Because both (Dippy and Tacky) are long time Teen AMD Fanboys from ExtremeTech looking to get their kicks off flaming folks. Hehehe, I'm not surpised how well they fit in with Lithan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades
Donnie27
Printable View
Because both (Dippy and Tacky) are long time Teen AMD Fanboys from ExtremeTech looking to get their kicks off flaming folks. Hehehe, I'm not surpised how well they fit in with Lithan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades
Donnie27
wow. what happened to the topic? :rolleyes: :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
Way to stop responding when we prove every single claim you've made wrong and still avoid admitting such.
All you've done is rationalize more crap and not proven anything. I'm not wasting anymore bandwidth on ya'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithan
Donnie27
And all you've proven is dothan is a better choice than a P-D. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
Don't worry. If you keep BSing long enough, eventually someone will find a golden 8XX that does 4ghz stable on air, and you can claim that lone result means that 4ghz is easy on stock air and vcore, or whatever else you think you can convince idiots who are too lazy to actually read the thread/link it means. Hell I wouldn't put it past you to keep blowing hot air until a new revision comes out which actually can hit 4ghz on air regularly. And when that happens of course it will prove that you were right all along and the people who argued you were just impatient fanboys. Brilliant!
Incidentally, since you wanted to see X2 versus 8XX compaired so badly. X2 flagship versus 8XX flagship = 72watts difference in power consumption @ full load. I'll let you guess which way. Now you can't complain. I'm pointing out the "bad" as you call it, of amd.
Because donnie, it is very simple, it is fun to :stick: idiots :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie27
You're a hothead and I tried to be Civil towards you. Posting stuff like "and you can claim that lone result means that 4ghz is easy on stock air and vcore, or whatever else you think you can convince idiots who are too lazy to actually read the thread/link it means." What, having yet another bad day? You're sick and in need of some help. Until you get it, please stop posting to me you're too friggen nutz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithan
Donnie27
Assassin . 5yndicateQuote:
Originally Posted by sabrewolf732
:slapass: tachyon in disguise!
Hehehe!
Donnie27
This thread is just retarded. I've read almost every post here in the last 5 days all the way from page 1. I totally agree with Lithan on this one.
There is just a lack of proof from the people who support the 4ghz Pent-D on air. It IS possible, but we have yet to see it. So one could say that it more than likely NOT going to happen. Though, there was a link that showed a Pent-D at 4.0+ ghz but if anyone took the time to read that post from OCforums, the person stated he was using a Koolance Exos watercooling system for 4ghz.
Can you all quit moaning and groaning and leave this be. Some of you are contributing worthwhile information and claims, but for the most part this is mindless babble in here.
Actually, a lot of it is ignorance.
Close this thread up. It is out of hand.
You're right. I'm sorry for my behavior. I just get frustrated when someone calls me a fanboy for presenting data that's true... irregardless of the motivations behind it (simply to rule out the hypothetical).
I have never seen a thread so full of retards....and I am ot talking about Lithan....
Just shut up and put up some proof...with the way some of the Intel fanatics here said it was soooo easy to get 4ghz on air I would have expected them to show some proof that wasn't able to be refuted in like 2 seconds....
the fact is must of the ppl here and that other OC forum have little to NO idea of what stability is...The OP wants stability not to stroke his e-penis with superpi 1mb scores and sandra benches...real world...join it please!!!!
To FUGGER...dude I dont care who your are superpi 32mb 2 instances of it is not a stability test. I can run them at 2.7ghz on my 4400+ X2 yet prime (2 instances) will not be stable at 2.60ghz and FH 2instances of it will get EEUs at about 2.62ghz....Get a better method of stability testing please....
I recommed to all P4 users to run S&M...that program will add 6c over Large FFT testing and will push you temps to the extreme....This is the Extreme site right??? too bad it is wasted on screenies of cpu_z with little or no proof of actual stability...
Give fugger time duvie, I believe that I did successfully talk him into running dual primes for us. He's just busy with work at the moment.
Does S&M show errors (in the way prime shows mathematical mistakes) or is it just a load program where the only demonstration of a computation or memory error is a lockup, program crash, or system crash?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithan
No it has an error count..you can have it continue with errors and just count them or stop at first error....It is about 70 minutes and it will load both cores with 1 instance launched....
Another app that is better then prime IMO is OCCT...It is more sensitive then prime and will usually error out sooner then prime...If prime95 is 1-2 hours for an error OCCT could error out in about 15 min....
Takes time just to catch up with this thread. Burried in work as well as just finished two shows this weekend.
I've got to check occt out. Know of any program that's as good as prime for cpu errors, but (much) better than prime for memory errors? Im sick of priming for 24 hrs only to have Mozilla crash after about 30 mins for a memory error.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvie
S&M has memory error count as well....but I still just run memtest to really be safe...OCCT is far more sensitive then prime from myine and others experience..some may say it is not long enough and I have to agree just keep running it...