Printable View
Nice:toast: That DQ6 sure is clocked really high FSB..
i think that this aren't yours ?
and in Intel section there is an discussion whether these are fakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
Why shouldn't that be his? I don't think that coolaler would post fake results. ;)
Nice to see a steping 6 rev B2 ES chip lmao :slapass:
edit: but seeing the later post it must be a bug.... sorry :clap:
Step 6 ES?
Nice.. ROFL...
Its a sure fake.
confused......
why should coolaler post fakes?Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenfrag
raiden
Bug , fake or not :cool:
PLEASE VALID CPUZ !!!!!!
Thank you
as now stands, withouth cpuz verification link, it is more likely that those are fake.
if coolaler says that he had sth to do with those, maybe we could start believing
but Bromptoners published that before coolaler, so results are prob not his.
Bromptoners
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=118694
he already write in his first post, that the results are from a member of his forumQuote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
Quote:
Originally Posted by blander
aaaah, k... now everything seems to be ok =)
congratz ;)
could you please explain why such a poor score for superpi, it should be 14s?
It's 1.36.0 not 1.36;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiden Zero
no more explainQuote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
just watch info
that's single channel
Coolaler clealy link/write in the bottom of the first post "My forum member did" :) So no...its not he´s results.
CPU-Z actely sometimes DO reconice the B2 steppings as ES...just a cpu-z bug. seen it with a tray e6600 of mine also:)
Did you see the memory timings? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
Bug timmings memory or really ??
FYI, ES-chips with Step 6 exists, even though there are very few of them. As source OPB sold two of these a while ago over at ocx.
it's bug cpuz 1.36Quote:
Originally Posted by SIOUX
when ratio is 6 show E6200
ratio is 7 show E6300
ratio is 8 show E6400
but it's real X6800
After reading both threads this seems to be fine after all, great result :toast:
Just posting as much info about setup as you can would be nice :)
Yes..but i did not talk about the multiplier thing. i mean that B2 are seen by cpu-z as ES also happend to me..just a cpu-z bug:) i belive the results 100%:)
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
arghhh i don't get the same result or have the same hardware so it must be fake !!!
i'm loving that ^^^^ in a hilarious way
nice FSB coolaler's friend :clap:
Nice results coolaler
never see X6800 ES B2?so many in taiwan:fact:Quote:
Originally Posted by lookmomnobrains
We have a step6 x6800es , ı will post some over 5ghz result soon..:)Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenfrag
hehe:toast: good job;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandybuck
lol have seen 1 now.. :p: and already posted that i was rong :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
lmao that isn’t it at all.. its just that he first posted a cpu-z screeny whit his 600fsb that is bugged and a superpi shot that was a high for the 3.6 ghz he was hitting..Quote:
Originally Posted by Slay0r
so seeing that people stared to fink its fake sins he doesn’t post a cpu-z validation and also says noting about his cpu-z being budged, and it was his 4rd post..
after the peeps where saying it was fake, he replays that he cant valid his cpu-z and posts some more benches, that also isn’t helping much…
so its not strange at al that lots say it was fake…so if he just posted a cpu-z validation or at least a partly valid 1 there wouldn’t be a discussion
@coolaler
nevertheless
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/411...aneltp1.th.jpg
no problem:banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by lookmomnobrains
good jobQuote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
u r best:D
so sorry if you are insulted but without explaination it could still be a bugQuote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
like this
http://img466.imageshack.us/img466/1470/20614ki2.th.jpg
You reply too quicklyQuote:
Originally Posted by lookmomnobrains
I do not post cpuz urgent
I like step by step.
i don't care;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
it's not my results
... Bromptoners did already posted his results in the Intel section... that’s where the discussion was going on that it was fake.. was talking about that topic not this oneQuote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
and also that he posted it.. sins he is kind of new to forum and doesn’t have as much credit as you :)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=114581
but seeing it now..grads Bromptoners :woot:
weird double threads
Old cpu X6800es step5 b1 is a very bad (4800mhz 1.92v asus p5wdh ln2 -125 ) , we have 78.2k at 3d 2k1 orb#9 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9033244
New x6800es step6 b2 cpu 5.2ghz spi 1m , 5.1ghz 3d benchable 1.76v on İntel bad axe rev 304 fully modded ln2 -135 , I think some more vcore with asus p5wdh and give me a more mhz:D
we will try 3d01 with full ln2 7900gtx sli:)
it's exciting:woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandybuck
f4e beta bios for the DQ6???...is that bios legit?, and if so...where can one download it?
Ha ha, you posted my mem WR. I can also post CPU WR if you want? FSB is 60k+ MHz. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
What cooling and Vmch on the mobo ?
I notice the chipset 965 version is C2 !!!!
So, I have to buy a new DQ6:(
F4e...GIMME GIMME! :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaler
ok:confused:
so..
FSB600 is non overclocking:D
thx anyway:)
nice results was funny seeing the debate if it was real or not, glad to see coolaler stepping up behind his member and supporting them.
congrats guys. huge fsb
so is this actually a Rev C2 chipset ??
stock coolerQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
whats the biggest difference between the 965 and 975 chipset?
Google is your friend. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Grinch
I am one to accept that cpuid is not perfect to all motherboards.
Nice work, I may try that board now.
Great Post... :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck.exe
try it with something other than a 6x multi
bet ya dont get very far.
This makes me more believe that it`s a fake ...Quote:
stock cooler
what's your point? I think the goal here was to show the limits of the board..not the chipQuote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
Same question here, what vmch and cooling?Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
I also have the same questionQuote:
Originally Posted by Eldonko
Quote:
Originally Posted by BottomsUp
it has nothing to do with the chip its all these boards.. both 975 and 965
none of them can go past a certain wall at a certain multi without heavy voltage mods.
one of these days one of these board makers is going to actually go past that wall, i just have yet to see a retail board do it without mods.
the chipsets themselves are quirky with certain multi's.
pretty much all the boards get goofy past 400 with a 9x multi. and ther eis no logical reason why.. its not the chips its the boards/chipsets
not to mention that my chip/board easily is bootable at 412mhz FSB, 3.7ghz but if i try and run 3.7ghz on any other mutli the board refuses to do it.
while others can run way high FSB on lower multi's just fine.
these 975/965 chipsets are very flakey.
Somehow i'm not impressed at all. Not with Colaler work, he a fine dude but with the performance of this MB @ 600FSB. Look at PI with cpu @3.6G:confused: 17+ sek. And Sisoft memory benchmark? it scores same as my p5b @ 1980FSB. The point i'm truing to make is not how high we can get the FSB but also the performance that should come with increase. I mean you can stretch those chipset memory timing to wazoo but whats the point:slapass:
would u tell me how did u know it's fakeQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
and CPUZ fake too ?
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...00s6/965c2.gif
that's new chip 965C2
maybe everyone can fsb600 too,as issue
Coolaler...how about uploading the F4e beta bios to rapidshare?
R U sure that's "C2" version,cpz version different?
look at the first and sec pictures,1st cpuz shows "c2", 2st cpuz shows"C1"
http://img10.picsplace.to/15/600-pi.JPG
http://img4.picsplace.to/img4/25/600-pi_2.JPG
so no one wants to tell the truth huh ?
its time to come clean girls... who's the liar here and who's telling the truth.
and for the kid who claimed it was his... if you got the balls to say its real then i would suggest you take yourself and start posting a crap load more pics not the same pics that other poeple post
cpuz 1.35 unsupportQuote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
c2 fsb600 all :toast: :toast: :toast:
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/965C2-2.JPG
test from andre
Please run sisoft membench @ 600 with those timings:D Those c2 looks to be a killer chip
indeed;)Quote:
Originally Posted by railer
I suggest an apology to Coolaler for your poor conduct Lestat, you are definitly crapping the thread without definitive proof.
I say its possible despite the poor pi run. We dont know what the guy had running in the background.
We will look more into the revision very soon so please stop with the accusations until more boards have been pushed (this goes for everyone)
C2:toast:
:slapass:
coolaler - oldman and dog
You are an honorable man and great overclocker. Thank you for being a part of XS forums
LOL at the ones crying fake.
LOL CPUZ certified = owned!. All the naysayers
my cpu-Z show rev.c1.That means c1 sucks?Or what?c1 have lower OC possibility?:rolleyes:
If cpu-z info is wrong then how can i findout what rev.of chipset i have?
It's great if it's legit...600FSB, i'm more convinced now since the new F5d beta bios has upped my own FSB to at least 420, with default MCH and FSB voltages.
420mhz...cpu-Z ver.1.36 show you rev.C1?Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dower
I just wanted to post here to prove a point, has anyone looked at the timings of the RAM 5-9-9-24... I don't expect the memory benchmarks to be good at these timings, also the CPU is probably not orthos stable which also contributes to the slow SuperPi.
To post #77 - I'm currently cruising at 410Mhz x 8 on my E6600, just waiting for the DDR18V to be fixed and I'll be mega happy :D ( I can see 3.6Ghz on the horizon!!!)
Its known now, newer boards are shipping with rev C2.
CPU-Z 1.35 does not recognise it, and lists it as C1
CPU-Z ver 1.36 identifies the newer revision chip as C2 correctly.
I'll have mine tomorrow (DS3,only ordered last week) so I'll see if mine also ships with C2
And????Quote:
Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner
c1 or C2?;)
is there a marking or anything on the dq6 that shows its a C2? or a different revision #?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DARK SIDE
C1 :(
But I have it stable @3.2 400fsb, ram @ DDR800 4 4 4 10
This overclocking makes you go bananas , There is one thing I would like to know is the boards potential is 600fsb , yeah.
Well if the multiplier is 11 or whatever it is then what is the bottleneck.Could the cpu sir coolaler was using get to 4.2ghz or what have you .
I see the board potential is 600fsb and the chip X6800 potential is .....?
For example on Vrzone where sir Shamino (great overclocker , good as coolaler or k[ngp]n) changed the bad overclocking board 590 and with the new bios he maxed the multiplier and got 4.6ghz.yaeh
All this said then can all conroes do this if the Bios lets it? the X6800 has a unlocked multiplier but isnt there a way to unlock the extra one like anandtech had us belive that you can do things like get a extra multi ?
That's nice fsb...only if you could go to 450mhz.And that's it!U dont need more....Quote:
Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner
One thing:
RAM settings...latency:
4.4.4.11(in some ways 12) give you stability.Settings 4.4.4.10 on voltage 2.2v(dont know how much you give V)?I think you will not have stability with 4.4.4.10.
yeah I've been having some issues. It will prime, run super pi, but as soon as I play BF2 for about 5 minutes it locks up, image stays on screen, cant ctrl-alt-esc out and have to hard re-boot.
Grrrrrr, tried lowering the CPU speed (by fsb & multi) but same problem. Must be the ram.
Have it on SPD now (which is incorrect @ 5 5 5 18 !!!)
StDId a 32m super pi no probs, so I have no idea what the issue is.
Coolaler, I can't trust you...
A 6x600MHz 5-9-9-x Single Channel RUN could NEVER make more than 17s. Impossible.
Single channel have 0.1-0.2s influence in SPI 1M RUN
Is this an other Quartz ?
anyone know default vcore for e6600?dq6 bios read default voltage for e6600 1.32V....this is default or bug?
On this vcore stabile 400mhz fsb and 3200mhz cpu on x8 multi....
Same sort of fake here :
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=114908&page=3
you mean same fake = c2 602fsb? why its fake? :confused:
Look at the pityful score with an x6800 @ 3600MHz...
Quartz removal I suppose
i dont think its fake, just really loose timings.
Open your eyes...
17.4s à 3600MHz with a 4Mb core...
Although single channel and CAS 6 timings it's impossible.
If you don't see the problem, I don't know how to finish my sentence smartly.
notice its 965 revC2 chip, also notice its slow on super pi
sure this thing clocks high , but poor performance clock for clock
tony said it uses 1600fsb strap for 600fsb
Hey great post try it and it comes right back to this very post, so seeing as if Google is obviously a better friend to you than me would you enlighten me as to what to put into your friend Google?Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck.exe
http://www.pctuner.info/test/results...551_foto12.jpg
this is my dq6 with rev C1
500 rock solid setted from bios, i can go up for some bench:cool:
and this is my review
http://www.amdclockers.it/schede-mad...-965p-dq6.html
All I can say is wow! I sure hope I can even get 500 from my board......
hy,
my dq6 make 520mhz fsb.....now are my ddr2 ram full limit.....i cant test more.
here a screen from 500 1:1
- NO MODS
- ALL PASSIV, ONLY CPU COOLING
- NO MORE VOLTS, ALL DEFAULT!!! (only cpu gets more volts)
- ALL DEFAULT SETTINGS !!!!
http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/1...b500pm3.th.jpg