Incase you didn't know, ATi is trying to go quad-crossfire too...Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
Again, people flame one company for something both companies are doing.
Printable View
Incase you didn't know, ATi is trying to go quad-crossfire too...Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
Again, people flame one company for something both companies are doing.
In response to nvidia doing so, as I said, the rest of the industry will follow.Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
7900GT
http://www.guru3d.com/admin/imageview.php?image=6819
memory layout looks alittle diffrent from the 7800, doesnt it?
that core is the same size as the NV42! :shock2:
ya, had my 7800GT nacked a few days ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinnacle
and the mem blocks on the 7800GT are almost perfct squares the ones on ur pic arent.
that and on the 7800GT there is less room between the blocks then on that pic.
http://www.techpowerup.com/?9172
New from tech-powerup.
450Mhz core clock for the 7900GT? And the 7900GTX is supposed to have a 650Mhz core clock? That's a rather LARGE gap considering that the 7800gt has a 400Mhz core and the 7800gtx a 430.
Interesting...
You fail to understand that is is more efficient to design a small Perfect Processor than it is to start from scratch and Strangle all the performance you can get out of it..Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
OR do you not understand why Thread Level Parallelization is the new standard...
If you consider more power consumption, more space needed, and more heat more efficient, go for it. I guess efficiency is subjective.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Bigger gap because the 7800gt had 4 pipes less than the gtx.Quote:
http://www.techpowerup.com/?9172
New from tech-powerup.
450Mhz core clock for the 7900GT? And the 7900GTX is supposed to have a 650Mhz core clock? That's a rather LARGE gap considering that the 7800gt has a 400Mhz core and the 7800gtx a 430.
Interesting...
Will you can't consider Processing without considering Power and costQuote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
Might I suggest you read http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000313
it will help you understand the reason behind multible cores a bit better...
7900GTX Details
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=915
lucky me
ok with 3500+ AMD DDR400 everything stock
9GTX5 stock not tweak
05 96xx
06 46xx ;SM2 2xxx SM3 2xxx CPU "8xx"
If that's true, then it would mean 48 pixel shaders just like the X1900, since current 7800GTX has 24 pipes and 24 shaders.Quote:
Originally Posted by onethreehill
that would be yummy.
and if they can keep it cheap :slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by HKPolice
there's no way it's twice as fast.
Twice as fast as previous gen. Previous gen was G6 series, this gen for nvidia is G7. So it will be twice as fast as the 6800Ultra..... which the 7800GTX 512 is already in a lot of cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybercat
What the heck is that?:slobber:Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
The future..;)
Why four?...It will be too hot:)
not with a small enough process
btw the temp for 7900gtx512 is really hot
with one card on 50 idle /66 load
SLi mode
the "inside" card up to 57idle / 73 load
*load temp is right after 06 finished
look just like 7800gtx512
650 but 700 no go
memory up to 950 / 1900 ok same as 78512
Denny, any chance for a better CPU than the 3500+?
Performs fairly identically to my GTX-256 at the same clocks (in the 06 GPU tests....I was running a 2.8GHz Toledo, so not a fair comparo in 05), btw....24pipes it is.
Kind of disappointing :(
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by physics_geek
It's obviously an Audigy or X-Fi card because of the black background, the bulky ram, and the 4 cores per card with the X-Fi stock heatsink :rolleyes:
I dont think something like that will ever exist anyway, because ram will probably be a lot smaller, and something like that would probably cook the insides of your PC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
lol, coincidence? :p:Quote:
Nvidia will invite its loyal press, to Satan Clara to show them its new part.