BOINC benchmark: post results

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-20-2010, 01:08 PM
retro77

4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM Benchmark results:
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM Number of CPUs: 2
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM 2270 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM 4784 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
04-20-2010, 01:21 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by retro77

4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM Benchmark results:
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM Number of CPUs: 2
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM 2270 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/20/2010 2:06:47 PM 4784 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

What CPU / Speed ?
What OS?
BOINC version?
04-20-2010, 01:34 PM
retro77

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

What CPU / Speed ?
What OS?
BOINC version?

CPU: P8400 @2.26GHz
OS: Windows 7 32-bit
BOINC Version: 6.10.43
04-20-2010, 01:48 PM
Sam_oslo

X5650 @3.8Ghz(173x22) 1.21v
w7 64bit
BOINC Version: 6.10.43

4/20/2010 11:44:39 PM Benchmark results:
4/20/2010 11:44:39 PM Number of CPUs: 12
4/20/2010 11:44:39 PM 3459 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/20/2010 11:44:39 PM 11165 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

http://img.techpowerup.org/100420/Capture043.jpg
04-20-2010, 02:05 PM
retro77

I guess I could post a screenshot:
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/5189/laptopcpuz.jpg

edit:
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1461/boincbenchmark.jpg
04-20-2010, 02:08 PM
D_A

Yes, the term "screenshot or it didn't happen" has particular meaning in this thread. ;)
04-21-2010, 09:49 AM
MrDucky

well my performance has gone down a little since the newest recommended version 6.10.43 and i aslo dont get anny projects annymore ...
04-21-2010, 10:07 AM
Biker

i7 920 @ 3.8

Windows XP x32

Boinc 6.10.43 x32

Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 8
3623 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8809 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Config :

http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/i...ulldetails.jpg
04-21-2010, 10:38 AM
MrDucky

My problem is solved now i have projects again :)
04-21-2010, 03:32 PM
roki977

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6033/qweq.jpg
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/7646/klkqb.jpg [927
core i7950,Win7 64........,Bionic 6.10.43.x64
04-21-2010, 05:53 PM
Bobsama

21 Apr 2010 9:46:38 PM Running CPU benchmarks
21 Apr 2010 9:46:39 PM Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
21 Apr 2010 9:47:10 PM Benchmark results:
21 Apr 2010 9:47:10 PM Number of CPUs: 2
21 Apr 2010 9:47:10 PM 3988 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
21 Apr 2010 9:47:10 PM 11504 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
21 Apr 2010 9:47:11 PM Resuming computation

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1145508

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/5748/72621152.png
04-21-2010, 07:04 PM
ReKcOlNu

What does the folding use, Floating Point or Integer, or is it a mix of both?
04-21-2010, 07:25 PM
sRHunt3r

I7 920 #1 Gaming/Crunching @ 4.5
http://www.straferight.com/photopost...3/Crunchin.jpg

I'll post up the new 920 in a bit, still setting it up.
04-21-2010, 08:59 PM
retro77

My home PC numbers:
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5016/testsv.jpg

If anyone has a Phenon IIX4 that isn't being used, lemme know.
04-21-2010, 11:52 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by retro77

My home PC numbers:

FYI those core temps are useless and misleading! AMD and Intel rate their CPUs by Tcase which is what the bios reads. Core temps are not the same as the CPU temp. You should use the monitor that came with your motherboard or similar that displays the single CPU temp like the BIOS does, that is the only CPU temp reading you can actually use and compare to AMD/Intel max CPU temp ratings.
04-22-2010, 06:03 AM
retro77

oh ok, thanks.
04-27-2010, 02:45 AM
kaktus1907

http://i44.tinypic.com/206lled.jpg

Vista x64 SP2
BOINC Manager: 6.10.18
05-02-2010, 03:41 PM
Johnmark

Boinc 6.10.45 x64
Win 7 x64

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...7/wcg_test.jpg

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u..._2007/CPUZ.jpg

Just ran bench on my new Air Cooled i7-860 running at 3800 Mhz (100Mhz slower) (no SC software on that machine yet).
and got 3508/12610. Damn it's putting out more when running at 1.25v on a Gigabyte P55A-UD3 mobo on air with the same temps as the i7-920 WC rig. (62c loaded)

John
05-02-2010, 04:14 PM
slaveondope

1 Attachment(s)

I wanna get in. Here's my main rig. It will have my 1090T in it soon.
I expect the same numbers or better assuming 4ghz or higher is good for 24/7 use.
Win7x64, 64bit Boinc
05-02-2010, 09:37 PM
snoro

very nice reckoinu, just need to add the model of the cpu like core i7 920 for example and that graph would be perfect.
05-02-2010, 11:44 PM
PaganII

1 Attachment(s)

Snip: Bionic 6.2.28 for W_intelx86
W7-64
05-03-2010, 01:15 AM
Jayster

Q8300 stock because its sitting on a packard bell mobo, Win 7, v.6.10.43
2542 fp
7009 int
05-03-2010, 02:26 AM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by snoro

very nice reckoinu, just need to add the model of the cpu like core i7 920 for example and that graph would be perfect.

Too much hassle haha, the only way to do it is if everyone would post their specs and results in the same text format so they are easy to copy to a spreadsheet or program that can read it, entering data by hand is a pain! EDIT I see a couple of other members have already tried this, the data is from like 2007.
05-03-2010, 03:18 AM
MrDucky

you can add my boinc ver if u want its 6.10.43 and im running win7x64 :)

Im glad im second :P
05-03-2010, 04:29 AM
Russ_64

i7 920 @ 3.6 Windows 7 x64 BOINC 6.10.43 (64bit)
CPU=8
fp/cpu 3276
int/cpu 10494

Xeon E5520 @ 2.26 Windows Server 2008 R2 BOINC 6.10.43 (64bit)
CPU=16
fp/cpu 2062
int/cpu 6539
05-03-2010, 06:32 AM
Vinas

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

FYI those core temps are useless and misleading! AMD and Intel rate their CPUs by Tcase which is what the bios reads. Core temps are not the same as the CPU temp. You should use the monitor that came with your motherboard or similar that displays the single CPU temp like the BIOS does, that is the only CPU temp reading you can actually use and compare to AMD/Intel max CPU temp ratings.

I think UncleWebb would disagree, unless I'm missing something. Doesn't coretemp and Realtemp read the internal register (temp probe) on each cpu? To my knowledge it does and is generally accepted as the defacto standard for at least Intel CPUs. Is this not the case for AMD chips or something??? :shrug:
05-03-2010, 03:01 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vinas

I think UncleWebb would disagree, unless I'm missing something. Doesn't coretemp and Realtemp read the internal register (temp probe) on each cpu? To my knowledge it does and is generally accepted as the defacto standard for at least Intel CPUs. Is this not the case for AMD chips or something??? :shrug:

Email I got back from AMD said, to monitor CPU thermals use the single CPU temp reading, not the core temp readings.

If you look at AMDs tech docs for K8 and newer chips they use Tcase to rate the chips max temp, not die or core temps like they did for the old Socket-A K7 chips. AFAIK Intel has always used a Tcase rating.
05-03-2010, 04:57 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

you can add my boinc ver if u want its 6.10.43 and im running win7x64 :)

Im glad im second :P

But your #1 in FPU, at least in the last couple pages of results. ;)
05-03-2010, 05:09 PM
slaveondope

Nice graph RekcOINu
05-03-2010, 07:21 PM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/Nihlj.png

Code:

5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM||Benchmark results: 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| 3952 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 5/3/2010 11:18:20 PM|| 8718 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU OS: Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit BOINC: 6.2.28
05-04-2010, 05:24 AM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by slaveondope

Nice graph RekcOINu

Thanks! Wheres your X6?
05-04-2010, 05:53 AM
MrDucky

nice graph if every one could post it liek that, then we could post it in the Topic start and help people choose the best boinc version and processor
05-04-2010, 07:37 AM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/uL2mm.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 2 3160 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 6360 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

http://imgur.com/T1jUi.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\ProgramData\BOINC Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz [Intel64 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 11] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 pni mmx OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise: x64 Editon, (06.01.7600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 4 2329 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 5103 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
05-04-2010, 02:51 PM
AMD-C

http://imgur.com/QKOzg.png

Code:

Starting BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Data directory: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5504 @ 2.00GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) Running CPU benchmarks Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks Benchmark results: Number of CPUs: 4 2138 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 4734 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
05-04-2010, 04:22 PM
ReKcOlNu

Well unless noted in the members post I'm assuming if you are running a 64bit OS then Boinc is 64-bit also?
05-04-2010, 04:23 PM
MrDucky

well i hope so for the people otherwise it sucks lol xD
05-04-2010, 05:01 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

well i hope so for the people otherwise it sucks lol xD

I just figured both x86 and x64 versions were in the Boinc installer and it would auto install the 64-bit version if it detected a 64-bit OS?

EDIT OK got a PM from PaganII and cleared that up as he's running boinc x86 on 64-bit OS,.... so take the Bionc "bit" in the charts with a grain of salt. :p:
05-04-2010, 05:12 PM
slaveondope

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReKcOlNu

Thanks! Wheres your X6?

As requested. All stock(undervolted) on Win7x64 with BOINC 6.10.18 64bit
The 955 was on 6.10.18 64bit too.
05-04-2010, 05:27 PM
ReKcOlNu

Quote:

Originally Posted by slaveondope

As requested. All stock(undervolted) on Win7x64 with BOINC 6.10.18 64bit
The 955 was on 6.10.18 64bit too.

Thanks!

Sort by Integer
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/9306/bench01.png

Sort by Floating Point
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8880/bench02.png
05-07-2010, 05:07 PM
mAJORD

I've noticed, for some reason the x64 version of boinc gives a much Lower score for FPU on AMD CPU's.. (about 25% higher on x86) Anyone know why?
05-10-2010, 04:27 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcool

16,5k integer? Holy crap... looks like Linux does beat Win in this bench. Curious to see the difference in actual crunching times

yep, just run on ubuntu x64 and getting 4k/21K @4Ghz E8400. I will try running a few nights under ubuntu to see the actual output. Win7 was getting 4.3/8.8
10-29-2010, 05:32 AM
bluestang

Work PC as listed in sig...

Code:

10/23/2010 12:43:40 PM Running CPU benchmarks 10/23/2010 12:43:40 PM Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM Benchmark results: 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM Number of CPUs: 2 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM 4216 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 10/23/2010 12:44:12 PM 8454 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 10/23/2010 12:44:13 PM Resuming computation
10-30-2010, 07:12 AM
Nikolasz

Thats mine BOINC benchmark: post results

quad 9550 :
2884 whetstone per cpu
8456 dhrystone per cpu

and cuda gpu
432 GFLOPS peak

http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/8781/snap0005.th.gif

Is not much i know, i dont like ocing. It kills smooth ride like weard os behavior, os crushes, and exploding electronics
10-30-2010, 07:44 AM
haschioz

29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| 1848 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
29/10/2010 7:36:20 PM|| 3490 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
t4200
10-30-2010, 08:05 AM
kaok

Q6600 G0 3.0GHz, Ubuntu 10.04 x64.

2785 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
14642 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Dhrystone MIPS in linux is somewhy much better. Not sure though, how much that makes overall difference.
10-30-2010, 10:20 AM
sRHunt3r

1 Attachment(s)

Here's my new one with Win7 64 and boinic 6.10.58 64.
Attachment 108975
10-30-2010, 03:05 PM
PoppaGeek

What am I not understanding here. A one cpu @3.5gz gets 8824 and another @2.3 gets 10342. What do these numbers prove? I am lost here. :shrug:

http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/benchamrk.jpg

Top one Opteron 1354 @2.4gz bottom Opteron 8356 at 2.3GZ
http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/bench.jpg
10-30-2010, 03:26 PM
Nikolasz

i call that overclock data loss.

your not spesific anyway.
Maybe some overvolt will help, or some other too tight timings

if your using one pc and oc it up and down...
and enable/dissable cores it will free up cache, so then rest of cores got more cache..
10-30-2010, 03:46 PM
bearcatrp

Dual quad E5420's running ubuntu
2940 whetstone
15000 dhrystone

Dual quad E5640's running win7 pro
2668 whetstone
6923 dhrystone

Not sure why my harpertowns are beating my westmeres. :shrug:
10-30-2010, 04:26 PM
PoppaGeek

Going by the charts above my 2.4gz opterons are beating a Athlonx2 @4gz, a Phenom2x4 @4gz and a i7 920 @3.8gz. I get very similar numbers on the 8356 @2.3. Of course they do not show this in PPD so what do these numbers mean?

http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/bench1.jpg
10-30-2010, 04:58 PM
xVeinx

The Dhrystone and Whetstone scores show something close to the max possible performance using simple calculations that fit entirely into cache (ie, the instructions can fit into the L1, so there is no instruction fetching). Since the work units are composed of much more complex code and don't fit entirely into L1 cache, architecture differences come into play far more. Actual performance (as measured in PPD) will vary based on the particular work units being processed. Each work unit type does something different in code, and some may be more optimized than others (generating more PPD). Linux is going to run most/all work units faster than on Windows, typically with a 10-20% speedup from what I can tell. This isn't captured by the PPD output, and I have no idea as to why one nets less PPD although having increased performance in linux.

I'm sure others here can explain/fill in details far better than I.
10-30-2010, 05:01 PM
D_A

Basically, Windows benchmarks are as good or better optimised than Linux, while the units take longer to actually process in Windows. The net result is that Windows will net more points per unit while Linux completes more units.
10-30-2010, 05:11 PM
PoppaGeek

Just ran the benchmarks on a 1354 2.4gz running Windows Vista 64 and got 2018 fp and 6223 integer. Seems closer to reality but still leaves me thinking these numbers don't mean alot. The Linux are 64 as well.
10-30-2010, 05:54 PM
[Ion]

Main laptop (x64):
http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/europa_benchmarks.png

Dedicated cruncher (x86):
http://img.techpowerup.org/101030/triton_benchmark.png
10-30-2010, 06:01 PM
kjeldoran

i7 860 @ 3255mhz
2974 Floating
10464 integer

Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bit

Athlon x4 640 @ 3.4ghz
2559 Floating
10451 Integer

Ubuntu 10.04 64bit

Sossaman 2ghz
1893 Floating
3868 Integer

Windows XP Pro 32 bit
10-30-2010, 10:06 PM
bearcatrp

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearcatrp

Dual quad E5420's running ubuntu
2940 whetstone
15000 dhrystone

Dual quad E5640's running win7 pro
2668 whetstone
6923 dhrystone

Not sure why my harpertowns are beating my westmeres. :shrug:

Deleted
10-30-2010, 10:18 PM
kjeldoran

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearcatrp

Just realized I am using boinc 32 bit. Would boinc 64 bit have much affect on my westmere box? I know the wu's are 32 bit but have read the 64 bit version is a bit faster.

Well, I thought the 64bit gives 10% more points than the 32bit version. I am not sure if effects the benchmark though.
10-31-2010, 12:10 AM
Nikolasz

I think moust important is math processor, floating unit, fpu. Some cpus got more fpu in it..
I remember days when cpus didnt have fpu in inside cpu, and without fpu jubs takes 800% longer to do.

As you may see fpu units got more or less same score, depend on frequency of fpu.
Then again there are good fpu units and wery good fpu units with extra cache for fpu.
And there are graphic cards that do cpu jub nowdays :)

At programable fpus are abit slow, there are logic chips that may do same jub for less cycles.
Well idunno abaut much of electronics.

Os load thats important too, if your using all kinds of crap instaled on your pc it slows down your boinc.
Why is that?
Coz it cpu calculates your windows, WITH Boinc

I simply saying this, os must be clean and install only boinc and do only crunch. Then you get best boinc scores

Idunno if this link may help you alot, i wrote it for game/s, hope you can use it
http://www.bz2maps.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=1597
10-31-2010, 06:36 AM
kaok

Well, thanks to everybody for explaining this dhrystone thing to myself and others. In case you are interested, here's some differences between windows and linux in different projects.
10-31-2010, 02:15 PM
Nikolasz

windows 7 pro 32 bit
@3560mhz
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/8523/22972016.th.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

windows 7 pro 32 bit
@3772mhz
http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/159/55166586.th.gif

windows 7 ultimate 64 bit
@ 3772mhz
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1823/snap0006.th.gif

Windows 7 pro 32 bit are on low os load, nothing much instaled, im just using as backup windows for my ultimate, if somthing gows wrong i can fix it eazyer.
Anyway low os load thats important, it give more free FPU for boinc
10-31-2010, 03:26 PM
TWOGUNS

Lol

31-10-2010 23:10:46 Running CPU benchmarks
31-10-2010 23:10:46 Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 31-10-2010 23:11:17
Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 4
3998 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8778 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
11-02-2010, 12:35 PM
Metroid

Intel Core I7 920 C0/C1:

4400Mhz:

Number of CPUs: 8 64bits
4019 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
13668 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 4 64bits
4518 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12934 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 4 32bits
4690 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10516 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

4180Mhz:

Number of CPUs: 8 64bits
3812 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12986 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 8 32bits
3973 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9957 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 4 64bits
4283 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12272 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

4000Mhz:

Number of CPUs: 8 64bits
3655 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11781 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 8 32bits
3813 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9623 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 4 64bits
4115 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11777 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

3780Mhz:

Number of CPUs: 8 64bits
3406 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10906 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 8 32bits
3567 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8928 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Number of CPUs: 4 64bits
3827 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10979 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

3000Mhz:

Number of CPUs: 8 64bits
2732 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9296 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
04-03-2011, 10:31 PM
Nikolasz

Sorry for grave digging.
Im just wondering how performs todays top cpus like sb at maxi mhz
04-04-2011, 01:40 AM
MadMike261

My i7 2600k @ 4.5 Ghz with HT
4291 Floating Point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
14253 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
04-04-2011, 04:50 PM
sparkler

Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Processor: 3 AuthenticAMD AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1075T Processor [Family 16 Model 10 Stepping 0]
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Processor: 512.00 KB cache
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni cx16 popcnt hypervis
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST OS: Linux: 2.6.35-28-generic
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Memory: 3.87 GB physical, 3.81 GB virtual
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Disk: 27.52 GB total, 25.57 GB free
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST Local time is UTC +1 hours
Tue 05 Apr 2011 00:19:27 BST No usable GPUs found
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:19 BST Running CPU benchmarks
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:19 BST Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:50 BST Benchmark results:
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:50 BST Number of CPUs: 2
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:50 BST 2290 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:50 BST 9091 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Tue 05 Apr 2011 01:48:51 BST Resuming computation
06-30-2011, 07:34 PM
SurrealNetworks

Core i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz

4562/14053

6/30/2011 10:13:49 PM | | Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7]
6/30/2011 10:13:49 PM | | Processor: 256.00 KB cache
6/30/2011 10:13:49 PM | | Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 syscall nx lm vmx tm2 popcnt aes pbe
6/30/2011 10:13:49 PM | | OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00)
6/30/2011 10:13:49 PM | | Memory: 3.98 GB physical, 7.97 GB virtual
6/30/2011 10:25:27 PM | | Running CPU benchmarks
6/30/2011 10:25:58 PM | | Benchmark results:
6/30/2011 10:25:58 PM | | Number of CPUs: 4
6/30/2011 10:25:58 PM | | 4562 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/30/2011 10:25:58 PM | | 14053 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
06-30-2011, 08:10 PM
INFRNL

I do not fully understand what these #'s mean. Apparently you obviously want higher #'s, but I do not think they really mean much.

Maybe people should also post other specs and definitly an avg ppd figure. My systems do not bench as high as some listed, but I am sure they are producing better.:shrug:
07-03-2011, 09:36 AM
SurrealNetworks

Core i5 2500K @ 5.0 Ghz
5052/15585

7/3/2011 12:31:15 PM | | Processor: 4 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7]
7/3/2011 12:31:15 PM | | Processor: 256.00 KB cache
7/3/2011 12:31:15 PM | | Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 syscall nx lm vmx tm2 popcnt aes pbe
7/3/2011 12:31:15 PM | | OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00)
7/3/2011 12:31:15 PM | | Memory: 3.98 GB physical, 7.97 GB virtual
7/3/2011 12:32:29 PM | | Running CPU benchmarks
7/3/2011 12:33:00 PM | | Benchmark results:
7/3/2011 12:33:00 PM | | Number of CPUs: 4
7/3/2011 12:33:00 PM | | 5052 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/3/2011 12:33:00 PM | | 15585 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
07-05-2011, 04:08 AM
sparkler

well i got my athlon II x4 running again its got a antec 300 case so the heat goes out of the top 2 fans instead of my psu anyways here are the results

Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST Processor: 4 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor [Family 16 Model 5 Stepping 3]
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST Processor: 512.00 KB cache
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni monitor cx16 popcnt
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST OS: Linux: 2.6.38-8-generic
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST Memory: 3.87 GB physical, 1.91 GB virtual
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:41:50 BST Disk: 33.93 GB total, 31.91 GB free
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:43:58 BST Benchmark results:
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:43:58 BST Number of CPUs: 4
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:43:58 BST 2305 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Tue 05 Jul 2011 12:43:58 BST 9205 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 AM.

XtremeSystems