GTX480 benchmark:
http://i44.tinypic.com/25qw2lc.jpg
Printable View
GTX480 benchmark:
http://i44.tinypic.com/25qw2lc.jpg
8 hours 12 minutes?
GTX480 full-load temperature(room temperature 20℃）
http://i39.tinypic.com/2usivrl.jpg
Similar to 295 GTX.
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=DVS=-
Similar to my 8800GT(s)
GTX 480 pricing?
http://www.amazon.com/Zotac-GeForce-...9600472&sr=1-1
^mindfury
Are those percentages for % faster than the 5870? If so, then WOW.
yepQuote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
Seems to me that the higher power consumption is reflected on performance. So it might be at more or less the same perf/watt of Cypress. And some of those numbers are really close to HD5970 :shocked:Quote:
Originally Posted by mindfury
So, which card is the one running @ 326W and 466W respectively?
Nope, there's no way on earth a 5870 only manages sub20 fps on Heaven, those are either minimum frame rates or pure bull:banana::banana::banana::banana:.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
You can see the HD5870 is the one on the left, the one on the right is blured out.Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton
wtf？ http://www.chiphell.com/uploadfile/2...0082631511.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by mindfury
Quakewar
1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 171.0fps 10.3drv 163.0fps 480-168.0fps
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 146.0fps 10.3drv 139.0fps 480-140.0fps
2560x1600 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 97.0fps 10.3drv 95.0fps 480-94.0fps
Crysis
1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 32.0fps 10.3drv 31.9fps 480-30.0fps
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 28.0fps 10.3drv 28.0fps 480-27.5.0fps
2560x1600 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 14.1fps 10.3drv 8.2fps 480-15.4fps
Farcry2
1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 77.8fps 10.3drv 72.4fps 480-105.6fps
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 67.9fps 10.3drv 63.9fps 480-90.4fps
2560x1600 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 48.3fps 10.3drv 46.3fps 480-89.1fps
UT3
1680x1050 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 158fps 10.3drv 156fps 480-253fps
1920x1200 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 132fps 10.3drv 131fps 480-207fps
2560x1600 4xAA 16xAF 9.10 drv: 85fps 10.3drv 85fps 480-133fps
AMD should fire ATI Cat Team according to these two tests with the same
hardware configuration, lol:down:
reminded me nvidias reviewer guide benchs actually games are same too
ps : as far as i remember ati doesn't have in game aa in unreal engine so that explain tha huge difference
The 185W is the idle power consumption of the HD5870 system and the 326W is the load consumption. The same goes for fermi. Well that's my best guess anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by clayton
Nvidia seems to have done a role reversal
Now nvidia appears to be king of high AA and king of ATi-favored games
I love seeing hinted crysis numbers
90% of 5870
thats so epic lol - but with at least 2x the shaders of gtx280 with future driver updates it should start to approach 2x in nearly every game
5870 full-load 326WQuote:
Originally Posted by clayton
GTX480 full-load 466W
MAX 96C ahhhhaaa thats hot....Quote:
Originally Posted by mindfury
Now i know why the 1.8A fan is installed, in the summers it gonna make your pc fly... :D
The TDP of 230w does not make sense, i mean max 96C with that huge a cooler and 92C avg on 230w tdp ??
ok with small work on Excel with the fx AVERAGEQuote:
Originally Posted by mindfury
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9306/avge.jpg
I can say GTX480 is faster the HD5870 by 50% on average
Yeah, you all have to quote the benchmark...
that vanatage score looks pretty bad for nvidia, 9k on extreme for 5870? is that accurate?
some of the numbers look good, but unigine is the only one that looks low for ATI, which could be they did something with the settings to make tesselation way to heavy for the 5870 to handle
Heaven 2.0Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconyu
@Jared,
where did you find that? is it at newegg?
'I can say GTX480 is faster the HD5870 by 50% on average' don't worry if that was true case nvidia would priced it above 5970 lol gonna wait for bettter reviews