PAY DAY - FOXCONN BlackOps - 7.5 WRs down...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-18-2008, 09:06 AM
giampa

thanks to all guys,
we're eager to do next run by BlackOps... :up:
03-18-2008, 09:26 AM
saaya

congratulations!
03-18-2008, 10:25 AM
Leghorn

thank's guys,
I upload the score now :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5808775

This was easy, serious test next time :cool:
03-18-2008, 11:09 AM
lukas69

Great score
03-18-2008, 12:33 PM
hipro5

Giorgioprimo.....IF NVIDIA sucks (as I think) in VISTA with QUAD SLI and the score with 2 x 9800GX2 in SLI is ~15% better than one 9800GX2, then ATI will SURE be ahead of it cuz of the higher efficiency in QUAD CF and VISTA.... ;)

Now, IF NVIDIA manages to go up to 20%, then it's gonna be a "war".... :D
03-18-2008, 12:43 PM
Kryckter

Congrats!!!

Amazing scores!
03-19-2008, 04:33 PM
CLPDJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

Giorgioprimo.....IF NVIDIA sucks (as I think) in VISTA with QUAD SLI and the score with 2 x 9800GX2 in SLI is ~15% better than one 9800GX2, then ATI will SURE be ahead of it cuz of the higher efficiency in QUAD CF and VISTA.... ;)

Now, IF NVIDIA manages to go up to 20%, then it's gonna be a "war".... :D

Hipro5 if the 9800gx2 wold be so good as the 3870x2 "in quad gpu solutions" then the maximo score of 3dmark hold be for nvidia... but @ the moment it sems to be a ATI supremacy... @ +- 32K 3dmark 2006...Nvidia is still a bit "lazy" crating good drivers for quad gpu; maybe a single 9800gx is still not maximum "driver tweaked" and only when that is achieved Nvidia will strart "fighting" for quad gpu solution's (i thnink).... but @ hardware level IMO the 9800gx2 is more powerfulll (and i dont like so mutch Nvidia as i like ATI)... just my 2 cent m'8s
03-20-2008, 01:42 AM
paulzig

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

Giorgioprimo.....IF NVIDIA sucks (as I think) in VISTA with QUAD SLI and the score with 2 x 9800GX2 in SLI is ~15% better than one 9800GX2, then ATI will SURE be ahead of it cuz of the higher efficiency in QUAD CF and VISTA.... ;)

Now, IF NVIDIA manages to go up to 20%, then it's gonna be a "war".... :D

If the 9800GX2 costs more than the ATI 3870x2, you'll be smashing world records with BUDGET, CHEAP cards :D
03-20-2008, 04:46 AM
George_o/c

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulzig

If the 9800GX2 costs more than the ATI 3870x2, you'll be smashing world records with BUDGET, CHEAP cards :D

It costs like 160$ more than 3870X2 ;) So the usage of " if " is incorrect ... :D
04-01-2008, 09:03 AM
batmang

amazing! congrats!
04-20-2008, 10:50 AM
Vatos_locos

hipro5 if there is any free time make a thread with the 3870x2 mods even those with the maximizer 1 have 2 of them and i need the mods please :p
05-24-2008, 07:59 AM
gmcg

2 Attachment(s)

hipro5, I have a question, how come you've got 5600 and 5746 MHz on CPU with 1.25 reported Vcore, is it a bug of CPU-Z or something?
05-27-2008, 01:17 PM
Zannema

Congratz for new score hipro5, now 40K is possible with your QX ;)

:clap::clap: :clap: :clap::clap:

http://www.hipro-tech.com/images/hip...918_1143_1.png
05-27-2008, 01:40 PM
psilos

We know vga?
05-27-2008, 02:25 PM
gmcg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zannema

Congratz for new score hipro5, now 40K is possible with your QX ;)

:clap::clap: :clap: :clap::clap:

Hmm, with 1.25V Vcore?
05-27-2008, 07:24 PM
T_M

It is a bug with BLackOps boards and CPU-Z.
05-27-2008, 07:30 PM
Movieman

George:
JUST 5902mhz?
You keep this up and we're going to have to punish you and let you just work on dual socket boards!:ROTF:

Very nice!:up:
05-27-2008, 09:48 PM
gmcg

Quote:

Originally Posted by T_M

It is a bug with BLackOps boards and CPU-Z.

Thanks, noticed it in some other posts. Only BlackOps or has any other x48 board that issue as well?
05-27-2008, 10:40 PM
T_M

Well, for certain the X48T-DQ6 works fine.
05-28-2008, 06:14 AM
hipro5

Someone is "digging" my server......... :D

That was a "plain bench" just to test the CPU how it does with 4 x cores enable into Windows Vista......... :)
05-28-2008, 06:20 AM
Slay0r

If you guys take a closer look at cpuz it says Core VID (default v) rather than Core Voltage (actual), and 1.250 as a default vcore is perfectly fine ;)

Bench on !
05-28-2008, 07:16 AM
T_M

Then explain why my BlackOps displays 0.865V
05-28-2008, 07:31 AM
systemviper

My BlackOps just came today, it has to be the best Motherboard I have ever owned, it's orgasmic, and big as a #%#%$. :up::up:

I think I am going to love this board.. :hump:

So should i put my E8500 or the Q9450....?

:party::party3::party2::cheer::cheer::cheer: :banana3: :toast:
05-28-2008, 07:37 AM
Zannema

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

Someone is "digging" my server......... :D

That was a "plain bench" just to test the CPU how it does with 4 x cores enable into Windows Vista......... :)

Sorry Hipro but i've see your score in ripping :)
05-28-2008, 01:48 PM
gmcg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slay0r

If you guys take a closer look at cpuz it says Core VID (default v) rather than Core Voltage (actual), and 1.250 as a default vcore is perfectly fine ;)

Bench on !

It is not "perfectly fine", the default VID for qx9650 is 1.13V ... T_M's explanation looks fine for me though, it's a bug.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page