I am not AMD so I don't make the clams sur. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
Printable View
I am not AMD so I don't make the clams sur. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
I don't believe for a second that you're hoping that. But I hope I'm wrong as it will benefit all of us if true. :)
No I do hope its true Poodle. It will keep Intel pushing things forward. We all have are reasons for wanting something. Mine are differant than yours!
Serge, this might help:
http://taiwan.cnet.com/sharedmedia/C...d/c2emb_30.jpg
G965 chipset + HDMI out.
Intel is now my future. :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by doompc
lol, some people just keep having problem to distinguish between AMD and intel.
If one did not switch to conroe as it launched and he will not do it now. SO save your bloody hell effort and stop posting intel in AMD forums!!
BTW, this is all about brisbane dual core 65nm.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
INTEL'S netburst begs to differ :slap:
IF any of you didn't notice jet:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=126558
So far 3.1GHz @1.4-1.5V and 2.6GHz(stock) @1.1-1.2V :)
The way i understood it, i think Turtle means clock for clock performance....Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowmage
Ya I been following that story. 3.1ghz is way better than before. If they hit 3.6ghz . Its a good shrink.. As for the voltage. Idon't Know if its being reported correctly. The temps aren't even worthy of mention as there way off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
To above poster . Yes a Was referring to clock for clock
Hehehe! Then they need 3.6GHz to catch the C2D overclock at what, 3GHz LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
I wouldn't say so considering his Prescott days. I'm assuming he is just making a comment to make Intel sound superior again :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
I believe 3.1 is already good for this shrink, in the first showing. No way in hell i would expect 3.6 to be possible, it would be an miracle in this arch. I would love to see accurate temps and volts report aswell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
I never ever Owned a prescot nor did I ever sell one. You assumed incorrectly. We were discussing the review a guy did comparing a E6300 against 65nm AMD @ 2.3 when the compare would have been more apples to apples if a E6400 would have been used.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Your good at this sort of thing nn and we all know it.
Great news from AMD
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/tic...&Symbol=US:AMD
Anand review of 65nm was Ok. Overclocking was good . No increase in performance. Power usage was lower. Temps were lower.
The thing I didn't like about Anand's review was he kept saying that It was more of a power consuption review than anything . Yet when it came time to O/C They never reported power consumption or temps at O/C.
http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2889
too high hypertransport
i feel OC lamers -)
http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/1808/ocqp7.png
Mas what is the most that the Ht link can be O/C.
Depends on the chipset. Some Via Chips will not allow the HTT Link to Surpass 1Ghz and be 100% stable. So there is a chance that they left the HTT multi high (which has virtually NO benefit) which effected the OCQuote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
So whats like the normal O/C of the HT with this M/B ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe
This is what Anand said in the comments section of the preview:
"Sorry I should have addressed this in the review - HTT speed had no impact on my overclocking results with this particular chip; even with a HT multiplier of 4X the chip won't get into Windows at 2.99GHz. Memory wasn't a factor as it was set to the lowest speed possible in order to see how far we could push the CPU.
I have a feeling that with better air cooling close to 3GHz may be possible, but I wanted to look at the worst case scenario overclocking potential of just using a stock heatsink/fan similar to what we did in our Core 2 overclocking article upon its release.
I'm working on the Brisbane 4800+ now and will find out soon if it overclocks any better.
Take care,
Anand"
This is going to be a wicked fast.
Ya I know got a warm fussy feeling all over.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon2ky
He most certainly does. I did notice however the use of differant chipset between the Amd -Intel systems. I looked on his site couldn't find the review of the Intel processor with that chipset.Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
If he wasn't going to use the same chipset I think maybe the 975 chipset should have been used rather than that very ineficient power robbing 680i chipset.
Not to nit pick or anything but the chipset uses a lot of power.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid...=expert&pid=21
On anands RD600 test . The differance between the Badaxe2 and the 680i idle power was 64 watts that changes things abit I would say.
Under load it was 40 watts.
Well AMD is just now getting high end chips to 3ghz with ~1.4V in the FX74's on 90nm. I would not anticipate 65nm cores going beyong 3.4ghz "from AMD." Yes parts will clock higher with more volts and cooling but they all do. and yes C2D is clocking higher, but for many reasons. There are not many at all C2D's hitting 4ghz on air, most are around 3600-3700 at most. So take the 3.1ghz for a first sample and say wow nice results ;-) With cooling like H20 and such and a slight rev. f these we surely will be seeing 3.3-3.4ghz out of them by summer which will put up a good fight to a C2D for sure. No reason why one in that range couldnt run or beat the 2.93 conroe.