No.1 in the world -AMD Athlon64 FX57 Show Up !

hahha

I should have one by this time next week :)

Can't wait

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 5-Clicks

when did WWM say it was a hardcoded 55? he said he HAS a hardcoded 55, but this isn't it. this is a different other chip: FX 57. if it was a hardcoded 55, then it would say so on the IHS too (unless you call a 3800 a hardcoded 3000)

---

i know this ONE is a REAL DEAL FX57 mate
:)

he did show the REAL 57 PICTURE this time LOL :clap: ...........what about LAST time :slapass: :rolleyes:

AND I do believe the WWM's FX 57's PICTURE now is real but what about BEFORE :confused: ............a FX25 :slapass:

I just read this article in The Inquirer:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24160

"One improvement that was expected was a boost in the memory controller speed to 533MHz up from 400MHz. Now that opens the door to a certainty. AMD has confirmed that FX will move to DDR2 memory in the "future". When asked, whether it was a near future or a distant one, the representative, Teresa, said probably next year."


Can anybody confirm the 533 Mhz controller?? That would be very interesting indeed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dimitriman

I just read this article in The Inquirer:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24160

"One improvement that was expected was a boost in the memory controller speed to 533MHz up from 400MHz. Now that opens the door to a certainty. AMD has confirmed that FX will move to DDR2 memory in the "future". When asked, whether it was a near future or a distant one, the representative, Teresa, said probably next year."


Can anybody confirm the 533 Mhz controller?? That would be very interesting indeed.

---

Wow, one of the first Inquirer articles that I've ever read that contains facts which are true :clap: ;)

Will that be 533MHz DDR1 or DDR2? Can someone with inside knowledge confirm that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by agenda2005

Will that be 533MHz DDR1 or DDR2? Can someone with inside knowledge confirm that.

---

It must be DDR-1, as the pinout and socket need to change for DDR2.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Wow, one of the first Inquirer articles that I've ever read that contains facts which are true :clap: ;)

---

So you can confirm an officially supported 533MHz DDR-1 memory controller on the FX-57?

Sweet.

EDIT: The Inquirer has deleted the reference to 533MHz... Hmmm... NDA issue, or not true?

So, does the FX-57 have a 533MHz memory controller, or not?

If it's NDA, do you really think you'd get an answer here? ;)

I just saw the FX57 listed under my distributor. Looks like its going to cost 1050 dollars

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Unrealcpu

I just saw the FX57 listed under my distributor. Looks like its going to cost 1050 dollars

---

http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...milies/cry.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER

;) I love Your avatar........ :clap:

:toast:

---

Yea ...Me Too!! :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

If it's NDA, do you really think you'd get an answer here? ;)

---

I'll take that as a Yes. :)

I just a confirmation from another source that 533MHz memory controller support is present in the FX-57.

Do you think they'll also enable that for E6 Venice and San Diego, coming in July?

The main thing we need to learn about FX-57 over FX-55 is

a) does it overclock better ?
b) does it do more IPC ?
c) for people using xtreme cooling does it have a cold bug ?

All of which this thread, after ( how many pages ? ) has failed to do.

I do not know whether Windwithme or OPB is right but what I do know is this thread has shown nothing whatsoever of interest !

Compare this to the 3dmark team forum where Oppainter and Sampsa in two threads both blew records away and posted cold bug issues on nvidia 7800 within 2 days and less combined pages of dross than this thread. this thread started off nowhere and after going around a roundabout 5 times is still going nowhere.

You can do the talk or you can do the walk.

Regards

Andy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zakelwe

The main thing we need to learn about FX-57 over FX-55 is

a) does it overclock better ?
b) does it do more IPC ?
c) for people using xtreme cooling does it have a cold bug ?

All of which this thread, after ( how many pages ? ) has failed to do.

I do not know whether Windwithme or OPB is right but what I do know is this thread has shown nothing whatsoever of interest !

Compare this to the 3dmark team forum where Oppainter and Sampsa in two threads both blew records away and posted cold bug issues on nvidia 7800 within 2 days and less combined pages of dross than this thread. this thread started off nowhere and after going around a roundabout 5 times is still going nowhere.

You can do the talk or you can do the walk.

Regards

Andy

---

That is true!

a) does it overclock better ?
b) does it do more IPC ?
c) for people using xtreme cooling does it have a cold bug ?

1. yes offcourse, every better rated chip OC better, see the FX55 BN. The FX57 is the better FX55 BN.

2. No not more then the FX-55BN or 3700/4000/4200+ diego. They are the same. E4 and B3.

3. some have some not. hope the FX57 have no more cold bug (~-40C coretemp)

windwithme some news ???

i m just wondering , why they dont just mount a vapols - machgt on fx57 to see some real power :slapass: or no ., benching on air or water , or just 200mhz overclock [3ghz] is just like someone buy a lamborgini murcielago and not pass 200km / hour . :( .

come on guys speed is sweet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Athens[2004]

i m just wondering , why they dont just mount a vapols - machgt on fx57 to see some real power or no ., benching on air or water , or just 200mhz overclock [3ghz] is just like someone buy a lamborgini murcielago and not pass 200km / hour . :( .

---

:D Yep - just find me someone who will send me one so I will test it immedeately on my MACH II GT.......... :p:

:toast: