Today's Numbers: Get 'Em While They're Hot!

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-05-2008, 07:53 AM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

Ahaha wow. So wait this 5million score is XS's daily output? :P correct me if i'm wrong there.

Anyways I just joined the WCG . Part of this grid. My specs as below. I will have an additional P4 dual core joining in (sister's computer).

Hmmm my Crucials going under crunching. lolol

Btw... I have a couple projects completed with "ready to report", am I right to assume that it reports automatically?

:welcome:
Yes, how is that score for approximately 275 people? :up:
04-05-2008, 07:58 AM
fungry

haha :P nice
04-05-2008, 08:10 AM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

haha :P nice

:welcome: and thanks for helping out!
04-05-2008, 08:13 AM
fungry

haha i'm itching to buy a new cpu now ^^
04-05-2008, 08:17 AM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

haha i'm itching to buy a new cpu now ^^

You will fit in very nicely here. :yepp: :up:

Be sure to read the "Disclaimer".
04-05-2008, 08:18 AM
WesM63

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

Ahaha wow. So wait this 5million score is XS's daily output? :P correct me if i'm wrong there.

Anyways I just joined the WCG . Part of this grid. My specs as below. I will have an additional P4 dual core joining in (sister's computer).

Hmmm my Crucials going under crunching. lolol

Btw... I have a couple projects completed with "ready to report", am I right to assume that it reports automatically?

Welcome! Thanks for the help, any help is greatly appreciated.
04-05-2008, 08:19 AM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by WesM63

Welcome! Thanks for the help, any help is greatly appreciated.

get back to work you!:rofl:
04-05-2008, 08:21 AM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

get back to work you!:rofl:

Yeah, he doesn't have time to read. :shakes: :D

Hope DDTUNG doesn't see that he is goofing off. :eek:
04-05-2008, 08:26 AM
fungry

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiGfever

You will fit in very nicely here. :yepp: :up:

Be sure to read the "Disclaimer".

the disclaimer in your sig right?

haha no worries man :D i am a self-poisoner. What I see is what I want.\

as for the goofing off? why not? lol employer? :P that would crack me o_O
04-05-2008, 08:27 AM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

the disclaimer in your sig right?

haha no worries man :D i am a self-poisoner. What I see is what I want.\

as for the goofing off? why not? lol employer? :P

You will definitely fit in here. :up:
04-05-2008, 08:29 AM
WesM63

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

get back to work you!:rofl:

Sorry this new phone is addicting. I'm on my way to look at 3 houses. When i get back i'll finish the system. ;)
04-05-2008, 08:30 AM
Hymay

Quote:

Originally Posted by VietOZ

Thanks DDT, my C2D rig has a 965P-DS3 rev 1.0 so I think it'll run a quad up to 3.2 without a problem.

Yup, it'll run fine on there. I'm typing this on one of those boards with a 3.4 quad running in it. It should run alot higher... temp is the only thing holding me back atm, needs a lapping and something a little better than this ninja+. I think Paladin is running one at 3.6 with the same board too.
04-05-2008, 08:31 AM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by WesM63

Sorry this new phone is addicting. I'm on my way to look at 3 houses. When i get back i'll finish the system. ;)

Ok, but I'm watching the clock!:ROTF:
04-05-2008, 08:32 AM
fungry

me > lost haha
04-05-2008, 08:34 AM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by fungry

me > lost haha

Me too, speaking of work, I need to do some myself.
Later guys!

Fungry, you keep Sig company!
he needs all the help he can get..meow!:rofl:
04-05-2008, 08:37 AM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

Me too, speaking of work, I need to do some myself.
Later guys!

Fungry, you keep Sig company!
he needs all the help he can get..meow!:rofl:

Where is that damn cat? :ROTF:
04-05-2008, 09:39 AM
twilyth

You can't blame the kitties for wanting to snuggle up to a nice warm quad core. Like many of us, they find the throbbing power of an oc'ed quad too much to resist.

OK, maybe "throbbing" wasn't the best word I could have chosen.
04-05-2008, 10:57 AM
Gamekiller

lol
04-05-2008, 02:05 PM
[XC] junglemaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by twilyth

OK, maybe "throbbing" wasn't the best word I could have chosen.

No, not the best ;)

and :welcome: fungry.... :up:
04-05-2008, 07:11 PM
[XC] junglemaster

Sadly we did not get to 5M...something must be wrong... :shakes:

XtremeSystems 4,814,549

Let's push it for tomorrow :up:
04-05-2008, 07:59 PM
fungry

Quote:

Originally Posted by JungleMaster

Sadly we did not get to 5M...something must be wrong... :shakes:

XtremeSystems 4,814,549

Let's push it for tomorrow :up:

haha damn.
04-05-2008, 08:26 PM
sierra_bound

Interesting little factoid. The Q6600 is now the number one CPU on the grid, based on BOINC credits.

http://boincstats.com/stats/host_cpu...hp?pr=wcg&st=0
04-05-2008, 08:53 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by sierra_bound

Interesting little factoid. The Q6600 is now the number one CPU on the grid, based on BOINC credits.

http://boincstats.com/stats/host_cpu...hp?pr=wcg&st=0

Interesting and just noticed this:
Pos.

CPU............................................... ......... Average credit per CPU second

1 Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz.......0.004894
97 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5350 @ 2.66GHz...............0.004828
The clovers can still hold their own with the quads..almost..:D
The interesting statistics are these:
#1 to 3 in credit per cpu second.. Beasts!
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9770 @ 3.20GHz ....0.008211
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz.....0.006867
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz.....0.006600

I wouldn't take any of that as gospel as I'll bet there are a lot of stock quads that drop the Q6600 number and not many OC'd X5350's..
The second set of numbers I think shows higher to the Q6600's than it would if compared to just XS machines.
04-05-2008, 09:31 PM
fungry

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

Interesting and just noticed this:
Pos.

CPU............................................... ......... Average credit per CPU second

1 Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz.......0.004894
97 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5350 @ 2.66GHz...............0.004828
The clovers can still hold their own with the quads..almost..:D
The interesting statistics are these:
#1 to 3 in credit per cpu second.. Beasts!
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9770 @ 3.20GHz ....0.008211
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz.....0.006867
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz.....0.006600

I wouldn't take any of that as gospel as I'll bet there are a lot of stock quads that drop the Q6600 number and not many OC'd X5350's..
The second set of numbers I think shows higher to the Q6600's than it would if compared to just XS machines.

nice stats ^^

haha when i first read it, i thought it said "... noticed this: piece of :banana::banana::banana::banana:" hahaha
04-05-2008, 09:41 PM
littleowl

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

Interesting and just noticed this:
Pos.

CPU............................................... ......... Average credit per CPU second

1 Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz.......0.004894
97 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5350 @ 2.66GHz...............0.004828
The clovers can still hold their own with the quads..almost..:D
The interesting statistics are these:
#1 to 3 in credit per cpu second.. Beasts!
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9770 @ 3.20GHz ....0.008211
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz.....0.006867
Intel(R) Core(tm)2 Extreme CPU X9650 @ 3.00GHz.....0.006600

I wouldn't take any of that as gospel as I'll bet there are a lot of stock quads that drop the Q6600 number and not many OC'd X5350's..
The second set of numbers I think shows higher to the Q6600's than it would if compared to just XS machines.

That is very interesting

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page