Official Nvidia 680i SLI Review Thread

Printable View

11-04-2006, 02:34 PM
Charles Wirth

Official Nvidia 680i SLI Review Thread
http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/1...0slivs4.th.jpg http://img473.imageshack.us/img473/1...lockfp2.th.gif http://img477.imageshack.us/img477/8...gpussr2.th.jpg

EVGA, XFX, BFG, ECS, BIOSTAR are all reference design. Foxconn will introduce it`s own. No words from other manufacturers.

Reviews :

Reference NVidia 680 SLI @ XbitLabs
Competitors :
- ASUS P5W DH Deluxe (Intel 975X Express)
- ASUS P5B Deluxe (Intel P965 Express)
EVGA 680i SLI @ Anandtech
Competitors :
- ASUS P5W-DH Deluxe (Intel 975X)
- Intel 975XBX (Intel 975X)
- ASUS P5B Deluxe (Intel P965)
- ASUS P5N32-SLI (nF4 SLIX16 Intel)
- Biostar TForce P965 Deluxe (Intel P965)
- Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6 (Intel P965)
- DFI Infinity 975X/G (Intel 975X)
- ASRock 775Dual-VSTA (VIA PT880 PRO)
EVGA 680 SLI @ TechReport
Competitors :
- Asus P5B Deluxe Wifi-AP Edition (Intel P965)
- Asus P5W DH Deluxe (Intel 975X)
- Asus P5N32-SLI SE Deluxe (NForce 4 SLI)
- Asus P5NSLI (NForce 570 SLI)
- Asus P5N32-SLI Premium (NForce 590 SLI)
EVGA 680 SLI @ VR-Zone with Kentsfield OCing
Competitor :
- ASUS P5WDH Deluxe (i975x Chipset)
11-07-2006, 11:15 PM
Senater_Cache

Well it isnt an external review but it is a guy giving us a mini-rundown of the eVGA board here on XS
Link
11-08-2006, 10:58 AM
Major_A

X-bit
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/chi...-680i-sli.html
11-08-2006, 11:16 AM
mykeos

that's rather dissappointing:(
hope evga made a better board
11-08-2006, 11:41 AM
Sneil

yikes, not to impressed with x-bit's review. Mybe Asus's version will do better, regardless of how ugly it is.
11-08-2006, 01:04 PM
Turtle 1

The power consumpstion on the X-bit review was eye opening
11-08-2006, 01:07 PM
Sheik

TechReport

Quote:

With our second 680i board, we were able to push the front-side bus all the way up to 490MHz. It was perfectly stable at that speed cranking Prime95 and the rthdribl HDR lighting demo, too. 495MHz would post, but fail to load Windows, while 500MHz wouldn't post at all.

Not content to limit our overclocking escapades to the front-side bus, we turned our attention to the memory. Nvidia shipped the board with a pair of Corsair Dominator CM2X1024-9136C5D DIMMs rated for 5-5-5-15 timings at 1142MHz on the nForce 680i SLI, and we were able to push them to 1200MHz on the board.
11-08-2006, 02:08 PM
afireinside

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2869
11-08-2006, 03:18 PM
Yoxxy

No tests with QX is a bit dissapointing as it would be nice to see if the processor has FSB troubles as Fugger and it looks Kingpin had while using the board.
11-08-2006, 03:21 PM
Cooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoxxy

No tests with QX is a bit dissapointing as it would be nice to see if the processor has FSB troubles as Fugger and it looks Kingpin had while using the board.

I think this is more related to BIOS immaturity - not the board itself.
11-08-2006, 04:00 PM
oshox

Any word on the 650i Ultra?
I'm planning a Core 2 Duo build, non-SLI/Xfire, and the features on this board seem right about perfect for what I'll be doing.
I'm just wondering if the OC ability on this board has been intentionally crippled, like it was with the 500-series.

And I apologize for the off-topic, btw, but this question is not worthy of starting a new thread.
11-08-2006, 04:45 PM
nealh

So who is correct on power consumption..Techreport or Xbit
11-08-2006, 04:51 PM
Cooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by nealh

So who is correct on power consumption..Techreport or Xbit

Both used different loading applications and TechReport even included monitor`s and speakers` power consumption in the graf. But 975 and 965 consumptions show opposite behavior.
11-08-2006, 05:02 PM
nealh

I was more concerned regarding the hughe difference of 20-30W(well even up to 50w) at Xbit
11-08-2006, 05:13 PM
darkandlong

At least the AT article points out the craptastic placement of the front panel connectors. Talk about dumb. I like the layout otherwise. Not sure I'll upgrade from my DS3 though, gaming benches look about the same. My E6600 isn't a golden chip anyways.
11-08-2006, 05:24 PM
tjelaw

I already sold my P5W-DH, gonna order this one as soon as I have the money. (its in stock at my vendor in NL)

The P5W makes me cry every night when I go to bed :'( cant even get 360x10 orthos stable with both a retail E6700 and a E6700 ES B1.... like..... dude
11-08-2006, 05:28 PM
Kunaak

Anandtech hit 525 FSB with thier EVGA 680i :D
11-08-2006, 05:34 PM
Metroid

Asus Strike Gamer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kunaak

Anandtech hit 525 FSB with thier EVGA 680i :D

That is funny other website review no more than 449 FSB I think was xbitlabs something like that.
11-08-2006, 05:44 PM
darkandlong

Of the EVGA(ref)/Asus/Abit boards it certainly looks like the Abit 680i is the best layout (IMHO) until they fix that front panel thing.

ATI/DFI's turn...
11-08-2006, 06:09 PM
nealh

ATI mobo I saw somewhere stated it looked like a Q1 2007

BTW...is there a vdroop on this mobo?
11-08-2006, 06:12 PM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by nealh

ATI mobo I saw somewhere stated it looked like a Q1 2007

BTW...is there a vdroop on this mobo?

Vdroop is for Intel chipsets, not third party ones.
11-08-2006, 07:58 PM
GrimReaper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metroid

That is funny other website review no more than 449 FSB I think was xbitlabs something like that.

yeah xbit had issues going over 449FSB :confused: and the memory didnt seemingly overclock that well compared to the 965,

The same cpu used in xbit easily hit 500fsb on 965 board but couldnt do over 449 on the evga.. Maybe it needs a new bios? :D
11-08-2006, 08:01 PM
Metroid

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimReaper

yeah xbit had issues going over 449FSB :confused: and the memory didnt seemingly overclock that well compared to the 965,

The same cpu used in xbit easily hit 500fsb on 965 board but couldnt do over 449 on the evga.. Maybe it needs a new bios? :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by XBITLABS

So, if you are happy with the today’s Intel 975X Express and Intel P965 Express based mainboards, then there is no need for you to switch to Nvidia nForce 680i SLI. As for us, we will continue testing new Nvidia nForce 600i chipset family for Intel platform as soon as we get our hands on the mainboards based on manufacturer’s own design, not the reference. And hopefully most of the problems we have described in our today’s articles will go away with the new BIOS versions and new design layouts.

Maybe Xbitlabs.com works for intel :D
11-09-2006, 01:23 AM
tjelaw

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metroid

Maybe Xbitlabs.com works for intel :D

Maybe so, but i'm totally not happy with my 975x board, so gonna buy it anyway :P
11-09-2006, 07:51 AM
Konflikt

Anybody test asus striker extreme? Amazing mobo, i think so:)
11-09-2006, 11:49 AM
Trice

:nono:

Quote:

Originally Posted by nealh

ATI mobo I saw somewhere stated it looked like a Q1 2007

BTW...is there a vdroop on this mobo?

Thats for the R600, aka GPU, not the RD600.
11-09-2006, 11:59 AM
Ad1tya

Lol.. just coz it has a LOT of heatpipes, doesnt mean its an amazing mobo.

Im just counting on Asus to :banana::banana::banana::banana: it up again.. Lol...
11-23-2006, 05:05 PM
Red_Sonja

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konflikt

Anybody test asus striker extreme? Amazing mobo, i think so:)

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...preview/1.html

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9...viewvy7.th.jpg

nice