I`d like to see how your systems deal with this one, it`s multithreaded.
Printable View
I`d like to see how your systems deal with this one, it`s multithreaded.
CB-CPU: 400/740 (85% MP speedup).
PC spec's in the signature.
nice, what`s the rendering time single and multi?
dual opteron 285 @ 2.9 ghz
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8123/cb3kt6.jpg
hm, seems I`m gonna wait for opteron 290 to come out.I thought the difference between oc 265 and 285 would be much higher... can you show me your rig specs npk?
http://img143.imageshack.us/my.php?i...ojezg00eq8.jpg
hrvojezg00, 313% multi speedup is a bit lower than normal on 2P (4-core) Opteron system, I think.
Can you post detailed memory settings of yours (CPU-Z shot).
You've mentoned before, that you're running Win x64, but I can't seem to remember does it make use of NUMA memory addressing - that would boost overall performance a bit?
I thought so too, but sandra shows the presence of numa.I`ve looked in bios and there are none options to actually activate it
oops forgot about this thread, here are my specs:
2* AMD Opteron 285 / TYAN S2895A2NRF Server Motherboard / 4*512 mb mushkin PRO3200 ecc reg / ATI Radeon X1900XT 512MB / 2*WD raptor 36 gb RAID 0 / WD 250Gb 16Mb / FSP Group Fortron 700W EPS12V / ENERMAX CS-718B Entry level Server.
/off
Man! Yo' people already jumped in the 4x4 bandwagon with those OpteronDP rigs, isn't it. :D
Kentsfield at 3.98GHz
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...ebench3980.jpg
conroe will still smoke that 4x4
Indeed it will.
you can`t compare kentsfield with 940 socket opterons, you can compare it with socket f 4 core amd proc. which will be out next year.that means: 2 proc., each 4 cores (8core) and with that my friends, kent. will have no chance
Anyone with a new 2P Opteron s.1207 board around?
DDR2 should add a little more here. ;)
p.s.: I think that Maxon Soft. should take some steps to introduce a new more complex scene with may be more actual size (720p-like resolution) or at least change the render-target format of the current one from INT 8-bit to 16/32-bit extended/high range. That will put some more strain on modern CPUs, IMHO.
It's time for Cinebench-HD. :D
new 3dmax 9 will be full 64bit so there we will finally be able to use the whole of our system.looking forward to it!!!
I still need to upload my pics. Highest so far
Conroe e6700 @ 3.8Ghz
Single 644 / Multi 1204
Well, of course eight cores will beat four. Someone in Japan has been testing dual Clovertowns (2 X 4 cores). The results I've seen are pretty amazing.Quote:
Originally Posted by hrvojezg00
I thought this thread was for posting Cinebench results. I didn't realize it was a competition.
it wasn`t supposed to turn out like one...sorry
those kentsfields results are insane, on winxp64 it will surelly be on the 9s. Seems like I need to upgrade my workhorse now...
@sierra_bound: is there any problem with the kentsfield ES like those RAID problems with the firsts conroe ES?
You know what I´d like to see ? vraybench :D that would rock :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by fellix_bg
I don't use RAID so I don't know. The best thing about Kentsfield is that you don't have to use a server board or registered memory. My Kentsfield can outclock a lot of Conroes. It's basically an Extreme Edition processor. I can use multipliers from 6 to 20. The biggest negative is heat. My CPU idles in low 40's. But temps will skyrocket when running quadruple Prime.Quote:
Originally Posted by npk
well it would be great but not everyone has 3dmax and vray, but I agree with youQuote:
Originally Posted by npk
@sierra_bound: so you have kentsfield?can you show us some benches?
I´m saying a packed 3d model with vray render engine just like cinebench, no need of having 3dmax and vray. Thatwould be the perfect benchmark for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by hrvojezg00
http://img274.imageshack.us/img274/8...dia3950ea9.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by hrvojezg00
Mandelbrot is a rendering bench used by the Japanese. This was the fastest time until just recently.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...delbrot5-2.jpg
400 FSB. Not easy with Kentsfield
http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2244/32m400x9rx8.jpg
Four instances of Prime
http://img126.imageshack.us/img126/3...0043400as5.jpg
omg thats some raw cpu power :eek:
sierra what's your actual volt and temp @ 3.6ghz?
For quad-Prime, I was using 1.45v (BIOS). According to the Asus Probe monitoring program, idle was around 42C and load temps got as high as 83C! Personally I think the readings are a little off.:) Even with temps supposedly that high, Prime did not fail.Quote:
Originally Posted by syne_24
For the other benches, I was using 1.53-1.56v.
very very nice, how come you got your hands on it?
what do you think, how will things with proc. develope in near future?
I can't reveal where I got the CPU. I think quad-cores are very nice. Kentsfield is very overclockable. Only thing you need to be cautious of, is heat. They get very hot under full load.
Just Dual core E6700
http://s150233688.onlinehome.us/PC/cineb38.JPG
This is the highest result I've gotten on air with 32-bit Cinebench.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...ebench3717.jpg
64-bit Cinebench at 3650MHz
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/5...nch3650pc1.jpg
this is kentsfield or puse core duo 6700 oc-ed?
Those results were with Kentsfield. Even a Conroe clocked at 5GHz probably could not score 2000 in Cinebench.
well yes, but what`s the point cause programs like cinema4d need stability and conroe at 5G doesn`t give that
The reason I got Kentsfield is not to have the fastest CPU in the world, MHz-wise, though it's not a bad overclocker. When it comes to rendering speed, there's no other CPU that can touch it. This is the type of processor that would have any graphics/animation artist drooling. There's another rendering bench that the Japanese use called Mandelbrot. Until recently I had the fastest rendering time. Was finally beaten by someone running dual Clovertowns.:)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...delbrot5-2.jpg
do you think it might be better then AMD`s two-socket 4 cores system?is there a comparison?
which mobo did that guy brake your record, cause woodcrest has none oc-able mobo yet?
I know very little about AMD's 4X4. The nice thing about Kentsfield is that it will work in most Conroe boards.
The person who broke my record was using a Supermicro X7AD8 board. CPU-Z incorrectly identifies the processor as Woodcrest. But under "processor selection" you will see eight cores (4 X 2).
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1155331585.jpg
Just tried the 64-bit Vista RC1 with 64-bit binary of Cinebench:
Single-CPU: 450CB/49 sec.
Multi-CPU: 844CB/26 sec.
nice, so vista is finally showing some improvement.will try it later, thnx
Sierra can you show us some asus P5B dlx vs P5W DH cinebench comparison?
I suspect there isn´t any noticeable difference when rendering.
I just sold my Kentsfield.:) P5B Dlx had slightly better score in Cinebench, if I recall correctly. I used that board to break 2000 with air-cooling. Not sure, but I don't think that's ever been done before on air.
The biggest problem with P5W DH is it doesn't get high FSB with Kentsfield. Low FSB really affects the score. The P5B Dlx is the only board I've tried that can do 400+ FSB with Kentsfield.