Bench scores for 7800GTX 512MB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wyt

He already has one 7800GTX 512MB.

---

I think he has two of these monsters

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tim

I say nothing......I don't care about 3DMark..it's not a game...and it's 1024x768....woohoo... :p:

I'll wait for the reviews thank you very much :D

---

hardocp

7800 GTX 512 pounces on x1800xt in every game tested. Also these are "real world" benchmarks in "real" games. Not some run of the mill synthetic benchies.
IMHO the tables have turned in a complete 180 from the geforce FX days. Hurray for competition! :toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tibu

hardocp

7800 GTX 512 pounces on x1800xt in every game tested. Also these are "real world" benchmarks in "real" games. Not some run of the mill synthetic benchies.
IMHO the tables have turned in a complete 180 from the geforce FX days. Hurray for competition! :toast:

---

We'll see what happens when ATI releases an overclocked x1800XT. Someone should do a bench with the x1800XT at 130MHz on the core and 200MHz on the memory extra :D . But as for that Hard review:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [H

ardOCP]The Radeon X1800 XT matched the 512 MB GeForce 7800 GTX by allowing 4X AD AA at 1600x1200. Performance, however, was very different. As you can see, the 512 MB GeForce 7800 GTX is simply faster, although both are very playable at this setting.

---

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...TvC5ZP_7_4.gif

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...TvC5ZP_7_3.gif

Better Average and Max FPS, and they were benched in different situations (and one was benched for a longer period).

:stick:
:stick:
:stick:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ahmad

We'll see what happens when ATI releases an overclocked x1800XT. But as for that Hard review:

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...TvC5ZP_7_4.gif

http://www.hardocp.com/images/articl...TvC5ZP_7_3.gif

:stick:
:stick:
:stick:

---

I'm pretty sure they have set 4xAA and used Catalyst AI standard option from CCC -> this results no AA in Battlefield 2 with Radeon X1800 XT. You have to use "Let the application decide" option and set 4xAA from the game. Here are my benchmarks with Battlefield 2:

http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkeli.../bench_bf2.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sampsa

I'm pretty sure they have set 4xAA and used Catalyst AI standard option from CCC -> this results no AA in Battlefield 2 with Radeon X1800 XT. You have to use "Let the application decide" option and set 4xAA from the game. Here are my benchmarks with Battlefield 2:

http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkeli.../bench_bf2.png

---

Thanks for your numbers Sampsa. Obviously the 7800GTX 512MB is the clear winner in BF2.

Edited due to stupidity. Hey we all have moments :slap:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ahmad

We'll see what happens when ATI releases an overclocked x1800XT. Someone should do a bench with the x1800XT at 130MHz on the core and 200MHz on the memory extra

---

Can you do that for us Sampsa? Please :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tibu

The Radeon X1800 XT matched the 512 MB GeForce 7800 GTX by allowing 4X AD AA at 1600x1200. Performance, however, was very different. As you can see, the 512 MB GeForce 7800 GTX is simply faster, although both are very playable at this setting.

That's the part you "forgot" to include in your pics. You know; the info right below the screenshots? It's funny how ATi fanboys like to deliberately take out information/facts to their "benefit"

---

Can you read? I quoted that first thing in my post :stick:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ahmad

We'll see what happens when ATI releases an overclocked x1800XT. Someone should do a bench with the x1800XT at 130MHz on the core and 200MHz on the memory extra :D

---

I've heard only +25 MHz for GPU and +25 MHz for memory?

My source: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=3902

Quote:

---

It's funny how ATi fanboys like to deliberately take out information/facts to their "benefit"

---

Let's not ruin Sampsa's thread with "fanboy this or bias that", lest you are looking for a nice shining pm in your inbox the next morning... :mad:

Sampsa, I think what ahmad was trying to ask is:

Based on your experience, what type of higher clocks can the XT achieve with minimal effort at stock voltages ?

Perkam

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by perkam

Let's not ruin Sampsa's thread with "fanboy this or bias that", lest you are looking for a nice shining pm in your inbox the next morning... :mad:
[snip]

---

qft!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sampsa

I've heard only +25 MHz for GPU and +25 MHz for memory?

My source: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=3902

---

I know ATI won't overclock them that much, but I am wondering how a 7800GTX 512MB would compare to an x1800XT with 130MHz/200MHz extra (just the differences between the 7800GTX 256MB and 7800GTX 512MB).

Sampsa, you have the X1800XT, the experiense and the means to clock it, do you know how much it needs to be clocked to match the 7800gtx512@stock? And how much more space for oc'ing do you belive that the 7800gtx512 has?