Unfortunately Im under NDA ;)
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/6...42014204rh.gif
Printable View
Unfortunately Im under NDA ;)
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/6...42014204rh.gif
haha nice
i thought it was for real.....then i saw "insane" lol
woh... i think you should keep that on the d/l ;)
does intel even have a name now for their new 45nm chips?
Is it a kentsfield?
kentsfield is the noobish quad core, this is octal.
Intel's name for its quadcore chips will either be Tetro or Quadro. It should fit into its curren Duo naming convention.
i think Quad-ro is kentsfield. Tetro? I dunno about 5 cores. Theyve been doubling cores from 1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 8? Im going w/octo, though 8 cores in 1 does sound pretty dam weird. I guess 5 doesnt sound that bad :p:
only 8 cores?
was expecting a few more tbh. :D
I derived tetro from tetra, which I believe means 4 in greek.Quote:
Originally Posted by m0da
Pfft, here you guys are all gloating over coolalers kentsfield wimpy quad core, and then I bring you octal and you expect more?!
How bout, it overclocks to 5Ghz on stock voltage! Drooling yet?
so when can u share benchies?
NDA ends 2008 :)
Cpu-z shot please.
so this thread is kinda useless lol
NDA, sorry ;)
lol!!! :stick: duh, sorry i was thinking of penta for some reason. tetra like tetrahedral duh. sorry about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShiningArcanine
we want 16 cores. will that be the eh... kentsfield's older brother huh?
I really doubt that Intel even has its 2008 micoarchitecture (the one after Conroe's architecture) working in its labs yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
I am in the lap of the intel CEO...
Err...! I mean, i have connections.
Yeah and I have a sixty trillion core processor :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
unfortunatly I am under AMD NDA till 2150
Are you saying you're sleeping with the CEO of Intel? Details please.Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
COMPGEEK is right
Intel Core 3 Octo is the real name (but logo above is chopped as you can see)
based on Nehalem 45nm 8-core 8Mb shared cache
CSI disabled
Spi1M WR @ Nehalem 2.66 stock
Here is a nice way of getting around the NDA, say its fake,lol
ok this might be fake
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/4...2custom3im.jpg
sigged ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
PkG, is that real? It validates correctly... O_O
but strangely the Check sum Validation result:Quote:
Originally Posted by PkG.1337
Checksum matches!
Which means SuperPI is now eithier faked :eek:
or it is possibly real....
444 FSB with a bus speed of 1333?? 444 x 4 = 1776....strange.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/9170/omg1bv.jpg
Too lazy to mod all the non-working text
lol, i knew thats what you guys would be interested in!Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderstruck!
Not me!:D Lets see a Rostetta bench with this. and block out all the cpu info if that is an issue. I'm just interested in what it will bench at with 8 cores, and thats if the current boards will even support that chip.Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
Nice score on the chip..Congrats!;)
hmmm, rosetta = 10,253/46,948
Can you do a SS of that? The info on the proc can be blocked if that's a concern.Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
Same integer speed as my Pentium D 805 at stock...
-k0nsl
:slapass: :slapass: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
ditto, I think you made a mistake compgeek, damn and i thought this was true :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
which mistake? :)
Incredible numbers!:slobber: I'm assuming that either your board or rosy can't pick up the other cores? showing as 2 and not 8..Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
Either way, you just totally blew away any existing benches on rosetta!
Congrats!:clap:
With those numbers I think your looking at a machine that will do close to 7000 a day on 2 cores..Very close to uOpt's quad 875 numbers.
bleh, i had disable all but one pair of core for super pi benching :rolleyes:, which is under NDA btw ;)
Forgot that i had done that, didnt reboot.
Then multiply that 7000 number by 4..28K a day on rosy? :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
or equal to 9 of my DX3600 systems..:slobber:
You do realise that you have to run this for at least a day and see what it will actually pump out..:p:
i cant let it connect to rosetta, that would violate NDA ;)
:rolleyes: :slap: :p: ;)
no it wouldn't :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
lol, you guys dont believe me? ;)
Sure i believe you.BTW i just typed my post on me new ES invisible keyboard:rolleyes:
Not that we don't beleive you. Just the reverse, a normal curiousity to see a 8 core unit in action.Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
I make the assumption that anyone that posts this type of info is legit.
We're all adults here hopefully and no need to make up stories.
My curiousity is just to see what that beast would do in a day. Same question I asked when I saw the first conroe and woodcrest.
Another point, you already connected to Rosetta, just set your comps to hidden and that takes care of any concerns with an NDA..;)
So does this:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
http://users.tpg.com.au/weigner/wtf.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwwww
nice funny, someone said who got 8cores,haha,
according my knows,the model just model,can't be run on any machine,now:D
umm what the hell is going on?
Alright, well, before I lead you on anymore, it IS fake. I found this image and just HAD to use it. As the first replier said, I though the "insane" in place of "inside" was a dead give away.
hicookie made it absurdly obvious. you run pi for a very low number (ie 16k) and then photochop it to 1M. same checksum, same time, it'll validate; the validator doesnt ask for the number of digits, does it? one must just remember to put in the proper number of loops for 1M, which hicookie did not ;)
Yeah,and i thought my ES invisible keyboard is something:rolleyes: .
I feel some may feel cheated CompGeek,you should appologise to them for making them :slobber: over their (still) visible keyboards:D
And for those who :slobber: : next time check a dictionary on the word fake ;)
I agree, but I always assume that what is posted in the forum is provable fact. No, I'm not naive. I just assume that there is no reason to make things up or lie to one another.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
I know, people do play their jokes from time to time.
Lets just leave this one at that, a joke that got taken too seriously by myself and others.
AMD's next chip (ES) ;)
windows would only boot with 1 core enabled, and L2 cache is per-core.
stock clocks/volts :)
did you really take it as real damn it was fake all over that is why its here in wamps
only 17 loops mate;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
i know, i didnt feel like adding 2 ;)
also, who's ever heard of 5 meg L2 cache?
ah well, i like how the SSE3 and 4 turned out...
LOL! Lot of NDAs being pushed to the limit here - might as well skip Conroe. ;) :D
They're all fakes, screenshots are easy to fake, let's see the real chip:
here's an original photo of my Core Octo
I blanked out bits so Intel doesn't bite me
http://index.wwwwwoc.net/intel.png
Unphotoshopped
I can't post benchies yet 'cause of NDA.
1) Lazy :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
2) Pentium Pro dude. there were a handful with 6Megs of Cache :fact:
3) I thought SSE4 is supposed to come out in the next few years...
Good one! Excellent m8!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by wwwww
hey, next time, could you do the SS in 1600X1200 32 bit so we could get a better image? :rofl:
lol, is that ss @ like 25x12? :D
5ghz on default vcxore:slobber: ...I want one:)Quote:
Originally Posted by CompGeek
Conroe has SSE4, matey.Quote:
3) I thought SSE4 is supposed to come out in the next few years...
Impressive Spi times from all abound.