Conroe E6700 voltage 1.78v to 4ghz already @tower120!!!

Printable View

06-02-2006, 09:32 PM
coolaler

Conroe E6700 voltage 1.78v to 4ghz already @tower120!!!

Conroe E6700 voltage 1.78v to 4ghz already @tower120!!!
Vcore1.78v

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...75V_3900_1.gif

:woot: 16k;)

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...75V_4000_1.gif
06-02-2006, 09:36 PM
mr_knowitall15

well,heres the fabled 4 on air... but JESUS that VCore is NUTS!!! whats temps like???? How heathy can that be for the longevity for that poor thing?
06-02-2006, 09:48 PM
Charles Wirth

Grats :toast:
06-02-2006, 09:54 PM
IvanAndreevich

16K stable. Woohoo! :)
06-02-2006, 10:03 PM
Repoman

1.78v on 90nm is insane, but 65 :eek: Nice work though
06-02-2006, 10:07 PM
alpha_tot

thats insane...what are your temps like?
06-02-2006, 10:08 PM
theteamaqua

omg !!!! 4GHz on X6800 is no dream yayaya!!!!! hooray !!!! :woot: :woot: :banana: :toast:

is that done on your new ATI XPRess3200 motherboard??
06-02-2006, 10:15 PM
farksy

Wow .. 4Ghz on air !!! Man Conroe is still driving me nuts.

:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:
06-02-2006, 10:16 PM
coolaler

3.9g@32MPI pass :banana:

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...V_3900_32M.gif
06-02-2006, 10:19 PM
eva2000

temps idle/load ?
06-02-2006, 10:20 PM
corvus_corax

Wow, 1.78V in 65nm is awesome! Great job!

Tower120 is one of the best heatsinks, the best that i've used.
06-02-2006, 10:21 PM
theteamaqua

wow its totally stable, it past the 32M pi test
06-02-2006, 10:23 PM
coolaler

prime95 can stable@3.9g single core
06-02-2006, 10:24 PM
uclajd

Ha, I wondered when someone would try to melt one of these. :eek:

Seriously, I'd like to see max volts before China Synrome. :lol:

This is just preposterous power on air. To think a month or so ago nobody could even come close to these pi times on LN2.

Obviously 1.78 is ludicrous on air, but maybe not on subzero cooling. Only time will tell. ;)

Keep pushing it Coolaler! "I'm willing to fight to the last drop of your blood." - Moe Howard.
06-02-2006, 10:27 PM
Nanometer

Christ, that poor chip :(.
06-02-2006, 10:34 PM
Absolute_0

Crazy voltage, i had no idea Conroe was so resilient to volts. Good work Coolaler, once again.
06-02-2006, 10:40 PM
coolaler

3.9G@Cinebench 2003

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co..._CINEBENCH.gif
06-02-2006, 10:42 PM
TEDY

0.08v ?
06-02-2006, 10:45 PM
theteamaqua

cpu z doesnt tell the real voltage

yaya more results, ill stay here for couple more minutes :)

keep 'em comin coolaler
06-02-2006, 10:50 PM
Charles Wirth

The Cinebench is way off, at that speed you should be under 20 seconds easy. @ 3.4Ghz I pulled 24s
06-02-2006, 10:53 PM
guess2098

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

3.9G@Cinebench 2003

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co..._CINEBENCH.gif

two sp2004 ?
06-02-2006, 10:58 PM
Athens[2004]

Those chips are immortals to http://img348.imageshack.us/img348/8245/0422af.gif
06-02-2006, 11:38 PM
ethernal

God damn, I don't even have the balls to take a 90nm P4 to 1.78 volts, and here you go and do it on a 65nm chip.
06-03-2006, 12:20 AM
Nanometer

I think Fugger ran 1.9V into his Prescott in the pre-90NM days.
06-03-2006, 12:33 AM
Kjaks

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

The Cinebench is way off, at that speed you should be under 20 seconds easy. @ 3.4Ghz I pulled 24s

Yep, and the multiprocessor speedup is only 1.52, normally it's around 1.82. And the Open-GL speedup is 0.52. There must be a bug somewhere, i've also seen the same dendencies on other Conroe Cinebechs, but not all.
06-03-2006, 12:55 AM
theteamaqua

wait so bigger cores are able to run higher voltage than smaller ones??

i thought more voltage = more power, and Conroe doesnt use much power does it??

whats the stock VCore for Conroe??
06-03-2006, 01:10 AM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUGGER

The Cinebench is way off, at that speed you should be under 20 seconds easy. @ 3.4Ghz I pulled 24s

his is running only one core, is you bench with one core as well?

Quote:

Originally Posted by theteamaqua

wait so bigger cores are able to run higher voltage than smaller ones??

i thought more voltage = more power, and Conroe doesnt use much power does it??

whats the stock VCore for Conroe??

i think stock volts is something around 1.1v or 1.2v
the arch. allows the higher voltage. if you remember p3 days they were able to take 1.8v, while netburst has massive leakage adding higher voltage with the already high heat output causes damage. Think of conroe along the same lines as p3's when it comes to handling voltage increases.
06-03-2006, 01:18 AM
Waus-mod

Nice job my friend. Cant wait to get me one :(
06-03-2006, 01:46 AM
johnnyliu3377

Boss!
Does good,I also must try it!
06-03-2006, 01:57 AM
railer

Damn that's overvolting it for sure. Could it be that cpu throtle and thats why the bench is so off? Anyway i'm glad that Conroe can take such pounding even for a short benchmark. I can only emagine what these cpu's will do later on with ln2 and perhaps 2.0 vcore?
06-03-2006, 02:03 AM
hani

extreem!!!
06-03-2006, 02:10 AM
theteamaqua

ill say it again, Core 2 XE X6800 4GHz stable with air cooling is no dream, i guess you just need enough voltage and a good mobo, at first i couldnt believe that, but now i do , nice work man !!

:thumbsup:
06-03-2006, 03:19 AM
Hyperr

Impressive! 4 Ghz on air... I want a Conroe! :woot:
06-03-2006, 03:46 AM
Ekren

Give it some ln2! :D
06-03-2006, 03:55 AM
wittekakker

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

:woot: 16k;)

My FX @ 3,68GHz did the same. AMD rulez :p:
In 5 ~10 years superpi1M will be just like 16k now... useless.
So... we really need a new standard :stick:

On-topic now :p Nice 4GHz. I remember someone mentioned the new Core Duo was able to hit 4GHz air cooled, but when Yonah came out not a lot people still believed in that. But now we have seen this...
:woot:
06-03-2006, 04:18 AM
2fink

congrats! when will you go subzero again?
06-03-2006, 04:30 AM
Garrett

what voltage could be considered as 'deadly'? :D
06-03-2006, 04:43 AM
althes

thats just so wrong
06-03-2006, 05:09 AM
DeltZ

it's probably just me but i seem to have no ever seen any temp readings. What kind of temps can we expect for conroe? anyone have any idea? Thinking pretty general here...
06-03-2006, 07:09 AM
freecableguy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garrett

what voltage could be considered as 'deadly'? :D

No one knows yet.

Well......I hate to say it....BUT I TOLD YOU SO. :)

4Ghz on air will be the norm with the E6700 and X6800 CPUs. Expect to see even better from the C1 stepping (I hear they are floating around....) :)

-FCG
06-03-2006, 07:15 AM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Repoman

1.78v on 90nm is insane, but 65 :eek: Nice work though

I know. The stock Vcore of Conroe is 1.15v, .2v less than 1.35v for 90nm AMD. So 1.78v for 65nm, must feel like 1.98v to a 90nm!:eek: On air too.
06-03-2006, 07:48 AM
LowRun

It's more like half a Conroe @ 4GHz on air, temps would be interesting too.
06-03-2006, 08:02 AM
DeltZ

tbh, if i gave that to my 0.13 micron northwood. it would die of SNDS

intel must have pleased the manfacturing gods somehow...
06-03-2006, 08:35 AM
vapb400

What motherboard is this? LOL you are running higher vcore than Japan did on their 5 ghz run with ln2, that is awesome that Conroe can take the vcore like that.
06-03-2006, 08:40 AM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by vapb400

What motherboard is this? LOL you are running higher vcore than Japan did on their 5 ghz run with ln2, that is awesome that Conroe can take the vcore like that.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=101778

@coolaler: when will you use DI/LN2? If you got those vga cards off stock cooling, I'm sure you'd have no problem taking down some wr for 3d.
06-03-2006, 08:55 AM
vapb400

Quote:

Originally Posted by thunderstruck!

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=101778

@coolaler: when will you use DI/LN2? If you got those vga cards off stock cooling, I'm sure you'd have no problem taking down some wr for 3d.

I don't think thats the board, look at the cpu-z memory screen shots. cpu-z doesnt support reading the timings on the new RD600 chipset, and in this thread it has all the timings.
06-03-2006, 09:18 AM
Supertim0r

no throttle ?
06-03-2006, 10:29 AM
Absolute_0

Conroe takes more volts than AMD, due to lack of memory controller or just design?

C1 stepping is sounding good... if B0 -> C1 is anything like A1->B0, we're going to see another nice bump in clocks, and i mean NICE.
06-03-2006, 10:52 AM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Absolute_0

Conroe takes more volts than AMD, due to lack of memory controller or just design?

C1 stepping is sounding good... if B0 -> C1 is anything like A1->B0, we're going to see another nice bump in clocks, and i mean NICE.

Where have you seen a C1 stepping?
06-03-2006, 10:53 AM
metro.cl

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecableguy

No one knows yet.

Well......I hate to say it....BUT I TOLD YOU SO. :)

4Ghz on air will be the norm with the E6700 and X6800 CPUs. Expect to see even better from the C1 stepping (I hear they are floating around....) :)

-FCG

i also heard about 4GHz on air for a long time now but i never thought it was only 16k stable :stick:
06-03-2006, 11:11 AM
rozzyroz

Quote:

Originally Posted by LowRun

It's more like half a Conroe @ 4GHz on air, temps would be interesting too.

why would it be half? both cores are enabled.
06-03-2006, 12:30 PM
uclajd

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecableguy

Expect to see even better from the C1 stepping (I hear they are floating around....) :)

:lol: u funny. One wouldn't have "floated" into your garage would it? ;)

Doesn't a big Intel embargo lift on Sunday? You got something you want to tell us FCG? :D
06-03-2006, 12:53 PM
LowRun

Quote:

Originally Posted by rozzyroz

why would it be half? both cores are enabled.

Ah, my bad then. I thought Evilsizer knew something i didn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

his is running only one core
06-03-2006, 01:05 PM
funkflix

Quote:

Originally Posted by metro.cl

i also heard about 4GHz on air for a long time now but i never thought it was only 16k stable :stick:

QFT ;)
06-03-2006, 01:22 PM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike6969

"NOT FLAMMING" - unless this guy shows me a picture of his setup running 4ghz at 1.78v on "Air" and a screen shot of his monitor showing 4ghz next to his entire setup, only then i'll give this guy props... In my opinion running that much volts on a 65nm cpu the temps would sky-rocket to 70c in an instant but yet this guy is able to run superPi , ahaha .. sorry but this is just too hard to believe.... AGAIN IM NOT CALLING HIM A LIAR OR AM I STARTING A FIGHT SO PLEASE DO NOT FLAME AT ME LOL . I just want further proof, thats all......... cyaa :toast:

Mike

Why would he lie? Coolaler is a very respected member, and contributes most, if not all of Core 2 Duo tests and new mobo information.
06-03-2006, 01:48 PM
theteamaqua

Quote:

Originally Posted by thunderstruck!

Why would he lie? Coolaler is a very respected member, and contributes most, if not all of Core 2 Duo tests and new mobo information.

yeah , he doesnt lie, at least thats what i think
06-03-2006, 02:27 PM
Waus-mod

Coolaler wont lie.. i know for sure!
06-03-2006, 02:56 PM
CompGeek

I want an X6800 now! :D

Insane SP1M results :toast:
06-03-2006, 03:44 PM
turbotoaster

just wondering as noone seams to mention temps they get on any of the memron/conroe threads, is this because of NDA, thats the only reason i can think of.
06-03-2006, 03:48 PM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbotoaster

just wondering as noone seams to mention temps they get on any of the memron/conroe threads, is this because of NDA, thats the only reason i can think of.

You are the first to ask, that's why;) . I'd also like to know. Just use everest to monitor windows temps. But then again, onboard sensors are never accurate.
06-03-2006, 04:00 PM
coolaler

my best records@E6700 on LN2

1.78v can't make CPU higher,if CPU limit come
so Vcore=1.63v is best setting on my platform

1M

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...553_1M6700.gif

32M

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...00_32M6700.gif
06-03-2006, 04:09 PM
IvanAndreevich

coolaler coolaler coolaler
What temperatures do you get on air at 1.55V maximum stable overclock?
06-03-2006, 04:14 PM
coolaler

Quote:

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

coolaler coolaler coolaler
What temperatures do you get on air at 1.55V maximum stable overclock?

i have no idea
no any info i can find
but looks like no high,i was touch hestsink
06-03-2006, 04:14 PM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

coolaler coolaler coolaler
What temperatures do you get on air at 1.55V maximum stable overclock?

Or at just the maximum stable overclock? 30mins of SP2004 is all it takes. Nice LN2:toast:
06-03-2006, 05:02 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Hmmm, now that I see that, I wonder what will come first: Under 10sec SPI 1m, or under 10min SPIU 32m?? Coolaler, you need some of Kinc's memory that does DDR 1204 @ 4-4-3 on AM2.
06-03-2006, 05:48 PM
dogsx2

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike6969

"NOT FLAMMING" - unless this guy shows me a picture of his setup running 4ghz at 1.78v on "Air" and a screen shot of his monitor showing 4ghz next to his entire setup, only then i'll give this guy props... In my opinion running that much volts on a 65nm cpu the temps would sky-rocket to 70c in an instant but yet this guy is able to run superPi , ahaha .. sorry but this is just too hard to believe.... AGAIN IM NOT CALLING HIM A LIAR OR AM I STARTING A FIGHT SO PLEASE DO NOT FLAME AT ME LOL . I just want further proof, thats all......... cyaa :toast:

Mike

That's called an oxymoron.

When you have posted 5% of the ss Coolaler has on Conroes, then maybe you can think about posting your post. Coolaler doesn't lie.
06-03-2006, 05:52 PM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

Hmmm, now that I see that, I wonder what will come first: Under 10sec SPI 1m, or under 10min SPIU 32m?? Coolaler, you need some of Kinc's memory that does DDR 1204 @ 4-4-3 on AM2.

under 10sec 1m run has been done, its somewhere in here.
06-03-2006, 06:09 PM
thunderstruck!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

under 10sec 1m run has been done, its somewhere in here.

Nope. WR is 10.2s by TAM. Hasn't changed.
06-03-2006, 07:02 PM
coolaler

Quote:

Originally Posted by guess2098

two sp2004 ?

2 sp2004 all error:D
06-03-2006, 07:07 PM
coolaler

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike6969

"NOT FLAMMING" - unless this guy shows me a picture of his setup running 4ghz at 1.78v on "Air" and a screen shot of his monitor showing 4ghz next to his entire setup, only then i'll give this guy props... In my opinion running that much volts on a 65nm cpu the temps would sky-rocket to 70c in an instant but yet this guy is able to run superPi , ahaha .. sorry but this is just too hard to believe.... AGAIN IM NOT CALLING HIM A LIAR OR AM I STARTING A FIGHT SO PLEASE DO NOT FLAME AT ME LOL . I just want further proof, thats all......... cyaa :toast:

Mike

i don't care,anything u can say:D and I proff for nothing!:)
06-03-2006, 07:34 PM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by thunderstruck!

Nope. WR is 10.2s by TAM. Hasn't changed.

i saw a pic of conroe doing 9.7xx secs, it was here somewhere. so many threads to go thru.
06-03-2006, 07:41 PM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evilsizer

i saw a pic of conroe doing 9.7xx secs, it was here somewhere. so many threads to go thru.

Well, must have been along time since, and 512K =)
06-03-2006, 07:48 PM
vapb400

Coolaler what motherboard is this?

or did you vmod a bad axe or msi rev2b?
06-03-2006, 07:56 PM
Evilsizer

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Well, must have been along time since, and 512K =)

eh if im wrong im wrong, i cant find it... just wait...
06-03-2006, 08:40 PM
coolaler

Quote:

Originally Posted by vapb400

Coolaler what motherboard is this?

or did you vmod a bad axe or msi rev2b?

this is MSI 975X
yes I mod it already
make vcore X+0.2v
and I set vcore 1.58v in BIOS will be 1.78v
06-03-2006, 08:52 PM
IvanAndreevich

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

i have no idea
no any info i can find
but looks like no high,i was touch hestsink

Ah, I see. So it runs quite a lot cooler than Athlon 64's?
06-04-2006, 02:47 AM
TL1000S

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

i have no idea
no any info i can find
but looks like no high,i was touch hestsink

Does that meen there is no utility (CoreCell, Speedfan.. EverestHome) that can report the temps from Bios with this board+Conroe?
That surely seem strange... :confused:

If the HS is cool/lukewarm.. the CPU surely is "cold" (we can rule out improper mounting I would think) :D
06-04-2006, 11:11 AM
SoF

impressive how they scale with voltz even they already have more than additional 0.5V...
here we go for the misterious 4GHZ on air - it's broken and whoever said it before - he was right :D
06-04-2006, 09:33 PM
bri1

im impressed i just hope i can get a job to get myself one of these sexy beasts
06-04-2006, 10:14 PM
yotomeczek

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

this is MSI 975X
yes I mod it already
make vcore X+0.2v
and I set vcore 1.58v in BIOS will be 1.78v

NIce :D
I heard about a few death Bad Axe mobos and I start to thinking that MSI is better option ... FSB max is the same (460MHz so far)
What You think ?
06-05-2006, 01:17 PM
coolaler

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

3.9g@32MPI pass :banana:

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...V_3900_32M.gif

another 32mpi result,just difference in e6700

http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co..._3900_32M1.gif

this result faster than last result 31s,what happen?same platform,same program and setting,just difference in e6700(another chip),because another chip stable more?I have no idea!
06-05-2006, 02:10 PM
dogsx2

Quote:

this result faster than last result 31s,what happen?same platform,same program and setting,just difference in e6700(another chip),because another chip stable more?

more stable=faster times :toast:
06-05-2006, 02:30 PM
alexio

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolaler

this result faster than last result 31s,what happen?same platform,same program and setting,just difference in e6700(another chip),because another chip stable more?I have no idea!

It could programs in the background causing this. Make sure you run superpi right after startup and clean the superpi folder from all files but the .EXE before each run. Open superpi and run it when you harddrive is completely silent. It is possible that your system is still starting up some things if you don't wait long enough.

For booting with at least processes running you can do this: start-->run-->msconfig-->choose diagnostic boot (apply and restart).

If the temps are really high it is also possible that the cpu throttled a little during one of the tests , but I think instability at such speed will cause superpi to fail before that happens.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 AM.

XtremeSystems