REMOVED UNTIL PERKHAM APPOLOGISES PUBLICLY FOR UNJUSTIFIED HARRASMENT
Printable View
REMOVED UNTIL PERKHAM APPOLOGISES PUBLICLY FOR UNJUSTIFIED HARRASMENT
^^^ Have to log into site to get it ^^^
Im too lazy to create new account :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by [cTx]Philosophy
No probs, I've attached it at the top for those ppl without an account, I forgot you needed one to be honest...my bad :doh:
Nice score there bud for non-tweaked. You should be able to squeeze quite a boost when you max it. I'll edit a TOP 10 list for fun :)
This is nice bench :)
Conroe: 3.8GHz
NB: 1066 strap
mem:4-4-4-6 timings 529MHz
Attachment 55520
Indeed, nice score. It's actually the new version we running here bud. Download it up top. You get a slight score boost with the new version also I find :)
I'll add you but can you re-run pls?
EDIT.......
Jeez your only 1K off topping last years DC champ :) Klassic
:woot: updatedQuote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
So far with a few things running. I'll go for over 10,000 later :D CPU speed is actually at 3.2ghz.
here is mine so far: 13672
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/5...titled0oe0.jpg
:eek: That's an awesome score mate, very very well done, congrats :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyz
That's the highest DC score I've seen on this bench.
Here you have my score for a E6600 @ 3600
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1170923214
Nuclearus.JPG
JP
3919, I think this is the first time i've ever been #1 at anything :banana:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3.../nuclearus.jpg
I'll test the X2 tomorrow.
All updated guys :)
Heres my little 6300 @ 3149 :(
P5B DLX arrived here yesterday, still waiting for the Tuniq Tower 120 until I rip her apart and see what this beast will really do..
Had fun with my opty 146.
http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/204/piltup5.th.jpg
all updated, nice scores guys
E6400 @ 3.4 MHz
got 10022
http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/1756/nucleargi5.jpg
updated :) I'll be off the top 10 soon :sick: :p:
Updated...CPU @ 3.4ghz!
Here's mine...
all updated guys, nice list we getting here.
Anymore QUAD-CORES wanna try it, SINGLE-CORES too?
C'mon ppl, lets show what XS users can do ;)
Hey Soldner-mofo64,
Sorry I should've mentioned I'm running two dual core Xeons, a pair of 5060's, proggy doesn't read HT otherwise it would see eight cpu's lol. It just reads it as a Quad core for some reason. A kentie or a pair of Woodies would kick my ass lol.
Are you gonna have a separate dual processor list.?
Cheers, D.
Edit.. Here's my E6600 running at 3.9ghz :D
Updated :)
Sure bud, I've added in the dual processor section. Thanx for informing me of your XEONS.
I notice it's the older version you've run also. This is now a new version RED LABELS, the final build which actually gives most users a small boost over previous builds. It's attached in two files on the first post of this thread. Do you think you could re-run the new version please so as to keep everyone the same?
Thanx.
opty 165 3ghz +
Gskill HS 275 3-4-4-10
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g2...uclearusMC.jpg
Hey, you look familiar :p:
Darn nice score you got yourself there aswell bud...........klass ;)
updated :)
Old XP-M 2600+
Good one there bud.....:clap: .....updated
what mobo you runnin' that in?
downloading now ...
5776-X2 3800@2589ghz
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...gcarcas/x2.jpg
:toast:
My setup sucks.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../Nuclearus.jpg
Opty 165 @ 3.2GHz 1.53v, 247MHz mem (2.5-4-3-8 1T) on water:
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6...rus7743fm8.png
HOLY OC's :eek2: Than's an awesome score m8.....crazy fast chip you got there :)Quote:
Originally Posted by spdycpu
That's also the older version you've run, you'll get a small increase if you re-run the new version attached to my first post in this thread.
All updated :)
Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention apparently. I glanced and saw "1.0.0 [Final]" and assumed I had the same. It may be less confusing if it was changed to 1.0.1 (even though I see "Red Labels" was added).Quote:
Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64
Looks like "Red Labels" is slower for me:
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/9...rus7589ww8.png
x6800 @3840MHz stock cooling Intel
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8...re38402zl8.jpg
Just re-ran it with the latest version..
Good score Spdycpu, us 2x1 gig guys cant compete with that crazy tight 2x512
ram. That BH5 kinda stuff always wins in the benchies.
updated :) Thanx for the re-runs Dualist.
NEW RED LABELS VERSION is attached to first post in this thread :)
Was there any specific Intel optimization done? It looks like whatever was done relative to the non-red label build is slower for AMD systems and faster on Intels.Quote:
Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdycpu
I'm not exactly sure mate. I wondered myself.
The only problem is, I and a few others I know who've run it on AMD's actually got an increase aswell. So I am kinda surprised these submitted here aren't :confused:
I'm running my 2600+ on a modded NF7-S. I'm currently looking for an old DFI Nforce board (hint hint) to achieve a higher FSB. My NF7 is limited to @245.
I've got a DFI nF2 Ultra Infinity thats been sittin in the closet a year and a half now. Was gonna do a game server build, or use it for torrents, but 939 stuff so cheap now. Cant vouch for how high it will go, I could never get my xp3200 to overclock at all.
Opty 144@3015Mhz
http://img349.imageshack.us/img349/9...4838ye8.th.jpg
If your willing to part with it, I'd be interested. We can discuss the details in PM.
Just setup my HDD to dual boot XP and Vista. My first score was run in Vista.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...1/NewScore.jpg
Here is what I got.
news result ;)
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/4...re41802gd1.jpg
Here comes the new king in single core :D
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/2...126origcn6.jpg
Nice boost there m8, VISTA POWER :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Major_A
Cool score, thanx for submitting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lu523
Klass.....another 13k'er :DQuote:
Originally Posted by danysm73
Good score bud, congrats :)
Good score there bud......added :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gam3Ra
ALL UPDATED GUYS
I have found a new version of nuclearus here: 1.2.0
http://cp.people.overclockers.ru/cgi...=NuclearMC.rar
new score: 4903
http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/4...4903tl8.th.jpg
Nice find mate, thanx for that......added :)
heres my lowly quad :(
http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/474/17754ry0.jpg
2GB @ 4-4-4-12
@ 1:1 L1/L2 @ 19,xxxMB/s
@ 4:5 L1/L2 @ 17,xxxMB/s
nice quad/octal benchmark!
10525 Here:)
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/5566/mnrlk8.jpg
Re-benched my Xeons with the new version...
12905..!! :D
:eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
updated
Hey guys I would like to try this out but I cant read the language on the page can someone please make it in English or send me a direct link to the download?
This is the best we can do for now. No direct link will work for this at the moment.Quote:
Originally Posted by littleowl
Go to this page here DOWNLOAD, and click the link NuclearusMC.rar
okay, a few more of my own :)
5212 on 3700+ @ 3258mhz
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...2at3215Mhz.jpg
6371 on X2-3800 (939) @ 2683mhz
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e364/mofo64/6371.jpg
SOLDNER hi m8 ill get it run in a bit had a leek on my comp lol
:up: Hey bud, nice to see you here. :clap:
Sorry to hear about your accident :)
I'll reserve you a slot shall I? ;)
This test likes RAM bandwidth, high FSBs and hates Vista. I re-ran it after adding another GB of RAM. I had to lower my RAM speed but got an extra 100 Mhz out of my CPU in the process. I figured the added CPU speed would make up for the lower performing RAM, nope. It also seems the 1.2 version runs slower than the 1.0.0.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ZNuclearus.jpg
I agree with RAM bandwith
new score with a better ram frequency:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7...5144ym2.th.jpg
Have you run 1.2 on your XP install m8?Quote:
Originally Posted by Major_A
Congrats on 5k bud......nice 1 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawker
Nope, I scraped my XP install. I was spending more time in Vista and rebooting to play a game turned into a pain.Quote:
Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64
Updated with my second stick of OCZ (from RMA! :D ) Later I'm going to go for a 11,000 pass. Core speed was actually 3550mhz.
updated....nice :)
100pts left and it will be good enough :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64
blackhawker...That's a nice score for a single core Opteron! :D
indeed, but mofo64 is too near
competition will be difficult with such a good 3700
12030 for a start
Updated....CPU speed @ 3.6ghz.
new score with single core version: 5262 pts :D
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3...5262hd7.th.jpg
nex version of nuclearus MC: 1.2.1
I have uploaded it here: http://anonyme.archive-host.com/nucl...3i0s5qjryt.rar
it would be a good benchmark but there is FAR too much variation from one build to the next, so theres literally no consistency between the benchmarks if one person is using a different version.
why do Cores take such a big dip in 8 Queens in the multithreaded version 1.2 and score about 3 times higher in version 1.0...
:worship: to Kunaak! Excellent score!
updated with nuclearusMC 1.2.1:
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/4...5275ez2.th.jpg
:D
Air cooled 13k dual core
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9...4150pt7.th.jpg
I've bench it in a while, now don't have time to bench it again with the newer version:(
Sorry for the delay guys, been a little busy......all updated :)
Congrats on TOP AMD SC Blackhawker ;)
Nice score there Kunaak
AMD and CPU singlecore, I have the best score for single core :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/2...ejs2ay7.th.jpg
Zalman 9500 cooled on P5b-Dlx
9148
edit: Kunaaks cpu is a single CPU quad core, its a LGA775 Xeon Kentsfield.
Fear the Thunderbird.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...2121/TBird.jpg
This bad boy runs 24/7 out in Texas weather. Talk about a durable chip.
my score should not be the top score considering that most use version 1.2 which is much slower then 1.0 cause the 8 queens score is so different from one build to the next.
I did not show that pic to get the top score...
but to hopefully get the programmer to try and make a more fair version of this benchmark.
Withs version must be used ?
Hey guys new to this forums and saw this, i thought i wouold have a crack.
My system is bone stock now tweeking wat so eva. E6600, ATI1950pro, 2gig DDR2. Need new board the MSI P965 Neo isnt cutting it, not too many overclocking features. Heres My Score anyway.
I did try overclocking a little bit and got this. I did try to overclock a little bit and got this. I was using vista the other day but found that things didnt like it yet, so reverted back to XP
It's time to improve WR with vista :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ganador
Aircooled opty144@3235MHz
2*512MB@270MHz@1.5-2-2-2 1T
5359
http://ceemic.pri.ee/oc/nmc5359.JPG
:D
I think I have to improve my score ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ceemic
good score N°1 :clap:
Little better score this time :)
Conroe 4GHz
Attachment 56256
What do you guys think..would this be nice benchmark to HWbot?
This is my score.
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/2...clearusht2.jpg
By what im seeing is the best mobo for the conros the ASUS P5B Deluxe, seems like everyone has one.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5517/xxou9.jpg
v1.0.0 should be available for download till v1.2 is fixed
v1.2 for the 8-core guys
That's an INSANE score there NAPALM.....truely extreme. You only have 1k to go and your the highest scoring ever! :)
Way to go bud ;)
__________________________________________________ _______________
UPDATED:- Well done everyone.........all present and correct, sir :D
Interesting benchmark
Q6600@9x387 = 3485Mhz
2:3 580mhz 4-4-4-5 memory clocks
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5B..._121_16883.png
Time to give it a try :)
E6600 @ 3.0GHz, the rest as per sig :)
The system results window really needs to be modified for this benchie, its nearly impossible to read
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...Nuclarus-1.jpg
http://img469.imageshack.us/img469/1629/57980291hc2.jpg
done! didnt really wanted to go over 22089 since this will get squashed by other quad-core guys here anyway, i just wanted to get very close at lower clock and happened to go 3 over.. sorry
:toast:
Mofo64: there is a problem with the singlecore, the first is an AMD, not an InTEL