You type like a... (insert whatever colloquial insult you imagine here)Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
or how Opie from family guy sounds when he speaks.
btw. ati have done well for themselves by hiring you :clap:
*Blocked*
Printable View
You type like a... (insert whatever colloquial insult you imagine here)Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
or how Opie from family guy sounds when he speaks.
btw. ati have done well for themselves by hiring you :clap:
*Blocked*
I have to admit, that using the kind of writing you do, no one's really going to take what you say seriously. You sound like a teenager who just learned that forums existed, not an adult in the industry who might actually be under an NDA for an upcoming hardware product.Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
test page
http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_23897423/tm.htm
11 Haziran 2008; 17:35:40
second news
http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_23898334/tm.htm
11 Haziran 2008; 18:07:10
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260: 399$
all fake or all true.
If you have nothing to say just STFU. We already know you're under NDA, no need of 20 more post to confirm.Quote:
Originally Posted by w0mbat
[QUOTE=Helmore;3051393]Eh, what does that even mean, what the heck is 'perlin noise'?
:rofl: Lol.
I´m not laughing at that u dont now what perlin noise is, I dont have a clue either. I just love honest question.
Before you go all "STFU",maybe you should read his post in which he says that slides are not fake...Quote:
Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR
So he had something to say about it and he did.Now you just made yourself look like a forum bully :rolleyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
I cant understand why you compare the 4850 and 4870 with the gtx 280. The 280 cost more than twice as much!!
Before you start going against everyone that doesn't say AMD ruls you should read ALL his post.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
My god w0mbat is Hector defending is graph maker to not fire him :rofl:
I don't completely agree here, you should keep in mind that there are lots of people here for whom English is not their native/first language. That also includes me.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
Before you start that "going against everyone.." crap(which only you know "is true"),i did read his posts and he just replied to that annoying dude who was trying to make himself a name by proclaiming he found out the slides are fake since he noticed a glitches in presentation...Quote:
Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR
And wombat wouldn't post that just to piss any one off,he was trying to make a point.And yes he is under NDA,and no you aren't,so get over it!
PS this is my second post in this thread(or 3rd).As you can see i didn't "go against everyone that doesn't say AMD ruls" (sic).
Like if I want! No please :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
Info = good.
BS and not concrete info = bad. If you want to say something, just say it. If you want but you can't, just STFU. We already have some guys that do that, no need for another one.
I'm going to laugh if all these claimed fake slides were real, and AMD just has a powerpoint maker who either sucks at powerpoint or hates aesthetics (probably an engineer did it I bet)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 22JHP
loook i'm faker and bad one ok?I'll make first page and second page 1 and 2 got me why second and fourth page?do you believe amd gives to dh these pics in a professional way?
huh, I honestly do not understand what you are trying to convey
you admit to faking them?
give me the layered source and I'll fire up corel and fix them up for ya
it'll give me some lulz
:rofl::rofl::rofl: I just love some of these discussions :rofl::rofl:
I think he was trying to be facetious in that he doesn't see why they'd fake the slides and number them 2 and 4 if a faker would probably number them 1 and 2
I dunno, maybe page 1 and 3 are the pictures of the 4870 and 4850 slides we saw earlier leaked?
Anywho, if those performance numbers are true, then I can see Nvidia pushing GTX260 down to $399 to compete against nvidia since even with the 55nm shrink of G92b, it'll be hard pressed to compete against those numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by conzymaher
These pictures are fake. :yepp:
Im just trying to say that even official slides/documents, when they arent ment to be released to the public, can look like the latest crap and be still no fake. i saw some amd nda slides which looked much more like rubbish then the ones posted today. the new ones look pretty much the same like some i saw a few weeks ago.
of cause theres nothing for 100% shure, so these slides could be fakes. but the "evidence" which got posted to declare this as a fake just doesnt proof anything. thats all i wanted to say here.
im not here to piss of anyone and im writing like this cause im german and not very good at english.
yes here is the real Sam jackson!Quote:
Originally Posted by fng77
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1...SamJackson.jpg
And the FYI on the Perlin Noise i mentioned:
Perlin noise is a ALU (shader)-bound test in 3dMark (06 and Vantage) that few people utilize
However, it's probably one of the better tests (along with a lot of the secondary tests which go underutilized) for analyzing maximum shader performance. So on shaders and shaders only (forget the rest of the card such as ROPS, TMU's, etc. for the most part):
That was from no-x at B3d.Quote:
perlin noise
HD3870: 175
HD4850: 335
If you do the math, 335/175 = 1.914
Rumored clocks and SP Count: (625Mhz * 800SP) / (775Mhz * 320SP) = 2.02
if you try using 480SP, the math just doesn't work.
For comparison:
That was from this sharkyextreme reviewQuote:
3850 149
3870 173 (+16%, = freq. diff. b/w 3850 & 3870)
8800GT 145
8800GTS 177 (+22%, = freq. & ALU diff. b/w 8800GT & 8800GTS)
So it's a pretty good estimate of ALU performance within architecture and is almost entirely shader * core bound (obviously thigns like memorybandwidth and other lesser things will matter, and fyi the 3870 has more bandwidth than the 4850)
elitebastards got 345 out of the 9800GX2 for comparison, and going by theoretical TFlop count, the 4850 is right in line... and if the 4870 is 20% better, we're going to have some pretty impressive shader performance out of these cards (gogo GPGPU programs!)
Papu:
You are killing me LOOOOLLL. :up:
Btw.
HD4850 And gtx 280 are both out on Prisjakt, a swedish equivalence to Pricerunner.
1 USD = 6.5 Swedish Kronor. Very resoneble price for the 4850 I think
HD4850 early review?! (or is it another fake?? )
http://publish.it168.com/2008/0610/20080610041601.shtml
mark06 12x10,no AA,no AF:
http://s1.screenshots.cc/upload/a2554353.jpg
Vantage scores:
http://publish.it168.com/2008/0610/20080610041604.shtml
PS Stargazer,is this fitting your posting standards :p: ?
mmmmmmmmmh MMMMMMMMMH SAMUEL L JACKSON BEERQuote:
Originally Posted by Papu
Real or fake ?Quote:
Originally Posted by fng77
L O L
This thread is Really funny !
~ I hear Elvis is writing the code for the drivers as we speak ! ~
No, it's real. RV770 has 800SPs. GPU-Z is simply outdated.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
It's a power consumption thing. There's nothing wrong with GDDR5.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
On a side note, Anyone who has actually seen an AMD presentation knows that there are usually a number of graphical and spelling errors. They are not proof of the slide being fake. Sadly, that's how they look, and to be honest an AMD presentation wouldn't be complete without them.
//Andreas