32m Low Clock Challenge

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-21-2007, 08:33 PM
dinos22

wow FAST run there from a cut down intel CPU there

:toast:
04-21-2007, 11:56 PM
luihed

Those are some sick times NewBeatle:toast:

Wow I need to start benching this and learn, I hope you guys know my last post was a joke, I was just amaze at how far my time is compared to you guys....... How different is 32m vs 1m tweak wise?
04-22-2007, 04:02 AM
esdee

very nice to have you in this thread NewBeetle .
(by the way, the last couple of weeks im driving a new beetle :D )

id be glad to compete with you in the 13.xx category! ;)
04-22-2007, 09:05 AM
NewBeetle

Quote:

Originally Posted by luihed

Those are some sick times NewBeatle:toast:

Wow I need to start benching this and learn, I hope you guys know my last post was a joke, I was just amaze at how far my time is compared to you guys....... How different is 32m vs 1m tweak wise?

Thank you for your toast. luihed-san. ;)
The difference of tweaking between 1M and 32M is as follows.

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle..._CL3474mhz.png

Quote:

Originally Posted by esdee

very nice to have you in this thread NewBeetle .
(by the way, the last couple of weeks im driving a new beetle :D )

id be glad to compete with you in the 13.xx category! ;)

Hello, esdee-san.
You are a New Beetle driver like me!? :D

Your PI is very fast and id be also glad to compete with you in 32m Low Clock Challenge! ;)

DEWA DEWA ～ (it means "best regards" in Japan)
04-22-2007, 10:11 AM
eva2000

wow newbeetle thanks for the tips :D
04-22-2007, 10:13 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewBeetle

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

10x for posting some of your tweaks, I'm very interested in ram disk tweaking, by your opinion how much seconds is gain on 3600mhz (your excellent result) if spi directory is on ram disk or on hdd? I suppose you are using eram?

sve najbolje (it means dewa dewa in Serbia ;) :toast: )
04-22-2007, 10:41 AM
Gautam

Thanks so much for tips Newbeetle-san. :toast:

I'm curious about what you mean by "physical memory adjustment." ?

Do you have a link to download Autogear by any chance, and how do you use it? How large is your copy-waza size?

Thanks very much again!
04-22-2007, 11:47 AM
ncsa

Khun Newbeetle-san khaawp khoon maak khrap

(Thank you very much) :)
04-22-2007, 07:37 PM
coop

Thanks NewBeetle. I think alot of people are running 32m's now.

Do we need /want a section for fastest (closest to 12.xx) time @ 3600 or below?
04-22-2007, 07:39 PM
Gautam

Considering the amount of times we got at 3.6GHz, I'd say yes. :p:

Maybe even enough to start a sub 3600MHz 32M thread.
04-22-2007, 07:51 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Considering the amount of times we got at 3.6GHz, I'd say yes. :p:

Maybe even enough to start a sub 3600MHz 32M thread.

yeah sub 3600mhz 32M is popular competition http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?p=64298#post64298

http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/3...07tablegf9.png

and http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?s=&threadid=32303

.
04-22-2007, 07:52 PM
Gautam

Shouldn't "sub 3600MHz" mean sub 3600MHz? :confused: :p:
04-22-2007, 07:53 PM
eva2000

we're pretty flexible on that definition LOL

anyway table i have is for another thread i'm starting soon hehe
04-22-2007, 07:56 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Shouldn't "sub 3600MHz" mean sub 3600MHz? :confused: :p:

it is i was just toying with the idea how far i am off sub-13m and george was working out efficiencies there :toast:

we're pretty serious about SPI

wow NewBeatle you are using a totally different approach in tweaks EEK >> more work and testing ahead i think :D
04-22-2007, 11:05 PM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewBeetle

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle..._CL3474mhz.png

DEWA DEWA ～ (it means "best regards" in Japan)

First, Only I was 2 days offline, and I see lot of new post:toast:

Hello, NewBeetle-san!:)

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.:)
04-23-2007, 01:34 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.:)

I'm 99% sure that he is using 2k3, which ramdisk application u are using?

yours 32M score is really great under zero, so yes we can resemble together :D, but me and my Team must use XP :(, give us much better clock for CPU vs. 2k3
04-23-2007, 01:42 AM
kiwi

Konnichiwa NewBeetle-san, your times are amazing :toast:

I also wonder what physical memory adjustment mean
04-23-2007, 01:43 AM
Misko

one more advantage for me of using Abit is that when go sub zero perf number will not go down like on other boards, little explanation:

when using dlx on 3600 category competition, u are using 2:3 divider fsb is 400, and ram is 600, when u go sub zero it would be pretty much the same thing, maybe u will move few mhz but.... when using abit, on air it is 514 for both RAM and FSB, and when u go sub zero it would be 540+:

http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/5...shot028tl2.png

Do not watch result it is not good (it is 3rd in the world, but win wasn't so good) so my Team will heave boost in fsb and memory (that dlx users do not have) :toast:
04-23-2007, 01:48 AM
dinos22

that's a killer CPU

what were your tube temps and core temps again and how close were you managing to keep the temps to

also what does that CPU do on dice
04-23-2007, 02:45 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

that's a killer CPU

what were your tube temps and core temps again and how close were you managing to keep the temps to

also what does that CPU do on dice

I have send u PM (because it would be off topic if we start discussion about it)
04-23-2007, 04:28 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewBeetle

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　 256MB　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 boot drive　　　　　　　　 RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　 Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

Hi NewBeetle impressive runs you have put in, I'm intrigued that your listed tweaks has included MAXMEM for the 32M runs. I have been doing some extensive testing of 32M runs (which can be found here) and have found adjusting MAXMEM to 400, 500 and 600 did not gain me anything in my runs. I wonder is there anything different in the way you are implementing this tweak? My method is as follows

Quote:

Start -> run... "msconfig" The System Configuration Utility box will open up and you need to go to the "boot.ini" tab. Click "advanced options..." to bring up another box notice /MAXMEM is at the top with a number input beside it. Now here is where it gets vague. The majority say that for 32M calculations setting /MAXMEM to 600 works best, and for 1M calculations a values of 104. A bit of playing around with this value will be required but don't go crazy low or high as you may well bork your OS install.

is this the same as your method? One last thing, under "special methods" you list "physical memory adjustment" seeing how your already using MAXMEM to limit the size of the memory seen by windows what is this tweak doing?

John
04-23-2007, 04:56 AM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misko

I'm 99% sure that he is using 2k3, which ramdisk application u are using?

yours 32M score is really great under zero, so yes we can resemble together :D, but me and my Team must use XP :(, give us much better clock for CPU vs. 2k3

Ramdisk version: http://www.ramdisk.tk/

why xp give better clock? I read already somewhere, but I don't understand..

I will try sub 10s 9*570-580fsb, if mobo can..we beated 572FSB yet..
04-23-2007, 07:30 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

Ramdisk version: http://www.ramdisk.tk/

why xp give better clock? I read already somewhere, but I don't understand..

I will try sub 10s 9*570-580fsb, if mobo can..we beated 572FSB yet..

I don't know but in XP we can shot 1M 5480, with 2k3 max is 5400, similar with 32M, ~100mhz less dunno why :confused: Do u have best 3600 32M with quadGT can u try it? I'll be very interested to see that.
04-23-2007, 08:57 AM
NewBeetle

Thank you for a lot of questions.
I'll answer the questions as much as possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misko

10x for posting some of your tweaks, I'm very interested in ram disk tweaking, by your opinion how much seconds is gain on 3600mhz (your excellent result) if spi directory is on ram disk or on hdd? I suppose you are using eram?

sve najbolje (it means dewa dewa in Serbia ;) :toast: )

Hello, Misko-san.
I tested it.
It increases for about five seconds on hdd.
And i am using "ERAM for Windows Ver 2.11".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Thanks so much for tips Newbeetle-san. :toast:

I'm curious about what you mean by "physical memory adjustment." ?

Do you have a link to download Autogear by any chance, and how do you use it? How large is your copy-waza size?

Thanks very much again!

Hello, Gautam-san,
When i adjust physical memory more under Windows, I use "MemEat" that reduces physical memory.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).
Look at this picture. if you are interested in it (Sorry in Japanese).

http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle/Mem Adjustment.png

And a link to download Autogear is here.
http://www.vector.co.jp/soft/dl/win9.../se293319.html
But i don't explain it well, please see the image and understand what kind of software it is.
http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle/Autogear.png

My Copy-Waza size is "MAXMEM size + 100-200MB".
But, this size is not the best, and try variously, please.

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

First, Only I was 2 days offline, and I see lot of new post:toast:

Hello, NewBeetle-san!:)

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.:)

Hello, over@locker886-san.
I run SPI only under win 2003.
Sorry I can't answer your question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

Konnichiwa NewBeetle-san, your times are amazing :toast:

I also wonder what physical memory adjustment mean

Hello, kiwi-san.
When i adjust physical memory more under Windows, I use "MemEat" that reduces physical memory.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo

Hi NewBeetle impressive runs you have put in, I'm intrigued that your listed tweaks has included MAXMEM for the 32M runs. I have been doing some extensive testing of 32M runs (which can be found here) and have found adjusting MAXMEM to 400, 500 and 600 did not gain me anything in my runs. I wonder is there anything different in the way you are implementing this tweak? My method is as follows

is this the same as your method? One last thing, under "special methods" you list "physical memory adjustment" seeing how your already using MAXMEM to limit the size of the memory seen by windows what is this tweak doing?

John

Hello, Johnny Bravo-san.
I understand what you say and your question is very reasonable.

First question,
I think MAXMEM shows the effect by combining with COPY-WAZA.
My Copy-Waza size is "MAXMEM size + 100-200MB".
Without MAXMEM, Copy-Waza size will be very large.
And there is no difference in MAXMEM tweaking itself.

Second question,
I use the tool named "MEMEAT" to adjust the physical memory more in detail after physical memory is roughly adjusted with MAXMEM.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).
I'm sorry I can't explain well any more.

DEWA DEWA ～
04-23-2007, 09:25 AM
hadji_a

1 Attachment(s)

for the 15.xx category.
04-23-2007, 09:43 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewBeetle

Hello, Johnny Bravo-san.
I understand what you say and your question is very reasonable.

First question,
I think MAXMEM shows the effect by combining with COPY-WAZA.
My Copy-Waza size is "MAXMEM size + 100-200MB".
Without MAXMEM, Copy-Waza size will be very large.
And there is no difference in MAXMEM tweaking itself.

Second question,
I use the tool named "MEMEAT" to adjust the physical memory more in detail after physical memory is roughly adjusted with MAXMEM.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).
I'm sorry I can't explain well any more.

DEWA DEWA ～

NewBeetle thanks for the answers your explanation is clear even with the language difference ;) MEMEAT sounds interesting I will have to experiment with it.
04-23-2007, 03:32 PM
luihed

Wow... thanks for all the tips NewBeatle.... You are very generous with regards to sharing your knowledge...... May the overclocking gods reward you with a very fast cpu.......
04-23-2007, 03:50 PM
eva2000

thanks Newbeetle i dropped ~4 seconds off my best 400FSB 4:5 500mhz memory 32M time with maxmem 512MB :)

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5B...3m19s266ms.png
04-23-2007, 04:32 PM
dinos22

eva are you running RAS TO CAS WRITE DELAY = 2 or is that a glitch

try 600MHz maxmem too....i had slightly better times with that over lower values

lower values was better for shorter runs for me
04-23-2007, 04:54 PM
eva2000

maxmem = 600MB = 13min 23s which is ~4 seconds slower heh

yes RAS TO CAS Write delay = 2 memset tweaked no glitch it isn't RAS TO CAS Read delay (tRCD) :)
04-23-2007, 06:07 PM
dinos22

interesting

i have to try two timings changes with my sticks and maxmem 500......that should get me to NewBeetle/KP times if my system behaves the same as yours george
04-23-2007, 10:41 PM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misko

I don't know but in XP we can shot 1M 5480, with 2k3 max is 5400, similar with 32M, ~100mhz less dunno why :confused: Do u have best 3600 32M with quadGT can u try it? I'll be very interested to see that.

hmm,interesting..

Today I will come back my cpu,what can run 514FSB, so I will test tonight..:)
04-23-2007, 11:28 PM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

hmm,interesting..

Today I will come back my cpu,what can run 514FSB, so I will test tonight..:)

:toast: I think it can go under 13min and if someone manage to make it, it would be great to see 514mhz ram under 13min run, good luck with your benching
04-23-2007, 11:33 PM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewBeetle

Hello, Misko-san.
I tested it.
It increases for about five seconds on hdd.
And i am using "ERAM for Windows Ver 2.11".

:toast: tnx a lot NewBeetle for that information.
04-24-2007, 03:50 AM
Johnny Bravo

NewBeetle (or anyone else for that matter) can you explain what autogear does that simply assigning cpu priority using task manager doesn't? It seems that the program assigns priority to running threads - though the application is in Japanese so I don't exactly know what I'm doing with it :)
04-24-2007, 04:23 AM
Viss

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...32&postcount=4
04-24-2007, 05:16 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...32&postcount=4

yeah saw that and another post from Fredyama, was wondering if there is no difference then why are most of the Japanese team still using it? I was seeing if it offered something more ;)
04-24-2007, 06:05 AM
shimmishim

just want to thank you guys for this thread. it has helped me find tweaks for getting the best possible pi time and also for setting goals to achieve at clockspeeds. i'm trying to see if i can break the 13minute barrier with 3.65 or less ghz on my 6600. so far i've been able to tweak down from 14m10s to 13m25s at 3.6. only 25 more seconds! lol.

@Johnny - thanks for this analysis you did.
http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/showthread.php?t=332

i actually found that the luna theme made things faster in win2k3 (the most interesting tweak i've ever tried).

it actually lowered my 1M superpi time at 3.6 from 14.064 to 13.938!
04-24-2007, 11:29 AM
andre X_X

so close to sub 15m :D

http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/1169/3138spi32mjl8.jpg
04-24-2007, 07:55 PM
erwinz

my 32M run.. :)

http://img.techpowerup.org/070421/jhgjgh.jpg

full screen
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/5225/jhgjghey8.jpg

validation..
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=189682
04-24-2007, 11:30 PM
over@locker886

32M
4*512MB quad-channel used,and copy-waza only 336MB. I tested maxmem=512MB/550MB but 600MB faster..I think I can faster with 2*1GB memory and faster test hdd(used 15GB Quantum Fireball:D)

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5...n04875sho8.jpg

1M
Yesterday, I no tested 1M with 1:1. This monday result.:)
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7093/13890zj5.jpg
04-25-2007, 12:48 AM
staxm

What do u think about this setup

QuadGt (vdroop,vmch modded)
e6300@1.45v,TT BigTyphon
2x1GB crucial ballistix pc6400@2.75v

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/5...037copyke3.png

ballistix need too much voltage for cas4-4-4-4@514FSB and that subtiminigs,for spi1m@530 need 2,825v....did anyone have same problem?

:wave:
04-25-2007, 01:09 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

32M
4*512MB quad-channel used,and copy-waza only 336MB. I tested maxmem=512MB/550MB but 600MB faster..I think I can faster with 2*1GB memory and faster test hdd(used 15GB Quantum Fireball:D)

Yes faster hdd will improve Spi result, also waza must be above maxmem. You have beautiful spi 1M result, is it done on the same windows as 32M run?
04-25-2007, 01:38 AM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misko

Yes faster hdd will improve Spi result, also waza must be above maxmem. You have beautiful spi 1M result, is it done on the same windows as 32M run?

Thx. Same windows. What do you think? 2*1GB I will get better results than 4*512MB in Quad-GT?
04-25-2007, 01:52 AM
Misko

Quote:

Originally Posted by over@locker886

Thx. Same windows. What do you think? 2*1GB I will get better results than 4*512MB in Quad-GT?

Yas I think it will, which ide driver did u use? default win or u apply intel drivers (and did u put intel driver for chipset, my experience say it is better to use win default drivers for chipset but with hdd I dunno know yet)
04-25-2007, 02:00 AM
over@locker886

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misko

Yas I think it will, which ide driver did u use? default win or u apply intel drivers (and did u put intel driver for chipset, my experience say it is better to use win default drivers for chipset but with hdd I dunno know yet)

default win ide driver, no install drivers..
04-25-2007, 04:55 AM
shimmishim

Quote:

Originally Posted by staxm

QuadGt (vdroop,vmch modded)
e6300@1.45v,TT BigTyphon
2x1GB crucial ballistix pc6400@2.75v

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/5...037copyke3.png

ballistix need too much voltage for cas4-4-4-4@514FSB and that subtiminigs,for spi1m@530 need 2,825v....did anyone have same problem?

:wave:

yes. 2.825 for 530 1M seems a bit excessive especially for ballistix.

i can do 4-4-3-4 ddr2-1040 or 520mhz memtest looping #5 with only 2.2 volts
04-25-2007, 10:37 AM
andre X_X

14.XX Category

3133.0......andre X_X..............14.58.890.....8x391 .....587mhz.....4-5-4-4.....2/3

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/8...3spi32mrj6.jpg
04-25-2007, 11:43 AM
Poliniboi#40

Cool info;)
04-26-2007, 01:55 AM
hadji_a

1 Attachment(s)

for the 14.xx category
04-26-2007, 03:13 AM
andre X_X

nice run bro, try to use themes....
04-27-2007, 03:56 AM
monteboy

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop

Fabulous looking board there monteboy. Excellent time too.

thank you !,
next step to do is the vdroop mod on my board than i hope to present new SPI32M Results in the new 3800 MHz (543x7) 1066 strap category :)

Quad GT rules !
04-27-2007, 10:16 PM
coop

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5062/19x2326uu0.png
04-28-2007, 12:43 AM
coop

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/3825/17x2584xz8.jpg
04-28-2007, 01:32 AM
ncsa

1 Attachment(s)

3182.5......ncsa...............14.58.375.....8x398 ......596.8mhz.....4-4-4-8....2/3
04-29-2007, 05:19 PM
coop

1 Attachment(s)

This took me many tries, so I'm posting it.
04-29-2007, 05:21 PM
dinos22

coop i'm going after your times in a couple of days :D

nice going guys :toast:
04-29-2007, 05:25 PM
coop

I'll enjoy while I can. I'm not able to keep up with high fsb boards. Thinking of a new one.
04-29-2007, 05:27 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop

I'll enjoy while I can. I'm not able to keep up with high fsb boards. Thinking of a new one.

most of my SPI is around 400MHz FSB anyways but P965 can clock RAM 600+ CAS4 unlike 975X :(
04-29-2007, 05:39 PM
coop

Yes, and I want some of that.
04-30-2007, 04:25 PM
funkflix

With B2 i should be very close to 12.xx category now.. :(

http://www.abload.de/img/clipboard01fgv.jpg
04-30-2007, 05:16 PM
dinos22

probably another 15-20 seconds better :toast:
05-01-2007, 08:34 PM
coop

http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/7439/16x2772ti7.jpg
05-01-2007, 09:43 PM
coop

http://img466.imageshack.us/img466/9756/15x2948bv0.jpg
05-01-2007, 09:51 PM
dinos22

are you finding that these are quicker than cas3
05-01-2007, 09:54 PM
coop

Yes, I can't get high enough at cas3 to make up the difference. Still learning.
05-01-2007, 11:25 PM
eva2000

Here's a fast sub 14min with my new 2x1GB Super Talent T1000UB1G5 PC8000 Micron D9GKX - Week 9, 2007 (cpuz reported) :)

http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/mem...8000G5_005.jpg http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/mem...8000G5_009.jpg http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/mem...8000G5_012.jpg

This 32M run is straight boot from bios

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5B...4m00s515ms.png

To break sub 14min, this 32M run is same windows session as above run but tweaked memset 3.2 timings for sub 14min run

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5B...3m59s563ms.png

All without any maxmem tweak yet :)
05-03-2007, 04:03 PM
staxm

13.xx Category

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/4...shot041nt5.png

:wave:
05-04-2007, 04:10 PM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

This has been one I've been waiting a while to do. Still can't quite catch kp and Newbeetle though, haven't touched memset yet however...seems to not play nice with this mem. :confused: Though I must thank Vince, Newbeetle, Fredyama and before for their tips, definitely came in handy. :)

Edit- matched Vince with a few MHz less. :p: Sorry I can't show any memory information, as soon as I used Memset, nothing displays it properly anymore.
:-/
05-04-2007, 05:49 PM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

Okay, here's the money shot. :D Memset and everything.
05-04-2007, 07:24 PM
wa77ss

Nice run!

Maybe you can show me how to do that later :D
05-04-2007, 07:36 PM
dinos22

ahh maxmem hey :D nice
05-04-2007, 07:46 PM
Gautam

I thought it'd be fun to defend CAS 4's honor in the 11.xx category. It wasn't any such thing in the slightest, but here it is.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/3959_1159.PNG
05-04-2007, 08:06 PM
ncsa

1 Attachment(s)

15.xx

3006.9......ncsa...............15.53.859.....6x501 ......501.1mhz.....4-4-4-9....1/1

A first run with a new MB :)
05-05-2007, 12:58 AM
NewBeetle

Nice run with a new MB (DFI Infinity P965 ), ncsa-san. :toast:
05-05-2007, 10:37 AM
ncsa

1 Attachment(s)

Thanks NewBeetle-san

It is not that fast (or should I say slow given the thread) but the fsb was nice, still getting to grips with this MB and it seems to be a bit finicky to the mem modules installed (such is DFI from the 939 days)... but here is another angle on the same run of 15.xx

2995.6......ncsa...............15.58.781.....7x428 ......428mhz.....3-3-3-6....1/1
05-05-2007, 05:23 PM
staxm

@Gautam
fast run at 12.xx category :toast:

my new results:
12.xx Category

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/3...shot032yh7.png

14.xx Category

http://img490.imageshack.us/img490/2...shot027ci6.png
05-05-2007, 10:32 PM
alpha0ne

^^^ I'm impressed :clap: :clap: :clap:
05-06-2007, 10:04 AM
Gautam

Well...this is what happens when I have too much time on a weekend. Sorry coop. (and everyone else :) )
05-06-2007, 10:05 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

12

Took out Newbeetle-san, but I couldn't have done so without the tips he posted himself. :)
05-06-2007, 10:06 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

13

This one was the hardest of the set by far. Shoulda seen that one coming seeing names like esdee and before at the top. :p:
05-06-2007, 10:07 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

14.xx
05-06-2007, 10:08 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

15.xx
05-06-2007, 10:09 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

16.xx
05-06-2007, 10:11 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

17.xx
05-06-2007, 10:15 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

18.xx
05-06-2007, 10:16 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

19.xx
05-06-2007, 01:20 PM
Gautam

Quote:

Originally Posted by staxm

@Gautam
fast run at 12.xx category :toast:

Thanks. :D 2:3 is definitely very strong. ;) However there are times I wouldn't have minded the QuadGT's 4:5 abilities. If only there was something that could do it all. :-/
05-06-2007, 08:26 PM
alpha0ne

^ Sorry if already asked but what board/ram are you using please
05-06-2007, 08:28 PM
Gautam

Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC2-8500 and Asus Commando. 2.57v roughly for all runs.
05-07-2007, 01:49 AM
over@locker886

10.XXX Category
http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/879/over32m1iz2.jpg
05-07-2007, 06:28 AM
Gautam

Nice job. :)
05-07-2007, 10:27 AM
Oldscarface

Gautam,

Very impressive scores you have there. :woot:
05-07-2007, 03:44 PM
Gautam

Thanks bro. You sure didn't make things easy on me! :p: Seems like overclocker886 has given me some more work too. ;)
05-08-2007, 11:14 AM
andre X_X

14.xx Category
im coming closer to you gautam.... need to tweak some more... this run was not using ramdisk and on winxp sp2, will try win 2k3 later... need to find out some more tweak...

http://img477.imageshack.us/img477/1...ategorydl8.jpg
05-08-2007, 02:46 PM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

Nice job dude, keep going. :up: Might as well give me more work to do. :p:

This one's for Vapor, hope he doesn't mind the extra 2.2MHz. :slapass:
05-08-2007, 03:39 PM
Vapor

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Nice job dude, keep going. :up: Might as well give me more work to do. :p:

This one's for Vapor, hope he doesn't mind the extra 2.2MHz. :slapass:

:woot: Good work bud, been wanting to see that one done ever since we got so close back at school :up:
05-08-2007, 04:51 PM
dinos22

are those timings for real 4-4-2-4
05-08-2007, 04:53 PM
Gautam

It's just ras to cas write delay, 2 is no problem. ;) Definitely not tRCD. :p:
05-08-2007, 04:58 PM
Vapor

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

are those timings for real 4-4-2-4

Most decent sets of GMH/GKX can do that no problem (though as Gautam said, it's not TRCD read, it's TRCD write) :) Nice (though fairly small) improvement in times too :D

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page