WOW :slobber:
[butthead voice]Come to Joris :p: [/butthead voice]
Printable View
WOW :slobber:
[butthead voice]Come to Joris :p: [/butthead voice]
Only i want a strong/robust memory controller :) More than Winnys.
SSE3 would be a plus :)
Really hope that Venice would have better memory controller than that of Winni... So far I don't any different except it can clock really high...
i believe its been largely confirmed that Venice cores will benefit from upgraded mem controllers. the whole IPC increase and such is all speculation AFAIK.
wow.. just wow... as soon as the prices are reasonable and supply is reasonable my winnie is getting the boot out of here... 2.35ghz and barely stable... POS.
You must've gotten the same batch of Winchester I did! I got a 3200+ CBBID 0451CPBW and could only get to 2.35... barely.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
If you saw the screenies he's already posted it looks like venice is about 3% faster than a winchester clock for clock.
sounds good. ackbar. mine is an 0506.. so not the same batch. but it sucks hardcore just like urs... i keep thinking to myself this cant be and there must be some other way to get it up higher... but no.. nothing.
512k is not fast enough for me...
staying 754, newark turion 64s will 0wn
the turions look nice, but i only seen them 1.8 on 1.2vcore, and you cant really compare that to 2.4 on 1.175 with dc, even when they have the extra cache. :(
Yay, no more teasing ;) Can't way to see more.
from my hometown malaysia... rocksssssQuote:
Originally Posted by |SiLA|
lol cbble???like the counter strike map??? :rotf:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ref
been lots of talk of the problem being the VID settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
This chip looks amazing and I cant wait to see it frozen.
Looks like I may finally make the jump from my trusty AXP-Mobile. Now I just want to see some more stable mobo's out....
Didn't help my CBBID 0451 crap at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
Waiting to be rescued by Venice :D
How high can it go with a 9x multiplier? the cheapest venice should be 3000+ 9x200 ?
*ahum FLOOR IT *cough
Air cooled + 1.65v = ?!
Venice + Subzero + X.XX volts = ???? !
I'm dying here :slobber: :D
(greetz to curious EOCF people :D )
Hello all,
Man it's been a long night with this Venice. You cannont even begin to comprehend how quarky this cpu is. I've managed to get a few more screenshots and I'll have to post them tomorrow since I'm dead on my feet. It's almost 4:00AM here and I need to get some sleep for work tomorrow. I know you all are wondering what's the deal with venice and sub zero....well here's the answer:
http://img63.exs.cx/img63/4923/cpuz30000xe.jpg
-47C on stock Mach2 Display
-31C from Type K Thermocouple mounted to the side of the IHS
Move over Winchesters, cause Venice has arrived...... ;)
Sweet :D
is that like 24 hours stable? cuase it seems a bit low compared to 2.9 on stock air
thats exactly what we were finally waitin for :D
:thumbsup:
Okay ill think ill be getting rocks thrown at me but i really dotn see what the big deal is.
First, its already a 3800+, a 450mhz overclock (and thats only superpi 1mb stable) isnt anything to write home about. Hell if it stops at 2850mhz (he said it didnt finish a 2900, so thats less than 30 seconds of stability), a good 3000+ can already do that.
Then 3000mhz at -47? Sure he didnt throw 1.70volts at it but im not sure these will even TAKE 1.7v, theres always a threshold where upping the voltage actually does anything, and if the stock voltage is lower, then the upper voltage will follow.
I guess im gonna have to see what a 3000 or a 3200 can do cause a 18% overclock (that we dont know is stable) on air isnt really blowing my pants away.
3Ghz @ 1.36v :slobber: Is that stable (ofcourse not, what am I thinking)? If not, what is the voltage required to get 3ghz rockstable?
Anyone seen any San Diego Cores Clocked on Vapo yet?