Just tweeted on their twitter accountQuote:
New GTX has the same number of transistors at 4 Intel Quad Core i7 CPUs (3BB)
Printable View
Just tweeted on their twitter accountQuote:
New GTX has the same number of transistors at 4 Intel Quad Core i7 CPUs (3BB)
Best review yet:
http://translate.google.com/translat...ml&sl=fr&tl=en
Covers numerous games and concludes that 480 makes a difference about 15% - 20% with 4x-8xAA. Not as bad as some feared, but IMHO not worth it. Let's hope they'll correct stuff with drivers.
Ashley McBroom:Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDiaz
"it has so much compute capabilities in it that it's gonna let you blow some :banana::banana::banana::banana: up"
Friday March 26, 2010 6:20 Ashley McBroom
6:20
You can "blow :banana::banana::banana::banana: up", like your power supply :rofl:
Very interesting. In some cases we have the 5850 beating the 5870 :shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezmen
Still 5870 1gb comparison, wth. What I can't explain right now is how even when the single 480 beats out the 5870, 2x480 in SLI get demolished by 2x5870s, let alone the 5970.
6:22 Ashley McBroom: "2x the performance in gaming so you can tear stuff up" Friday March 26, 2010 6:22 Ashley McBroom
6:21 Ashley McBroom: He's showing perf charts and everyone is cheering Friday March 26, 2010 6:21 Ashley McBroom
6:21 Ashley McBroom: "pretty good from one generation to the next" Friday March 26, 2010 6:21 Ashley McBroom
6:21 Ashley McBroom: GTX 480 is up to 2x faster than the 285, sometimes MORE Friday March 26, 2010 6:21 Ashley McBroom
6:21 Ashley McBroom: Comparing perf of GTX 285 versus 480
OK WTF is he lying to people right there ? He must be showing SYNTHETIC performance charts. It just is NOT 2X or more faster than GTX 285, so far as we have seen in benches. Sure would like this to be true but of course he doesn't say that it is in most games and also of course the "up to" wording.
WoW...massive damage on that card man...seriously
That's across the board... strangely, in DX11, the advantage drops down to 3-12% at 4xAA in 2560x1600 and 15-19% at 8xAA. It's at -1% to 10% in DX11 without AA.Quote:
Originally Posted by annihilat0r
Looks like Fermi will be good with AA, just ~5870 without it
She?Quote:
Originally Posted by pentium777
Anyways, it sounds like they're talking about synthetics, cause most of the reviews so far peg it in the 30-40% faster than 285 range, and slightly more than 295, depending on SLI scaling..
6:27 Ashley McBroom:
Sorry, correction: not of Need For Speed, Battlefield Bad Company 2
6:26 Ashley McBroom:
Drew is inviting up Gordon Van Dyke, Lead Producer from Need For Speed at EA
:frag::shoot::explode2::explode::bsod:
http://i41.tinypic.com/rax99k.jpg
Yeah, pretty much that. Not bad, considering I use 4xAA for all games I can. Can't see any benefit of 8xAA though.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
Catalyst 10.3b available here:
http://sites.amd.com/us/underground/...3-preview.aspx
why don't they properly broadcast this event through the Internet ?
First review to show 5870 faster than 480 in Dirt2 @ 2560 res.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
There are only 3 games in the world right now, Dirt2, Hawx, and Farcry2. I am going to go buy these three games and dump them in a huge firepit.
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn Of War 2
, No AA, No AF
1280x1024 http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1280-pcie.html
1680x1050 http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1680-pcie.html
1920x1200 http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1920-pcie.html
2560x1600 http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...2560-pcie.html
AA 4x + AF 16x
1280x1024, AA+AF http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1280-pcie.html
1680x1050, AA+AF http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1680-pcie.html
1920x1200, AA+AF http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...1920-pcie.html
2560x1600, AA+AF http://www.ixbt.com/video/itogi-vide...2560-pcie.html
double post sorry
GTX 480 epic fail? :D Any LN2 results?And 3D mark 03 are interesting too. ;)
Epic Fail is your post.Quote:
Originally Posted by ..::G80::..
:down: thats why i don't trust pr bsQuote:
Originally Posted by pentium777
No surprise the GTX480 comes out faster than the 5870 at higher res and AA. Now let's get a 2GB 5870 then compare.
pax (vid link) is live here if you missed the earlier link
Anyone calling this card a total winner or loser is emotionally attached to Nvidia or AMD (respectively :D).
Performance with AA justifies its price (if its indeed $500, and 5870 stays at $400), but it fails on power issues (power draw, temperature and the resultant noise). PhysX and CUDA can be counted as slight advantages. Everything considered, if I were building a rig today I might consider buying a 480. However, for people who already own a 5800/5900/GTX 295 this card is worthless to upgrade.
haha nvidia fanboy! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by pentium777
Bad day?:p: