Pifast Benchmark

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

05-30-2005, 08:19 AM
Garrett

2922Mhz Pifast (1122mhz OC lol) :D
Going under 40s won't be possible yet, I'd need some real cold water for that I think :P :woot:
http://img143.echo.cx/img143/3448/4061pifast4ov.th.png
*clickable*
05-31-2005, 09:53 PM
chefnr1

heres mine with very tight memsetting, and water on cpu and gpu :p:
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...d0/pifast3.jpg
06-03-2005, 06:35 AM
Garrett

Finally, below 40 seconds woohoo oh yeah :D :thumbsup: :woot:
http://img85.echo.cx/img85/591/pifast39885ra.th.png
06-03-2005, 07:02 AM
Mauri Antero

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

heres mine with very tight memsetting, and water on cpu and gpu :p:

with those clocks and timings cannot be 30.39 close 40s is right time
06-08-2005, 08:50 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mauri Antero

with those clocks and timings cannot be 30.39 close 40s is right time

and why do you say that i have a faster results with machII that i can show you...
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...d1/pifast8.jpg

why are you doubht on it i get this results every time i run pifast.
my timings : 1.5-2-2-3-7 read premable 4.5
06-08-2005, 12:00 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Wait, isnt the record for PIFAST something like 32's or so by Memsema?
06-08-2005, 12:04 PM
ZMarre

Indeed ChefNr1, your result doesn't fit in the picture :D

My guess: you didn't use the .bat file, but just the .exe and entered your own numbers ;)
06-08-2005, 12:52 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZMarre

Indeed ChefNr1, your result doesn't fit in the picture :D

My guess: you didn't use the .bat file, but just the .exe and entered your own numbers ;)

are you cidding me ofcourse i use the bat file , and i dont entered any mumbers at all why you say that, i'll get this results and thats it, why would i cheat on this im just glad it goes that fast, well you sure can ruin a fine score i post. stupid to think that. why type my own numbers? i dont wanna be a cheater i'll get around this score every time i run THE BAT FILE :rolleyes:
and i can use a DVcam and film before and during the test uncut, my son will come in next week and he can film the test an then i'll post it so you can see it, is that good enough for you :p:
06-08-2005, 01:21 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

are you cidding me ofcourse i use the bat file , and i dont entered any mumbers at all why you say that, i'll get this results and thats it, why would i cheat on this im just glad it goes that fast, well you sure can ruin a fine score i post. stupid to think that. why type my own numbers? i dont wanna be a cheater i'll get around this score every time i run THE BAT FILE :rolleyes:

It is suspicous (not saying u cheated) but I think the WR is something like 32 or 31. I know for a fact it isnt in the 20's though.
06-08-2005, 01:25 PM
Colin

From Sept 2004 but shows that something is out of whack.
06-08-2005, 01:26 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

It is suspicous (not saying u cheated) but I think the WR is something like 32 or 31. I know for a fact it isnt in the 20's though.

read what i edited in my post before this..and it's for sure i'll get this time in pifast using the BAT FILE

Colin thats about 9 months ago!!!!
06-08-2005, 06:11 PM
Colin

True it is but the guys on top are still faster than you are, that's why it still applies.
06-08-2005, 10:17 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin

True it is but the guys on top are still faster than you are, that's why it still applies.

I'm using the latest pifast, running the bat.file... Then how come 33.96 from september 2004 is faster than 28.73? By the way did you check my timings, tight enough for you? or do i detect a spot of jealousy in all of this , it's in black and white 28.73 :fact:
06-08-2005, 10:35 PM
nutcase

1 Attachment(s)

first, All the records were set using Hexus Pifast..

The two runs (ignore scores, were done on my everyday machine) were done like this:

Top one is using Hexus Pifast which uses pifast41.exe

Bottom one is TheLab Pifast which uses Pifast43.exe

Notice over 15 seconds difference between them and they were ran on the same Machine..
06-08-2005, 11:06 PM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag6br

first, All the records were set using Hexus Pifast..

The two runs (ignore scores, were done on my everyday machine) were done like this:

Top one is using Hexus Pifast which uses pifast41.exe

Bottom one is TheLab Pifast which uses Pifast43.exe

Notice over 15 seconds difference between them and they were ran on the same Machine..

so you mean that i have to use an older version to get an acceptable score on pifast? thats look insane to me!!! then all must run with the newer version to get correct scores, since it seems a little bit pointless releasing a new version that shows inreliable results... But still, your post's the one making most sense here, "all other posts seems to be just doubt about me faking the results :slapass: "

EDIT: here it's run in same speed with pifast41
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...fast-38-53.jpg
10 sec difference hmmmm
06-09-2005, 02:35 AM
Mauri Antero

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

10 sec difference hmmmm

Now you got the right pifast.
06-09-2005, 03:25 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mauri Antero

Now you got the right pifast.

ok! but why are they released a newer version that nobody use :confused: the newer is much nicer to run :p:
06-09-2005, 03:26 AM
ZMarre

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefnr1

ok! but why are they released a newer version that nobody use :confused: the newr is much nicer to run :p:

It's simply another version. Hexus <> Pcenter

It uses another algorithm IIRC, wich is little slower.
06-09-2005, 03:48 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZMarre

It's simply another version. Hexus <> Pcenter

It uses another algorithm IIRC, wich is little slower.

aha ok well then i have to clock more to get a quicker score :)
06-09-2005, 04:38 AM
Garrett

chefnr1 that's some nice BH-5 you got there... 279 is pretty good... mine maxes out @ 270, that's with 3.7v
06-09-2005, 04:50 AM
chefnr1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garrett

chefnr1 that's some nice BH-5 you got there... 279 is pretty good... mine maxes out @ 270, that's with 3.7v

279 is not the max i can run them in 286 is the fastest with them i've tested but in that speed super-pi and pifast dont wanna play :) this 3d01 is run with 283 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8578684 well it should show 38k and 3114mhz = 283x11 1,1
06-11-2005, 01:14 PM
Maxtor

http://www.no-ip.freehosting123.com/...rschriftTZ.jpg

Max stable oc = 2850 :) With a good powersupply can i break the 42.xx, this 3.3 V line is verry low :mad:

0516GPCW Batch 860
06-11-2005, 02:13 PM
ZMarre

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxtor

With a good powersupply can i break the 42.xx, this 3.3 V line is verry low :mad:

3.3V is mainly used for RAM. Your ram is allready quite high now, so I doubt if you'll get a lot higher with better PSU... :toast:
06-13-2005, 12:51 PM
<Wouter>

hey people, I've got a 205sec :banana: :banana: pifast on my duron 700@9x110 ~pc100@147mhz :P before i tweaked my mem i ran 246sec :slapass:. I hope 160-180sec is possible when i oc my cpu a bit more xtreme.
07-07-2005, 01:36 PM
cpulloverclock

on wc with a venice now

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...ique/39.86.gif

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page