That's coollll........Any screenies yet from S-Sandra Arithmetic and PCMark-3DMark???....... :)
Printable View
That's coollll........Any screenies yet from S-Sandra Arithmetic and PCMark-3DMark???....... :)
@hipro
hiho, do u have any new news about IS7- E bios, or is the official version No. 16 all we can get 4 now ?
hmmmmm..... 43xx mhz at 1,5V? It's quite too impossible even to think without ln2 or dryice at least.... post new proves and we would be more happy :) :toast:Quote:
Originally posted by KennethChong
i suppose its a bug, it was at 1.5v, temps on cpu were -39, nb was -20
seven pages and not a single benchmark result?? whats up with that?
With calm :DQuote:
Originally posted by macci
seven pages and not a single benchmark result?? whats up with that?
Really strange... With a cpu like that, impressive frequencies at so low vcore on simple phase change cooling... It should be quite simple to power the system and get the same result again for taking more screenies and benchies... let's wait ...Quote:
Originally posted by macci
seven pages and not a single benchmark result?? whats up with that?
Not yet....In a few days......Just wait....... ;)Quote:
Originally posted by jayray580
@hipro
hiho, do u have any new news about IS7- E bios, or is the official version No. 16 all we can get 4 now ?
looks like someones getting impatientQuote:
Originally posted by macci
seven pages and not a single benchmark result?? whats up with that?
Didn't you to have 2.4c at just about the same speeds? I can't imagine there being to much of a difference between your rig & his.
not impatient, ;) , just curious !!!
not impatient, ;) , just curious !!!Quote:
Originally posted by jayray580
not impatient, ;) , just curious !!!
not impatient, ;) , just curious !!!
not impatient, ;) , just curious !!!
:D :toast: ;)
woa there kiddies, its been really busy over here, havnt had much time to mess with it, but i ran a sandra just for yall, the highest speed i could manage for sandra was about 4.0, I might try and see what i can get with 1:1 when i get some more time.
i have quite a bit to do sometimes, just keep your pants on and ill get to it :)
as ive said, the v-core doesnt seem to matter with this chip, ive tried up to 1.8 with no diffrance besides higher temps.Quote:
Originally posted by Diablo II
hmmmmm..... 43xx mhz at 1,5V? It's quite too impossible even to think without ln2 or dryice at least.... post new proves and we would be more happy :) :toast:
Damnit!Quote:
Originally posted by KennethChong
i have quite a bit to do sometimes, just keep your pants on and ill get to it :)
*ziiip*
Nice response there. :D
Hell yes I'm getting impatient :DQuote:
looks like someones getting impatient
Didn't you to have 2.4c at just about the same speeds? I can't imagine there being to much of a difference between your rig & his.
There is one big difference in our rigs: I got my highest 2.4C clocks using a very slow Albatron mobo (with very slow albatron bios, this and supercooling on NB made it possible to hit the FSB speeds I hit) and Mr. Chong is doing the same FSBs with quite a bit faster IC7-max3 mobo. So I'd really like to see how it performs.
Yes lets see some benchies :slobber: chong seems to have the time to reply back to this forum.
and show the hole pic of the bench mark not just the top w/the bottom cut off that could have been run at any speed or someone elses far as that goes
Woof.
Dude just go back in this thread and look at his benchies!
He is for REAL !
I think that he must have a great CPU and was smart when putting his system together .
IE he chose the right parts.
I'd like to see pcmark
im confused , i get 11,300 on sandra at 3.5ghz
is that with HT disabled?
Which benchies???.....Only "half" of IT you mean of caurce.......Don't you??? ;)Quote:
Originally posted by gordos1
Dude just go back in this thread and look at his benchies!
He is for REAL !
Yeap......Me too...... :DQuote:
Originally posted by Amoeba Assassin
I'd like to see pcmark
NO......It's WITH HT ENABLE........I get about 11000 at 4200MHz with HT Disable....... ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Peen
is that with HT disabled?
Hmm, I assumed it was with HT off as well since with my 2.4C at 3.9 GHz I score 12000 ALU and 3381/7560 FPU/SSE2 with HT enabled.
http://members.lycos.co.uk/csmo/Comp...2.4C/CPU_2.gif
As ive said, ive been busy, i finaly asked my gf of 4 years to marry me, the house is in a clutter right now as were getting ready to go down to florda next week for the marrage/ honey moon, but as soon as stuff calms down over here ill be sure to take a pic of the chip, and run some benches for ya by the end of this week. untill then, im not guna be in much.
sorry for leaving all these questions unanswerd, ill be sure to get to them when i have some more time for this sort of thing, untill then, there are more important things.
NO.......Wrong again.........Take a look at 4200MHz with HT DISABLE......... :D
OR........in the other hand, he got lucky with ALU's....... :D
Anyways......a PCMark2002 would be good........ ;)