If you overclock XL to XT clocks, which most XL can do, then you can compare your card against pure X1800XT and thats how fast XL can be, and even little faster, if XL can take more Mhz and voltage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3ak
Printable View
If you overclock XL to XT clocks, which most XL can do, then you can compare your card against pure X1800XT and thats how fast XL can be, and even little faster, if XL can take more Mhz and voltage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3ak
Whats the XT preform on 05 stock?
Well a slight update, my memory doesn't seem to like to go higher. Its stuck around 650 for stability. If I apply more voltage it crashes eventually, sorta similar with the core, I know I can run a few tests with it @ 635 but doesn't seem to take it after a while.
Still @ 625/650... 1.25/1.95/1.95V and thats under 60C overall temps full dual core cpu load also.
something between 8700-8800 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
I got bad feeling, that water cooling will not improve overclocking, only lower temperature of GPU.
ok people i am back online after a few problems with the dslam here, so i got ati tool 0.25 beta 9 and i do get artifacts even in stock freqs. Does anyone else noticed this? by the way mine clocks to 575/600 with no artifacts at all in 05+01, but ati tool shows quite alot of artifacts, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1479192
My latest data.. gonna see if i can take the next person on the orb w/ a 1800xl heh (currently #7 :D - out of the 256mb x1800's)
ati(5/11) - 8104 (560.25/558.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9
ati(5/11) - 8177 (560.25/571.50)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 64.9°C
ati(5/11) - 8219 (560.25/580.50)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 67.1°C
ati(5/11) - 8257 (560.25/589.50)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 66.6°C
ati(5/11) - 8297 (560.25/598.50)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 65.8°C
ati(5/11) - 8363 (560.25/612.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 64.8°C
ati(5/11) - 8384 (560.25/621.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 67.8°C
w/cover off + 120mm blowing down on copper core HS - tightend core HS backplate screws (2 loose)
ati(5/11) - 8405 (560.25/621.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/63.1°C
ati(5/11) - 8443 (560.25/630.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/63.3°C
ati(5/11) - 8489 (569.70/630.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/63.0°C
ati(5/11) - 8646 (580.50/630.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/63.3°C
ati(5/11) - 8656 (589.50/630.00)(1.100V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/63.3°C
ati(5/11) - 8810 (600.75/630.00)(1.125V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/64.9°C
these measuring temperatures would be better with ati tray tools, since it can show temperature in fullscreen too, which ati tool cant do, so when benchmark ends, temperature can differ from what you seen like 4 seconds ago.
can anyone in here confirm my last post?
does anyone in here have an idea if the gpu and memory location on the board of the x1800 and 7800 are the same? cause i bought a water block for my x1800 xl. i know the gpu would fit for sure but dont know about the memory. this block cools the gpu and ram at the same time dont wanna risk opening it and get charge for a restock fee if it doesn't fit.
ati(5/11) - 8791 (625.50/603.00)(1.175V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.75ghz / ram 250mhz - opteron 144) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 50°C/64°C
Why 5.11 are not FM approved?
I dunno, i don't think i used drive cleaner when i went from 5.10a omega's to 5.11s. i also removed the CCC since it kept bugging out 1/2 the time (not showing overclock panel).Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
I'm just taking data on progress so far, seeing the limits of my card and cooling, so i'm not too concered with my drivers. I can take my cpu up at least another 250mhz too, that would yeild me some more points. But my new high is:
ati(5/11) - 8895 (621.00/630.00)(1.150V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.5ghz / ram 250mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 46°C/64.4°C :)
The card temp runs up to 69°C playing Farcry on max settings @ 1600 x 1200.. so i don't think i can really go much higher without a better cooler.
You can have Ati tool log them for you, every 10 seconds or whateve interval you want. you can see where you changed clocks, ran your benchmark, and take the highest reported temp from the log file ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
omg i forget about that lol :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Diverge
well .. i have clean windows install, since i tried 720/1680 (registry f00ked up) hehe and installed 5.11 WHQL .. but not FM approved, weird.
Yeah, i have to do a clean install someday - this install of windows has been used with 3 different chipsets so far rdx200, asrock, and now the eXpert.. and my dual core driver wants to install everytime i reboot... lolQuote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
But i just moved up another place, heh :)
ati(5/11) - 8981 (621.00/630.00)(1.150V,1.905V,1.905V)(cpu2.7ghz / ram ???mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 47°C/66.5°C
For some reason nothing will read the divider i am using with my opty - using the 140 divider - the 133 at this cpu speed gave me 180mhz on the mem, so this one must be a little more :confused:
Yes its very similar. So ur waterblock will work.Quote:
Originally Posted by z00mX
What rank are u? Cause i got 9143, but didn't bother upping my score.Quote:
Originally Posted by Diverge
What's safe 24/7 volts for water cooling on the XL? I'm running 700/650 right now at 1.3v core/1.95v mem. 9600 3dmark05. Cpu is a 170 at 2.8 GHz.
i finally got my X1800 XL to OC!!! i got it to 600/1400 and am gonna try to push it further but for now i am happy
So what was the problem why you was unable to overclock before? The magic trick? :p: You thought that your memory is scrapy, but now 700 (1400) Mhz on it :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by l337x3r1cx
Depends on C you got on chip, but i would say 1.4V is ok for water cooling and chip, did you tried to go higher with gpu? im still waiting for my water cooling :rolleyes: ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy
X1800XL
My first result :slobber:
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6...06300xs.th.jpg
1,2 1,95 1,95 GeCube VGA
Is overdrive ok to use to overclock? I just stuck the clocks at 650/775 and it was fine, 9300 in 05.
What settings are best for benching in the drivers? do i ust stick the all settings tab to performance? ive turned of A.I.
im back at 570 GPU .. anything over it, randomly hangs up, no matter what voltage i set, dont hope watercooling will improve anything at all.
similar situation here, same cooling and over 570 hungs up.Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
sounds software related
One trickey card to OC. The fun part behind it, keeps ya busy for hours on end :)
I dont why people are stopping at 6xx for the memory after the initial burst of people with 700+ memory clocks...
Perkam
Why... Because ATITool doesn't loosen the timings, or does something else to the ram that makes it run not in spec.Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
Thats why its harder to get higher scores on the memory. Sure I could get 820Mhz wiht the OC tool, but yet I get higher scores 400points + to be exact in 05 so there is a preformance increase going with ATITool, which yeilds lower clocks.
But how about 256Mb X1800XT BIOSes on the XL cards? I saw that there is 256Mb XT cards available on manufacturer sites like this card - Club3D X1800XT 256MB CGAX-TX186! Maybe someone can get one of the 256Mb XT cards BIOSes to test how does it work or work at all ;) Maybe its possible to transwer some XLs to XTs :p:
Hope to get my X1800XL soon, once there were shipping problems and needed to resend the card :slapass:
Updating
http://img347.imageshack.us/img347/3...16308zy.th.jpg
What maximum voltage done recommend me??
Thanks :)
Nice result anomalos! What cooling and what voltages are you useing? And how fast at the moment yor 3200+ are runing?
Hope my card will overclock at least like this or better :p:
Stock cooler 1,22 1,95 1,95 3200+@2650Quote:
Originally Posted by Kashelz
This card is very impressive :)
Am I limited from the CPU?
I think no if you are runing it @ 2650 Mhz, but it should be to slow to fully utilize the X1800XL/XT cards with default 3200+ CPU frequency 2000 Mhz :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by anomalos
I'm running 3200+ E3 @ 2800 Mhz and sometimes I want my CPU even faster, lets see what Opteron 146 CABYE 0540 can offer for OC + 1Mb cach on it :banana:
Had a chance to try out the ATItool some more. I also toyed around with the CPU a little to see what I could get. This is still with the stock ATI cooler, although the first run I opened the case and the second I pointed a house fan at at the inside of the case.
Overclock Tool:
625/750 1.275/1.95: 8625 X2 4400 @ 2.4
675/810 1.35/2.2: 9160 X2 4400 @ 2.4
ATItoolB9:
630/650 1.25/1.95: 9008 X2 4400 @ 2.4
625/675 1.3/1.95: 9115 X2 4400 @ 2.4
675/725 1.325/2.2: 9447 X2 4400 @ 2.4
675/720 1.35/2.2: 9629 X2 4400 @ 2.6 Hi Temp 79
685/750 1.35/2.25: 10008 X2 4400 @ 2.7 - although final screen came up out of ATI display driver in the 16 color VGA driver. Not sure if it was the CPU that glitched or the GPU. Kind of was a bummer. I will try again later. But I think 10K is in site with the stock cooler. With the case open I hit 79 as my high without the house fan.
One thing is for sure - it is definitly addictive trying to get a high score even if you won't play games at it! The X1800XL rocks...
Quigs : could be one or both :-) surely i cant set 750 or even 720 even with I/O or mem voltage to 2.25 .. it soon starts artifacts, i even got more then 80C with zalman now!
also tried 16xAF Trilinear and AA4x and got with 685/666 90fps in mother nature, nice :-)
Na not CPU limited its the video card still holding back the power. I'm @ 625/650 w/ a 2.6Ghz dually and I hit 9114-9118 constantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by anomalos
More volts and more cooling and it should definatly go further.
New update
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/3...06399rh.th.jpg
1,25 1,955 1,955
HAHA wow turns out mine is an OCing demon!!! All i had to do was raise the GPU core as well as memory volts and it allowed me to OC the memory. Now heres what I'm running at stabely 650/1600 volts at 1.225/2.0/2.0 on air at around 57* celsius... im loving my new XL the framerates in games are fantastic, i think ill finally be able to break 7000 3dmark with my 3500+Quote:
Originally Posted by Kashelz
did you OC with atitool or overclocker?
İ want this card :)
overclocker http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...1800xlpwnz.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by robin
ATi Tool Beta 9
625 Core 603 ram
1.225 1.922/1.922
8570 3dmark 2005
Sapphire X1800XL OEM With Zalman VFCU
YES YES i finally got my card clocked.
http://img321.imageshack.us/img321/552/90145hd.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1492364
So what did u do right? Let us know?Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
yes sure, first of all i flashed it with spphire bios. Then i increased the voltage of core and mem at 1.25 and 1.93Quote:
Originally Posted by mR Yellow
then i started pushing the mhz bar up slowly , leaving the 3d box on and spinning and a one minute halt every 10 mhz. it took me around 10 minutes to reach the freq of 625mhz/648 . At 600 mhz i applied 1.45 vcore and pused 25 mhz more. Then i ran the bench and voila. :woot:
Man you could have a 3D window up and change the speed? Everytime I do that it hard locks :(
As for the voltage, dang 1.45V.... Hate to see the amps thats comsuming at that voltage, let alone the heat.
Nice...just try and lay low on the volts ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
I haven't tried higher than 700 MHz on the core at 1.3v. The memory starts artifacting badly at 675 MHz at 1.95v. I'll try higher on the core tonight, maybe I'll do a couple of runs at 1.4v, temps seem pretty low with the maze4 I have.Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
my new high w/ stock cooler:
ati(5/11) - 9193 (641.25/643.50)(1.200V,1.922V,1.922V)(cpu2.7ghz / ram 193mhz - opty 170) - AtiTool0.25B9 - 52°C/71.5°C
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1497072 i still have more room i think at these voltages, i haven't pushed it till it crashed yet... but i think i need better cooling if i go higher much higher.
Nice OC :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Diverge
My XL is still voltage bugged. My max is 1.125v on gpu.
Got 600-680 now. @ 2.1v for the memmory. Gonna try a other mainboard soon maybe that will help me get past that 1.125v :(.
8773
625/621 Voltages 1.250, 1.930, 1.908. Stockcooling
I got 9222 With 600-700 thats my max @ 1.125 - 2.135v.
Core cant handle higher that 1.125 its sux :slapass:
I whant a voltmod !!!! i don't trust that regulator.
well i got artefacts at more then 550Mhz on GPU, it was ok yesterday :-( its in FEAR, Quake IV ... :-(
I dont know, these XL are weird, they are like never happy girls....
Nope That A14 core sux a bit :D A15 ( XT cores ) can do mush better. Range tho. But A14 just dont like voltage. Try lover voltages. @ stock i could hit 560 then i needed 1.125 in ATi Tool to get 600.Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
well .. i run ati tool .. scan for artifacts and it was good on 620Mhz when i set 1.375V only! but then it hangs after 5 minutes (gpu was at 75C)
It was ok before, i guess problems could be in XG Warcats drivers, will try it again today.
Taking 1.125V to get 600, is great man. I need 1.2V to touch 600, at least last time I checked, and my memory really doesn't like going over 650Mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astennu
Hi
I am improving :
waiting for the new cpu "opteron 146" .....
new result
http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/3...16527kc.th.jpg
1,25 2,01 1,955 stock cooler :D
damn, i need 1.15 to get 600 and 1.25 to run 650, i got super lucky with mem, at first i thought it was crappy, but with the right volts it goes to 800Mhz just fine, im loving my X1800 XL so glad i disregarded the advice i got and got the XL over the 7800 GT, though my 3D Mark score is rather disappointing, at 575 mhz core stock mem w/ my AMD 64 3500+ at 240x10 mem at CPU6:RAM5 divider to have my mem run at exactly PC-3200 speeds with 2/3/3/7 timings i only got about 6400 on 3D05 less than 200 more than my X850 XT w/ CPU at 214x11Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
l337x3r1cx : what motherboard you got?
Chaintech VNF4, probably the culprit preventing any decent OC, im actually considering a new mobo after Xmas
looks like your PCIE slot is running not in 16X but in 2X .. since i got that score too when i got gfx in second PCIE slot that got speed set to 2X
hmmm, how would i set it to 16x?
Well been messing around trying to get more out of my core. Seems to be that more voltage on the core is a hinderer ot me.
1.15/2.105/2.105V for 600/675. It gives me just a tad under 9k (grrr), but it does well in games. I'll try a cold boot either before I go to work or when I get home to see if it boots at that speed. But its lasted a few 3D marks looping and 30min+ of FEAR and Quake4 back to back.
Seems the high voltage on the core was holding my memory back from OCing. Guess I'll be trying higher memory and raising the core a little more if possible.
l337x4r1cx, are you using OC or ATITool beta 10 for those clocks? Guessing with 800 on the mem its OC tool, try using ATITool, it should improve scores also.
Well new tests, more stable over time. You know all that good stuff.
610.2/675 w/ 1.2/2.102/2.102V tested for a few hours of 3d windows, couple hours of gaming. Ghost Recon seems to be very sensitive to it, damn thing would crash after a few min of game play if there was an issue.
Hitting 9,053 in 05 and 16,839 in 03.
Doing more tests and seems to be running good so far. 615.6/702 w/ 1.2/2.149/2.004V. So far 9,212 in 05, and 17,123 in 03. I'm moving up in the world :)
Seems if my core starts reaching 60C it has issues, but then again that might of been the voltage causing this too. And for some odd reason, AoEIII at default clocks/volts it has artifacts on the screen,the black area's u can see it and sometimes on the land and such, but it runs perfectly fine. Yet if I bump up the voltage to 1.1V there all gone, strange. All other games I had no sight of artifacts.
One of the stranger clocks I had, 600/675 w/ 1.15/2.102/2.102 worked for FEAR, Quake 4, and AoEIII (AoEIII definatlly for extended periods of time), but it wouldn't last 15min in a game of Ghost Recon. I mean come on Ghost Recon? It bearly heats up the card unlike the other games, which I highly doubt it stresses it much at all, expecially things cranked to max, and running at 1920x1200, still showed 60FPS capped in the game (and no, vsync is not on).
hi, i have added a waterblock onto my x1800xl and managed to pull this score
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1520081
core never goes over 41C and voltages were 640/648 at 1.15/1.95/1.25
Then i am getting an error message that ATI DRIVER DO NOT RESPOND while benching and gives me 640X480 @ 256 colors . Any ideas why is this happening?
Ya thats simple you need more voltage on the core. Your running quiet high on the core expecially with that voltage. I can run 600 with a few games at 1.15 but its not fully stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
I can run 650Mhz on GPU with FEAR or Quake IV, play for like two hours, no lockups .. but then i run world of warcraft and it froze when in heavy battle situations lol :-) and i still didnt get WC, pity.
And of course i cant finish any cpu tests in 3d marks with higher Mhz on GPU ... gives me bluescreen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
if i raise the voltage mate , it doesnt even run the first test!:( . 640/650 is the freq i can complete the bench
over than this , i get a lockup, no matter what voltage i have applied. me thinks its a software issue
If you raise the voltage and run a slower clock does that work? Or just anything over 1.15V is crap for ya? I know my limit is 1.2VCore now after more extensive tests :( Oh wish I could use more volts I could hit 675 on the core.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
if i lower the clock and raise the voltage i still get crashes. looks like i hit the wall
Guess try dropping the core clock... start at 600 and work up.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
Or does this give a similar result also? Talking long term here not just running 3D mark for the few min it does stress the GPU, unless its looped 10+ times.
i did about 4 times a 05 series of tests ar the freq i gave the score. It completed them without any hitch. But when i restarted the pc , i couldnt reach the freq i was before. Thats why i am sayin it must be software related issue. It doesnt make any sense, bench in X/X freq and after a restart not being able to reach even close to this!?.
Mind you have had a 9014 score last week , the last few days i was tryin to reach these freqs unsuccessfully, now last night i only managed to pull this and till this moment we type i cant pass 610 in the core. The memory though is another issue , behaves like normal memory
and this is my setup , its not a cheapo watercooling setup...
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4094/17yf.jpg
http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/8229/1124vv.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/9900/1117dp.jpg
I've had this happen a few times. Cold boots seem to really test stability issues with the card if its reliable at that speed upon boot up.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
Ya memory, voltage is king with it :) Scales very nicely, just too bad it doesn't scale as well in benches as the core does, but in games doubt it makes much of a difference if its 625/600 or 600/625.
Oh ya last night managed in 05) 9334 with 615.6/729 1.2/2.203/2.004V
Dang core won't go higher :( Doh Really curious to how much voltage is the limit of these ram modules. And what truely is the default voltage for these chips to run 700Mhz since thats what its rated for right?
cold boot? hmm you think this buga needs some pre-heating before starting to look for its limits. Maybe this is the case why if i start from low freqs and push up slowly leaving the 3d window spinning for quite some time it reaches high mhz . You think so?
Yes i think exactly that. Depending on the voltages I can get some really high core #'s with voltages that I can crash instantly on a cold start, or even a restart (core cools down so much in that time for me), with lower values.
Best I think was 1.25V core able to hit 665. Yet 625 was shakey at times with it, expecially the ram it had to be at or below 650 and less then 2V otherwise it would lock up instantly.
So whats ur best stable OC?Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
Stock :) HeheheQuote:
Originally Posted by mR Yellow
No really I havn't tested it that much since my voltages where over 1.2V on the core, and that makes it crash. So far though 615.6/729 has been working today even durning cold boots.
Ja Ja, but give us all the juicy details...Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
What the voltage u running on the mem and core at that speed?
Mine, that i've tested so far (using ATiTool artifact testing) is:
540 core - 1.125v
650 mem - Default voltage.
615.6/729
1.2/2.203/2.004V
Seems to be working from cold start standpoint. I'd love to give another .05V to the memory but not sure. Does anyone know or can find what the "stock" voltage for these ram chips are to run at 700Mhz? Currently its basically a 16% Overvolt from stock, which seems to be the "limit" in most OC's when overvolting.
My tests consist of Quake 4, Fear, Ghost Recon (damn picky) AoEIII, 3D Mark 03/05 (will try 01 again now that its uninstalled once again), rthdrible for 4 hours open (crashes usually in 30-60min if instability) and its easy to pick up artifacts.
Do me a favour and try 01 again and run Filtering test especially test 1 (single filt).Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
BTW have u tried running 01 without ur CPU overclocked? 01 is great for testing system stability.
I can try when I get home ya....Quote:
Originally Posted by mR Yellow
No its always been OC'ed, and it running prime again just to be sure, put new memory in. But it is stable @ 2.6Ghz for at least 18+ hours already. Just the damn ram I had was unstable and causing issues (evil ram) and degraded in preformance over time. So thats my guess to why 01 was really giving me issues over time and crashing back to the desktop.
Sounds like it definitly was the ram, cause u should be able to finish 01 without any problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
tomorrow is coming my asus X1800Xl
does someone try this card ,how is clocking ,is it good
Have someone successfully flashed with bios of X1800XT (256 )
We haven't been able to get hold of a 256XT bios to try.Quote:
Originally Posted by milen_bg
I read that one person tried it Fuggur (sp?) - but that might have just been a rumor.Quote:
Originally Posted by milen_bg
Getting my VF700 and Zalman 9500 cpu fans later this week. Anyone have any advice prior to installing either of these? I have never installed anything but the stock CPU heat sync. Is it difficult to do the GPU? I did buy Artic Ceramique. Hopefully, I can beat my 10088 score when I get these...
Ya thats what I thought.... At least this ram passes test 1-8 1 run @ 2.6V and 260Mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by mR Yellow
Compared to the others that did have some faults on tests @ 260, but had much more at lower frequences like 250Mhz, default timings @ all rest auto or maxed out.
Ghehe my card craped out @ a max of
590-690 :\
V-gpu= 1.125v ( my max :mad: )
v-mem= 2.135 ( More did not seem to help )
And the other mem voltage = @ stock. It did not seem to improve clocking.
But i think i have a reay sukky card. Its a Ref to en features 2.0 ns ram :\ To thats why i have a max of 690 mhz. Stock voltage max was 560-610.
Those 2.0 ns mem modules run fast but i liked the 1.4 better. I did 820 with those :\. So its a new card for me. Hopefully the R580 will be here fast.
HI
Above the 9500 :slobber:
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8...07023ap.th.jpg
win @2650 1,48 / 670 702 1,25 1,98 2,100
What brand ?> and can u run 1.3v And the rthdribl_1_2 demo ? mine locks up @ 1.175v :\Quote:
Originally Posted by anomalos
Quote:
Originally Posted by anomalos
Wow nice score man... Congrats. What brand do you have? And whats the numbers on the chip under the hood :) I'm curious if its an A14 core.
Should be same as Sapphire or HIS, cause all these brands are made in one factory.Quote:
Originally Posted by milen_bg
So nobody got bluescreen when running cpu tests in 3D Mark 03 or 05 before testing graphic tests? i can loop graphic tests without bluescreen, but when i add cpu test, bluescreen. Also WOW still resets gpu but even if got stock clocks! solution? disable AA, weird, cause FEAR or Quake IV didnt crash. Still waiting for watercooling ... :mad:
I can run 600+Mhz again, just these XTreme-G WarCats 5.11XT makes more speed, but also make artefacts at 550Mhz on GPU
Quote:
Originally Posted by mR Yellow
Ok well either my graphics card is unstable at that speed or something but anyways. Went to default to run the test quick. What am I looking for in that test?
Another thing, is 01 that picky about the voltages on the graphics card?
I mean I can't use anymore then 1.125V at default without it crashing on the core. That just seems odd. So does that really mean that anything over that is truely unstable?
Not to sound rude guys but that is the kind of stuff that turned me away from the XL and straight to the XT. Too many variables, what you think is stable isn't, the problems some users have that others don't etc. The XT is a by far stronger card and much more stable. From now on I only get the high end models of the video cards as the extra money is well worth it I feel. My XL behaved like crap for me and I regretted buying it after all the little issues myself and others have had in terms of stability, voltage problems, crashes in 01, black squares etc.
Ya thats true, but where also pushing the core/memory much further then most people do with the XT's too, even though its the same core, just different process.Quote:
Originally Posted by cantankerous
I actually enjoy this, but then again I won't go to an XT, im just wating for the R580's :)
Well re-ran 01, OCed with my 615.6/729 with the fillrate test only. The game tests don't like me on that I guess.
Single Texture: 4942.6 MTexels/s
Multi-Textures: 9638.5 MTexels/s
Stock speeds
Single Texture: 3332.0 MTexels/s
Multi-Textures: 7801.4 MTexels/s
It isn't just your card. I had issues with 01 as well. IT would complete every run however setting it up for a loop hours on end would always crash to desktop as if it was never running at all. That was with a measily overclock of 575/550. I had to bump voltage up just to get it to loop for hours on end with crashing. I can only imagine how much harder it would be on your higher clocked/already high voltage running cards.
In all honesty as well I think it is the way these new cores run cause my XT crashes in 01 if I have it clocked too high as well however it would run longer than the XL before crashing and at much higher speeds. I had 01 looping for over 2 hours before it crashed but that was at stock voltage 690/800. If I dropped the core down to 675-680 it would loop forever (well until I stopped it anyways which was quite a few hours later).
Hey can anyone understand this?
http://origin.samsung.com/Products/S...23qg_rev10.pdf
Section 10 or page 48 it starts on. Gives some info on the ram.
Curious it says ~2.5V max yet also it says 1.9V max in another part right below. But yet the 1.2ns ram runs @ 2.0V stock on the XT. So my guess is these can really run upwards of 2.5V? Is that true?