Printable View
It has attained U10. Although BIOS was changed, FSB does not go up.
M/B: ASUS P5W DH BIOS:0801
CPU: Kentsfield 2.66G
CPU Cooling: LN2
Memory: Corsair 6400C3 1GB x2
VGA:Matrox Mille PCI
HDD: Maxtor 6L080P0
Power Supply: Zippy-720PE
Vcore: 1.87V, Vdimm: 2.8V, Vio: 3.34V
OS: Windows Server 2003 Enterprise
MEM: 3-3-3-4-15.6μs16T-25-5-9-8-7-4-4, 1:1 T-D
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1156903428.jpg
nice score..
congratulations ! ! !
do some cinebench for me :D
very nice!!!
well... time to get <9
Quad-core under 10sec SPI 1M :slobber:
awsome, that is with all cores enabled :)
Congratulations, kaz-n-san. :toast:
And a wonderful memory speed to boot as well. Few could even dream of putting Conroes at such speeds. 4 cores at 5.25GHz is simply stunning. :toast:
wow i cnat wait for kentsfield!
Under 10 with Kentsfield :slobber: :slobber:
Impressive! :toast:
<10s...
5,25 GHz...
with just 292 fsb...
18x multi :eek:
wow... tsugoi desu! :cool:
Omedetou kaz-n-san! :clap:
amazing core duo quad :toast:
wow one instance on a quadcore :eek:
still sweet though, can you do benches at this speed? like cinebench and 3dm06 (cpu test)?
Really Awesome:woot:
What about 4x Super Pi on one time?
Congrats! Nice Score! I want a Kentsfield ;p
21ghz :woot:
:toast: That is surely impressive!!!
EDIT: I just noticed... You are sooo close to be the first with 100% overclocked Kentsfield E6700. Lets fix that too. ;)
Crazy score!:slobber: :woot: Can you run Cinebench @ 5GHz?:D
When or if you get the chance to run this chip on LN2 once again, please run another benchmark besides SPI1mb ;). It dosn't show QuadCore power by any means. Nice SPI1MB though, keep up the good work.
H O L Y crap omfg.. nearly a 100% on a kentsfield O_O 5,32ghz would be a 100% oc woah dude tahts insane .. uber .. gratz 4 U10 .. keep the insane work up .. greetz
awesome work - congratulations on the milestone :toast:
I just cant believe my web-browser ... This is rollin higher than C2D !!!
If the retails are going to be as good as these, than we will see some crunch action, oh yes we'll do ... :toast:
... A Cinebench shot would be very nice :woot:
these new step5 are really awesome:banana: :banana:
keep going for 100% oc man
congratulation for this sub 10
Fabio:cool:
Quad core with 1 instance of SP? Shouldnt you be doing 4 instances? When testing a dual core most people run 2 instances. 4 would reflect the true potential of that chip.
Welcome to XS ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by GFDuke
Here PPL run 1x SPI instance, due higher max freq when doing so, futher the shared cache causes worser time with 2 instances :)
Kaz-n-san, impressive stuff - to bad with that FSB wall :(
How is that 18x multiplier possible?
Kentsfield is an Extreme Edition processor with four cores. On the board he's using, multipliers 6 through 20 are available.
Kentsfield is much different from Conroe. It's not a high FSB processor. But the upper multipliers are unlocked, so you don't necessarily need high FSB.
Wow!!
Amazing cpu and great score... Congratz... :toast:
For a second I thought you where talking about a "mobile U10" quadcore :P
Thank you, everybody.
cinebench is downloaded now. Probably LN2 cooling can be performed during a weekend. I'm sorry since work is slightly busy.
Looking forward to your Cinebench score, kaz-n-san.:)
kaz-n,ur the quad-legend, great sub10
Thanks, sierra-san,hicookie-san.
cinebench Result.
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1157594516.jpg
Cinebench score would be much higher if you were able to run higher FSB, even with less CPU speed.
Very nice
4*5.1Ghz in a CPU
20,4Ghz :eek:
Omg :woot:
so much for 10GHz by 2010...........anyone say 20GHz by 2006 :D:banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin
Woah that that's what you call raw processor power :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin
Wow, thanks update. Grats on the 10 seconds :toast:
really impressive, nice job!
man do some PCMARK04/05 world records right now............there is nothing even remotely close to this atm heh
:toast:
looks amazing..
any chance for under 9? or not posible?
congratulations, great result, well done! :toast:
It simply rocks :slobber:
I want one too :banana:
ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP Result BIOS:0614 .
M/B: ASUS P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP BIOS:0614
CPU: Kentsfield 2.66G
CPU Cooling: LN2
Memory: Corsair 6400C3 1GB x2
VGA:ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB
HDD: Maxtor 6L080P0
Power Supply: Zippy-720PE
Vcore: 1.82V, Vdimm: 2.8V, Vio: 3.34V,Vmuch: 1.95V
OS: Windows XP PRO SP2
MEM: 3-3-3-4, 1:1
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1158496470.jpg
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1158496520.jpg
8sec Cinebench @ FSB410 :slobber: :eek:
:woot:
first Kentsfield under 10... and nice sPI1M and CB too...
now that's a great score on cinebench =D
Great to see that P5B can give a much higher fsb with their i965 then i975x one's ;)
is this the perfect combo (asus P5B+kentsfield)?
Very nice result, kaz-n-san. :toast:
p5b is the only board atm who has the multi working right.......so higher fsb possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sesto Sento
450 fsb done with kentsfield :D
Thanks TaPaKaH-san,charlie-san,Sesto Sento-san,sierra_bound-san,Rol-Co-san.
BIOS 0614 FSB limit B0 is 440, B1 is 420.
I will wait Next P5B BIOS or P5W DH,64 New BIOS.
C O N G R A T U L A T I O N S[/color]
Amazing! :d
Woowoowoow :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
I m Speechless.
@sierra:
You predicted better cinebench with lower clocks/higher fsb. Which is exactly what happened: >5% less cpu clock produced about 15% higher score running on a chipset that is usually slower than 975. Sorry for the newb question, but would you mind explaining? Just better ram speed?
Cinebench is a very FSB-dependant bench. CPU speed in and of itself won't necessarily give you a good score.
If you can get FSB above 400, you have a good shot of scoring over 2000, even with air cooling.
Here's an example. I did this awhile ago with air cooling. Only needed 3.7GHz to score above 2000. Conroe won't get anywhere close to this score, regardless of cooling.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...ebench3717.jpg
Nice work kaz-n......Keep it going.....:) :toast:
Thanks. So, do you suppose that's due to increased fsb = faster inter-core communication?
I'm not sure of the technical reason. I just know this from personal experience.:) FSB makes a bigger different than CPU or RAM speed. Notice how kaz-n's score jumped after he switched to the P5B Deluxe and ran 400+ FSB. The P5B Dlx is the only board at the moment that can do 400+ FSB with Kentsfield.
Have you noticed the same thing (faster fsb being more important) when doing video rendering with kentsfield, or is the difference to subtle to see outside of a benchmark?
Did not really noticed it in other things. But after running Cinebench a number of times, I began to notice that CPU speed by itself wasn't the key to getting a good score. BTW, my Kentsfield has now been passed on to a very capable overclocker.:)
bandwidth is important, but there is one problem with kentsfield and the boards
p5b is the only board who got the multiplier right......rest of the asus boards aren't
p5b + 0614 bios
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/445.png
asus p5w dh i'm getting this, so multi is no use
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/multi2.png
but at lower fsb and higher cpu speed you can make a nice score.
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/cine3730.png
all at air cooling
sorry kaz-N san for going a little oftopic.
how do you get the multi 12 working on the p5b , i got the same bios but the step 4 b0 doesnt do that.
Hi,Rol-Co-san.
In BIOS, a magnification variable was set to ENABLE and it was able to carry out variable ordinarily. I think that it was possible to 20 or more times surely.