ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series discussion

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-11-2008, 08:21 AM
Papu

i also don't think they would have 19x12 as a res on something professional.they would use 1900x1200.
06-11-2008, 08:25 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papu

i also don't think they would have 19x12 as a res on something professional.they would use 1900x1200.

or have bad punctuation

; then ,

should be :
06-11-2008, 08:41 AM
22JHP

uhh mr. awesome! in the picture green area page2 and page4 look at the first picture.if faker that stupid why second and fourth page?
06-11-2008, 08:48 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by 22JHP

uhh mr. awesome! in the picture green area page2 and page4 look at the first picture.if faker that stupid why second and fourth page?

I don't understand what you mean.

but they are still fake, a pisspoor job too.
If you want I could fake some then post them on the net.

I'll show the weirdly long page site how it's done

of course my fakes would be researched and based upon specualtion and ATI's own graphs from this year.
Everything would be exact with no poor mismatches, ie; the out of place res on the pic on the fake graph

or the childlike bar graphs. Maybe I would select a better quantative analysis measure
06-11-2008, 08:53 AM
22JHP

loook i'm faker and bad one ok?I'll make first page and second page 1 and 2 got me why second and fourth page?do you believe amd gives to dh these pics in a professional way?
06-11-2008, 08:55 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by 22JHP

loook i'm faker and bad one ok?I'll make first page and second page 1 and 2 got me why second and fourth page?do you believe amd gives to dh these pics in a professional way?

huh, I honestly do not understand what you are trying to convey :confused:

you admit to faking them?

give me the layered source and I'll fire up corel and fix them up for ya ;)
it'll give me some lulz
06-11-2008, 08:56 AM
mascaras

Quote:

NVIDIA shakened by Radeon HD 4800, lowers prices?

Written by Andreas G 11 June 2008 18:53

It seems that NVIDIA believed that RV770 would only have 480 shader processors, and only be a modest upgrade of the RV670 core. This is suppose to be one of the reasons for the rather high prices of the GeForce GTX cards, that and the ridiculous manufacturing costs. Now that it has been unveiled that RV770 does not have 480 shader processors, but rather 800, it seems NVIDIA might lower the price of the GeForce GTX 260 to make it a bit more appealing in comparison to Radeon HD 4870. We're hearing $399 from more than one source, but we're also hearing that Radeon HD 4870 might not come as cheap as hoped, $349. The GeForce GTX prices are expected to stay put for a long time, but AMD has every possibility to lower the prices of its new graphics cards, if sales are slow, without losing much money.

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7853.html

regards
06-11-2008, 09:01 AM
22JHP

alright forget the page numbers.faker is not stupid he's insane it seems because he used second and fourth.these pics could be non-permitted, copy, reconst. but today i saw two tests, don't know fake or not but these cards will be great i'm sorry just drop it.
06-11-2008, 09:03 AM
clayton

I hate these nVidia and ATI Quick-Performance overview charts. It's so hard to understand. And I thought my chart was worst.
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/7...chchartfy9.gif
Detailed to the maxed!
06-11-2008, 09:04 AM
w0mbat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

totally faked, and badly

http://b.imagehost.org/0424/Untitled_8.png

:up: U did a really great job. Ur so good, u even can proof that these real slides are fake. Man, u should be president :rofl:

Did u ever have a real AMD NDA document? If yes, u´d know that these arent fake but real.
06-11-2008, 09:04 AM
Genius_pt

Great news! :up:

So nvidia is to lower prices... if amd "plays the same game" we may see some serious cards with lower prices than expected. Consumers win.
06-11-2008, 09:05 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by mascaras

regards

Thanks!

Quote:

Originally Posted by 22JHP

alright forget the page numbers.faker is not stupid he's insane it seems because he used second and fourth.these pics could be non-permitted, copy, reconst. but today i saw two tests, don't know fake or not but these cards will be great i'm sorry just drop it.

yeah, ATI uses percentile grading.
They always have as far as I can remember

http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Arti.../xf_vs_sli.jpg
http://www.techarp.com/article/AMD/S.../Spider_05.jpg

percentages and not point based like nvidia.
06-11-2008, 09:09 AM
w0mbat

@Jowy Atreides: U are comparing the official slides w/ some leaked ones. Thats just BS.

And no, i wont type "you" in the future just cause u would like it.
06-11-2008, 09:10 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

@Jowy Atreides: U are comparing the official slides w/ some leaked ones. Thats just BS.

And no, i wont type "you" in the future just u would like it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

:up: U did a really great job. Ur so good, u even can proof that these real slides are fake. Man, u should be president :rofl:

Did u ever have a real AMD NDA document? If yes, u´d know that these arent fake but real.

let me guess, you do?
(everyone around here is under nda apparently)

Well, I'd fire whoever made them for sure.
Or at least i'd give them my old QAFB notes and teach them how to use a computer better than a child with excel charts

Please, type "you" in future. I'm not using textspeak so show the same courtesy
06-11-2008, 09:12 AM
w0mbat

Yes, i did and i do have AMD NDA documents.
06-11-2008, 09:15 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

Yes, i did and i do have AMD NDA documents.

good, I want you to tell your superior that whoever collates the data into visual format should be fired.

If these charts are official then someone is terrible at making charts
06-11-2008, 09:19 AM
w0mbat

Just because they look like rubbish it doesnt mean that its a fake. If the reader, which opend this document has eg a lower resolution it looks like that. And then this slide has been cut and so on.
06-11-2008, 09:21 AM
bill_d

i'll bet making charts is not the amd guys only job, so he make the dam charts and got back to what he likes to do
06-11-2008, 09:25 AM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

Just because they look like rubbish it doesnt mean that its a fake. If the reader, which opend this document has eg a lower resolution it looks like that. And then this slide has been cut and so on.

But it does mean someone is terrible at designing presentations

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

@Jowy Atreides: U are comparing the official slides w/ some leaked ones. Thats just BS.

And no, i wont type "you" in the future just cause u would like it.

It's called coherence, your posts do not have any.

if this wasn't such a nice forum then there would be 20 pictures of Samuel L Jackson with captions on them in this reply.
06-11-2008, 09:31 AM
Hornet331

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

It's called coherence, your posts do not have any.

if this wasn't such a nice forum then there would be 20 pictures of Samuel L Jackson with captions on them in this reply.

:rofl:
06-11-2008, 09:32 AM
G0ldBr1ck

This thread has been more entertaining then educational. It seems that for everyone to not know what all the real specs are that it would be hard to know so indefinitly what is fake.

So this is what I have got from this thread.....Nobody knows what the true specs are of the card but tons of ppl know what the specs are not. Seems then you could subtract everything you know the card isnt from all posabilities and then you would have what the card is.....hrm...very interesting.
06-11-2008, 09:36 AM
Kai Robinson

Speak english m***********! :D
06-11-2008, 09:36 AM
Extelleron

Quote:

Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck

This thread has been more entertaining then educational. It seems that for everyone to not know what all the real specs are that it would be hard to know so indefinitly what is fake.

So this is what I have got from this thread.....Nobody knows what the true specs are of the card but tons of ppl know what the specs are not. Seems then you could subtract everything you know the card isnt from all posabilities and then you would have what the card is.....hrm...very interesting.

RV770 = 800 SP / 32 or 40 TMU / 16 ROP / 256-bit external/512-bit internal

HD 4850 = 625MHz w/ 512MB GDDR3 @ 2GHz
HD 4870 = 750MHz w/ 512MB GDDR5 @ 3.6GHz

The only thing we don't know exactly is performance. The specs are pretty well known, the only thing I am not sure about is the number of TMUs.
06-11-2008, 09:44 AM
w0mbat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

But it does mean someone is terrible at designing presentations

It's called coherence, your posts do not have any.

if this wasn't such a nice forum then there would be 20 pictures of Samuel L Jackson with captions on them in this reply.

No, it means that someone is just terrible @ presenting them.

And i dont care if there are 20000 pic w/ Samuel L. Jackson, u could even post a pic of ur grandma or the pope. :shrug:
06-11-2008, 09:45 AM
conzymaher

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

if this wasn't such a nice forum then there would be 20 pictures of Samuel L Jackson with captions on them in this reply.

http://images.dawgsports.com/images/...l_with_gun.bmp http://peakperformances.co.za/inside..._jackson_1.jpg
http://www.worth1000.com/entries/211...1597SxAW_w.jpg http://swisscharts.com/actorimages/samuel_l_jackson.jpg
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-pho...rds-0HPcg4.jpg
http://www.slybaldguys.com/serendipi...on-6223710.jpg
http://www.biography.com/famous/imag...on_320x240.jpg
http://www.theaspectratio.net/quiz-jackson.jpg
http://swisscharts.com/actorimages/samuel_l_jackson.jpg

k

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:38 AM.

XtremeSystems