C2D
E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333)
E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333)
E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066)
E6850 (3.00G/4M/FSB1333)
another E6XXX (2.13G/2M/FSB1066 without VT)
Bearlake-G named G33
Bearlake-G+ G35
Bearlake-P P35
Bearlake-X X38 (replace i975X)
matbe.com
Printable View
C2D
E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333)
E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333)
E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066)
E6850 (3.00G/4M/FSB1333)
another E6XXX (2.13G/2M/FSB1066 without VT)
Bearlake-G named G33
Bearlake-G+ G35
Bearlake-P P35
Bearlake-X X38 (replace i975X)
matbe.com
If those aren't the most mediocre speed-increases I've seen for a long time..
Is it simply an increase in FSB, or are there going to be some more optimizations done??
Best Regards :toast:
Not possible, typo? This is obviously a 1066 part....as in the X6800. ;)Quote:
E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1333)
I also expect that these will be B3 stepping Conroes.
what does intel ?txt mean? only new batch has those checked?
Yes,it is FSB 1066Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
I'm wrong :slap:
better stepping, yay 4.3GHz conroe on air?? i'd take that over a 3.7GHz quad core for games. not just money wise but performance wise as well
E6800 is what ill get b4 yorkfield or K8L
yeah also is it confirmed that these are B3 stepping? cuz that will make a big difference.
The lower multi's mean tougher overclocking - the e6850 will have the same multi as a e6600 - so unless overclocks are significantly higher, I couldn't justify the increase in price.
A range of 800fsb part would be far more interesting.
C2D
E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333) 7x333
E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333) 8x333
E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066) 11x266
E6850 (3.00G/4M/FSB1333) 9x333
E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066)
This could be a nice overclocker, 11x multi :D, I wonder how expensive it will be.
hopefully these 1333 CPU's dont come on a neuterd motherboard, like the Badaxe is at 1333 strap.
that would just suck.
True,this is acctually bad news for overclocking; lower multies and all.
Maybe they will sell them cheaper with Kentsfield just around the corner??
I ask because I don't like the idea of a E6300/6400 (overclocked by Intel) and then sold to us for 300$-500$ as E6650/6750
________
MASTURBATION :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:
Quote:
Originally Posted by onewingedangel
Now THAT would be a real BANG for BUCK as far as overclocking goes
9x200fsb 1.8 GHz sold at a price of current E6300, man that baby would overclock to 4GHz on air for sure (especialy if it would be B3)
Who knows, maybe as future Celerons or some thing...
________
LovelyWendie
More here
DailyTech has stumbled across Intel’s latest roadmap that reveals the naming scheme for its upcoming Bearlake chipsets. Bearlake is Intel’s upcoming replacement for the current Broadwater 96x series of chipsets and expected to arrive in 2007. Six variants of Bearlake are expected in the form of Bearlake-Q, Bearlake-QF, Bearlake-X, Bearlake-P, Bearlake-G+ and Bearlake-G. Intel’s upcoming Bearlake series has been named the “3 Series.” On the vPro side of things, Bearlake-Q and Bearlake-QF have been named Intel Q35 and Q33 Express respectively. Consumer high end chipsets Bearlake-X and Bearlake-P will receive the Intel X38 and P35 Express names respectively while mainstream Bearlake-G+ and Bearlake-G receive the Intel G35 and G33 names.
Intel’s upcoming X38 Express chipset is expected to replace the current Intel 975X Express chipset. The X38 Express brings new features such as PCI Express 2.0 compatibility as well as two full speed PCI Express x16 slots. DDR3 1333 will be the memory standard of choice. On the premium and mainstream side of things is Intel’s G33, G35 and P35 Express chipsets. Intel’s upcoming G33 Express chipset will feature a graphics core that features Intel Clear Video Technology. Memory support on G33 Express will be limited to DDR3-1066 or DDR2-800. Front-side bus speeds of 1333 MHz are supported with the mainstream G33 Express. Stepping up a notch is the G35 Express which features a DirectX 10 compatible graphics core. G35 Express will fully support high definition content playback with HDCP protection. DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 and a 1333 MHz front-side bus are also supported. Intel’s P35 Express will be similar to G35 Express except with the integrated graphics core removed. Intel’s X38, G33, G35 and P35 will be paired with upcoming ICH9, ICH9R and ICH9DH south bridges.
Moving into 2007 are new platforms as well. The current Averill vPro professional platform will be replaced by the upcoming Weybridge Pro platform. Weybridge Pro is expected to arrive in Q3’07 and based around Intel’s Q35 Express chipset. New features to Weybridge Pro include Intel’s AMT Pro and Intel Trusted Execution Technology (TXT). Intel’s Trusted Execution Technology is new and is designed to protect sensitive information from software attacks. This is performed without compromising usability. Weybridge Pro will also support Intel’s upcoming 1333 MHz front-side bus processors as well.
Catered towards business users that don’t need advanced management capabilities is the Weybridge Fundamental platform which is expected to arrive the same time as Weybridge Pro. Weybridge Fundamental is based around Intel’s upcoming Q33 Express chipset and adds support for Intel’s AMT technology—a feature only available on Intel’s vPro platform. In addition to Intel AMT, Weybridge Fundamental will be upgraded to support 1066 MHz front-side bus processors. While there’s no platform naming, Intel will also position its 946GZ chipset with Pentium D and Pentium E1000 series processors towards the budget business user.
On the desktop side of things, Intel’s enthusiast platform retains the Extreme Platform moniker, albeit the Intel X38 Express chipset replaces the current 975X Express chipset in Q3’07. Two premium/mainstream platforms will be available this time around in the form of Salt Creek and Santa Rosa Desktop. Salt Creek is based around Intel’s upcoming Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor and existing Core 2 Duo processors. Premium Salt Creek platforms will feature Intel’s P35, G35 and X38 chipsets while mainstream platforms will feature Intel’s G33 Express chipset. Santa Rosa Desktop systems will feature Core 2 Duo T7000 series processors coupled with Intel’s GM965 or PM965 Express chipsets and essentially be a mobile on desktop platform. Intel Extreme Platform, Salt Creek and Santa Rosa Desktop platforms are all part of Intel’s Viiv multimedia platform. At the value end of things is Intel’s 946GZ Express chipset paired with Intel Pentium E1000 and Celeron 400 series processors.
Lastly is Intel’s single processor workstation platform. Current Wyloway single processor platform based around Intel’s 975X Express chipset will be replaced by the upcoming Garlow WS platform. Garlow WS is expected to arrive Q3’07 and feature Intel’s upcoming X38 chipset with support for dual and quad-core processors.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4588
They probably will....but I'd also bet that BIOSs will start featuring strap control as boardmakers realize it's causing headaches....and memory manus are requesting it since it's making their products look bad in reviews.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
with how bad motherboard fsb overclock i odnt like the idea of lower multi :(
only great thing is b3 stepping this should fly
If one could extrapolate form this "Three refreshed models will debut with the upcoming Bearlake 3 series chipsets" and this "The upcoming Core 2 Duo E6800 will arrive clocked at 2.93 GHz?similar to Intel?s Core 2 Extreme X6800. The processor is expected to be Intel?s flagship processor for mainstream segments. Aside from the locked multiplier, the Core 2 Duo E6800 is identical to the Core 2 Extreme X6800."
One could conclude that they should be at least a bit cheaper than the ones we have now (MHz per $ at least)
________
Fix ps3
Well the 1.8ghz 800fsb allendale is coming in january, as part of the 4xxx series, 9x200, 2m cache, but with vt disabled. I was hoping for a whole range, including 4m cache parts all the way up to the x14 multi that I believe the conroe design tops out at.Quote:
Originally Posted by XS Janus
OC'ing should be a pain in the a** with these 333mhz fsp cpu's.
From the prescott super high multiplier days we come to the super high fsb days. :p:
Can't intel just pick the sweet spot?
Like we've got used to 266mhz fsb...
Who knows. Maybe the new chipset will go up to 800Mhz FSB and the memory ratios might actually work ;)
I like to see the E4+++ series.. :D any ES around???
Perhaps these will be relegated to the 'mainstream' segment that E6300/E6400 occupies? I've heard Wolfdale ES in April, shipping Oct/Nov:)
nice.. :D
that bearlake info is so old news, i wrote specs od desktop bearlake like 1 month ago (24th of september)
here is the info:
High End:
Bearlake-X Q3 2007(reemplazaria a bad axe 975)
FSB1333
PCI-Express 16x (2)
Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1333
Mainstream:
Bearlake-P Q2 2007(reemplazaria a P965)
FSB1333
PCI-Express 16x
Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1066
Integrada:
Bearlake-G Q2 2007 (reemplazaria a G965)
FSB1066
PCI-Express 16x
Soporte DDR2 800
Bearlake-G+ Q3 2007 (reemplazaria a G965)
FSB1333
PCI-Express 16x
Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1066
Source Chilehardware
looks nice :toast: :toast: :toast:
Too bad that I already have a E6600 CPU.
Why kill the 975X chipset that soon?
Would a E6600 at 9*333 be exactly as fast as a E6850 at stock?
If thats the case, I dont think there will be much of a performance boost over 266FSB CPUs.
Though it might be interesting if they come with B3 stepping.
But I would still prefer the 200*9 Allendale over any new Conroes :)
Why on hell did they name 2.33 GHz CPU E6650! If I'm correct "slot" for E6500 was empty?!
If I remember correctly 6650 is higher then 6600, but then again, E6650 will for sure be slower then 6600!
The e6600 may be discontinued by the time of release though.
WOW that will mean some serious earnings for Intel being that the new,Quote:
Originally Posted by onewingedangel
E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333) 7x333 and E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333) 8x333,
are only 6300/6400 with a 1333 FSB :slobber: :slobber:
Better buy them now while they are cheap :D
________
Lexus Sc Specifications
975X should have been killed by the time Conroe launched... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by GMK
Noob question, but will these 1333FSB chips work stock on an Asus P5W64 WS Pro? And does anyone know if the future quad-core chips will also work on said motherboard?
In my eyes the Intel chip sets are the best. When can we expect some reports of their performance?
IMO 2.4GHz w/ 1066FSB>2.33GHZ w/ 1333FSB.
in a lot of things atleast.
that new e6800 looks tempting :slobber:
any prices on that one?
can't wait to see some oc results.
i975X is an old piece.Quote:
Originally Posted by GMK
It's paired with ICH7, while mid-end P35 is paired w/ ICH9.
It was already time for a new high-end solution. ;)
yeah 975 is ancient :rofl:
joking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamsleath
Just a bit older then this old thread you dug up. :rolleyes:
QFT :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Here's to hoping for $120 E6320s...seeing is Barcelona is currently playing the role of Carmen Sandiego.
Perkam
so what should be the best choice?E6850 or a Q6600?prices would be the same from July,22nd.Keeping in mind that i probably wouldn't play games like supreme commander and Alan wake?