1.76 max for ddr3 i think not ( i put 3.8v through my old corsair xms3 dhx rated for 1.8v and it still works and i still have it) now that's overvolting
but i do not understand how this works so i will not be entering
Printable View
1.76 max for ddr3 i think not ( i put 3.8v through my old corsair xms3 dhx rated for 1.8v and it still works and i still have it) now that's overvolting
but i do not understand how this works so i will not be entering
Greeks are ON FIRE....... :D
3399.5......hipro5..........9.59.922....16x212.5 ....1062.4MHz.....7-7-5-20....2:10..x58 EVGA Classified 4-WAY SLI
http://www.hwbox.gr/attachments/hwbo...m_9.59.922.png
5.3ghz nb-----wow! awesome run hipro
greece are crazy with 32m!:D
i7 950...8x...3846,6......202,5x19.......08,58,531... .TONY GAL....1012,5...6-7-5-18...evgax58
some little better 8x
i7 950...8x...182,5x21....08,59,547.....3833,1...TONY GAl....1095...7-8-7-20...evga x58..E760
liitle better 7x
dinos22 i try to catch you but i dont have 25 multi:D:up:
i7 950...7x...4356,8...181,5x24....07,59,531....1090. ..7-7-7-20..evga x58 E760
i7 950...9x...3415,2...213,5x16....09,59,891....TONY GAL...1067,4...7-7-6-20....evga x58 E760
*Christmas-Update from #113 to #173* :D
But the credits go to cheapseats who sent me an updated list via PM, so I only had to double-check it and correct a few things.
@hipro5: hipro-tech.com shows "Website Disabled" so your image is gone, too. :( Please edit a working link/forum attachement at this posting, so that we can see your magic again. Thanks in advance. :)
Not a submission.
More or less showing some of the AMD guys the right path and working on my own effeciency.
http://chew.ln2cooling.com/XS%20low%...0clock%204.JPG
http://chew.ln2cooling.com/XS%20low%...0clock%203.JPG
*Updated from #174 to #184* (not included: #174 - CPU-Z/Mem is missing)
--> As promised no backlog in 2010 :)
7χ...ι7 950...07,59,968...217,4χ20...4348,9....1088...7-7-7-20....TONY GAL...X58 evga
6χ...ι7 975...06,57,281...219,4χ23...4827,8....1097...7-7-6-20....Mike...X58 evga
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/1171/5732m.jpg
Wow...way ahead of the pack :surf:
*Update*
@ mike: Sorry, but I can`t take on the score.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rules
2813.8......kintaro..........11.59.453....13x216.4 ....1082.2mhz.....7-7-6-19....2/10..X58
i7 960 ..TONY GAl...216,4x13..2813,7.....11x..11,59,312...1082.. 7-7-5-20...evga x58
i7 920 ..Marcolecorse...224,3x21..4710,7.....11x..7,59,75 0...897.. 7-7-7-18...Asus P6T SE x58
Yeah, no worries at all, becuase at this point I am pretty sure that that run was actually just as bugged just like this one:
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7622/buggedj.jpg
Something happens close to the uncore limit that causes some timers to get really messed up. So please disreagrd both of these!
this would be a nce submission - no? Good thing it doesn't show CPU tweaker...and invalidates it too. BTW out file is valid after these bugger runs
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/5986/558ys.jpg
2813.6......kintaro..........11.59.188....13x216.4 ....1082.3mhz.....6-7-6-19....2/10..X58
3092.1......kintaro..........10.59.187....20x154.6 ....1082.3mhz.....6-7-6-20....2/14..X58
3415.2......kintaro..........09.59.875....16x213.5 ....1067.4mhz.....6-7-6-20....2/10..X58
3824.2......kintaro..........08.59.562....18x212.5 ....1062.3mhz.....6-7-6-19....2/10..X58
wow kintaro your kit is something else :D
also, it's appreciated that you haven't taken the CPUZ read any lower for your 9.x and 8.x cheers .. :up:
11.x @ 2813.7 and .6 .. CPUZ not low enough on mine, so new tRCD 7 run
only @ 2813.8 and time is 'blocked' by 0.2mhz CPUZ, oh well
--------------------
(not for update)
still going with the Blades :)
8.xx
also now using 2 disks
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/q...2M_8m59265.gif