The World Record Database

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Stilt

IIRC cpu speed doesn´t affect memory bandwidth on Intel, because the memory controller is on motherboard instead of cpu...

---

It does partially but not to the extent as it does on an Athlon64.

The Big limiting factor on an Intel is the transfer Rate between the cpu and the Memory controller.

Cpu speed does make a small difference as the Faster the Cpu runs, the faster it gets it to the Cpu FSB.

But the BIG Factor in my scores is the OS. In win2003, There is a function Called "Lock Pages in Memory" which allows Sandra (or any program) To lock the same Memory pages for it's use Only as long as the program is open. This Makes a big difference.

I attached a Pic that shows Sandra's estimated Bandwidth efficiency.

"Lock memory pages" tweak helps but that only makes 150MB/s - 200MB/s difference, not this much: Sandra Buffered - 3-2-2-1 350FSB 1:1

You can´t defeat pure performance with any tweak ;)

btw. Just in case, I had to accomplish some counter measures:

New bios gives pretty good boost compared to older ones:



Corsair 5400UL - Sandra Buffered (Verified)

Corsair 5400UL - Sandra Unbuffered (Verified)

ps. tRAS 1 is pretty much faster than tRAS 10..

:slapass:

:D

all I can say is NICE,

I am the first to admit my Unbuffered scores are no where near yours :clap:

well, it is time to stop flooding this thread with our stuff and let some records get posted..

And all I can say is.. The P5wd2 premium is a great Mobo :toast:

Is this AV8 HTT World Record? :toast:

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?ac...=post&id=60552

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PCcrazy

Is this AV8 HTT World Record? :toast:

---

It could be, but with all the Dothan processors in -> 1 <- category, i don't think he'll compliment AMD with a WR for every MB.. Though it would fit well with his idea of 5 different classes for just one processor model.. :p: ;)

Just asking, dont need to record it here...

I can add different Dothan processors sure but then I want you to give me the WR of them. I'm always open for new stuffs but I might don't like some. But post dothan model and WR so I can edit the first post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

I can add different Dothan processors sure but then I want you to give me the WR of them. I'm always open for new stuffs but I might don't like some. But post dothan model and WR so I can edit the first post.

---

Thanks :)

According to the somewhat unofficial and sometimes sparsely updated Japanese ranking site (http://www16.big.or.jp/~bunnywk/cgi-bin/superpi.cgi), it looks like this:

Dothan 740: New Beetle - 3482MHz http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle/13x268=20S.gif

The 730 record must be higher than this, but just to start with the KING ;)

Dothan 730: Macci - 2944MHz http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8570052

And now it's updated ;)

Strange I've never noticed this thread before :rolleyes: Heh, well since there's no current record for a 3200+ Venice, I guess you can throw mine up there for the time being. Toobad I didn't have time to test this cpu more. I know there was a little left in her ;) :
http://img215.echo.cx/img215/6171/cp...erified0qy.jpg
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=19719

nice results s7e9h3n, as usual. I would have liked to see 3.5, although 3.4 isnt anything to sneeze at. Is that superpi stable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by moddolicous

nice results s7e9h3n, as usual. I would have liked to see 3.5, although 3.4 isnt anything to sneeze at. Is that superpi stable.

---

Thx....no way is that superpi stable ;) You know, spi could have been possible, but the cpu's memory controller just was a POS. Here's the fastest I was able to run spi @ with this cpu:
http://img151.echo.cx/img151/3595/10x330spi1m3gr.jpg

oohh well, still pretty good. Since u get to try all these newer CPU's out(like X2 and others) whats the lowest SPI u ever got???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by moddolicous

oohh well, still pretty good. Since u get to try all these newer CPU's out(like X2 and others) whats the lowest SPI u ever got???

---

TBH, I really don't remember. I can tell you it's not in the 24's for sure mainly since I don't have the cpu's long enough to optimize all the timings. I basically throw the cpu in, test it a various timings with minor tweaks and then get rid of it ;) . In fact, this 3200+ was a cpu I purchased retail while waiting for my FX55 to return from RMA.

3700+ (Newark): conrad.maranan - 3367.61 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=21306

Nice resutls conrad! And nice BMW :)

630: Tyrou - 5320.04 MHz http://img295.echo.cx/img295/6369/sc...20verif9gi.png


:)

Updating...

sorry, the correct link for my 630 is : http://img295.echo.cx/img295/6369/sc...20verif9gi.png

;)

Ok I'll fix it.

the image link for intel 560J world record by Fugger is broken
need to be fixed to http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/intel_sc...ots/270i.pjpeg

great job for updating the world record database

Fixed..

little oops here.

4000+ (ClawHammer) petervandamned - 3523.75 MHz http://<br /> http://valid.x86-sec...een-3460MHz.jpg

Fixed now ;)

a couple of days ago i saw a 4000+ San Diego that will soon do a good jump from the current record now :P heehhe news soon ;)