you guys are so cool and know it all that you can explain what I had to explain in 30-40 lines in few line with no relation to topic. Awesome!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
Printable View
you guys are so cool and know it all that you can explain what I had to explain in 30-40 lines in few line with no relation to topic. Awesome!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
After reading your post severral times i am ready to take your word for it :confused: :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
Another very simple thing is to avoid quoting loooong posts your are not replying to :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Turtle 1
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32790
AMD makes the first move it seems...i just downloaded and will start testing with FX62
Wow, now you are the one "speaking from above". :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
As for your experience, I can match you when it comes to general programming, drivers, low level, peek'n'poke, but I must bow down when it comes to Boeing and SQL.
Although, I can say that Boeing engineers were presented with our reconstruction code and they almost passed out when they saw a reconstruction of a dataset which took less than 15 minutes on 3.0 GHz P4 because they used to have to wait 10 hours for that at home.
They serve the same purpose - they feed this rotten consumer society with quantity instead of quality. But I don't expect you to admit that you are bored down to bits doing relational databases just as 14 year old boy in Indonesia is bored by sewing Nike size 10 left shoe for the 47th time today.Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
The only difference between you and that boy is that he is getting 1$ a day and you get much more, but don't worry. Once they teach them how to make RDB you will get the same offer too.
With normal management you can always explain that some changes in other parts of application are needed to correct poor design or to gain speed, that is if you care of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
Job offers are always welcome :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
The cost goes to customers anyway, the question is how much will they get for their money.Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
What I am trying to say is that you get more from hardware than from software for the same amount of money. Not because hardware is cheap mind you, but because software is expensive and that expensiveness in 95% of cases is not justified.
I never said that nor I intended to do so. I was just pissed off by all those wussies who keep whining how programming is hard. It was your choice to study it and get a programming job so have some dignity and take it like a man. It is also very interesting that I never hear any engineers working on a CPU complain how hard it is to design one.Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
Well? How well does it work? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
the dual core optimizer isnt RHT sadly
the dual core 'optimiser' (am i the only one who notices the misspelling?) really only fixes the few apps that messed up on dual core systems, it fixes that sync problem or whatever. not reverse hyperthreading in the least.
I thought AMD denied there was a problem with X2 when these timing problems was first pointed out a year ago? So why have they made this "optimiser"? THG reported strange results from their famous multitasking "stresstest" concerning X2 DVD encoding, the task had been more or less ignored, that problem could be related to this optimizer-thing. And now, the fact that ppl over in the XS AMD forum are reporting improvements when using this optimizer doesnt match well with AMDs denials. Too early to tell yet, but it could look like AMD has to bend over and take whats coming, the claims that Pentium D's was not real dualcores could strike back at them, at least Pentium D dont need any software patches...
Anyway, easy to forgive when considering the performance advantage of X2 over P-D, noone is perfect (they just like to think so), and people would still have bought X2 instead of P-D.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
you mean like sandra does ?
Quote:
It is also very interesting that I never hear any engineers working on a CPU complain how hard it is to design one.
who do you work with? ( what company? )
wtf? no answers lol
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32885
Actually, this was all a rumor. At least for AMD, that is; they're not planning to release this anytime soon, if the inquirer can be trusted. :p:
It could take a while to get reply from that guy... However, someone mention Boeing to him and suddenly, "been there, they were sooooo impressed!". What a convenient coincidence... Now combine that with being experienced in programming but dont know anything about how the software business works in reality? His posts made me need another housing fan to remove the smell of con artist from my rig...Quote:
Originally Posted by i found nemo
Quote:
Originally Posted by i found nemo
I work for hire over the Internet. If you need more details, ask.Quote:
Originally Posted by i found nemo
You bet it could, but only because I have other things to do than hanging around here.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Read again, I never said that I have "been there", but they were impressed. Coincidence or not, it wasn't me who mentioned Boeing first in a chest-beating attempt.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
I was criticizing the trend which is setting amongst the developers and that is to ask others (hardware vendors) for the easy way out, while other industry branches do not have that commodity. Does the word "slacking" ring any bells?
Or you have just farted from too much brain exercise while trying to understand my post and you won't admit it? :hrhr:Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Sorry, but you will need HEPA air-purifier for that, no housing (perhaps you meant case?) fan will do. :nono:
What a mature reply, i guess rear end humor is fun in your age? Just admit youre a student who thinks he knows everything. Reply in a few years when you reached the point where you understand that the more you learn the more you come to realize how little you know. You made it clear that you are not even close to that point yet, you obviously have no real world experience. Con artist, 100% sure now.
Tsk, tsk, tsk... you could have checked my age in my profile, that would spare both the others and me from having to read such rediculous claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Moreover, you can't actually say that your reply to my original posting was anything better to begin with.
I am quoting your post again for the record:
Now let me break it down for you:Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
- You are not addressing me directly but instead you are gossiping behind my back
- You are talking about me in derogatory terms insinuating that I stink and that I am a liar with no proof to back it up
- There is no smiley face next to it
We hopefully all know how such posts (and posters) are classified.
Following are your claims about me based on my reply to your mouthwashing:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Thanks God that just you saying it doesn't make it true.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
You haven't challenged any of my claims but instead you are hitting below the belt by disputing my credibility while you still haven't established your own.
It is such a mature way of discussion -- congratulations ted3 for mastering it so quickly.
Tnx, i know im the best. :toast: All other programmers are just whores for the money, they dont care about the art in it. See, i have no idea about teamwork, i spit on other programmers skills. Now does that sound like you or what?
I dont want to play "mention a big company and i made apps for them too" or any other game of yours, you can reply anyone with better credentials and greater achievements anyway, thats what con artists do best. In fact its the only thing they do, lol. Ofcourse i cant prove what a braggard con artist you are, but as long as im convinced that noone who been in the trade could say anything of what you said then it works for me.
Obviously not the first time you state extreme controversial opinions on forums. Youre one of those who can get into an argument about how to correctly wind a wristwatch.Quote:
Yo Audio Freak!Still kicking ass all over the internet, i see
Sory for off topic, i think everyone except one agrees that core multiplexing would have been/will be of benefit to users.
Of course it doesn't. Yet again you are attacking and discrediting me personally while I have been commenting on a (IMO) negative trend in the industry.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Are you intellectually challenged or what? Read what I said again, but do it slowly few times until it sinks in, I really hate when I must QFT myself and I apologize to everyone for the offtopic:Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Note how I said "I can match you", and not "I am better than you". Also note how I said "I must bow down when it comes to Boeing and SQL".Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofreak
Hello?!? Do you get it? I am not a con artist, he knows SQL and I don't, he has worked for Boeing and I haven't. I just mentioned that a company I work for hire over the Internet had some contact with Boeing as an example how code optimization can be much better approach than CMT or RHT and that is all. I am not stealing anyone's 15 minutes of fame because I don't care.
Then perhaps you could share your doing with us if you are so bold in accusing someone else of doing nothing?Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Aside from not even being able to prove that you know proper English by using correct spelling in your posts I consider it normal that you can't prove something which is not true. If anyone could do that then the world would quickly come to a bitter end.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
Btw, if you keep calling me names I will report your next post instead of wasting time to reply to such childish acts from a 36yr old.
The person who posted that comment is a friend of mine from another forum. And no I wouldn't because I do not even use wristwatches so get a life.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
That goes to show that you haven't even bothered to read the whole thread. In other words, you can think whatever you want but when the facts don't match your thinking you simply end up looking rediculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by ted3
@audiofreak & ted3
I don't care who's right and who's wrong. But, knock it off.
-FCG
OMG... You came here to brag about how good a programmer you are and how terrible everyone else is, and you escalated your bragging till its impossible to believe you. Your post was nothing but offensive to programmers, a tribute to yourself and your allegded optimizing skills. Bottom line is, your post had nothing to do with CMP, you dont care about CMP or any other CPU tech, you care about talking :banana::banana::banana::banana: abt programmers.Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofreak
Most stupid post ever:
But programmers complain all the time, except you ofcourse.Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofreak
I cant say it better, and i dont know why you denied saying it, but its a good way to end this, since it sums up what you said in your first post. Im knowcking it off now FCG. Sorry...Quote:
Originally Posted by jinu117
I take it this technology just disappeared off the face of the earth. Pity, it could've increased the effective performance by ~80%+ in singlethreaded apps.