Amd Fsb Ranking

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-31-2004, 07:18 AM
bachus_anonym

ooops, i messed some stuff up...

correction.... i rerun all benches since that time :D

All Dual Channel CPU Enabled

Max CPU-Z and Sandra - 250FSB

Proof of rock_stability ;)

3DMark2001 and Sandra ---> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7693144
PCMark02 and SuperPi 16M ---> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1744559

VOILA :D
03-31-2004, 07:49 AM
tictac

ok update for ya
03-31-2004, 01:01 PM
bachus_anonym

thanx man :toast:
03-31-2004, 02:07 PM
Cap_Hook

Quote:

Originally posted by tictac
ok update for ya

I'm missed !!... you forgot me :confused: I repeat the link: ;)
250 FSB 3DMark01 Dual Channel whit the rig at the sig.
03-31-2004, 02:14 PM
SAE

3dmark link is in my sig :D

260x11 dual channel, infinity bios 1-31, and so on, kingston hyperx bh-5...
03-31-2004, 02:32 PM
Cap_Hook

One question..., in the ranking I can see 251FSB but the 3DMark project show 246 FSB..., or 250 FSB and the project show 249 FSB..., why?? :confused: what scoring is the valid one?... the shown by the 3DMark project..., or the one that the user indicate? :confused:
03-31-2004, 02:42 PM
muzz

Quote:

Originally posted by Cap_Hook
One question..., in the ranking I can see 251FSB but the 3DMark project show 246 FSB..., or 250 FSB and the project show 249 FSB..., why?? :confused: what scoring is the valid one?... the shown by the 3DMark project..., or the one that the user indicate? :confused:

If the user used clockgen or 8RDAVcore to adjust fsb (obviously in windows) it will show up incorrectly in 3DMark01, it WILL show what the BIOS settings are only(which are overwritten by those proggies).

So USUALLY the user will write what the settings were when he was benching.
03-31-2004, 02:50 PM
SAE

Mine shows 4MHz... do you think I was that low? ;)
03-31-2004, 03:46 PM
Cap_Hook

Quote:

Originally posted by muzz
If the user used clockgen or 8RDAVcore to adjust fsb (obviously in windows) it will show up incorrectly in 3DMark01, it WILL show what the BIOS settings are only(which are overwritten by those proggies).

So USUALLY the user will write what the settings were when he was benching.

Then.., why is necessary the 3DMark project link?
With nVidia System Utility i can reach 265 FSB.., but the 3DMark doesn't recognize it..., and then i don't post a project link with 265FSB, or 260 FSB, or 255 FSB that it show the 3DMark system stability.
I think that all nforce2 Ultra400 board can set 250 FSB in BIOS (some go 300 MHz.), and then the 3DMark yes will recognize it.
The question is simple.. it's necessary for the ranking the 3DMark project link or it isn't?...., if it's necessary only there's a correct score: the shown by the 3DMark project, i think. ;)

Quote:

Mine shows 4MHz... do you think I was that low?

Really that is a poor score, i think that your mobo can reach higher FSB. :)
Reaches the mobo 266 FSB 3DMark stable?.. OK, it's correct..., now you only need a 3DMark project link that show 266 FSB and you "crash" the 3DMark ranking. ;)
03-31-2004, 10:37 PM
SAE

11x266 would be killer ;)

Remember, I have a locked barton ;)

But 11x260 was stable with prom :D

Anything over 260 (except 261) is causing lockups on windows boot screen... :(
03-31-2004, 11:13 PM
Susquehannock

Sorry if I've missed it ... what are the requirements
for highest FSB submissions?

Highest obtainable screenshots? Or must they be Prime95
and/or gaming stable to be considered?

Voltage mods or stock?

Thank you.
04-01-2004, 01:38 AM
CarpeDiem

no updates, I have 2x256 corsair 3200LL v1.1, 2x256 corsair 3200LLPT v1.1, 2x256 corsair 3500 v1.1 and none would run 255 fsb without erroring in memtest86 , they seem to run 250-254 max.
Unless I add more voltage, not going to go any higher..
04-01-2004, 06:48 AM
Cap_Hook

Quote:

Originally posted by Susquehannock
Sorry if I've missed it ... what are the requirements
for highest FSB submissions?

Highest obtainable screenshots? Or must they be Prime95
and/or gaming stable to be considered?

Voltage mods or stock?

Thank you.

None of those requirements.. :)

Cucumber says:

Quote:

I really think there should have to be a set benchmark everyone has to run to qualify.

Then tictac says:

Quote:

:up:
Ranking Reset to 0

to put name in ranking as cucumber said

Compare link for 3D mark 2001 or 3D Mark 2003 score.... :up:

Also tictac says:

Quote:

OK 3D Mark 2001 ONLY!
:up:
lets see who is the highest stable FSB

And finally tictac says:

Quote:

Valid Compare Link: 3D Mark 2001 / 3D Mark 2003

The requirements are clear......, the ranking will be made with the FSB shown by the 3DMark2001/3DMark2003 projects.
The system cann't boot 260 FSB?... then you'll not be able to have a valid link for the ranking that show the 3DMark2001/3DMark2003 system stability running 260 FSB.
04-01-2004, 10:09 AM
TheDogFather

I provided a 3d mark link but don't see my name in the list. :confused:

TDF.
04-03-2004, 10:51 AM
Cap_Hook

Ummmm, it's curious......, suddenly all 3DMark01 projets are reset to FSB = 0 MHz.. :D :D
04-03-2004, 06:02 PM
CarpeDiem

update, now running 10.5 x 250 @ 1.9v (1.85v actual load)
I also can prime at this speed, new 3dmark2k1 link in sig.
04-04-2004, 01:08 AM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally posted by Cap_Hook
Ummmm, it's curious......, suddenly all 3DMark01 projets are reset to FSB = 0 MHz.. :D :D

ORB should be up and running properly again on Monday...
04-04-2004, 05:49 AM
SAE

Hope tictac's adding me this time ;)

Link still in sig... anyone doubting this 4MHz is 260??? :D
04-04-2004, 08:28 AM
mongoled

Well id better post my new attempt for this challenge.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7722474

This was run at 251mhz
Winbond BH-5

mong
04-04-2004, 09:48 AM
texuspete00

Quote:

Originally posted by Cap_Hook
None of those requirements.. :)

Cucumber says:

Then tictac says:

Also tictac says:

And finally tictac says:

The requirements are clear.......

Maybe tictac should edit his original post then.

This isn't a "help me" thread. People shouldn't have to read 8 pages to post there fsb.
04-04-2004, 09:57 AM
SAE

Quote:

Originally posted by mongoled
Well id better post my new attempt for this challenge.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7722474

This was run at 251mhz
Winbond BH-5

mong

Not bad, my friend :D :thumbsup:
04-04-2004, 10:17 AM
mongoled

Thanxs SAE,

I wish i had your hardware and cooling though

;)

I had to force 3.6volts through my BH-5 and had to run them at cas 2.5 to get that run. I shouldnt complain though, was done in a closed case with normal water.

Sometime in May i will get round to some serious benching, havnt got the time right now

mong
04-04-2004, 11:19 AM
Cap_Hook

Quote:

Originally posted by texuspete2k2
Maybe tictac should edit his original post then.

This isn't a "help me" thread. People shouldn't have to read 8 pages to post there fsb.

You are right.
04-04-2004, 11:23 AM
SAE

Quote:

Originally posted by mongoled
Thanxs SAE,

I wish i had your hardware and cooling though

;)

I had to force 3.6volts through my BH-5 and had to run them at cas 2.5 to get that run. I shouldnt complain though, was done in a closed case with normal water.

Sometime in May i will get round to some serious benching, havnt got the time right now

mong

A defective mach1, a wicked-acting bad ocing 9800p and a locked barton??? :D

Bah... that's more stress than pleasure ;)
04-05-2004, 05:33 AM
Cap_Hook

Quote:

Originally posted by bachus_anonym
ORB should be up and running properly again on Monday...

ORB are running properly the new projects, but not the previous ones ! :confused: I had to change my "old" project for one new.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page