1GHz? Wow :eek:
That means, it will end up even faster than 6970, right? :shocked:
Printable View
1GHz? Wow :eek:
That means, it will end up even faster than 6970, right? :shocked:
1GHz for the SOC model is quite impressive :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
1GB is a little tight though. :shrug:
Thanks for sharin' kaktus :up:
If an AIB has the courage to sell a 1ghz part, then I think it's safe to say these things should clock like crazy.
If GTX 560 can really OC +20% it sounds really nice. Otherwise the reference seems to be slightly faster than a 6870. If they price it at 250$ or less I'm sure it will be popular among overclockers.
The last slide says something about HD 6950, so it will probably end up closer to that and that is in no way only slightly faster than HD 6870.
That's for the OC model at 900 MHz, which probably is on the same level as a 6950, but the reference has 820 Mhz clocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
Yeah, you could be right, although, there is still this. That should be at default.
http://i51.tinypic.com/293vey8.jpg
Someone needs to translate the last slide.
But that's Vantage with PhysX on...:shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
And yes, at 900mhz the GTX560 should be on the level of a stock 6950, with 1Ghz at GTX570/HD6970 level. Let's wait and see the price of those. ;)
Most likely, yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
It's quite nice to see 1GHz, finally. Hopefully it will scale well under water. Fermi seems to be quite nice to overclockers so far. Unlike certain recent AMD offers...
The 1GHz sounds good, but the picture seams to be fake.
It looks like a photoshop GTX460 to me, they forgot, that OpenGL 3.2 should be 4.1 :p:.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
The 1GHz may still be true tho, hopefully.
1899Y = ~ £180 Sweet pricing, probably looking at ~£220-250 at retail.
I've already tipped $199 for GTX560, but it may still be +/-, depending on the final price of 6970/50-1GB.Quote:
Originally Posted by initialised
google translate:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
V-N560OC-1GI initial frequency of 900, 822 increase over 10% of the public version, memory 4000. the actual performance of more than 470 public version of it. ( Does mean GTX470OC version perf only ? )
GV-N560SO-1GI initial frequency of 1000, compared with 23% of the public version upgrade, memory 4580, the actual performance more than the public version of 570 3% or so. ( 570 - 3% ? But the slide is not clear, as they said next high segment.. )
But offcourse it's needed to know exactly what was the bench, and in what situation, it can be " at best " as "on average " as on a specific situation.
No it wont, bit faster then a 570 but doesnt touch the 580 and thats where the 6970 sits..Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
According to who aside from HardOCP? 6970 is far more in common with the gtx 570 in regards to performance than the gtx 580 with pretty much every review website out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
Unless your chocking the memory of the cards by setting things to 2560*1600 and 8x AA, the 6970 is more often than not match for match with a gtx 570.
I don't think so buddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
http://i55.tinypic.com/9iv2ad.pnghttp://i55.tinypic.com/rmn32b.pnghttp://i51.tinypic.com/nbylhs.png
GTX560 (384) at 825MHz will be between HD6870 and HD6950. At 950/1000MHz will be close to GTX570 performance but it could lose in DX-11 games.
Depending on the game, at 1000MHz it could be close or better even than 6950/70, take HAWX2, Lost Planet 2 and Civ V in DX-11.
I believe there will be two models, one at $199 (one SM disabled ??) and the second at $229/239(1G memory).
Ive been right with pretty much all the new release hardware.. ie.. Sandybridge, Cayman.. lets just wait and see.. everytime its the same thing all this hype and speculation and when its released you act shocked because it didnt live up to all this hype..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant
I have summerize the result of ComputerBase.de Using GTX570 as baseline (100%) 1920x1200 and allways with 16xAF and their max setting for AA ( sometimes it's 4xAA, sometimes it' 8xAA, it's the setting they have use, not mine )
1900x1200 this is just the result of how much the 6970 is faster of the 570 following their % for each games ( and not the complete )
# DirectX-9-Benchmarks
* Arcania – Gothic 4 +14%
* Call of Duty: MW2 +2%
* Mafia 2 +17%
* Mass Effect2 +29%
* StarCraft 2 -7% (8xAA) +14% without AA
# DirectX-10-Benchmarks
* Crysis Warhead +13% ( 4xAA here cause 8xAA is overkill for any card and it will have give again a bigger advantage to the 6970)
* Just Cause 2 +18% +4xAA ( +31% with 8xAA )
# DirectX-11-Benchmarks
* Battlefield: Bad Company 2 +1%
* F1 2010 +14%
* Metro 2033 +4%
* Stalker – Call of Pripyat +9%
So each time it's how much is the 6970 faster of the GTX570 in % at 1900x1200 with the max AA they have choose ( i just copy their numbers ).
I have just exclude 2 games of the listing... LostPlanet 2 ( the 570 is 30% faster ) and Battleforge cause the 6970 results are completely bugged, the card is 30% slower of the 5870
in the result of Computerbase.de bench, surely due to a driver bug )
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/g...chnitt_mafia_2
I don't think it's a good idea to compare GTX560 with those old 6970/50-2GB, because the price will more likely be much less, and pretty close to upcoming 6970/50-1GB.
Besides, those 6970/50-2GBs are EOL soon (if not already), because nobody would buy those "expensive" cards when upcoming "cheap" cards hits the marked.
EDIT:
The real fight will be between GTX560 and 6970/50-1GB, and SLI vs CFX of these. Probably including 6990 too.
You didn't hear that from AMD & AMD will not want to cripple eyefinity again with only providing 1 GB cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
Awake up.
AMD 6970/6950 CFX and NVIDIA 580/570 SLI Review
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/...0_sli_review/1
They are going for 1GB cards!. That's a wrong move, and I've already complained extensively about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Final8ty
Yep, you are right, that would hurt eyefinity, but if rumors about low-price 1GBs is true, then who would buy those "expensive" 2GBs?
I'm afraid that SLI vs CFX figures would change in nVidia's favor soon. Because AMD is going for 6970/50-1GBs for sure, and rumors says nVidia is going for GTX560-2GB. We have to wait and see the exact results, but I'm afraid you will soon wake up and find a new figure for SLI vs result.
Your not making sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
1) People who run very high res & eyefinty are people who would buy those expensive" 2GBs.
2) Again where has AMD said that they are going to drop 6970/50-2GB.
6970/50-1GB makes sense for people on lower resolution monitors & only offering expensive 6970/50-2GB is a total waste when there is a wide market to cover.
By your own views who's going to buy the more expensive GTX560-2GB when they can buy the cheaper GTX560-1GB.
You cant make 1 logic rule for one & another for the other that total contradict each others reasons.
@Sam_Oslo...
Why will you they EOL them ? Peoples who want the 2gb version will buy the 2gb version and the ultra cheap 1gb version will sell a lot ( whatever is the perf of 560 ) ( i suspect lower will be the price of 1gb version, faster we will see a drop on 2gb version then ).... the cores are same, only the amount of ram will vary... ( PCB is another story as rev2 PCB have been shown with HIS and gigabyte boards ) .... the bigger production cost is the core, and so whatever they sell well or not, this will allow AMD to play on 2 prices point without any worries ....
The only one i see who will maybe disapear on official AMD, is the 6950 2gb and will just be continued by some AIB in low quantity ( it don't really make a lot of sense to get 6950 1gb - 6970 1gb and the 6950 2gb )