Asus 7900GT standard clocks
stock volts stock cooling:
http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/2...06749qm.th.jpg
1.55v and zalman VF900 no vmem mod:
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/9...19337hf.th.jpg
Printable View
Asus 7900GT standard clocks
stock volts stock cooling:
http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/2...06749qm.th.jpg
1.55v and zalman VF900 no vmem mod:
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/9...19337hf.th.jpg
How hight temps do you get with the VF900 and the 1.55v mod?Quote:
Originally Posted by pinto
/Grau
Just got my card! Gonna through it in and test it on stock cooler before I give it some water.:woot: :banana:
approx 55° load and 42° idle.Quote:
Originally Posted by GOESA
2x galaxy 7900 gt. stock 450/1320 oc stock cooling+volts to 550/1820:D
:clap: :toast: Very nice, I just got my MSI NX7900GT 450/1320 and if I can get the same as you I'll be a very happy man :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ncc-1709
mine is factory OCed @ 695/1750Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyH20
vmem mod done, at least head room of 15mhz more to come:
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/468...50955pr.th.jpg
http://img424.imageshack.us/img424/8...22019ep.th.jpg
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/728...63998mh.th.jpg
XFX Extreme 550/1630 stock clocks, $329 at Monarch.
I haven't had time to mess with it yet, but I did run 3dmark05/06 at 600/1630 yesterday at stock volts and cooling.
Edit: core maxed at 615 at stock cooling. Still finding upper range of memory, right now it's at 1800.
***Deimos***,
Check this out:
713/913 on GT:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=660
vs
http://img81.imageshack.us/my.php?im...k0663998mh.jpg
713/1826 vs 740/1978
6512 vs 6399. Yeah the CPU in the first case +125MHz.
mark06 doesn't so sense to freq in case one core CPU.
But the core and memory! pinto should get much more in HDR/SM3.0 tests!!! Anyway - we can add 113 marks due to CPU compesation but... +27MHz on GPU and +162MHz - it does make sense.
Also, what do you think about 11.1k in mark05 on 740/1850 GT and one core 2.8GHz AMD? I think 11.9-12.0k should be here. Since 11.769 was done by Shark-357 on 716/1000 GT with the same one core AMD CPU.
Also, if you compare Shark-357 with pinto - you will see that Shark-357 can hit 12.0k in mark05 on 716/1000 with dual core Opteron at 2.8GHz.
If you look accurately, pintos HDR/SM3.0 score is driven with 2D clocks not 740MHz. That's why score is so low.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilson
This is normal HDR/SM 3.0 score:
http://img320.imageshack.us/img320/6803/06markit2ni.jpg
All results I have seen here, are just what they should be! You can leave this topic now :nono:
:worship:Quote:
Originally Posted by SF3D
Yeah? Who says that? Could you please point to me the reason for 2D clocks in HDR/SM3.0? Overheat or not enough volts? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by SF3D
You post 6610 marks on dual core 2.8GHz Opti with 705/900. It is correct points for these clocks and CPU! Thats what I'm talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by SF3D
You didn't get me. :stick: As I said earlier in my post for you - "you should be able to get on your system 6700 mark06 only with 720/1800." Now you prove it.
Shamino get 800/2126 and 7013 marks. His points in HDR/SM3.0 = 2744. Try to prove that it's correct points for 800/2126 - and I'll leave this topic.
I'm talking about issues on GT in case of 730-800MHz on GPU. Why we can't get stable clocks in tests? I mean 3D clocks in one subtests and 2D clocks in over subtests at the same test run? I saw many results on 730, 740, 750 MHz for 7900GT - no one can pass mark06 only on 3D freq. Aslo, does anybody can prove that on 740MHz or 750MHz he can pass mark05 without freq drops or skiping GPU cycles? No one I suppose. 12.2k on GT with 750/1820 with delta +20? I can believe if it's one core GPU but not two cores.
Can you try to flash 740 for all modes and run mark05 and mark06 tests? but it doesn't helps if we have power circuit issues.
Doing 705/1800 on water so far with 1.55v
Mysterfix, please post your 05 and 06 results on 2.8GHz....
OK Dude here ya go.
<a href="http://img339.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot0016uh.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/4741/screenshot0016uh.th.jpg" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" /></a>
<a href="http://img114.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot0027zg.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2760/screenshot0027zg.th.jpg" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" /></a>
@Mysterfix: What version of the 7900 GT EE do you have?
Does anybody know that the absolute maximum overclock of the Extreme versions is higher then the normal 7900 gt's? I think a lot of people do not want to spend another extra 10% for a factory higher clocked card if the max. overclock is the same for both cards. Does anybody know? Do the card manufacturers put their better samples on the Extreme cards or do all the chips cope with the higher speeds? So this goes for both the gpu and the mem.
Penny for your thoughts :)
I have the 520/1500 version.
Has anybody fitted an Accelero X1 to their 7900gt, or does anybody know if it will fit, web search found conflicting results
To my mind pinto's board has some idling issue, i got similarQuote:
Originally Posted by Nilson
Even if frequency raise very high, the score doesn't improve from a certain point. For me over 910 MHz on the VRAM doesn't help, and moreover lower the performance even if the RAM can raise up to 1GHz
Same for the GPU but hard to sense, should be around 720-740 MHz
Am thinking of the issue mentionned in the Vmod section where either the OVP is in cause or the switching frequency of teh regulator, both can be patched with some modding that i will try soon
Waiting for a swithc like SF3D used, easy way for switching from 1.5 to 1.7 without removing the board.
Go and get yourself a Zalman VF-900.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Tractor
Thanks a lot :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysterfix
These shots are very stable and all scores are fine. I mean without any issues with GPU or Memory.
It is prove that 720/1800 for 7900GT is around: 6.7k+ mark06 and 12k+ mark05.
Just did the 1,4V mod. I choosed to use a micro switch for the mod, this make the mod really easy to enable/disable. Did this because I often work with noisless solutions, and I have plans to make a non fan cooler for the card!
The card is a XFX GeForce 7900GT eXtreme. Running default @ 520/1500
Could run @ 541/1600 before the mod..
..after the mod the nForce drivers reports 636/1764 as the highest clock.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...5&d=1144254434
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&d=1144254450
I got my eVGA 256-P2-N563-AX today from nn_step :toast:
Initial clocks a bit mediocre @ 541MHz / 1680MHz with stock cooler.
Gonna do some work on it and report later..
I did mount my NV Silencer 6 without any modifications whatsoever, everything fits like it's meant for it....precise length and clearance:clap:
Temps I see with the NV on slowest fan is 42 idle and 52 load....and dead silent
ArcticOC, nice work man :) so neat vmod :)
Mine topped out at about 560/1660 on stock everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint
Ah, well...can't be lucky allways.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Mysterfix
Yeah but it's nice when you have a string of good luck.:) Oh well, I'm very happy with my clocks as they are, these are the clocks I was shooting for when I bought the card so I'm content with my results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint
One thing that is puzzling me though is that my bench scores only go up by about 100 points in 05 and 06 from 2.8ghz - 2.9ghz on my opty.:confused:
Does that seem normal to you?
Mysterfix, can you post detalied(with fps for subtests) screenshots with 2.8 and 2.9 results? Also, please point your drivers version. I think you should have a little bit more in mark06 like 6.5+k. Post your memory screen in CPU-Z. I think you have more slower memory speed than 1Gig systems.
2All: Just flashing +20 delta to GTX instead original +40 makes mark05 points GT equal to GTX. ;)
Both 3DMarks are very GPU dependent.. faster video card makes a big difference.. faster CPU makes small difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysterfix
3DMark2005 doesnt use CPU score at all in final score.
3DMark2006 does use CPU score for final score... however, 2.8 -> 2.9Ghz is a very small difference. Perhaps 2->3Ghz you would clearly see a difference in 3dmarks.
Ok, got my 7900GT vanilla a couple days ago and this is what i've got so far. This is part#256-P2-N560-AX. Stock clocks are 450/660.
I did the 1.5 volt mods so far. Both these screenshots are done at 724/921 with a 40mhz delta in the bios. 84.21 drivers with 100mhz pci freq. Both are submitted on the orb.
BTW, thanks guys for the volt mod info on this site. This is where I got all the info to mod the card.
EDIT: Just bumped the PCI Freq up to 120mhz and got 12,122 in 3dmark05
Marlon
http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/4...97249210cy.jpg
http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/3...07249215bt.jpg
I did the memorymod and it hasn't changed much...this card is giving artifacts and the modules gets crazy hot!
Snakeskinner ..how do you get the Nvidia panel to show higher memfrequencies than 900MHz?
Coolbits is just a registry entry that allows NVIDIA overclocking. The range of overclocking options is based on the clocks in the bios, I think it adds 25% if I remember right. So I changed the bios to 500/800 to give me more range with coolbits. You can also physicaly change the registry entry as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint
Marlon
Ah, can you give me the specific key?Quote:
Originally Posted by snakeskinner
If you decide to play around in the registry, do so at your own risk. Its also a good idea to back it up first. I can't guarantee this will work, because I changed the bios and let coolbits change the registry for me. But this is supposed to be the entrys it changes. I think its Krusty, Krusty3D and homer that you need to change. These changes should give you the same range that I have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clint
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/296/registrykey3yx.jpg
Thanks for the info but it didn't work, still have a max of 900MHz.
Guess I'm gonna have to do some bios editing then, I have to mess with the memorytimings anyway so..:p:
EDIT: It seems like my PSU aint giving full current on one of the dedicated 12v rails, I swapped it and got 560 core at once..:D
I now see 970MHz on memory on 2.2volts...a nice relief:woot:
Now it feels so much better, I would say I'm up to par with what others have had on this particular model.
Here are my first OC attempts with my new MSI NX7900GT 450/660 overclocked to 550/800 still using default Volts and HSF :D
'05
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...05850-8002.jpg
'06
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...06850-8002.jpg
Looks like there is some more left in this card @ default :eek: :D
All stock Volts and cooling
Out of the box :)
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/3...19307dl.th.jpg
10545 :kiss:
My ram is insane ,no sinks ot it and it makes 1930mhz:eek:
Which card is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
Sorry I forget :)
XFX GeForce 7900GT 256MB DDR3 Extreme Edition
(PV-T71G-UDE (R,7))
Clock rate:
520 MHz
Memory Clock:
1.5 GHz
Defaults:D
I must change cooling and place ram sinks and Vmod it to 1.5v and 2.2v and 720/2000 can be in reach:)
Anyone using 1.5V 24/7 on aftermarket air?
Well guys I have some bad news. My cards memory took a crap and will no longer do even default speeds without artifacting like crazy.:( No volt mod was added to the memory so I'm guessing they are defective. Gonna contact XFX today and see what they can do.
Little update ,still 1.2v and def.cooling
Crazy card:stick: HT is very important for over 10k I just lowered cpu multi ,so HT goes UP from 900 to 1000 with x3 multi and that gave me over 500p
610/1940 :bow:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/553...19407ih.th.jpg
11101 :kiss:
Whowwww that a crazy card you've got there DS :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
Heres my MSI 7900GT, stock V and HSF and tortured using ATITool for an hour to detect any artifacts, none found at this speed :D , idle temps 43C load 58C
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...05580-9202.jpg
:woot: :woot: :woot: :D
Ouch, but they sure will replace it for you...as long as there are no solderingtraces that is..:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysterfix
I have noticed that at least my 7900gt's memory is very sensitive to having proper current delivered.
I went from:
Bad single 12v feed @ 1680Mhz max
Good single 12v feed @ 1800Mhz max
Good dual 12v feed @ 1900Mhz max
all on stock volts and clean..:D
If I raise the memvoltage to 2.17-2.2 I get only a 60Mhz raise...when touching 2Ghz comp freezes and goes BSOD on me...but I don't see any artifacts whatsoever at that speed.
I believe there is something that needs to be done, something related to that high frequency.
It seems that HT and PCI-e frequency were my limiting factor after rising them to 1005(2010 real) and 105 for PCI-e ,I have new scores with still no mods or cooling ,straight out of the box :eek:
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/128...19405dv.th.jpg
11431:eek:
wow thats one heck of an overclock. I'll try raising my PCI-E thing a lil to see what it can give me.Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
EVGA 7900 CO just arrived, 500/1500 stock clocks.
After an hour or so of playing, core seems to max at ~ 555 stock sink ( no extra cooling) with ram at 930 (only a VERY small number of artifacts) so theres still a little to go.
Does rivatuner support these cards yet? Is there anyway you can view the Delta clock?
An update on the eVGA in sig:
I made the 1.4v mod and coolbits autodetected 550MHz/868MHz
Thats a 18MHz jump on the core for .2volts added.:(
This core really sucks, will go up to 650 but not artifactfree until down to 620MHz.
Memory now perform worse than before, even though coolbits autodetected 50MHz higher...
with 1.40vmod on my XFX 7900GT XT on find ptimal frekuencies i get 587/885 and its artifacts free at 670/900 .
regards
Here's my first '06 run.
Did the 1.4v mod out the box.
http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/5...651core8by.jpg
mascaras... woah.. are you sure? Didn't you have pics of 650Mhz++, and even 700Mhz. Perhaps that 570/900 is at stock 1.2V?
I mod to 1.4v still def.cooling --->http://www.xfxforce.com/media/produc...0Cardshot1.jpg
692/1940 :shock2:
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/8...19404jf.th.jpg
12362
I have no artifact @ that speed ,but for some reason @695 and over 3dmark freezes:(
Wow i forget sm3.0 from 2006
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6...6sm35gq.th.jpg
3215:shock2:
It seems deep freeze is very video mem. dependent almost 36 fps
Can I pretend for WR 2005 on def.cooled 7900gt :))
Your into ATI 1900XTX speeds now :eek: :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
OMG....:toast: :clap:...INSANE...Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
DStealth is that tweakerizer from tweaksrus you're using for overclocking ?
No Powerstrip ,but my driver is XG 84.22 v2 and that's why it looks that way:)Quote:
Originally Posted by graham_h
To be compared with my eVGA 500/1500 that does 615MHz on 1.4...with NV Silencer...Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
..sometimes it sucks to hang around here:D
Those drivers are ok in your opinion ?
Better than whql ones ?
Definitely in both perf and IQ ;) IMOQuote:
Originally Posted by graham_h
I'm using them now, thanks for the info.
Is there any way to be sure the 1.4v mod has been successful without having to use a volt meter ?
Hi guys!
I've just run 3DMark05 and I think my score is a bit low?
Look,
84.25
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/945...5124ghz1dj.jpg
But I have a old version of 3DMark05, i think its 1.1.0 or something, do you think that the old version of 3DMark affect my score?
you should patch it to the latest version
yes, it was my mistake , i meant to say 670/900 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ***Deimos***
XFX 7900GT XT @1.40vmod (670/880)
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7687/2k5oc6en.th.jpg
i run this clocks with no artifacts att all , next i go try 680/900.
regards
Well after a few attempts at vmod finally got it to work as in coolbits detecting a higher core as when i tried foil + copper tape coolbits did not recognise any higher clocks... so i just tried paint first attempt run coolbits no difference but when i moved the core slider it was ok up to 660core before clock test failed...so i took it out and give it another once over....and hooray ran coolbits and it finally detected 634 on core....Thankgod!:).....Oh and now for sometesting.
Well, I good way to GUESS would be if you can overclock higher, and nothing is smoking. Really, you guys crack me up. You pay $300+ for a video card, and cant spare $5 for some conductive ink, or $5 for a multimeter.. its almost as if you have so much money, that dont care if new 7900GT burns up.Quote:
Originally Posted by graham_h
If you want to do volt-mods:
Get the proper tools!!
DStealth, WOW.. 693 @1.4V
Anybody thinking of putting together a database..
ie:
card model:___
stock clocks:___
top at 1.4V :___
etc.
Vocch, how did you use the copper tape? Do you have pics?
Ok, now I've patched my 3DMark, clocked my card up to 560/1800 and my CPU to 2,5Ghz, and still I have a bad score. :S
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3...0025ghz6hd.jpg
zyprex with my opteron 148@2990mhz and XFX 7900GT 520/1500 (Default) i got 9023 marks , something wrong with yours , its a new OS???
Yes, only a few days old.Quote:
Originally Posted by mascaras
Here is my 3DMark06 score. This score seems more normal.
http://img327.imageshack.us/img327/9...0025ghz0vp.jpg
Hi all, I've got a MSI 7900GT and I'm trying to overclock with coolbits. But even @ default clocks, if I test with coolbits it says that it didn't pass the test.
I'm wondering if coolbits is compatible with MSI's drivers? Because they have there own overclocking utility. However, if I have coolbits "detect optimal frequencies" it sets my 3D values to 536 Core and 778 Memory.
I doubt my video card is defective, because I've been gaming with this card @ stock clocks since yesterday with out a hitch. Just wondering if there is a software conflict of sorts with these particular MSI drivers. BTW those drivers are version 83.90.
Thanks for the help all. :)
Here you go...i did this just for you Deimos...pic a bit on the large side....copper tape peel of backing and apply.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by ***Deimos***
Coolbits isn't a great way to check to see if the volt mod worked. Its autodetect thing is buggy at best. When I modded my card to 1.5 it still auto detected like 600mhz on the core or something like that. It took forever too for it to autodetect.
It was wierd, I checked with my DMM very first to see what the voltage was. It was 1.500 on the dot. I thought cool, i'll hit autocetect and see how far it increased. I was looking for way more than the 585 my card did at stock volts. But it went through its thing and autodetected like 600. I thought, oh well, that was a waste of solder, lol. But then I started overclocking for real, and bumping the clocks and benchmarking to see what happens like your supposed too, an lo and behold, up to 724 I go.
So the morale of the story, don't rely on any auto detect thingys, its been my experience that they all suck.
Marlon
DStealth do you have bios info on your card?
It'd be great if you could save it and upload it somewhere, as it obviously allows some major tweaking
Use the latest 84.26 drivers available from Tweaks R Us here http://www.tweaksrus.com/index.php?o...d&ascdesc=DESCQuote:
Originally Posted by cmay119
I have the same card and its a beast, 580 core / 920 memory default volts and cooler with more left to go :toast:
Finally got around to doing the basic 1.4V mod and now my detected optimal frequency has gone wayyyyyyyy up :eek: :D :woot:
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ptimalFreq.jpg
Good to see you got round to it at last. :D
You using coolbits there ? or something else ?
coooooul bits :DQuote:
Originally Posted by graham_h
Mine detected core at 627mhz... maybe some more conductive pen is needed you think ?
ok lets see some benchies at those clocks uh ?
Run '06 for us would ya ?
Do someone know of any solutions for my bad score?
XFX 7900GT XT 562/1800
X2 3800+ @ 2.5
84.25 drivers
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3...0025ghz6hd.jpg
It seems about right. Did you turn off any background apps ?
How'd ya go in '06 ?
No, just 3DMark.
3DMark06
http://img327.imageshack.us/img327/9...0025ghz0vp.jpg
But when i tried a second run with some higher clocks (580/1900) my score went down. I got 5300..? :S
my best was a 650 core, 670 gave worse results.
I'm thinking its a bios issue, which cam hopefully be resolved quite quickly.
But something definitely wrong in that score ~37 fps, nothing relative to VMEMQuote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
You got Ã:banana: 8900 GTX in the hand ;)
Either something to do with the driver or the 2MB ov RAM
First run of 06 with 1.4mod:)
Driver is better for 2005 with it I gain about 100-150p over WHQL 84.21 ,but in 2006 there is no difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebola
Yes my SM3 score is some kind of bug I try hard to do it 2nd time ,no luck of course.Over 3010-3050p max with that Clocks:rolleyes:
Little improvement I didn't even published it :)) Yes 1.4v still def.cooling same VGA Clocks ,but lower CPU and 2 points gain :))
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/8...proj0ao.th.jpg
These 7900gt's are beasts for the money they cost.I go for 1.55v and CPU cooler and try to hit 800mhz GPU.Just wait to have little free time
:)
Edit: Yes I do it almost :)
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3...19403qw.th.jpg
12446
Still def.cooling and 1.4v but this with LOD 3 lol
Very close to 12.5 mark :)
And 2006
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/330...19400qy.th.jpg
6146
I hate this mark ,with dual core and these SM's I'll be over 7k barrier :(
Nice scores! But what are your load/idle temps with the 1.4 vmod? (with def. cooling)Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
I have no idea how you get that 3dmark scores :S I have 705/962 and 3000mhz Opteron 146 and get 11635point, i really wanna break the 12k barrier, what did you do? and which drivers etc?Quote:
Originally Posted by DStealth
/Grau
Lod Tweaks Dude;)
With my setup, I was only able to break 12K by changing the delta in the bios to 40mhz, which worked best for me. And changing the PCI Express freq to 120, which was another nice boost in score. At 724/921 that gave me 12,122 in 05, and 6750 in 06. Thats also with official 84.21 driver.Quote:
Originally Posted by GOESA
If you try some of this, I bet you could break 12K pretty easy.
Marlon
Do somebody know about som tweaks to get the 3DMark score a little bit higher? My 3DMark score suck:S
X2 3800+ @ 2.6
XFX 7900GT 560/1830
Only 9.4k 3DMarks
I'm gonna buy me either a XFX Extreme Edition 550/1.63
or
XFX XXX Edition 560/1.65
Now, is it really worth the extra bucks for the XXX version?
Has anyone seen any evidence of that the XXX version is clocking higher?
o5? do you have settings on highest performance and aa, af and vsync OFF?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyprex^^
I am only getting 12,000 @ 2800mhz
aqua mark 114,439
03 24,633
05 12,008
06 6657
It doesn't seem to me that your scores are off that much, if any at all. Your core is only 560, and I think 9400 in 3dmark05 is a pretty decent score. To get over 12000 I needed 724 on the core with a 40 delta. 560 to 724 is a BIG difference. So I think your scores are ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyprex^^
If you want a little bit higher score, I would see how high you can get your delta, thats good for a few more points. Try 40, that worked best for me.
Also raise your PCI freq as high as you can get it. I ran mine at 120mhz just fine and that was good for a few more points.
You can also try the drivers Dstealth is using, they seem to give a decent boost in 05 scores.
Marlon
Delta? What is that?Quote:
Originally Posted by snakeskinner
I'm using XG 84.22 drivers.
Btw, try to run a 3DMark with 560/1800, lets see what you get. Can you do that?
Well guys I got in contact with XFX tech support and they have agreed to RMA the card. Newegg also said I could send it back to them but they don't have any in stock so I think I'm gonna send it back to XFX. They said it's gonna be about 2 weeks from the time I mail it till I get a new one in my hands.
Dstealth: Your scores are pretty dang good :banana: I'm gonna pm you so you can give me the run down on that LOD thing you were talking about. I never heard of it before.:confused:
Delta is a setting in the bios. As far as I know, it can only be changed there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyprex^^
At 560/1800 I get just under 10K. Around 9800 or so.
I would try a different driver and see how it works out. Look on the orb and find the one all the guys are using that are on the fron page and use that one. Should be 84.21 official driver I think.
Marlon
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3.../3dmark052.jpg
my first results with a EVGA 7900 gt co using 1.4 v-mod. My question is how do I get powerstrip to let me clock my gpu higher? Its maxed at 665. Do I need to flash my cards with different bios?
MsB you just have to double click on the icon at the bottom of the gpu bar and change it from 133 to 199 and that will give you alot more head room.
:yawn: DOH! :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysterfix