Thank you:)Quote:
Originally Posted by CraptacularOne
:up:
Printable View
Thank you:)Quote:
Originally Posted by CraptacularOne
:up:
That would be a lot of work for craptacularone but it would make it a more complete data base.:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by linflas
Not only that, we'd have to get everyone who's submitted a result to post their VID. The list is fine as it is and is giving a real good indication of what voltage is needed to get speeds stable as well as what steppings are doing what. And the more people post their results, the more complete it will become. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by crossg
1) B3
2) L634A700
3) Validation @ 4.1Ghz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=242169
4) 3.720Mhz
WPrime
In progress
http://img453.imageshack.us/img453/2...ablewn3.th.jpg
TesT Done
http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/9...ble1ym6.th.jpg
@BND|MOD : very nice B3 chip you got,later week B3 (***F***) can't compare. What 's your 24/7 speed ?
My 24/7 is 3.0Ghz, only to has my vga free :) fonr any botlle neck....Quote:
Originally Posted by 911us
Q6600 @ 3.0Ghz - 1.2Vcore
Q6600 G0 | L725B057 | 3906mhz | 1.496V | Liquid |
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/8...1105op4.th.jpg
1) G0
2) L725B057
3) Water - D-Tek Fuzion
4) 1.496V
5) Asus P5K-E
By;)
CraptacularOne,
would this qualify? same chip Q6600 L727A673 G0
air cooled: Tuniq tower 120
1.387V bios
asus p5k-deluxe wifi
http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t...3600spi32m.jpg
List updated :toast:
@ BND|MOD, I'm going to need your voltage for that run to make it usefull :)
@ timber715, I'm going to need at the least a quad instance of 32m Pi :)
@ 1.55vcore in BIOS thanksQuote:
Originally Posted by CraptacularOne
Done :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BND|MOD
Sorry other update
1) B3
2) L634A700
3) Validation @ 4.1Ghz - http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=242169
4) 433 x 9 @ 3.9Ghz @ 1.58volts in BIOS
SP32M X 4
In progress
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7...2x41vo3.th.jpg http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9...2x42kv6.th.jpg
Finshed
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7...2x43yo4.th.jpg
will try to run one later perhaps, i just want to thank you for the work you do for the community... Cheers...
Sorry, but to the frequency of 3906Mhz The prosessor is stable with 1.48V, end not 1.496V.
Q6600 G0 | L725B057 | 3906mhz | 1.48V | Liquid |
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/5...148vhw4.th.jpg
1) G0
2) L725B057
3) Water - D-Tek Fuzion
4) 1.48V
5) Asus P5K-E
By:up:
Can some of you guys post some of your other settings please such as NB, SB, ICH etc... I'm just wonder on average what your cranking those up to as well. I just starting priming 3.6 @ 1.35v but 3hrs into Prime one of the cores failed. Any help is appreciated, thanks!
Priming for 20mins does not qualify as stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by dj883u2
And what's the real vCore? Or the BIOS setting?
agree! whats the deal with those 20min shots, BS!Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
if u would like to post something provable, at least make 1-2h prime shot!
And to be honest a 2hr prime is NOT stable, I can back this because last night I was priming and at 2hrs and 45min one of my cores failed.Quote:
Originally Posted by no_n|ck
Quick question. What are you guys using for priming, Large, small or blend?
Thanks
i agree, trying to lower my Vcore a while ago and one core failed after 2hrs...:shrug: after an hour though, i felt it was gonna be alright...:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by GameGuru
priming with small ffts
oh well, back to it again...
What I have to say next is not really an educated opinion, but solely based on my experience.
With the x2s and duo cores I used to run 8+ hour prime and orthos runs.
Over the last year with quads, I haven't really bothered.
If it fails after a few minutes, I'll make adjustments and try again. If it then runs for 30 minutes or so that's good enough for me.
I use my kit for a lot of 3d rendering, using a renderer called fprime. Fprime is an interactive renderer that let's you adjust scenes whilst they're rendering. It pushes the cores to the max, more so than other renderers, and is a pretty good indication of stability.
In addition to this I do a lot of photoshop work on large files, and also play games.
With all of that, my kit certainly up to this point has been more than stable.
So for me personally, hours of priming is just overkill.
As I say this is just my experience.
RLM
You know I appreciate that CraptacularOne has gone to the effort to start and constantly update this thread, People are always demanding 8 or 24 hour stability tests. Thread title says "Quad core OC Data base"? I find the info valuable, Chip batches/stepping that clock high, what kind of voltage is required for a given FSB. I myself have submittted under 3 hour primes and if that gives someone doubt then thats fine with me but someone may make use of the information I or others submitted. I don't OC 24/7 but I test quite a bit and maybe there are others out there that do the same as myself. I have run prime a few time for extended hous and had it fail because I was dicking around in the background when I shouldn't have been. What a waste of time.:rolleyes: Yeah I don't think 10 0r 20 minites is a good indicator of stabilty but 1 to 2 hours should be a good indicator of the chips capabilities. Sorry just my 2 cents:) .
This thread is completely useless if everyone's inventing their own definions for stability. For years the term "prime stable" has stood for 6-24h of continuous, high priority stress. Now it's just a quick 20min session that is infact less stressing than a quad instance 32M SPi?
I guess the OP should had worded the conditions more unamous than what he did:
Quote:
4) Screen shot of it running at that speed (orthos, prime95..ect) 100% load
(...)
I will accept a quad Pi 32m run (4 instances of 32m Pi) as well but please stable OCs only
(...)
P = Prime stable
32m = Pi 32m stable
Wp = Wprime stable
I agree. I have seen quite a few posts lately where people even :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: that we ask for proof of stability and some even put you down and insult you for asking for a prime stable screenshot.Quote:
Originally Posted by largon
YES prime95 IS the standard for measuring stability. It has been for years and will continue to be(for me anyway).
O/T. @Largon & GripS. Wasn't my intent to :banana::banana::banana::banana: on anyone nor is it my intent to hyjack the thread.;) Honestly I have had bad Q6600 G0's that would fail well before (in a matter of minutes) most of the clocks seen here. I have a good one now and can reference this thread for info which is useful to me. It is pretty simple to open up an new thread saying ("Post your 8 hour Prime small FFT's quad results here.") Anyways nuff said and no offence I hope.:)
oh man!...prime fanatics at it again...stability is what the user does with his or her system and there are no freezes, no BSOD, no random reboots, play games without dropping back to the desktop, etc.
there might be only one program that stresses the computer and that is "Folding"...the user might want to test his overclocked computer with prime 95 before beginning to fold...then, it makes sense to run P95 for 24, 36 or 48 hours to make sure he can hack folding with an overclock computer.
i don't think it is in any book which says you have to show 8 hours of prime to make it a valid overclock!...if you do 1, 2 or 8 hours, what does that prove?!...to me, it says you hacked 1, 2 or 8 hours of prime...grrr-eat!:D