I want to see the at least version of that advertisement.
Printable View
I want to see the at least version of that advertisement.
http://imgur.com/a/Yzo8L
All/most of the slides. I hope AMD releases the demo during the presentation (give a damn QR code or something).
EDIT: It got removed. There isn't really much new except a few things like: Kaveri is 8~15% faster clock for clock compared to Richland (we already know this), Battlefield 4 Mantle is up to 45% faster (no benchmarks given), and Oxide DirectX vs Mantle is 200% faster for Mantle (we already know about this too, but this should shut up anyone who keeps saying it's running at 300 fps for some reason).
So, these 45% only in completely CPU-bound scenarios...
Thanks, I did see your link when it was working, it had 74 images in the album.
Here is a new link from the same site, this time only with 47 images http://imgur.com/a/Oqmuf#0
EDIT
I did see at another forum whole tread deleted about the Kaveri AMD Tech Day.
something to do with the NDA.
Guess the leak first started at this Polish site, they say by mistake.
here is the Google translation
EDIT #2
The album is now re-uploaded with 88 images
http://imgur.com/a/4WiVM
http://oi42.tinypic.com/ws7jbt.jpg
at what Resolution ?
I found it,
http://www.overclock.net/t/1456842/w...r-than-directxQuote:
Note: The Performance below is all done on 1920x1080. With Kaveri AMD pushes for 1080p. Also, everything is stock, not overclocked.
Wow , that's nice if it's true.damn 1080P??
Kevari is only two modules if I remember correctly, and that bench is very CPU limited on DX11. With DX11's API overheads I'm not surprised it could only do 10 fps when trying to handle all those ships and effects, the frame rate would be much higher on a 4770k but if you built a game to drag the i7 down to 10fps on DX11 then I guess Mantle would be able to bring those frame rates back up too.
meh the slides tell us usual nothing at all.. need the reviewer to pick it up...
Full presentation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIWyf8Hyjbg#t=17
Edit:
Looks like it's a little old. Still good.
it is a very bad presentation :( .
%45 performance increase is awesome. I believe %45 number is setup specific but it doesn't matter.
ohhh crap presentation but good product......my grandma can sell me her potato and leek bake way better than this dude can sell me something we're heavily interested on.
Hardware.fr talks about ~10% increase where the CPU is not a problem.
http://www.hardware.fr/news/13525/ce...antle-bf4.html
LOL HardwareFrench has the patch, must have got it from Nvidia. :) First AMD did say up to 45% and who cares where it comes from.
Off course even only 10% for free would be nothing to complain about, some people did pay $350 for only 7% more performance, and usually it is at least $150
Before everyone starts running out to buy AMD stock, keep in mind the 45% figure comes not from Battlefield, but Oxide Games’ Starswarm demo - a 64-bit engine test first shown in December that attempts to fill space with thousands of ships on-screen at once kinda like the test on 3dmark Vantage. And it doesn’t apply to just any generic AMD card - rather the A8-7600, a new APU from the Kaveri line the manufacturer is showing at CES. A very expensive AMD FireGL card.