What's the answer if it doesn't take much. I upped it to what it was because I knew it was not good. Is there a formula for Vcore to Vdimm?Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
Printable View
What's the answer if it doesn't take much. I upped it to what it was because I knew it was not good. Is there a formula for Vcore to Vdimm?Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
:banana::banana::banana::banana: 200€ :(
so how much you need? I think you are complaining and cry for hunger everywhere :DQuote:
Originally Posted by TEDY
OPN, don't worry, TEDY is famous for grumbling and envy complains in our country.
he is also famous for buying opty and OCZ VX and runs them on stock volt/freq and he is afraid of water (in comp).
arn't I a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: :D
i think 1.45+ vcore for 3.2+ vdimm at least.. some folks said they get system more stable when vcore is closer to VTT (vdimm/2)Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
i set my vcore at 1.5v in bios for my 2x 512MB XMS3500C2v1.1 BH-5
@260-264mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.44-3.48v
@266mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.54v
Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
Now I see the tru image of "The sharpness from cat's eyes!!";)
One can see many things after the last couple days. ""The sharpness from cat's eyes!!", I don't know about that. One thing we are not seeing is anyone being able to get some of this and other good ram so we can see how well they perform.
Patience my friend :toast: ....it's rumored that TeamResearch will be receiving another "small" shipment (but definately more than 5 kits :p: )of these sticks very soon ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by coop
3,7v :), didn't have the time to open MBM or SG, had to leave.Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
I Don't know, maybe because the screensaver was kicking in every 10min :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Yeah, maybe, I will rerun it when my Expert arrives (RMA :( ), with:Quote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
SmartGuardian,
Different TREF (3072?)
Dynamic counter enabled.
Will also try for 274MHz
Try TREF 4708 (166, 1.95) and if that doesn't work, 3120 (200, 15.6u)Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertShooter
or even 166, 15.6usQuote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
just do NOT try anything with 3.9us and 7.8us(133mhz 7.8us excluded;))
did you guys find this with these particular sticks or BH5 and other RAM in generalQuote:
Originally Posted by Onepagebook
200mhz 15.6us gives higher clocks but give slower times for me, 100mhz 1.95us is fastest for me(khx pc3200 256mb sticks).Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
200Mhz 3.9us is very fast for 3D on RDX, much better than anything 1.95us ;)
I should have some results with my set by Tues, waiting on 510 SLI mod.
Most RAM will perform @ optimum with one of those settings (unless GHZ is right about the RDX board - and there's no reason to doubt him ;) )Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
@ GHZ - I know you'll have something nice to show ;)
and LV's right - sometimes I get a faster time using the 100, 1.95u setting (but on the Expert, the 166, 1.95 FEELS a little faster)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lastviking
that's because you got old school bh-5 and that 's all tricks from PCB and spd matters.;)
GHZ is right, that's why if you are using 1900 CF(2 cards), 200 3.9us would just the good number to do it. BUT I would tru 166, 3.9 as well;)
all depends on ram and board/cpu/bios
old school for me loves 200mhz 15.6 (3120)
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...tweaker_tn.jpg
trfc18? :wth:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
yeah it ain't the best but it works... at lower end can do tighter though
------------------------------------------------------------
Async
10x300HTT = 3000Mhz
166 divider
250mhz 2-2-2-1 7-13 2212 at 3.2v vdimm in bios
1M = 27.484s
32M = 23m 59.641s
10x310HTT = 3100Mhz
166 divider
258mhz 2-2-2-1 7-13 2212 at 3.44v vdimm in bios
32M = 23m 13.922s new PB
10x312.6HTT = 3125Mhz
166 divider
260mhz 2-2-2-1 7-13 2212 at 3.44v vdimm in bios
32M = 23m 02.640s
10x315HTT = 3150Mhz
166 divider
262mhz 2-2-2-5 7-14 2223 at 3.48v vdimm in bios
32M = 22m 56.875s old PB
32M = 22m 57.859s <-- need to work on it :)
------------------------------------------------------------
1:1
10x266HTT = 2664Mhz
266mhz 2-2-2-5 7-17 2223 at 3.54v vdimm in bios
32M = 26m 33.422s
10x267HTT = 2670Mhz
267mhz 2-2-2-5 7-17 2223 at 3.67v vdimm in bios
32M = 26m 29.609s
Hmmm...that's quite odd for old school bh5's. IMO, playing with TRFC values seems much more of an issue with the UTT/New BH5's built on the BP PCB's. Old school BH5's on JEDEC specced pcb's were able to run at a TRFC12 basically, almost to the ablsolute limit of the sticks. Here's my old school Twinmos BH5's:Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/2...70bh32m3za.jpg
ram like cpus is all luck heh
Depends on who you ask ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
lol... i know my FX-57 has a better mem controller than any opteron i tested so far - can run mem tighter timings on fx-57 that all my opterons still :D
Yes, i think is dependent of the RAM (chips, binning and PCB) too and even of memory controller. For example here i have in this moment this old pic testing 8M on 260MHz using 166Hz 7.8us (1168 i think) in one of my pairs of GH. But for example, in my old Winchester (CBBHD) with that tref i can't pass SP8M, in this case i need to use 200MHz 15.6us (3120).
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/3...8mgh0rg.th.png
With Geil Ultra-X (UTT-BH) i remember i used 3120 and with OCZ VX too for the same freq.
For faster times, in NF4 Ultra-D (RA02) i've noticed that 166MHz 1.95us and 166MHz 15.6us are very similar for PI, but i still think 166 1.95 is a little bit faster. In fact all 1.95us family are good for PI (except 200MHz 1.95MHz)
Sorry my bad english, since 2 months ago my english is very unstable
3120 is easier on your memory controller since it's the actual refresh rate of ddr. So basically, the ram is refreshing @ its default frequency. When we set the tref to - say, for example - 166, 1.95, we're asking our memory controllers to work harder and as a result, weaker MC's won't be able to run that. The key to getting a fast Spi result is finding the right combination of STABLE frequencies at a given speed...Quote:
Originally Posted by corvus_corax
No worries about your English, it proably would be better than German? would be after 2 months :p: