Share the love! Or are you NDA'dQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Printable View
Share the love! Or are you NDA'dQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Any one experianced sudden BSOD 0x124 during daily use / web browsing after overclocking?
My P8P67-Pro with 2600k can pass LinX @5Ghz with 1.4v for 20 loops but BSOD when idle or web browsing... this issue likely happen in windows 7 but seems not in XP
looks to me a BIOS issue...
Yeah, that's SB. Load goes down, voltage goes down but the clock stays same and boom - BSOD. Tweak voltage for low loads with LinX 1 thread. No LLC is better.
Yes it happened to many people and they solved it by upping the vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by ci2kla
Happened to me as well but i'm using offset now so its a different story.
the test was done with win 7 + sp1 ?
20 Pass Linx is not 24/7 stable. Thats what I use to narrow down my max oc. I run a 8hr small fft and then 8hrs blend to make sure my rig is 24/7 stable.
I realize this, but when member who represents ASUS says its coming in a week and then silence, it leads me to wonder.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praz
same for me, cant even build raid0 on SATA3 port 0,1 as raid manager fails to detect SSD on port0. marvell ports works fine though..Quote:
Originally Posted by Utnorris
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvous23
I think just Win 7 only, no SP1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sevenz
The bottom Line is, I used another i5-2500k which require quite the same voltage as 2600k to get 5Ghz stable for testing, but didn't experiance any BSOD so far. Also if running the system under Windows XP with the same setting will not have any problems/reboots/BSODs...kind of weird...
Yes I have to admit by upping the vcore will help, but it only mitigates the issue which delay the 0x124 BSOD occur time but still cannot solve completely, which leads to me to suspect it's a BIOS problem...
that's what happen when big corporations stop making money on particular platform..they simply don't care :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyea
lol silly ppl
next time check hwbot forum for the new bios
M4e 1090
btw no prob here running two raid's
Marvel Port - Asus DVDRW
port 0,1 - Crucial C300 128gb x2 Raid 0
port 2,3,4 - Intel X25m 80gb x 3 Raid 0
port 5 - WD 1tb Black
Just waiting to defy that 15 percent chance lol
Listen "silly" boy..i should't have to check on hwbot forum or any other mf forum for bios,there is your mobo maker side where they should be wildly available ,some of us just want some type of response here from the rep.Quote:
Originally Posted by cstkl1
Get back Jack
With the new chips if all that is being done is to isolate some transistor(s) then other than increasing the firmware stepping of the chip is there any reason the BIOS would need to be much different?
In other words I can not see why the current BIOS would stop being developed as there is so little change in hardware as far as the BIOS is concerned.
This is not officially supported by Asus ( title might be misleading), Bingo13 and Praz do it in their free time... Meaning if they lack time, they won't post here or answer to all the posts... nothing to do with ; "they don't care..."Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhandluke41
Lots of testers/benchers/reviewers got their hands on the new(er) bios(ses), maybe it isn't suited yet for us to use or try... Some of them just leak the biosses, some don't...just chill... If you know ya way around the web you will find them, since you are such a smart kid, that shouldn't be any problem at all...
Ok guys, comeon... please stop the flaming, or Fugger will bring out his pet Tiger and restore order...the last few posts above lee's were really uncalled for.
All you had to say was look on hwbot for leaked bioses, without calling someone a "kid".
And yes, they are LEAKED or beta bioses. if they were official, they would be on Asus' webpage. How would you feel if Asus released a beta bios officially and it bricked your board and destroyed your CPU in the process? You already saw what Nvidia did, TWICE last year, right? Sent out drivers that DESTROYED video cards. And you saw all the drama resulting from that...
Seriously, a LOT of overclockers here are over age 40. Some are in their 60's. Going around and calling us "Silly boys" is just asking for trouble. If you want teenage heaven, there are other sites (Like FM)...
Sorry, I'll try not to ask such questions again. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkentyne
I'm not a mod. I just want to avoid some of the flaming that occurs on the [H] and elsewhere. There was alot of this stuff here back, like during the days when some people thought SNDS/GNDS was a myth, and thank God those days are over....
It's fine to ask questions, and it's fine to be upset at the slow pace of bios releases, even to vent about it. But anything that resembles a personal sort of attack gets uncomfortable. So much going on in the world lately....
I don't have an asus board, but I do know about the problems people are having with them, even on latest bios versions, and not related at all to the PCH issue...
BTW the people who release the beta bioses, if not released by the reps themselves, are often the overclockers/testers...it would indeed be useful if there was a thread always updating the latest test bioses...
BTW: a small word of history:
It took companies about 6 months (I could be very wrong; feel free to correct me) or so to release bioses that would stop the 975X strap "power off/on" cycle above 320 FSB, though some boards (like p5w64) never got one. That was annoying to anyone who had a cooling system that had to remain powered. The SB boards have been out just over a month, just to keep things in perspective...though the companies have had more of a presence now than in the early core 2 days...
And the hard work done by truehighroller helped fix a serious issue on the P45 board. It's sad though that Asus never did ANYTHING about the ram subtimings that were missing on the 975x, but were present on the 965p...the bios fully would support it....it's like Asus simply didn't CARE about 975x users at all back then....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ci2kla
Could be that you miss a hotfix for Win 7, this is what Gary Key (ASUS Technical Marketing Manager) say and suggest about it.
"If you are receiving random BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) under Windows 7 OS without any warning at stock or what appears to be stable OC settings, please download the following patch from Microsoft to have the problem fixed (98% fix rate): This hotfix will be in SP1.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979444"
Source
:shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkentyne
I'm still trying to figure out where in my post I fit in there. My question was about BIOS for the B3 stepping chips yet to be released and try and offer some comfort in that I believe BIOS development is still continuing in hope to try and dispel the thought that it might have come to a stop by some people.
Seems you have misunderstood my post. If you going to come in waving a stick at least try to point it in the right place.
u guys are asking too much from asus infact from any manufacturer.
heck for 4 months for m4e to reach bios 10xx
when in the past lol that took a year or two.
I don't think it's asking too much. Just because customer support was slow in the past doesn't mean it should stay that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by cstkl1
Asus or any other manufacturer want to sell their product, customers provide feedback to make the product better and help the manufacturer sell more. :)
My board is stable but Im waiting for a few bugs I have tested out so far.
1 fix the sleep when pll overide is on(computer will not wake back up)
2 cant run tight timings at all with 4 sticks of gskill 2200 cl7 running 8-10-10-27 2t and with just 2 sticks I can run 7-9-7-26 1t and bench at 6-7-7-24
3 fix the stupid double boot everytime you reset the computer and fix the endless restarts it does when the oc settings are too much.
4 fix the reset,the last 3 asus boards Iv owned never worked when reset was pushed,it would double boot,endless boot or just boot and say oc failed.
Im waiting for the next bios just like all you guys and hope some of my issues get resolved
I had a LinX stable 5GHz CPU, it wasn't Prime95 stable (BSOD 124 and 101) so yeah, LinX is good but it's not the be all and end all of system stability.Quote:
Originally Posted by ci2kla
On the POST Issue:
Resetting the CMOS using the switch (Deluxe) or jumper (vanilla) has just worked on a group of six PCs of which at least 4 had exhibited the no POST issue.
Has anyone noticed any changes in cpu temps either more or less with the bios changes i.e. 1053 vs 1253 vs 1204 vs 1302 ? I'm on 1053 and temps avg 75-80 C @ 1.43vlts on load
Was wondering if updating might help temps. By th way 1302 is posted here http://hardforum.com//showthread.php?t=1578865
Any experiences on the UEFI 1302 versus 1204?
Looking for P8P67 Deluxe users :)
No 1600Mhz any longer, the new BIOS is Idling @4.5GHz.Quote:
P8P67 LE UEFI 1003
Change Log -
- Removes full reset at POST (double post) on cold boot or auto overclocking routine.
- Improved OC performance using Auto Overclocking
- Improved BCLK and DRAM OC capabilities when enabling the “Internal PLL Overvoltage” option in BIOS.
- Minor Bug Fixes including Auto Rule for C3, C6 being disabled when overclocking and improved USB compatibility.
- Enabling Internal PLL Voltage will still cause resume/hibernate issues (Intel related) but we are working with Intel on any potential workarounds.
http://img.techpowerup.org/110215/Capture033395.jpg
I didn't touch the C3, C6 or other power managements, but it's using ~32w at Idle now (VS ~9w before), both according to Real-temp. CPU-temp is up a few degrees too, at Idle.
I'm still evaluating this, and may enable those manually, but I don't like the Idle power-usage for now. At least if real-temp is right/accurate. Is it?
Still testing the old OC, but a short Prime-run seams to need same setting/vCore as for 1204.
EDIT:
At least, the C-state can be turned on manually, and the power usage is back to ~7w :)
http://img.techpowerup.org/110215/Capture034639.jpg
I'm still wondering if Real-temp is right/accurate tho. That's a big difference for idle power usage. Anybody knows?