Here I come with my sad score ;) My p4 won't get any higher, maybe soon with phasechange cooling.
- P4 northwood 3,0
- Gigabyte ga-8ik1100 rev 2
- zalman cnps7000 Cu
- 2x Corsair XMS3200C2PT rev 4.2, 256MB, 1:1, 2-3-3-6
Printable View
Here I come with my sad score ;) My p4 won't get any higher, maybe soon with phasechange cooling.
- P4 northwood 3,0
- Gigabyte ga-8ik1100 rev 2
- zalman cnps7000 Cu
- 2x Corsair XMS3200C2PT rev 4.2, 256MB, 1:1, 2-3-3-6
Celeron ''Northwood'' 2.4GHz @ 3815MHz
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/9012/59539rp.jpg
Intel Celeron 2400 @ 3815MHz
Asus P4P800SE
Corsair TWINX512-3200LLPT v1.1 (BH-5) @ DDR398 2.9v
Custom PhCh - Single Stage (Epsilon's Promkiller)
No validation link because the system rebooted when I tried to save that file :mad:
Here is my FX-57, cooled by an MachII ..DFI mem volt jumper still at 3.2v so only 257mhz on the Redlines :)
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/PIFast_3372_3602.jpg
Anyaway not a bad start ;)
Here is mine at 3520mhz....memory at 3.70V with maximizer ona a dfi sli
http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=315976
Uhm, missed this thread..
33.19 sec, reached at netbyte using LN2 on a FX55 clawhammer :)
Aint home, so cant post pictures, but quite some time ago.
By New Beetle
Return match of Pifast with his M780.
Many thanks to Hipro5 for your mods;)
Time: 28.83s
Clock: 4098.2MHz(FSB256.1MHz x 16)
M/B：ASUS P4P800-SE #2 mod + CT-479 mod / 55MM339*** / BIOS：P4P8SE1011.ROM
M/B Bed：「V-TEC ARC Bed Rev.3.3」
CPU：Pentium M 780 / 7506B***
CPU Cooling：「KuriPro２」+ LN2
Memory：SanMax PC3200 512MB x2 + DICE / CL2.0-2-2-5-4-A-A-A
Vcore：1.85V（Actual）/ Vddr：3.40V / Vcca：2.40V / Vio：3.65V
VGA：ATI XPERT 98 PCI 8MB
HDD：IBM-DTLA-307030 /U-DMA 5 (ATA100)
PowerSuplly：Zippy-460WS #2 （3.3Vmod）
http://premium1.uploadit.org/fredyam...New-Beetle.png
k|ngP|n on 18.5s
http://pic20.picturetrail.com/VOL256.../176350862.jpg
Regards
Andy
FX57 with DI, one-timer pifast. 32.88s
http://koti.mbnet.fi/boble76/Tietoko...ast_32.88s.jpg
X6800 + Vapochill LS
http://img422.imageshack.us/img422/27/pifast2053ci7.jpg
I have 36.61... see my sig... pretty pathetic NOW huh? :p:
24.45 - E6700 @ 3980MHz (398*10) 1.6V
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=558614
Hi, i'm new, but i'm doing a research project about cpu temps when calculating pi. If anybody could post some times temps n cooling methods they used to achieve them, i'd appreciate it. Any information helps.
thx
i feel dumb for asking this but how many number's are we supposed to calculate?
how many is normal?
E6600 and P5B dlx:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../pif460020.jpg
hexus.pifast.net download the package, run the bat, not the exeQuote:
Originally Posted by flclisgreat
Also.... (air)
http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardware/E6600/1667x9.jpg
Sorry to sound like a complete newb but how do you run this benchmark? It gaves me so many options and im just not sure which ones I want? sysfailur says something about running a bat file but there wasnt one in the download just an exe and a txt
I Stopped maintaining Pifast because of all the cheating as it is cheatable, I did have a word with the program maker but he was un-interested in sorting a fix.
However its as simple as... downloading .... http://pifast.hexus.net/hexus_pifast.zip
and then run the file hexus_pifast.bat
I don't think QuickPi is cheatable. How are the cheats done?
A person would have to go to extra lengths to effect QuickPi but I have just confirmed it can be messed with... see pic below
A liitle time and effort and easily made less noticable.
I see, of course -- changing the system clock skews the times. I was thinking more along the lines of tampering with the output. Ah well, where there is a will, there usually is a way...Quote:
Originally Posted by PMM
I think I can fix this, anyone interested?Quote:
Originally Posted by PMM
After running this again on my home machine a few times I like it :) esp as its multicore friendly it kind of brings in a new type of tinkering to get max speed the run above I did at work.
I think if you can certainly put into place....
1) An anti cheat
2) A Validation at the end to confirm the calculation is all is OK
3) Suggest an autorun batch file to say kick off a 10M run as a fixed benchmark standard.
I think you have a winner :nod:
Version 4.5 is is available here:Quote:
Originally Posted by PMM
http://home.istar.ca/~lyster/pi.html
Let me know if you can easily cheat it. The app can compute a checksum over all the digits and you can verify the correctness that way (by comparing it to a known good checksum). Use the -check option. Other options are the -bin and -stats options. By submitting the resulting binary file, it can then be independently varified.
Passed my test but I admit I'm not clued up in the ways of tripping progs up.
I have PM'd Kunnak here in the view if he is willing to put his superior know how to give it a thumbs up.
Excellent work by the way http://www.brittech.co.uk/thumbsup.gif