I can bench 05 tonight with following setup:
Yorkfield 333x9 + X38 + DDR2 + 2900Pro 860/980
Operating system is Vista 32-bit.
Let's see what the score will be...
Printable View
I can bench 05 tonight with following setup:
Yorkfield 333x9 + X38 + DDR2 + 2900Pro 860/980
Operating system is Vista 32-bit.
Let's see what the score will be...
I would be interested in seeing yorkfield vs phenom folding SMP for a half hour each both at stock settings but then again this would be the wrong section.
cant blame a guy for asking :D
Really interresting thread, i'm really happy for the good results from the phenom, 2005 is so cpu dependant. 3DM2005 is a lot more cpu dependant than new games as Crysis with quality setting settings just under 60Fps.
It would be interresting to see some numbers under XP too, particulary 3DM2001 :)
Just any question : Phenom should have 6Mo L3 and 4X1Mo L2 in 2008 ?
Thanks for the numbers macci, i hope a lot since you reappeared :clap:
Edit : Ok Vista Roxx :D
You filthy pron macci...... :D
You didn't tell me that 2k5 on Windows VISTA shines!.....AHA!.....THAT'S why you have benched it on VISTA right?...... :D :p:
I ALSO have stutters in the beginning of GT3 with XP OR VISTA....You should fix the drivers a bit I think..... :D
With my previus setting on rams, I got 20694 and with more tight settings, I got the below...... ;)
ALSO my VGA rams are LOWER than yours.... :p:
Take a look at the Performance Level you INTEL guys..... ;)
http://www.hipro-tech.com/images/hip..._860_990_1.png
http://www.hipro-tech.com/images/hip..._860_990_2.png
http://www.hipro-tech.com/images/hip..._860_990_3.png
Memory Bandwidth influence a LOT GT1 and a bit GT2.....
Now tell me this..... Isn't Phenom supposed to have INTERNAL MEMORY CONTROLLER that wipes out EVERY Intel rig?......Yes or No?..... ;)
This is GT1 of the 2k5....
Now do you want to compare ALL 3Ds to see how Phenon is NOT doing that well at all?..... ;)
SOFTWARE used the SAME now......Windows Vista and it seems that it performs BETTER as for 2k5..... ;)
SO we will NOW "avoid" the "SOFTWARE influence" since BOTH benchies where done on VISTA and we keep on, right?.... :)
Hardware: Look my above answer to BeardyMan.... :)
We are testing at the EXACT SAME FREQUENCY/bench/software and EACH system is MAXED out with whatever methods the manufacturer provide us.... :)
:D
"Insane fsb for QUADS" is the 500MHz+ M8....This 428 is peanuts.... ;)
.
hipro you cheater.. no wonder your scores are higher because your GPU clock is 863 MHz instead of 860 MHz ;)
good job hipro
what's the vMCH on the board for that PL?
Ok i will do it myself next week on my QX9650, and teamgroup DDR2.
Omg a stupid run on DDR2 seems to be mission impossible :rolleyes:
I don't care who wins this is fun to watch. I think Macci can tweak a fair bit more yet but i get the feeling Hipro has more in hand hardware wise.
It's nice to see Macci back benching again :toast: Looking forward to results with LN2.
Regards
Andy
that explains low PL value besides monsterous voltages on MCH
what cooling do you have on MCH
looks like i'll have to crack open my nautilus 500 with chipset cooler block from corsair to really push the damn RAM and straps
buying one of OPBs boards :p for super fast CDT ownage hahahah j/k
really need a decent board for RAM clocking and ddr3 GB isn't cutting it atm
bios needs a lot of work on them :(
You sick bastard :D. PL=4 is just TOO fast :D
Anyway, I take your point, going as fast as you can with the hardware that the manuf supports does seem to make more sense :)
Now, I'm hoping that Macci is going to pass this again, just to keep this battle going. You know ... I have a flashback to 2003 :rofl:
Hipro: 4,5k @ 2750 is FAST, Don´t think i can match that...ever, But I will try ;) My DFi board, does not suffer from the Low NB clock bug. As my older Gigabyte did\does.
Regarding the FSB thing, K8 does not scale with HTT\FSB I have not done testing with K10, but i think it´s safe to say that running high HTT does not give much in terms of preformance on K10 either. But it would be nice to see what a york does @ 3Ghz with 333FSb for reference. Could someone run 2,4ghz on a York to? Would be nice to see how it scales with Mhz aswell! No one have tested york @ low mhz, right?
Macci will beat it :)
Here is totally stock result with yorkfield. Over 20K, but not much. (This is my 24/7 machine, so there is a lot of crap in background)
QX9650 9x333
Maximus Formula
2900Pro 863/999
2GB ram/ DDR2 1005 / 4-4-4-6
"strap" 266 (-->200 wasn't stable because NB was too hot.)
Performance level= 4
Vista 32-bit.
Catalyst 7.10 /7.11 doesn't work for some reason.
Attachment 68721
@ SF3D
Nice!
Can you show us some 3DMARK06 with those stock settings?
[]'s
Simps
nice one guys, come on Hipro play nice :D
good to see Macci benching ti is fun to watch
good to see ipc is close
Really impressive there George.
Keep pushing it.