Allendale e6500es on gigabyte ds3 mobo results

Printable View

07-22-2006, 07:12 AM
horrorwood

Allendale e6500es on gigabyte ds3 mobo results

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2...rpi2nt1.th.jpg

Don't want to do anymore because my cpu is reading 55 degrees at idle? :eek:

Im sure the heatsink is on fine though...

Im on F1 bios.
07-22-2006, 07:14 AM
Cooper

E6500 ? Now that`s something new.
Is that upcoming 800FSB chip ?
07-22-2006, 07:17 AM
`odin

this could be what the 3000+ was for amd :)
07-22-2006, 07:19 AM
misteroadster

No, 3000+ is 6300 For them
6500 is more like 3500+ :D
07-22-2006, 07:19 AM
Cooper

Actually this one will be named as E4300. It seems cpu-z ain`t recognising it quite well atm. Very good chip never the less. 9x multy and 200FSB at stock.

http://www.overclockers.ru/images/ne...7/e4300_02.jpg

Now go and get some decent cooling for that little chip and squeeze >3.5 out of it :D
07-22-2006, 07:30 AM
horrorwood

No its deffiantly a 6500...

They are due out later i think..

Im on a coolermaster hyper 48+ which should do the job?

Still these high temp reports are worrying, does anyone elses gigabyte report high temps?
07-22-2006, 07:32 AM
Cooper

try to flash F3 BIOS - perhaps temp monitoring ain`t that correct with F1.
Oh and what`s the default clocks ? with 200FSB it should be 1.8GHz - just like E4300
07-22-2006, 07:34 AM
Chri$ch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

try to flash F3 BIOS - perhaps temp monitoring ain`t that correct with F1.
Oh and what`s the default clocks ? with 200FSB it should be 1.8GHz - just like E4300

if you look @ cpu-z = 2.4Ghz (266x9) :toast:
07-22-2006, 07:35 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

try to flash F3 BIOS - perhaps temp monitoring ain`t that correct with F1.
Oh and what`s the default clocks ? with 200FSB it should be 1.8GHz - just like E4300

default is 266fsb and 2.4ghz
07-22-2006, 07:40 AM
Cooper

So it`s E6400 with only 2MB L2 - alrighty then.
And YGPM horrorwood
07-22-2006, 07:44 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

So it`s E6400 with only 2MB L2 - alrighty then.
And YGPM horrorwood

e6400 is not 2.4ghz at stock.
07-22-2006, 07:45 AM
Cooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorwood

e6400 is not 2.4ghz at stock.

oops I ment E6600 :D
07-22-2006, 07:45 AM
horrorwood

oh and i dont have any floppy disks, what can i use to flash the bios in windows?
07-22-2006, 07:45 AM
Chri$ch

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

So it`s E6400 with only 2MB L2 - alrighty then.
And YGPM horrorwood

no, its a E6600 with 2MB L2 :)

edit: to late :D
07-22-2006, 07:45 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

oops I ment E6600 :D

No you mean E6500!
07-22-2006, 07:52 AM
Cooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorwood

No you mean E6500!

i ment E6500 = E6600 with 2MB L2 ;)
And it seems you must have Floppy to flash BIOS.

PS you have PM ;) upper right corner of main forum index webpage
07-22-2006, 07:53 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by COOPER

Try Q-Flash. More info in manual

Still need a floppy disk for that...
07-22-2006, 07:55 AM
horrorwood

Whats stock cpu volts?

1.3volts?

Using cheap kingmax ram too, seemed to do ddr667 at 1.9volts ok though. Only ram i've got that will post in this mobo :/

Whats safe volts to go to on ddr2 ram?
07-22-2006, 08:23 AM
don_vercetti

That looks like a great chip, good balance between Perf. and price i would imagine.

When's it due out?
07-22-2006, 08:57 AM
horrorwood

3dmark01 result:

Very low, i think its because theres no optimisations in later drivers?

All stock btw.

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/7...rk01nk3.th.jpg

http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7...k012wo4.th.jpg

What to run next, hmmm?
07-22-2006, 09:00 AM
`odin

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorwood

3dmark01 result:

Very low, i think its because theres no optimisations in later drivers?

All stock btw.

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/7...rk01nk3.th.jpg

http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/7...k012wo4.th.jpg

What to run next, hmmm?

aquamark please :)
07-22-2006, 09:51 AM
Gun_Strife

how bout some 05 and 06
07-22-2006, 10:01 AM
`odin

btw this would mean 250$? if you want to obtain this chip?
07-22-2006, 10:04 AM
couppi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

Actually this one will be named as E4300. It seems cpu-z ain`t recognising it quite well atm. Very good chip never the less. 9x multy and 200FSB at stock.

http://www.overclockers.ru/images/ne...7/e4300_02.jpg

Now go and get some decent cooling for that little chip and squeeze >3.5 out of it :D

Wait, isn't the E6500 the 2.4 ghz 1066fsb 2mb chip Intel is also releasing in Q4?
07-22-2006, 10:10 AM
DsK

Yay, well done mate, see you finally got it working then!!

Seen what kind of clocks youve been able to get out of it yet?
07-22-2006, 10:16 AM
SMa

Isn't E4x00 the budget version?
And also I thought it was single core, the Core 2 Solo.. but then that picture isn't correct.
07-22-2006, 10:21 AM
theteamaqua

meh i ill go with E6600
07-22-2006, 12:45 PM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by DsK

Yay, well done mate, see you finally got it working then!!

Seen what kind of clocks youve been able to get out of it yet?

Only 2.6ghz, just put my hyper48+ and temps are now more reasonable.

Anyone have any idea what temp i should stop at!? :confused:
07-22-2006, 02:08 PM
Evilsizer

well since we dont know how they handle temps ATM. 50-54c would be my stopping point. dont forget to watch for thermal throttling, over at ocforums ross said his cpu on the stock HS when oced was reading 65 or there about. Throttling was kicking in at those temps, was oced to 3.8ghz-3.9ghz. cant remember the voltage he used, atm.
07-22-2006, 03:35 PM
Owen1978

Release date?
07-22-2006, 07:32 PM
ArcTan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

i ment E6500 = E6600 with 2MB L2 ;)
And it seems you must have Floppy to flash BIOS.

erm no you don't
I flashed mine via the gigabyte program fine from F1 to F3
07-22-2006, 07:46 PM
775911

will it flash from cd also? I havent owned a fdd since 2000
07-22-2006, 10:57 PM
oijkue

what the data on cpu IHS?
07-23-2006, 01:21 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by oijkue

what the data on cpu IHS?

There is none.

I flashed the bios, bought a floppy disk.
07-23-2006, 01:57 AM
ArcTan

Quote:

Originally Posted by 775911

will it flash from cd also? I havent owned a fdd since 2000

Just use @bios which is on the gigabyte cd. I downloaded F3 bios, ran @bios and that's it
07-23-2006, 03:37 AM
matt89

nice work there i think i will be getting a gigabyte mobo
07-23-2006, 03:48 AM
zert

wow an Allendale at 9x multi. if this chip gets a nice price it will be a nice oc'er for the gigabyte board since Allendales seem to OC higher than Conroe's
07-23-2006, 03:37 PM
Evilsizer

well this 6500 is suppose to be released around xmas time and some price cuts coming hopefully. i would expect to fit in the current price point of the E6400. Either that or the 6500 is going to be around the $300 range.
07-23-2006, 05:10 PM
Phosphate

So what would the practical difference (as far as benchmarks) goes between this E6500 and the E4300? They both have 9x multipliers but different FSB? I'm talking OC'd benchmarks not stock benchmarks.
07-24-2006, 04:34 AM
XS Janus

Interesting...
________
GAY TEEN
07-24-2006, 07:57 PM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phosphate

So what would the practical difference (as far as benchmarks) goes between this E6500 and the E4300? They both have 9x multipliers but different FSB? I'm talking OC'd benchmarks not stock benchmarks.

if im not mistaken the e4300 is also single core not dual...as far as ocing goes the e6500 will own it. i would expect the e4300's to be dud's of the higher end ones. That is unless the e4300 are really popular like the 2.4c's and they start binnning them to meet demand.
07-24-2006, 09:01 PM
ArcTan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

if im not mistaken the e4300 is also single core not dual...as far as ocing goes the e6500 will own it. i would expect the e4300's to be dud's of the higher end ones. That is unless the e4300 are really popular like the 2.4c's and they start binnning them to meet demand.

no they're dual core as well
07-26-2006, 08:07 PM
onethreehill

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phosphate

So what would the practical difference (as far as benchmarks) goes between this E6500 and the E4300? They both have 9x multipliers but different FSB? I'm talking OC'd benchmarks not stock benchmarks.

E4300 is 7X (It should 9X)

EDIT: You are comparing 2.4GHz/1066MHz FSB with a 1.80GHz/800MHz FSB
07-26-2006, 08:13 PM
cupholder2.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by onethreehill

E4300 is 7X

No, 7x200 = 1400 Mhz, that doesn't make anysense...
07-26-2006, 09:03 PM
adeoliver

I thought all the core 2 duo's were going to be 266 FSB chips not half 200's and half 266. Did I miss something in the past month or what??

All the E6XXX chips are going to have 266 FSB's are they not?? The 4300is the only 200 with a 9x multi.
07-27-2006, 03:07 AM
onethreehill

Quote:

Originally Posted by cupholder2.0

No, 7x200 = 1400 Mhz, that doesn't make anysense...

My memory failed me. It should be 9x200 = 1800 Mhz
07-27-2006, 03:54 AM
ocZZZ

My ds3 temp sensor is wrong too. It reports cpu idle at 63c in bios but in windows with the gigabyte overclock tool and mbm, it lists the cpu at a normal 33c idle.
07-29-2006, 01:25 PM
horrorwood

3.3ghz on stock cpu volts. Ram at 2.2volts. Ram is cheap stuff, £38.50 off ebay for the pair.

I've tested the ram at 400mhz and it was fine, so hopefully i can get the cpu going a bit faster.

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/4...rpi3iw5.th.jpg

Might be slow times because i was doing other stuff while it ran.

Also ram timings are probably crap, im a noob at ddr2.
07-29-2006, 04:28 PM
ShiningArcanine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

i ment E6500 = E6600 with 2MB L2 ;)
And it seems you must have Floppy to flash BIOS.

PS you have PM ;) upper right corner of main forum index webpage

I thought that the E6500 was an E6400 with 2MB L2 cache that is slated for release in the fourth quarter.
07-29-2006, 04:45 PM
Phosphate

Quote:

Originally Posted by onethreehill

E4300 is 7X (It should 9X)

EDIT: You are comparing 2.4GHz/1066MHz FSB with a 1.80GHz/800MHz FSB

Yeah that would be stock but I'm talking comparing benchmarks OC'd. That e4300 should have a lot of potential for a fat OC because of that 9x multipier. (at least that is what I am thinking assuming RAM was good enough)

Could the FSB on the e4300 ever get as high as a e6500 in OC condition? ( post editted from e6300)
07-30-2006, 12:49 AM
don_vercetti

Quote:

Could the FSB on the e6300 ever get as high as a e6500 in OC condition?

All else the same, it would get higher, as the E6300 has a lower multiplier so assuming all else the same, when they hit a cpu ceiling (assuming they hit it at the same time) the E6300 would have a higher FSB than the E6500.
07-30-2006, 01:04 AM
Phosphate

Quote:

Originally Posted by don_vercetti

All else the same, it would get higher, as the E6300 has a lower multiplier so assuming all else the same, when they hit a cpu ceiling (assuming they hit it at the same time) the E6300 would have a higher FSB than the E6500.

Made a typo. I might to say e4300 (not e6300). So could a e4300 clock as high as an e6500 as far as FSB goes? Remembering they both have 9x multipliers.
07-30-2006, 01:09 AM
Lestat

Quote:

Originally Posted by horrorwood

Still need a floppy disk for that...

do you own one of these boards ? horrorwood ? RTFM kiddo,,
qflash can use the following
floppy
cdrom
usb flash drive

go into the bios and hit F9 and go to town man
just burn it to a cdr or rw.
07-30-2006, 01:10 AM
Lestat

266 is 1066 FSB call it whatever you want but its not one of the lower models.
its a 9x multi with 1066 fsb and 2mb L2
07-30-2006, 01:19 AM
don_vercetti

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phosphate

Made a typo. I might to say e4300 (not e6300). So could a e4300 clock as high as an e6500 as far as FSB goes? Remembering they both have 9x multipliers.

Well yeah, it would clock exactly the same assuming that both CPU clock equally well. Once you had the E4300 at 9x266 it would be a E6500 (minus virtualization of course), and beyond that it would be exactly the same as the E6500.
07-30-2006, 01:48 AM
horrorwood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phosphate

Yeah that would be stock but I'm talking comparing benchmarks OC'd. That e4300 should have a lot of potential for a fat OC because of that 9x multipier. (at least that is what I am thinking assuming RAM was good enough)

Could the FSB on the e4300 ever get as high as a e6500 in OC condition? ( post editted from e6300)

Depends. e4300's could be the chips that are failing to run at higher speeds.

So they could be dud's.
07-30-2006, 03:04 AM
onethreehill

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShiningArcanine

I thought that the E6500 was an E6400 with 2MB L2 cache that is slated for release in the fourth quarter.

You meant the E6500 was an E6600 with 2MB L2 cache, no?

E6400 2.13GHz/2MB L2
E6500 2.4GHz/2MB L2
E6600 2.4GHz/4MB L2
07-30-2006, 02:33 PM
horrorwood

How many times has this been said now.

E6500 is E6600 with 2mb cache instead of 4mb

NOW STFU!

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:26 PM.

XtremeSystems