Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-04-2006, 09:44 AM
arisythila

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon2ky

Go ahead, I want AMD's to go down a tad anyway so I can pick more up. :p

Me too, I got 1000 shares in AMD, when they were 14 dollars a few years ago.. I want them to go down again.. :-)
04-04-2006, 09:44 AM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by xgman

How is Intel achieving the superpi advantage at lower speeds like that though?

The large L2 cache should have a fair amount responsibility of the performance leap in 1Ms
04-04-2006, 09:47 AM
Disposibleteen

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeguava

The large L2 cache should have a fair amount responsibility of the performance leap in 1Ms

The conroe used in this test has the same amount of L2 cache as the 9xx series dual core CPUs have so that cannot be the reason. Im thinking the reason is the shortend 14 stage pipeline Intel used in Conroe and this made it more efficient per clock than their older CPUs with the longer 31 stage pipeline.
04-04-2006, 09:47 AM
Donnie27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon2ky

Do what I'm doing, wait till 2008 to buy a new rig ^_^.

I'm getting Conroe soon as it ships. I will replace my 3500+ with an X2 after their becoming dirt cheap after being made low value by much cheaper and faster Conroes.
04-04-2006, 09:50 AM
VictorWang

very very very good news...

conroe 2.4Ghz can runing more fast.
I saw even when sys dle, there are 25% cpu_load.
that's a bios issue.

I believe that... some days later, 2.4ghz stock running can break 19s ;)
04-04-2006, 09:51 AM
BitpowerPM

can you do Cinebench 2003 please. ? :) :) :) :)
04-04-2006, 09:53 AM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disposibleteen

The conroe used in this test has the same amount of L2 cache as the 9xx series dual core CPUs have so that cannot be the reason. Im thinking the reason is the shortend 14 stage pipeline Intel used in Conroe and this made it more efficient per clock than their older CPUs with the longer 31 stage pipeline.

You right - this architecure is mostly responsible for this - but having 4MB L2 vs 2MB ( 9XX) helps quite a bit for 1Ms - that's all I wanted to bring across
04-04-2006, 09:54 AM
BrownTown

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disposibleteen

The conroe used in this test has the same amount of L2 cache as the 9xx series dual core CPUs have so that cannot be the reason. Im thinking the reason is the shortend 14 stage pipeline Intel used in Conroe and this made it more efficient per clock than their older CPUs with the longer 31 stage pipeline.

incorrect, the 900 series has split L2 chache, so SuperPi only gets 2MB, on Conroe it gets all 4MB, or twice as much as any other CPU to date.

also, about that 25% in BIOS, woudl that really affect it that much? cant it just be running on the other core that SuperPi isn't using?
04-04-2006, 09:54 AM
CRUSH-ER

Holy moly Victor. Good stuff. July can't come fast enough damnit. :slobber:
04-04-2006, 09:56 AM
ozzimark

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

aboard pi_32m, starts sisoft.

cpu multimedia :

so much much more integer power a huge drop in floating point. :D
04-04-2006, 09:58 AM
Kjaks

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

very very very good news...

conroe 2.4Ghz can runing more fast.
I saw even when sys dle, there are 25% cpu_load.
that's a bios issue.

I believe that... some days later, 2.4ghz stock running can break 19s ;)

It could be the other way, that it really IS idle, and that the 25% cpu_load is a bug within the os.
04-04-2006, 09:58 AM
PMAer

73K on Sisandra Mmedia???

That's Insane :O
04-04-2006, 10:00 AM
Sentential

o_0 ... woa
04-04-2006, 10:01 AM
SoulGG

lol, 370 toooo ohhhhhhh sayyyy 90?

Jump ship time!
04-04-2006, 10:02 AM
Ad1tya

Awesome!!!!!
Conroe 4TW!
I wanna see this monster @ 3.5 GHz + !!!!
04-04-2006, 10:05 AM
n00b 0f l337

I wanna see at 5ghz.
04-04-2006, 10:06 AM
pik-ard v1.1

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulGG

lol, 370 toooo ohhhhhhh sayyyy 90?

Jump ship time!

what are you reffering too? people viewing the intel vs. amd forum? it's over 400 now viewing intel. :D

and what happened to the 32M super pi? or did the image not load and i missed it somewhere? i thought he said he started it?
04-04-2006, 10:07 AM
BrownTown

315$ is the price of this chip :slobber:

so, now that 3 people have these chips we need a Conore overclocking competition thread!!
04-04-2006, 10:13 AM
freecableguy

We'll see if the Asus P5DWG2-WS can handle the Conroe soon....
04-04-2006, 10:14 AM
n00b 0f l337

4050 is the max for 9x @ 450fsb :(
04-04-2006, 10:15 AM
VictorWang

Quote:

Originally Posted by pik-ard v1.1

what are you reffering too? people viewing the intel vs. amd forum? it's over 400 now viewing intel. :D

and what happened to the 32M super pi? or did the image not load and i missed it somewhere? i thought he said he started it?

I interupt the pi_32m benching 'cos of the bios problem.
i now working with some good guys for some software Overclk tools.
04-04-2006, 10:16 AM
Donni

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecableguy

We'll see if the Asus P5DWG2-WS can handle the Conroe soon....

mhhhh.... ? I hope it !
04-04-2006, 10:21 AM
StixxX

sweett..This puppy is going to shows scores never been heard of.I can see 60K for 3dmark1 and 25k coming 4 3dmark 2005.Let the madness beginng and hopefully the P5DWG2-WS works.Since I aw sure quite a few people have that board n would luv it f was conroe proof:p: Guess you can only tell us FCG:D

Intel nice job on the conroe.Makes my Dothan seem slow:clap:
04-04-2006, 10:26 AM
Vapor

What's the current 1M WR?

Me thinks it's in reach of an air OC with these beasts :slobber:
04-04-2006, 10:26 AM
BrownTown

Quote:

Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337

4050 is the max for 9x @ 450fsb :(

oh no, only 4G, that would be very disapointing...:slap:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page