Is a Quad Rad overkill?
Printable View
Is a Quad Rad overkill?
definitely not.
These i7 run hot like hell, believe me, I own one.
I already have the project built with a dual what about adding an extra instead of replacing the dual? Like a triple or another dual...
A dual rad can cool the CPU but it depends on the goal you are trying to achieve.
What speed ? what temps ?
You would probably get 4Ghz at about 80c degrees max.
It also depends on your fans, configuration, block and ambient temp.
Adding another dual is an option but a bit messy IMO, I like solid stuff :p:
Cool, thanks for the heads-up on my batch. I thought because I didn't have a "B", I got a crapper. Just glad I can do 4.0 on air with under 1.4V. That was my goal, months ago.
On a different note, I lapped my TRUE Black as I always lap my HSF's. Well, I lapped the i7 last night perfectly flat and my temps did not change AT ALL. Not one single degree difference on any of the cores. Did multiple previous runs and multiple post runs, idle and load. EXACTLY the same. So, for those on the fence about lapping their CPU for air cooling, I wouldn't - just lap the HSF.
My block is an Apogee GTZ, MCP655, Silverstone's FM121. CPU Loop only.
My objective is as much as i can get.
I've been studying i'm thinking of keeping the 2x 240 rads for my SLI setup (thinking 2x GTX285) and will put a triple for the CPU on top with push pull config. FM121's too. :D
Thanks for clarifying these questions and in providing the links. But do you think 4Ghz or 4.2Ghz are possible with a 120.2 rad and only CPU in loop?
me thinks anything like pa120.3 is quite sufficient to cool these suckers ;)
Ahh yes I'm very happy with mine so far.
On the topic of actual performance: for fun I went to an old favorite 'fun' bench of compiling the linux kernel. Here are the data points I have so far:
Edit: Re-tested everything and got better data and reformatted it a little, I wasn't using enough iterations.
Ubuntu Desktop 2.6.27-9-generic SMP x64, compiling kernel version 2.6.28.1, make menuconfig, saved without changing settings.
ReiserFS on a Seagate 7200.11 1TB drive
time make -j8 vmlinux, fresh boot, text mode, 3-6 back to back runs, best real times used:
3.8ghz, 3200mhz uncore: real 1m2.207s/user 5m53.758s/sys 0m42.675s
3.8ghz, 3400mhz uncore: real 1m1.152s/user 5m51.986s/sys 0m42.591s
4.0ghz, 3200mhz uncore: real 0m58.972s/user 5m37.037s/sys 0m42.019s
4.0ghz, 3400mhz uncore: real 0m56.923s/user 5m36.913s/sys 0m41.127s
4.0ghz, 3600mhz uncore: real 0m56.887s/user 5m33.673s/sys 0m41.039s
4.2ghz, 3200mhz uncore: real 0m55.090s/user 5m23.288s/sys 0m41.315s
4.2ghz, 3400mhz uncore: real 0m54.617s/user 5m22.072s/sys 0m39.890s
4.2ghz, 3600mhz uncore: real 0m54.440s/user 5m19.956s/sys 0m39.370s
A decent enough air cooler although I found the fan to be a little weak. Easily replaced with one that has sufficient pressure to handle moderate oc's with an i7.
I had a similar problem with my first i7 920,it would not fully post above bclk 172 with the same diag code as yours.I have since sold that i7 920 and have a new one which does bclk 200 (previous batch no 3838a820 ,new batch number 3839a557).Stay clear of 3838a820!
the thing is... stay away from 3838A, period.
SSD action? - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=531
using the feser 480 I can get 4.2+ HT on prime stable @77C max temp - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=2068
That's what I did, but are you cooling a GPU with that? If you are, you'll see an increase in temps depending on the card. I have 2 - 4870X2 in the same loop with a double and triple rad. I removed the vid cards and my temps are 5-7C cooler idle. I still have to run some tests to see if the cooling difference is greater under load.
What is a good batchnumber for a 920 CPU?