So many ram choices....
:confused: :confused: :confused:
Printable View
So many ram choices....
:confused: :confused: :confused:
id like to see it be 3dmark stable at 325fsb ras-cas3. I dont think anyone hit over 300fsb at ras-cas3, only 4 which hurts performance badly anyway. also 3.4v is not available for many. I for one am not vmodding or using the booster, id just like 280+ at 2.7v ras-cas3
Let me see if tony can run some 3dmarks for ya
How high a ddr voltage is it relatively safe to run Athlon 64's MSi neo2, to not kill the onboard memory controller of the FX55?
I have been running 3.1-3.5 for long periods of time.
Not THAT many.....Quote:
Originally Posted by MUCHO
You have Samsung TCCD, Micron, BH5s and generic.
who says you need to volt mod?Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
Get a bios with higher vdimm options and a PSU with adjustable pots...
Thats true , but some people arent comfortable with high voltages period
Waiting for screenies Trans.
Hope their smokin :toast:
I want to see some result with dual channel :P
I think 300FSB-310FSB will be perfect on dual channel for my needs for notching down to 10x multi instead of 11x multi I am on now.
I think 300 dual channel might be dificult , unless someone has been doing those speeds already
I beter get to playing with a dual channel 939 board
If such ram exists that can do ddr600 at 2.5-3-3-7(no fours!) I am soooooo buying it for my winchester. imagine 300x8=2.4GHz at 1:1 this would give me serious 3dmarks ;)
haha
Well haven't tried the FX-55 yet, but I've been running 3.6-3.9V with the DDR Booster on this board for a couple days at a time (couple days on, couple days off, depending on testing schedule). Used a 3700+, and FX-53. No problems yet. :) Your mileage may vary though, but for me personally I have not seen any issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman
Note: It should be noted that I run pretty nice cooling over the booster though to keep it nice and cool (it's *not* recommended to run the booster without active cooling at high voltage for extended periods).
-Eric
I wont be boosting or modding cause the ondie controller can die or something else can fry
Isn't that what RMA'a are for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
I think a few gskills and ocz has done 2.5-3-3 at 300FSB
Yet to see this happening with my previous 3 A64 chips. And that was kicking voltage all the way to 3.6v at times. (mostly 3.2-3.4 volt)Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
I haven't bothered with it yet with TCCD (I seem to be only getting the low volt loving stuff :P) but who knows.
If you want to talk the talk, you've gotta walk the walk too.
I know we're all more interested in performance rather than looks, but I had to give my first impression here. Unfortunately I won't have any initial performance results until probably this evening. For the price I just paid for these, this does not leave me with warm fuzzies, especially since if I just completely remove the spreaders, I've voided the warrenty. And no, no shipping damage to my package. Maybe we can just say "bad QA" or "bad assembly process", eh? :rolleyes:
Both sticks, both corners.
http://mysite.verizon.net/res6otqr/s...s/DSCN0744.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/res6otqr/s...s/DSCN0740.jpg
Nice....
Quote:
Originally Posted by longshot
your warrenty would be voided to hell long ago. also its cheating to rma stuff you killed, its your fault :stick: eshbach can personally tell you he killed his own claw a while back with a vdimm mod, when he rebooted it spiked and took out the ondie controller. besides I see no reason to mod when tccd does just fine at low volts and is equal or better than bh5 too. The only reason for this would be 3dmark and I cant justify boosting the volts for this alone, well I could for a world record but thats not gonna happen with this winchester anyway. eshbach also has shown you only need 30fsb tops to match bh5. thus tccd at 280fsb=bh5 at 250fsb and you could run 280x9=2.52 vs. 252x10=2.52 and both would perform about equal. The big thing is I dont need any mods or boosts with tccd :D
It's not cheating it called taking advantage of the system.
Longshot,
Cheating RMA policies way is what causes companys to have rigid RMA policies
If you have a problem and screwed something up that you knew would void your warranty , try being honest about it , you would be suprised how nice people can be when they know your being honest .
So remember everytime you screw over a company by cheating on your RMA , you are also forcing them to lower the quality of service for each guy after you .
Frankly after all the hell some of the tech support guys go through to help people out in these forums it sickens me to hear you refer to screwing over a company and there employees as taking advantage of the system.
Can we get back on topic. Mikead's heatspreaders aren't even making contact with the ic's.
Kudos to that :) I personally know at least one person is going through hell to satisfy me at this point ;) Thanks again Ryan. Last time GeiL didn't quite do RMA fine for their bad stick I remember getting 3700 Golden dragon instead of Platinum as bit of extra :P (I think I was the first one in US to have one as customer... it was so new ;P) Wonder if something like that is in my way? ;) ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanpgroovy
trans_am i dont see any report of you getting 4200 ?