats opb, now show us some 1m action....
Congrats OPB:clap:
dammit.. that's insane!!! 624 4334... congrats man!
Marco
hit prediction
anyone with P965 and RAM at 4-4-4-x timings should be able to take this score down at same MHz
cough waits for Vince to crank it a little more ;)
NICE TIME WITH 680i :toast: ..................
Question is can the 965 achieve the same MHz ?Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
why not? you mean because of the cold bugs on them or slightly more jittery voltage stability to 680iQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
vince has already benched the CPU higher i think..............he's not done yet i'm sure .............but this feat from OPB is certainly great considering it's nvidia chipset :)
Subtimings with NV is the key.
seeeeeeee..............
Very compliments, with 680 it's very hard to reach this score, probably impossible!! :)
Wow....im totally impressed......:clap: ...those memtimings are awesome:eek:
very good boy,you are the wizzard of fake...but now,tell me,what is the trick?:D
Master piece of Super Pi Art!!~Congrats!
:eek: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo really common now?Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
I actually meant fro ma RAM MHz point of view - this is where the nvidia really has the upper handQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
^^ exactly. what 965 board is going to take RAM that high WITH those subtimings. i know for me, as soon as i start really tightening subtimings on 965 i start getting unstable real fast.
Very nice there mate
But tighter timings on nF6 don't mean faster times... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] itznfb
Nice time indeed. :)
you mean on 965 it doesn't make as much of difference?Quote:
Originally Posted by before
no; AFAIK 965 doesn't need to have the nF6 very tight timings to be faster at the end.
Perhaps, though I think this can only be applied to a certain degree, at some point the 965 will simply run out of steam even at looser timings, and I believe this could be the opportunity that the nF6 chipset needs to take advantage of the situation - either way though this is going to be great fun, a bit like an AMD Intel battle, who will be the better chipset for Spi ? I look forward to people on both platforms pushing their systems to see who is the victor :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by before
I am sure I am not the only mod thats watching this thread so please keep it clean and no accusations/flaming/fighting or a ban will be handed out as fast as you post it. NO OCX vs. XS AT ALL!!!
Man nice scores keep up the good work
Appreciated njkid32.
Yea; you may be right... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
BTW I've tested both chipsets and never succeeded in getting faster times with NF6 clock-for-clock even with tighter timings.
This is the stuff that dreams are made of, a good CPU, some very good cooling, awesome ram and a freaking fast 32M run..
Congrats bro! :toast:
Yeah this I could believe, in a straight apples for apples comparison the 965 will be faster than the nF6, and AFAIK the 975 is faster again in comparison to the 965 chipset. Then conversely the 975 will top out first in terms of FSB followed by the the 965 then finally the 680i. I would surmise though if someone were to get some serious cooling on the ol' 965 then it would give the nF6 a pretty hard time :)Quote:
Originally Posted by before
In 32m it isn't even in 1:1 ratio, one other + for 965 is that ram can be set much higher then on 975X, and 32M test is all about what u do with your ram (of course well tweaked win and cpu that can make 5350 32M is must have for WR)Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
I was very surprised none of that have came up yet, and Im impressed. Hopefully it stays that and its good to see that you also want to keep it clean :)Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Back on topic, as Ive already said, great time OPB :toast:
I only dream of having a kit like that :slobber:
Johnny i don't know if you've tested 680i against intel chipset but i can tell you right now........for SuperPI P965 wins hands down with looser timings hence why i said what i said.....and people can bench with CAS4 past 650MHz so there's plenty of headroom it's just a matter of having the right CPU that can reach those MHzQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
i've been on nvidia's case through my contact about SPI performance since they sent me the motherboard for testing and they have not addressed it at all that i can tell........guess isn't important enough for them..........Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
Hardly hands down mate ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=682
Though once I've had a go at the sub 4GHz 1M run on this platform I'll be moving to my QuadGT so then I'll be better able to answer your statement :toast:
Don't get me wrong here as I just simply want to see this but can you provide me a few screen shots of folk running at this still FSB/CAS on a 965 platform, I'm just curious to see the platform setup, cheers.Quote:
....and people can bench with CAS4 past 650MHz so there's plenty of headroom
John
bit of searching will uncover that for you :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
680i is slower in superpi....bottom line.....here is a link in my thread
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&postcount=41
i had to jump from 400MHz 4-4-4-x on P965 to 550MHz 4-4-4-x on 680i to beat P965 lol
obviously i could have also tightened the primary and secondary timings more but i didn't touch P965 at all as i wanted to give people an idea what they do straight from the box ....
Granted but this is where we differ I guess, if we're gonna go after world records and what not then everything is up for tweaking ;) Like I said I haven't moved over to the 965 platform but from what I've seen so far the 680i is not dead and buried just yet, but it's very different creature to the Intel chipsets. Come to think of it it's more like tweaking an A64 in many ways, I think we all just got a little lazy went me moved over to the c2d scene, maybe it's time to look at the old benching notes....Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
i don't know about comparing the complexities of A64tweaking IN THE EARLY DAYS with TCCD and BH5......it was not easy and cold temps use to make the CPU IMC behave different so you have to re-learn the RAM and some wouldn't clock well at alllQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
i agree about tweaking with you and trust me no matter how much tweaking you do it will not really compare to 965 with the same hardware........well in some instances it may depending on how well the RAM dividers work with both mobos.....
take the 3.6GHz SuperPI 32M challenge..............it's extremely difficult to get to sub 13m........EXTREMELY difficult and the only board that did it is P965....680i are not even close even with 4-3-3-tight subtimings.....eva2000 showed many that 680i is not a throwaway just yet but it still isn't close to top performers
we all know that 5/10/15/20 seconds in 32M is a LOT
if OPB with his tweaks could run a 3.6GHz 32M time with supertight timings at say 1200MHz or above it would be nice to see how far off 13m mark he would be
I like a challenge, see you on the flip side ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
good on ya :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Langley
..............:D .............
......good risult.....