Onepagebook Lifetime Ban at HWbot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KirkNash

that's exactly my point here, what i'm trying to figure out is what was the let's call it illegal trick he used which caused the mismatch, what i fail to understand is why the score wasn't out of bounds and it was indeed in the speed clock range he was at

doesn't the aquamark generate a html file which would tell the real FPS? did he provide that to the hwbot crew? this would rule out the photoshop in case the html file says it was indeed 397k, or it'd finally confirm the image was edited if shows the 392k one

anyway either one or another leads me to think it could've been a bug cause it doesn't make any sense for me otherwise :confused:

---

If it was a bug we'd hear of "bugged" AM3 runs more than once in a decade.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KirkNash

that's exactly my point here, what i'm trying to figure out is what was the let's call it illegal trick he used which caused the mismatch, what i fail to understand is why the score wasn't out of bounds and it was indeed in the speed clock range he was at

doesn't the aquamark generate a html file which would tell the real FPS? did he provide that to the hwbot crew? this would rule out the photoshop in case the html file says it was indeed 397k, or it'd finally confirm the image was edited if shows the 392k one

anyway either one or another leads me to think it could've been a bug cause it doesn't make any sense for me otherwise :confused:

---

Let's put this to rest with one little statement:
He admited he cheated on his own forum..OCX..
Now if that doesn't settle anyone who has any doubts nothing will.

why dont you just lock this thread sticky it for a little while and that's that

I guess the problem is that his score is in line with his FPS... even when they claimed it was not the case. But I mean to admit guilt it a different story all together. Nobody likes thieves, and that's what he is. A thief of benchmark scores..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

why dont you just lock this thread sticky it for a little while and that's that

---

because people want to add their comments and it's under control.. ;)
besides, I have my hammer if things get nasty..:p:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vinas

I guess the problem is that his score is in line with his FPS... even when they claimed it was not the case. But I mean to admit guilt it a different story all together. Nobody likes thieves, and that's what he is. A thief of benchmark scores..

---

no, it was not..
Your score is EXACTLY 1000 times your average FPS and that average FPS is located at the top left on the "submitted" screenshot..
The FPS were in the 372 range and the score was in the 377,000 range.. I may be off a tad on the numbers but my point is valid.. Go to HWBots page and see for yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dinos22

why dont you just lock this thread sticky it for a little while and that's that

---

I agree dino :up:
This thread (news) is getting old. The thread is starting to drift off topic and what few post that are trickling in don't seem to add to the thread. :yepp:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KirkNash

i wonder why should he wanted to generate an score if he had the hardware capable to perform that score anyway? :confused:

---

Normally I would've stopped reading right there.
But I was curious so I continued till the end.

After saying that you should consider your best option and stop posting here supporting OPB.

Benchmarking isn't a "hit & run" thing.
It's not a lock that you simply turn around to open the vault and get inside.

Just a few software tweaks can give you more than 2000pts at the same hardware configuration & clocks.

Shall we put this thread to rest now ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by runmc

I agree dino :up:
This thread (news) is getting old. The thread is starting to drift off topic and what few post that are trickling in don't seem to add to the thread. :yepp:

---

the admin that brought me here 3+ years to I always defer to..Thread closed.