http://bbs.expreview.com/attachments/1_k4PUO0M8R228.jpg
http://bbs.expreview.com/attachments/2_nuUKyOGolZo4.jpg
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/graph..._chip_0004.jpg
Printable View
Oh, wow. Only thing missing is the animation. Hope it is as good as the graphics :D
Hotness+Technology=Great Success....NIIIIIIIICCCCEEE!
wonder if she has any black heads :-P The detail is amazing.
You cannot tell from 2d pictures of course but the eyes have it in the third picture, excellent realism apart from the white highlight
This card seems to have incredibly good none angle dependent AF and good AA to boot.
And it is fast as f*ck
:woot:
Nvidia have delivered in spades this time.
Celebrate good times,come on! (Let's celebrate)
Celebrate good times, come on! (Let's celebrate)
There's a party goin' on right here
A celebration to last throughout the years
So bring your good times, and your laughter too
We gonna celebrate your party with you
Come on now
It's time to come together
It's up to you, what's your pleasure
Everyone around the world
Come on!
We're gonna have a good time tonight
Let's celebrate, it's all right
We're gonna have a good time tonight
Let's celebrate, it's all right
Baby...
Yeah baby ...... :D .. not bad for a still independent company apart from the big boys ;)
Regards
Andy
Face pics? I prefer other demonstrations of polygon rendering.
yep they still can craft a good replica of a skank
No comment here... i don't see the point...any video card can render that...the difference is only in the amount of time it takes to render it.
The hardware has no actual affect on what the rendered object looks like other than the time it takes to render it lol...
Perkam
All I have to say is Christopher Knight is a lucky guy. :)
This is what a m8 of mine said after i gave him the link to the pics:
i think her nose looks wierd. Kinda like PinockiosQuote:
jesus thats almost wacking quility
That's scary, and yeah I'm wondering what moving graphics this card is capable of when pushed to the limits, I hope it destroys what we see on xbox360 and even the PS3.
You miss the point completely perkham, yes any card can do that but when it comes to marketing and delivering in 3d they have to tie in what they wish and what the card can deliver. Of course the 2d shots will always be better but there has to be some correlation.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Lets see some old Ati and nvidia 2d shots so we can contrast and compare how good the 2d to 3d then was compared to this.
Go on, stick em up and lets judge, lets see Ruby in 2D on X1800, or Dawn on nvidia
Regards
Andy
Someone did a LOT of "polishing" on that project :D
________
MEDICAL MARIJUANA
Filmmakers have been using character modelling for almost a decade, andy...the G80 is a big leap in the direction towards more powerful 3d rendering but i fail to see how a single picture makes a difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
If the G80 can render at that level of quality in real time (and i think they'll release that after launch)...thats the thread i'll be looking forward to :)
Perkam
That's my point, they do 2d with what they can get away with regarding 3d and so it should be uniform from FX / R350 onwards so in this case are you not impressed with what they can get away with in in 2D this time ?Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Or are you saying nvidia are taking it too extreme and making the gap bigger ?
Who knows, we will see.
Regards
Andy
My bad...all i'm concerned with is processing power...and in this case...polygon processing power :D Unfortunately one picture isn't a judge of that :(Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
Perkam
Very true. It will all come out in the wash I am sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Exciting times ahead though :)
Regards
Andy
What we require is a real time demo, a videoQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
You dont even need a video card to render it, ok you need one to display it :PQuote:
Originally Posted by perkam
I want to see more than just the face. The most important part with a lot of polygons is missing :/
can you do 16-bit color on that pic, it took me 15 min to load those pics!
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
I 2nd that notion, that would be a real test of GPU capabilities.
the only un releastic portion IMO is the eyelashes they dont have any reflection or color distortion due to ambient light otherwise at a glance that is some hella realistic rendering
wow, I think I'd hate to see a rendering of myself that looks better than the real thing.
She is definitely not as cute as this thread would have me believe.
only I can say WWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOWWWWW MY GOD!
does she really have such a pointy rat-nose?
yes, and its a nice nose :stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
i'd hit it !
"adrianne curry" patch anyone ?:D
link removed as requested :S
:p
Wrong post.
huh? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by korby
it's not about the thread, it's about the nude patch :D. and i bet there will be some kind of nude patch for the lovely madame curry :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by korby
Oops, my mistake. :slap:
muh..... doesn't impress me the least.
Thats not even GPU qualities they are showing there. just a artist who slaved HOURS and HOURS to get the bump map/however you wanna call it in order.
The eyes are "just" a normal shader used by about every single 3DsMax user with a few twists to it...
Seriusly it doesn't impress me one dam bit.
Now a "fluid" demo, with glowing fluids or some sorth dancing and twisting and shapeshifting etc now THAT could impress me of its shader qualities and rendering performance not to mention quality of picture.
This i can do on my Xeon...
Seriusly no offence but... This is far from impressing
Korby you have a nice YGPM waiting for you :)
Perkam
This makes me want to go to nvidia again. Been gone since the geforce 2 mx days.
God so that is all they can show us.
Go back to studies is far better than see something that even my G4 can do.
Thanks anyway.
Remember we're at XS forums btw guys. It's alright for us to laugh at it, but think what alot of fickle, non-savvy, deep-pocketed consumers are going to be thinking:
"Ooh. Me see laady. Lady look niiice. Ug buy card! UG BUY CARD FAST!!!"
Superb :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: This is Great Stuff :cool:
Actually, props to Nvidia. I just google imaged this chick and she is nowhere near that hot in real life.
:slobber: :slobber: Nvidias new babe :slobber:
A nude patch for her face?? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by RaZz!
All it does is take off the makeup, undo her hair and add the blemishes back ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3ak
playboy models do it best
Well, for your viewing pleasure...Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GglmrDSbubY
It's not the exact same quality as the pre-rendereds but i find it pretty amazing for a real-time demo. The poly-count is kinda ridiculous in that there are no visible facets at all - it almost looks like a subdivision surface mesh within a 3D app.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
QFT.
it might even be cool if it was real time.
Honestly the faces in Crysis look just as detailed and realistic.
thats a joke right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybercat
Is that the girl who married the brady bunch guy? I didn't think she was that hot to begin with and was quite an annoying dumb broad....:D
Dude, i posted the real-time link 2 posts above yours lol. Check it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
lol